Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله

Side Effects Analysis from Pfizer and Moderna Vaccine trials


Recommended Posts

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)

 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239

 

Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials

Interesting analysis from university researchers from evidence based healthcare departments, pharmacy schools including researchers from Stanford and UCLA based on the original phase 3 trials submitted for FDA approval by the vaccine makers.

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

Imagine the influence billion-dollar pharmaceutical companies have on regional politics and public health regulations. Sadly, people who argue this lack financial literacy.

You can have 1000s of trials, but you don't have to go public with all of them, just pick the one that makes your drug appear good.

 

Alhamdulillah, I haven't taken a single dose and am not deficient in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

This idea of mRNA vaccines is counter-intuitive, says Pfizer CEO.

Denmark Finally Admits Vaccinating Children Was A Mistake

Denmark provides Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccinations, like many other countries. But reports reveal that Denmark has finally admitted that vaccinating their children was a mistake on their part.

A top Danish health authority has stated that immunizations should not have been prescribed for all children aged 5 and up.

Søren Brostrøm, the director general of the Danish Health Authority, told TV 2 that depending on the information that has developed since late 2021, it was incorrect to generally immunize children.

The Omicron form of the virus was then becoming prevalent worldwide, thus it was urged that children aged 5 to 15 get vaccinated.

The virus, also referred to as SARS-CoV-2, induces COVID-19.

“I want to look all parents of children who have vaccinated their child in the eye and say, ‘You did the right thing and thank you for listening,’” Brostrøm said.

“But at the same time—and this is the important thing to maintain confidence—I will admit and say that we have become wiser and we would not do the same today. And we will not do that in the future either,” he added.

Studies on the vaccinations’ effects have revealed that they offer little protection from virus infection. Additionally, research has shown that vaccines do not provide adequate protection against severe disease in youngsters, who are generally at low risk for negative outcomes should they contract the virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)

EiE makes an excellent point about the insidious reach of Big Pharma. 

I realize there are still some individuals who trust all big pharma companies and think they are altruistic organizations. Remember their goal is profit maximization...the actual costs of deleterious actions be damned...they happily pay the multimillion dollar fines when they get caught, as long they already made their billions.

If you don't belive the above statements I will give you a link to an excellent investigation into big pharmas influence on doctors and regulatory agencies....

 https://medium.com/@bexstrong/big-pharma-corruption-and-lawsuits-amidst-covid-vaccine-c734a494b776

 

And as to jAM's  post regarding COVID-19 vaccination in children...countless studies have shown the risk benefit analysis is not in favor of vaccination.

I sometimes work in a Pediatric Hospital and treat Peds ICU pts and saw cases of Covid induced MIS-C ( the kawasaki disease like multi system inflammatory disorder ) ...again this was always in kids with multiple comorbidties...not healthy kids. Also MIS-C,  was easily treated with steroids and IVIG. Healthy kids are remarkably resistant to symptomatic COVID-19, again all thanks to Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى)'s gift of an amazing immune system.

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Abdul
On 6/28/2022 at 10:39 AM, justAnothermuslim said:

This idea of mRNA vaccines is counter-intuitive, says Pfizer CEO.

Denmark Finally Admits Vaccinating Children Was A Mistake

Denmark provides Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccinations, like many other countries. But reports reveal that Denmark has finally admitted that vaccinating their children was a mistake on their part.

A top Danish health authority has stated that immunizations should not have been prescribed for all children aged 5 and up.

Søren Brostrøm, the director general of the Danish Health Authority, told TV 2 that depending on the information that has developed since late 2021, it was incorrect to generally immunize children.

The Omicron form of the virus was then becoming prevalent worldwide, thus it was urged that children aged 5 to 15 get vaccinated.

The virus, also referred to as SARS-CoV-2, induces COVID-19.

“I want to look all parents of children who have vaccinated their child in the eye and say, ‘You did the right thing and thank you for listening,’” Brostrøm said.

“But at the same time—and this is the important thing to maintain confidence—I will admit and say that we have become wiser and we would not do the same today. And we will not do that in the future either,” he added.

Studies on the vaccinations’ effects have revealed that they offer little protection from virus infection. Additionally, research has shown that vaccines do not provide adequate protection against severe disease in youngsters, who are generally at low risk for negative outcomes should they contract the virus.

I was very close to agreeing to let my kids get the vaccine but I later changed my mind so hopefully that was the right decision.

I already took 3 Pfizer shots, 2 were compulsory and the 3rd was a booster shot. They are going to introduce a 4th booster shot but I am seriously thinking of ignoring it this time because it's not mandatory.

May Allah protect us all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)

More studies regarding post vaccine complications still being published :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8946610/

COVID-19 Vaccination and Neurological Manifestations: A Review of Case Reports and Case Series

[Edited Out]iz Sriwastava, Kanika Sharma, [...], and Sijin Wen

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557950/

Spectrum of neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccination

Ravindra Kumar Garg and Vimal Kumar Paliwal

While still considered rare reactions , we need to remain vigilant.

 

In our hospitals we are seeing significant pts with CVST ( cerebral venous Sinus thrombosis) and reactivation of herpetic viruses,  presenting as Herpes Zoster and Bells palsy.

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
On 7/3/2022 at 10:53 PM, Guest Abdul said:

I was very close to agreeing to let my kids get the vaccine but I later changed my mind so hopefully that was the right decision.

I already took 3 Pfizer shots, 2 were compulsory and the 3rd was a booster shot. They are going to introduce a 4th booster shot but I am seriously thinking of ignoring it this time because it's not mandatory.

May Allah protect us all.

 

You can never be made to take medication against your will, nor is it required.
That violates basic human universal laws.

I'm not sure of your location, but I have Christian friends who have used letters of religious exemption.
There is a topic about it in Shiachat, but I'm not sure why it's locked right now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
On 7/3/2022 at 3:53 PM, Guest Abdul said:

I was very close to agreeing to let my kids get the vaccine but I later changed my mind so hopefully that was the right decision.

 

I think, you’ve made the right decision with regards to your children, according to this article.

 

Children simply do not get seriously ill from Covid, nor do they die. Yet this approval for the vaccines is based on “Emergency Use,” which means it can only be approved if there is an emergency. Where, in God’s name, is the emergency? The infection death rate for children 0-19 is .0027% There is no level of coercion or manipulation that is going to make me believe that such low risk of death from the disease the vaccine is supposed to prevent constitutes an emergency. Are we living in some alternate universe? How can anyone justify putting an experimental drug in the bodies of 18 million children (in the US alone) based on that minimal risk factor of dying from Covid?

Allahu a'lam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Abdul
On 7/12/2022 at 11:55 AM, EiE said:

 

You can never be made to take medication against your will, nor is it required.
That violates basic human universal laws.

I'm not sure of your location, but I have Christian friends who have used letters of religious exemption.
There is a topic about it in Shiachat, but I'm not sure why it's locked right now.

 

 

What I meant to say was 2 shots were mandatory to keep your job, you can refuse the vaccine and many people did but they lost their jobs in the process or resigned. Almost every job sector across the board employed those vaccine rules so I had no choice really.

3 hours ago, justAnothermuslim said:

 

I think, you’ve made the right decision with regards to your children, according to this article.

 

Children simply do not get seriously ill from Covid, nor do they die. Yet this approval for the vaccines is based on “Emergency Use,” which means it can only be approved if there is an emergency. Where, in God’s name, is the emergency? The infection death rate for children 0-19 is .0027% There is no level of coercion or manipulation that is going to make me believe that such low risk of death from the disease the vaccine is supposed to prevent constitutes an emergency. Are we living in some alternate universe? How can anyone justify putting an experimental drug in the bodies of 18 million children (in the US alone) based on that minimal risk factor of dying from Covid?

Allahu a'lam.


 

 

 

That is good to know, thank you.

May Allah سبحانه وتعالى  protect us all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Guest Abdul said:

What I meant to say was 2 shots were mandatory to keep your job, you can refuse the vaccine and many people did but they lost their jobs in the process or resigned. Almost every job sector across the board employed those vaccine rules so I had no choice really.

Yes I understand, the same thing was said where I reside.

However, there were so many protests around the world and so many physicians, scientists, biologists, virologists, and others who opposed all of this that the majority, if not all, of the countries have revoked the restrictions and the requirement for vaccination.

There's also no requirement to disclose your vaccination status to others. The same goes for your religious affiliation, sex status, and any other medical conditions you may have, all of these things are protected by your right to privacy.

Many governments in the EU threatened their citizens who refused to take the injections, with fines and jail sentences.
Alhamdulillah, the non-Muslim organisations remained vigilant and demonstrated for months, forcing their government to delay the grace period until it was finally abolished entirely.

 

But don't get too excited, because it will return, this has been planned for a long time.
InshaAllah, if the Qur'an is true and the imams are true, I can't wait for my imam to arrive and expose the lies and fraudulent lives we have been following.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Advanced Member
On 6/28/2022 at 2:39 AM, justAnothermuslim said:

This idea of mRNA vaccines is counter-intuitive, says Pfizer CEO.

Denmark Finally Admits Vaccinating Children Was A Mistake

Denmark provides Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccinations, like many other countries. But reports reveal that Denmark has finally admitted that vaccinating their children was a mistake on their part.

A top Danish health authority has stated that immunizations should not have been prescribed for all children aged 5 and up.

Søren Brostrøm, the director general of the Danish Health Authority, told TV 2 that depending on the information that has developed since late 2021, it was incorrect to generally immunize children.

The Omicron form of the virus was then becoming prevalent worldwide, thus it was urged that children aged 5 to 15 get vaccinated.

The virus, also referred to as SARS-CoV-2, induces COVID-19.

“I want to look all parents of children who have vaccinated their child in the eye and say, ‘You did the right thing and thank you for listening,’” Brostrøm said.

“But at the same time—and this is the important thing to maintain confidence—I will admit and say that we have become wiser and we would not do the same today. And we will not do that in the future either,” he added.

Studies on the vaccinations’ effects have revealed that they offer little protection from virus infection. 

In that vein, bad pun, but on a serous note now we know why countries like Denmark were not advising Covid Vaccines for children. They had the data and used science to make decisions. 

As opposed to the CDC which unfortunately has been bought and paid for by Big Pharma companies. 

It used to be that FDA and CDC were free of Big Pharma influence,  but now their budgets rely on those payments for new drug applications and side deal contracting. 

In most countries the top three cause of Mortality are Cardiac disease,  Cancer and Stroke. Cancer and Stroke change positions depending on country. 

The same top three are causes are found with Major Morbidity. 

https://www.moh.gov.sg/news-highlights/details/positive-progress-for-16-year-old-who-had-an-out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest-after-covid-19-vaccination

16 yr old in Singapore gets $225, 000 after  Vaccine induced Acute MI.

https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/01/18/vaccinated-boy-died-aged-6-heart-attack/

6yr old dies of Acute MI,  after covid vaccine.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/328529

New study links COVID vaccines to 25% increase in cardiac arrest for both males & females. Study based on data from emergency services. COVID infection itself not linked to significant increase in cardiovascular complications.

Again while these are considered rare complications,  but children who are age 5 to 11 should not be getting Acute MIs.

This is normal a disease which takes years to develop lesions on the vessels which restrict flow enough to cause Acute heart attack.

We need to remain vigilant if we choose to vaccinate our children,  which most major European Health agencies have not recommended yet.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11015235/Health-experts-quitting-NIH-CDC-droves-embarrassed-bad-science.html

In the USA there was a mass resignation of CDC and the NIH of physicians and scientists after Vaccine recommendations im children.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
On 7/23/2022 at 12:41 PM, Hasani Samnani said:

In that vein, bad pun, but on a serous note now we know why countries like Denmark were not advising Covid Vaccines for children. They had the data and used science to make decisions. 

As opposed to the CDC which unfortunately has been bought and paid for by Big Pharma companies. 

It used to be that FDA and CDC were free of Big Pharma influence,  but now their budgets rely on those payments for new drug applications and side deal contracting. 

In most countries the top three cause of Mortality are Cardiac disease,  Cancer and Stroke. Cancer and Stroke change positions depending on country. 

The same top three are causes are found with Major Morbidity. 

https://www.moh.gov.sg/news-highlights/details/positive-progress-for-16-year-old-who-had-an-out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest-after-covid-19-vaccination

16 yr old in Singapore gets $225, 000 after  Vaccine induced Acute MI.

https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/01/18/vaccinated-boy-died-aged-6-heart-attack/

6yr old dies of Acute MI,  after covid vaccine.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/328529

New study links COVID vaccines to 25% increase in cardiac arrest for both males & females. Study based on data from emergency services. COVID infection itself not linked to significant increase in cardiovascular complications.

Again while these are considered rare complications,  but children who are age 5 to 11 should not be getting Acute MIs.

This is normal a disease which takes years to develop lesions on the vessels which restrict flow enough to cause Acute heart attack.

We need to remain vigilant if we choose to vaccinate our children,  which most major European Health agencies have not recommended yet.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11015235/Health-experts-quitting-NIH-CDC-droves-embarrassed-bad-science.html

In the USA there was a mass resignation of CDC and the NIH of physicians and scientists after Vaccine recommendations im children.

 

Salaam Aleikum, 

There are also kids who died on covid virus even when they were healthy. Unfortunately like other viruses this is possible and happens. 

But I really would never give covid vaccine to a child when their body can easily fight the virus itself, as long the child himself is healthy. 

I believe the next they are doing it with monkeypox. I personally will skip the vaccine if they offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
On 7/23/2022 at 3:59 PM, Abu Nur said:

I believe the next they are doing it with monkeypox. I personally will skip the vaccine if they offer.

Just a few hours ago, WHO (World Health Organization) declared monkeypox a worldwide health emergency.
So it is possible that we will see mass vaccinations again and perhaps mandatory aswell.


I'm relieved to find that I'm not the only one who has begun to question the widespread vaccination programme.

kindly check this thread, I find this very strange.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Abu Nur said:

Salaam Aleikum, 

Wa'alaikumussalam

2 hours ago, Abu Nur said:

There are also kids who died on covid virus even when they were healthy. Unfortunately like other viruses this is possible and happens. 

According to this German Study, no healthy kids are dying from C19 infection.

 

The German physician-scientists found that only six children in that age range with serious preexisting conditions died of COVID.

And serious illness was also extremely rare, with the researchers finding that the odds that a healthy child aged 5-11 would require intensive care for COVID were about 1 in 50,000. For older and younger children, the odds were higher, about 1 in 8,000.

The researchers reported: “Overall, the SARS-CoV-2-associated burden of a severe disease course or death in children and adolescents is low. This seems particularly the case for 5-11-year-old children without comorbidities.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

 

Can anyone tell me why this article The "safe and effective" narrative is falling apart is wrong? TIA

Life insurance companies in countries all over the world are reporting record numbers of excess deaths. These are not “statistical fluctuations.” The deaths are all caused by a huge intervention that is affecting the health of millions of people. And it’s all new. Nothing like this ever happened before 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
28 minutes ago, justAnothermuslim said:

Wa'alaikumussalam

According to this German Study, no healthy kids are dying from C19 infection.

 

The German physician-scientists found that only six children in that age range with serious preexisting conditions died of COVID.

And serious illness was also extremely rare, with the researchers finding that the odds that a healthy child aged 5-11 would require intensive care for COVID were about 1 in 50,000. For older and younger children, the odds were higher, about 1 in 8,000.

The researchers reported: “Overall, the SARS-CoV-2-associated burden of a severe disease course or death in children and adolescents is low. This seems particularly the case for 5-11-year-old children without comorbidities.”

 

Few cases yes, for example recently a 4 year old singaporean Muslim girl died from covid. I believe it is very rare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

 

A study published in The Lancet studied the patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 and compared details of the patients who passed away and patients that survived.

This figure below shows the progression and duration of the major symptoms of COVID-19 in survivors and non-survivors for hospitalized patients in the study. image.thumb.png.6f07b04cf3c8d34f57b71b8ae0ece65a.png

source

On 7/23/2022 at 7:08 PM, Abu Nur said:

Few cases yes, for example recently a 4 year old singaporean Muslim girl died from covid. I believe it is very rare.

As I understand it, the 4 yo girl showed symptoms on Friday 15 July and passed away on Sunday 17 July .

Is Omicron subvariants likely linked to her death? Not likely, according to this article.

 

OMICRON SUBVARIANTS ‘UNLIKELY’ LINKED TO DEATHS

As for the four-year-old girl, he said that he did not have the full details of her case and symptoms, but noted that there were reports in the media about her vomiting and frothing at the mouth when she collapsed.

This suggests that she might also have had a brain inflammation, which has been reported in children with viral infections in the past.

Prof Tambyah added that deaths from pneumonia due to Covid-19 is extremely rare, especially among children.

Who’s right? IDK.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

 

If this is true, how horrific can it be?

Nowadays, anyone telling you that he/she knows what the truth is, is likely to lead you astray for one reason or another. Do your own research and come up with your own conclusion.

source

 

I am not saying that this is exactly like finding evidence of Dr Mengele’s experiments; but I am saying, with these findings, that now the comparison may not be that excessive.

They are targeting the female body’s ability to sustain a newborn human being with nothing but itself. They are targeting the amniotic membrane, the ovaries that release the ovum, they are targeting the lymph and blood that help support the building up of mother’s milk, they are targeting the fetus in utero, helpless.

They are targeting the human fetus’ very environment, one of the most sacred spaces on this earth, if not the most sacred.

And they know it.

Allahu a'lam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, justAnothermuslim said:

 

If this is true, how horrific can it be?

Nowadays, anyone telling you that he/she knows what the truth is, is likely to lead you astray for one reason or another. Do your own research and come up with your own conclusion.

source

 

I am not saying that this is exactly like finding evidence of Dr Mengele’s experiments; but I am saying, with these findings, that now the comparison may not be that excessive.

They are targeting the female body’s ability to sustain a newborn human being with nothing but itself. They are targeting the amniotic membrane, the ovaries that release the ovum, they are targeting the lymph and blood that help support the building up of mother’s milk, they are targeting the fetus in utero, helpless.

They are targeting the human fetus’ very environment, one of the most sacred spaces on this earth, if not the most sacred.

And they know it.

Allahu a'lam.

 

 

Naomi Wolf and her research group have done a deep dive with well qualified researchers , into the the Data, which the companies, with well established track record of corruption( see previously referenced Medium.com article in my above post, Data which they tried to hide...

Their conclusions are shocking to understate the case,  and the FDA AND CDC were complicit in the corruption. 

They tried desperately to hide the Data, but a Noble Cadre of Ethical Doctor's sued to get the actual data, and interpret and use it to help people. Pfizer, via a highly compromised FDA, first tried to scuttle the investigation by saying it would take 75 yrs to release,  then they admitted to fraud and but since the Govt knew about and accepted the fraud, it doesn't really count as fraud. If that isn't criminal thinking then I don't know what is. 

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)
On 7/4/2022 at 12:53 AM, Guest Abdul said:

I was very close to agreeing to let my kids get the vaccine but I later changed my mind so hopefully that was the right decision.

I already took 3 Pfizer shots, 2 were compulsory and the 3rd was a booster shot. They are going to introduce a 4th booster shot but I am seriously thinking of ignoring it this time because it's not mandatory.

May Allah protect us all.

mRNA Vaccine May not help reduce hospitalization and ICU admission rates, in fact the opposite has occurred, the vaccinated showed higher hospitalization and intensive care admissions.

The mRNA shots can not stop infection, transmission or injury but the last hope is that they can stop long term serious illness.  Data, however, from the Dutch government show the mRNA Covid shots do not offer long term protection from serious illness.  After seven months, they substantially RAISE the risk of hospitalization and intensive care.

Dutch Govt sponsored study shows that there is no real protection against hospitalization and ICU admission via mRNA vaccines, In a newly released peer reviewed study. Sorry it's in Dutch,  but can use online translator.


Dutch Study (Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against hospital and intensive care admission in the Netherlands (Mar. 15- June 28, 2022)-In the period 15 March – 28 June 2022, little or no effectiveness of the intial vaccination series is evident. 

https://www.rivm.nl/documenten/effectiviteit-van-covid-19-vaccinatie-tegen-ziekenhuis-en-intensive-care-opname-in-14

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Forum Administrators
On 7/26/2022 at 4:36 PM, Hasani Samnani said:

The mRNA shots can not stop infection, transmission or injury but the last hope is that they can stop long term serious illness.

But ...

Quote

now a large, real-world study confirms that the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines are more than 95% effective in preventing confirmed infection.

https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210722/gold-standard-study-mrna-vaccines-prevent-infection

Of course if you meant that they are not 100% effective at stopping infection, you are correct. But 95% sounds pretty good to me. To take a comparison the MMR vaccine offers the following protection:

Quote

After 2 doses:

around 99% of people will be protected against measles and rubella

around 88% of people will be protected against mumps

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vaccinations/mmr-vaccine/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
On 7/26/2022 at 5:11 PM, Haji 2003 said:

But ...

https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210722/gold-standard-study-mrna-vaccines-prevent-infection

Of course if you meant that they are not 100% effective at stopping infection, you are correct. But 95% sounds pretty good to me. To take a comparison the MMR vaccine offers the following protection:

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vaccinations/mmr-vaccine/

As  with all medical literature please read the source material, not a badly summarized version on WebMD. 

Adeel Butt is a respected internist and Infectious Disease specialist,  but he is a publishing animal and many of his papers are not that scientifically valid or can be validated.  He now works in Qatar with Cornell and a Qatari hospital.

https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/9/7/ofac311/6617574

We used the US Department of Veterans Affairs COVID-19 Shared Data Resource to identify veterans who utilize VA health care and had no documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection before December 11, 2020. Using a test-negative case–control design (TND), we used conditional logistic regression with adjustment for covariates to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) over time for veterans who received 2 doses of mRNA vaccines or 1 dose of Ad26.Cov2.S.

This translates into using statistical methods to back designed  to an expected outcome, hence a positive study which gets published,  negative studies don't get published, depends mostly on the orientation to the big pharma machine.

Thr criticisms of the study.

They used only male veterans,  a class of people once considered athletic warriors.

Results  may not apply to general population which has females, non athletic people, and the elderly. they admitted this in paper. 

Conclusions

mRNA-1273 was more effective than BNT162b2 in older veterans and those with chronic diseases.

Remember Moderna mRNA-1273 uses a much higher dose of mRNA Than Pfizer which is called BNT162b2.

Case Definition or Outcomes

Following WHO guidelines [10], we assessed 3 outcomes from December 11, 2020, to October 31, 2021: symptomatic infection (defined as presence of symptoms consistent with flu-like illness and a PCR-positive swab), hospitalization with COVID-19 (the subset of those with a symptomatic infection who were hospitalized between −14 and +2 days of a positive test for SARS-COV-2), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission or fatal case of COVID-19 (the subset of those hospitalized who required admission to the ICU or died within 28 days of a SARS-COV-2-positive test) [11].

So that translates into we used a flawed WHO methodology which makes vaccines look more effective than they really are. Also they counted any pt admitted with a covid positive PCR, So if you had a cold and had positive PCR And did not get admitted to hospital or icu,  you were considered an effective vaccine save.

The mean age (SD) was 64 (16) years, and 2 042 637 (42.5%) and 680 958 (14.2%) were ≥65 and ≥80 years, respectively. Approximately 58% (n = 2 786 910) of veterans had ≥1 documented chronic disease, 36.4% (n = 1 750 890) had ≥2 chronic diseases, and 21.3% (n = 1 022 369) had ≥3 chronic diseases.

so we skewed the results to relatively healthy people, just high blood pressure was chronic disease. Or arthritis, or gout, or chronic skod disease etc 

Consistent with prior studies, VE for symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and ICU admission or death decreased over time (P < 0.001 for all 3 outcomes) 

Effectiveness was higher for mRNA-1273 (84.6% and 46.6% for months 1 and 7) compared with BNT162b2 (76.1% and 0.1% for months 1 and 7). Vaccine effectiveness for hospitalizations due to symptomatic COVID-19 over time also varied by vaccine type (P < 0.001), and effectiveness was higher for mRNA-1273 (76.6% and 71.3% for months 1 and 7) compared with BNT162b2 (72.9% and 19.8% for months 1 and 7). Similarly, monthly VE for ICU admission or death was higher for mRNA-1273 compared with BNT162b2 (P < 0.001; 80.5% and 77.2% vs 74.7% and 39.5% at months 1 and 7, respectively). The differences in VE for all 3 outcomes were small in the initial 4 months and more pronounced in the subsequent 3 months.

So I don't see 95% anywhere

Both mRNA vaccines were effective for nearly all time points in veterans who were younger or had no or only 1 chronic disease.

Right , so in healthy people the vaccine works....or is it Allah's given immune system which works.

VE for mRNA-1273 for hospitalizations and ICU admission or death was >70% for most time points in elderly veterans ≥65 years of age and subjects with >1 chronic health condition. In contrast, effectiveness for BNT162b2 for the same outcomes in these patients declined below 50% after the second month,...

Again no 95%, surprise surprise. after 2nd month very little to no vaccine effectiveness. 

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that vaccine effectiveness was higher for the mRNA-1273 vaccine when compared with the BNT162b2 vaccine, particularly in older veterans and those with chronic diseases. The effectiveness for BNT162b2 was <50% in these veterans, and therefore, the mRNA-1273 vaccine may be preferred in older adults with multiple chronic diseases. Overall, our findings suggest that the type of vaccine and perhaps the timing of booster doses may have to be precisely targeted based on age and chronic diseases.

so Pfizer...not very effective early on and quickly loses VE.

What's most interesting is the unvaccinated did remarkable well.

Also they timed the retrospective analysis to exclude omnicron and new variants...tall about moving the goalposts.

Limitations include the lack of generalizability of our findings to nonveterans, women, and small sample sizes of persons who received the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine, and for some of the subgroup analyses for the mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines, and potential for residual confounding despite adjusting for multiple covariates. In addition, we did not perform chart review to confirm that deaths within 28 days of a SARS-CoV-2-positive test were caused by COVID-19, which could have resulted in misclassification bias. Also, our study period does not include the period of Omicron predominance, a variant characterized by overall lower vaccine effectiveness.

At least they are honest enough to admit it.

Please brothers don't reprint headlines designed to get view and click bait.

Look at the actual study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

 

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/july/25/ugly-covid-lies/

Last week in a Fox News interview she again revealed the extent of her treachery. After months of relentlessly demanding that all Americans get the Covid shots, she revealed that the “vaccines” were not vaccines at all!

I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection,” she told Fox. “And I think we overplayed the vaccines. And it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization.”

So when did she know this? Did she know it when she told ABC in late 2020 that “this is one of the most highly-effective vaccines we have in our infectious disease arsenal. And so that’s why I’m very enthusiastic about the vaccine”?

If she knew all along that the “vaccines” were not vaccines, why didn’t she tell us? Because, as she admits in her book, she believes it’s just fine to lie to people in order to get them to do what she wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
On 7/27/2022 at 5:36 AM, Hasani Samnani said:

mRNA Vaccine May not help reduce hospitalization and ICU admission rates, in fact the opposite has occurred, the vaccinated showed higher hospitalization and intensive care admissions.

The mRNA shots can not stop infection, transmission or injury but the last hope is that they can stop long term serious illness.  Data, however, from the Dutch government show the mRNA Covid shots do not offer long term protection from serious illness.  After seven months, they substantially RAISE the risk of hospitalization and intensive care.

Dutch Govt sponsored study shows that there is no real protection against hospitalization and ICU admission via mRNA vaccines, In a newly released peer reviewed study. Sorry it's in Dutch,  but can use online translator.


Dutch Study (Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against hospital and intensive care admission in the Netherlands (Mar. 15- June 28, 2022)-In the period 15 March – 28 June 2022, little or no effectiveness of the intial vaccination series is evident. 

https://www.rivm.nl/documenten/effectiviteit-van-covid-19-vaccinatie-tegen-ziekenhuis-en-intensive-care-opname-in-14

 

I think I can agree with you that sometimes we hope on too many things. But we shouldn’t blame ourselves. Even Dr. Deborah Birx thinks it was hope that these mRNA shots can prevent transmission.

Jordan asked her:

When the government told us that the vaccinated couldn’t transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess? Or is it the same answer?

Birx answered:

I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way.

source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
On 7/31/2022 at 3:47 AM, justAnothermuslim said:

 

I think I can agree with you that sometimes we hope on too many things. But we shouldn’t blame ourselves. Even Dr. Deborah Birx thinks it was hope that these mRNA shots can prevent transmission.

Jordan asked her:

When the government told us that the vaccinated couldn’t transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess? Or is it the same answer?

Birx answered:

I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way.

source

 

So the scientists in charge of the Covid-19 response team, were hoping that things would work out ....with no regards for future side effects???!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)
On 8/1/2022 at 12:31 PM, guess said:

with no regards for future side 

The Govts around the world are now getting to know about Side effects by what are called post marketing surveillance studies. 

Also they are starting to compensate those injured and killed by mRNA vaccines.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/covid-vaccine-injuries-quietly-being-compensated-around-the-world-are-you-eligible_4632576.html

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)

 

 Twitter

 lan Miller

 Hospitalizations in Australia have now set a new

 record with over 96% of adults fully vaccinated

 and one of the highest vaccination and booster rates.

 

 

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
On 8/1/2022 at 4:31 PM, guess said:

So the scientists in charge of the Covid-19 response team, were hoping that things would work out ....with no regards for future side effects???!!!

I think she’s very much smarter than that. Some people think, she’s just promoting her own book on this matter. Here’s what’s more confusing, at least it seems so to me.

On the one hand we have “Let’s be clear the future is not just happening, the future is built by us, a powerful community here in this room. We have the means to impose the state of the world.”   — Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum 

On the other hand we have “UN Declares War on ‘Dangerous’ Conspiracy Theories: ‘The World Is NOT Secretly Manipulated By Global Elite’ 

and 

The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked a worrying rise in disinformation and conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories can be dangerous: they often target and discriminate against vulnerable groups, ignore scientific evidence and polarize society with serious consequences. This needs to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)

mRNA vaccines cause 2x the rate for Shingles , or reactivation of Herpes Zoster, a highly painful and debilitating condition.

The mechanism of action behind reactivation of the neuropathic virus is still unclear, but thought to be related to diminished T Cell mediated immunity.

"Consistent with the hypothesis, a higher incidence of HZ was statistically detectable post-COVID-19 vaccine. Accordingly, the eruption of HZ may be a rare adverse drug reaction to COVID-19 vaccines. Even though the molecular basis of VZV reactivation remains murky, temporary compromising of VZV-specific T-cell-mediated immunity may play a mechanistic role in post-vaccination pathogenesis of HZ. Note that VZV reactivation is a well-established phenomenon both with infections and with other vaccines (i.e. this adverse event is not COVID-19-specific)."

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jdv.18184

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Posted (edited)

40% of women having menstrual irregularities after Covid-19 vaccination,  with increased rates of hemorrhage most commonly,  but other irregularities as well.

The menstrual cycle is one of the most intricately regulated homeostasis mechanisms in the body. Disruption is often a sign of ill health. We see this in starvation, excessive loss of body fat, chronic diseases and even some drug/other vaccine induced side effects, not just covid-19-vaccine,  however this rate is really quite striking.

What is especially alarming, is the incidence of breakthrough hemorrhage in post menopausal Individuals, this is one of the ominous signs doctors use as an early warning of gynecological and endocrine cancers.

Now this doesn't mean the vaccines are causing cancer but reactivation of menstruation in such populations is Indicative of hormonal disruption and abnormal cellular growths. Is there is a possibility that it could cause cancer, unfortunately we won't know until we get long term data.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abm7201

Edited by Hasani Samnani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

 

Wayne Root's story is nearly IMPOSSIBLE to explain if the vaccines are safe.

Wayne Root reported that 33/200 guests at his wedding who are now sick or dead were all vaccinated. The punchline: at least half his guests were unvaccinated. So that’s unexplainable. He wrote: “It’s important to note, I’m a conservative talk show host who has warned LOUDLY of the dangers of the vaccine since day one. So, my friends are overwhelmingly conservative and unvaccinated too. Yet the few friends I know who did choose to vaccinate are almost all dead or ill.” And he said, “Among my friends and family who are unvaccinated, not one of them has died or been sick since my wedding eight months ago.”

 

source

 

Government figures are hard to verify. But personal anecdotes that you hear over and over are hard to ignore. One of the most stunning anecdotes I've heard recently is from talk show host Wayne Root.

Wayne’s anecdote is nearly impossible for a vaccine which the manufacturer has claimed to have fewer serious adverse events than taking a placebo (see the information that Pfizer gave to the FDA shown on page 22).

To further validate what he observed, I’m launching a survey where you can report your own anecdotes.

The beauty of my survey is there is no judgment required at all as to the cause of the injury or death! You simply report the number of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed in ANY group you know the stats on (your household, your family, your friends, or some organization you belong to) and the number of injuries/deaths in the two sub-groups. That’s it. Easy peasy.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Veteran Member

Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) has endowed us with knowledge and intellect. Do not be ignorant and chance the future of your children and your own lives over the small potential of side effects of a vaccine. Of which, we are required by birth to get so many life saving vaccines and those also have in some cases even higher side effect chances than the covid vaccine. Heck the pills and medicine you take have infinite more repercussions than the covid vaccine.   Thousands are dying in North America due to covid every week. It is no joke. There are so many side effects from getting covid that will last through a life time if you catch covid. See how many children have died from covid, the tv and media stopped talking about it in north america. Covid is beyond more dangerous than the vaccine. No government that is obsessed with money and power will willingly destroy the future of their country by allowing young people to take a dangerous vaccine.

Article: https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/covid-and-the-heart-it-spares-no-one

Another source

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...