Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Why Would Richard Dawkins Say That An Alien Created The Universe? (3 mins)

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • Advanced Member

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Veteran Member

They have been moving away from Darwinism. Its simply too stupid. For instance, life designed and engineered itself without perfectly yet arbitrarily for no reason while not copying, being genuine? And since the one instance no new different and weird life was formed, I mean every new day is a new "billion of years" and there could have been shark-horses, 6 legged robotic unicorns, AI emerging from the depths of Pacific and what not. But no. Countless problems with the theory. People have written whole books. So now they are moving to something easier. It was a little green man who put his DNA in a river once and we mutated albino green men came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Veteran Member
5 minutes ago, The Green Knight said:

It was a little green man who put his DNA in a river once and we mutated albino green men came out.

Correct. Yet they still need to explain where this green man came from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Forum Administrators

Interesting how the focus is always the physical aspects of life. It becomes even more problematic once you try and bring in/explain the more abstract concepts like creativity, economics and ethics and it becomes worse when you combine these with the natural world.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Veteran Member
1 hour ago, Haji 2003 said:

It becomes even more problematic once you try and bring in/explain the more abstract concepts like creativity, economics and ethics and it becomes worse when you combine these with the natural world.

 

I think the only explanation they have is “it’s just a brute fact”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's how you should speak with atheists, only by looking at the big picture. They'll try to distract you from the big picture by zooming in on unimportant details, or by setting up the debate on a false premise ("If X is true then that proves God isn't real"). If they talk evolution, bring up the first cell. If they talk big bang, bring up what happened before it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will accept anything but God, who cares, if they continue this mission of anti religion anti God what is waiting for them in the depth of darkness of hell we won’t be laughing at them but feel sorry for them, nevertheless mighty deserving for their arrogance and stubbornness 

Edited by theEndIsNear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Veteran Member
On 5/25/2021 at 1:48 AM, guest 2025 said:

If they talk big bang, bring up what happened before it. 

Some atheists would then just say that time started with the Big Bang at t=0 and so the question of what happened “before” it is redundant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 313_Waiter said:

Some atheists would then just say that time started with the Big Bang at t=0 and so the question of what happened “before” it is redundant.

I wouldn't buy that from them. Just making excuses to run away from the question. You have to call them out on this too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Advanced Member

Dawkins would say that an alien created life on Earth because he's looking for any explanation but God (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) because he hates religion and religious people. He and the "New Atheists" have had disastrous consequences on American culture and the little shred of morality that we had left. I really can't stand the guy or anyone like him who has such an axe to grind against religion and religious people because they practice "Scientism": the idea that everything in the human experience can be explained through the scientific method.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

Science has answers for things that can be observed & tested, but not everything in the human experience can be observed and tested. The idea that scientific method is sufficient to explain every aspect of the human experience is called "scientism" and it's amazingly popular in liberal circles in America and Western Europe and why wouldn't it be? Their end goal is to get rid of religion and destroy mankind's faith in the divine & supernatural because then there are no rules telling them how to live their lives and if there are none of these rules, they will no longer feel guilty about that which they do.

It's all a big project to get rid of their own guilt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...