Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

[Declaration of War] Dispute goes international

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

On 3/7/2021 at 10:31 PM, Haji 2003 said:


Until now I've not mentioned this because it was just an internal matter amongst people many of you non-Brits would likely never have heard of.


I’m sure unless people have been living under a rock, everyone’s heard of the drama going down in the British Royal Family. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member

The Internet Has a Wild Conspiracy Theory About Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Engagement


Based on zero evidence that this fifteen-month relationship is all leading up to a political takeover, Twitter user Greg Pollowitz has a hilarious theory to suggest the marriage could be strategic.

Prince Harry's kids will be Americans. What if one grows up to be president and is in line for the throne at the same time? Brits are playing long-ball here, but it's a smart move. They want America back and this is how they'll do it.

— Greg Pollowitz (@GPollowitz) November 27, 2017
It spread delight across the Internet.

Negotiations began a long time ago pic.twitter.com/pYmMX48Vkj


Theory: Harry and Meghan are looking to do deals, say, in entertainment or fashion, that they couldn't do if they were senior royals. 

The entertainment press was atwitter over speculation that Harry and Meghan could follow the lead of their pals, former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama, who secured a partnership deal with Netflix to produce films, documentaries, scripted series and features.

Although it might seem unlikely, Meghan could return to acting, which fans of her legal drama "Suits," would love, or maybe line up endorsement deals with fashion brands, as The Sun's Dan Wootton has already reported she's doing. 

"I think Meghan Markle will remain a huge superstar," says Ronn Torossian, CEO of 5WPR, a New York-based PR firm. "At this point, Meghan and Harry have the potential to get any endorsement deals in the world they may want.

"Whether this will give them the lower profile they seem to crave remains to be seen


Theory: Oprah Winfrey encouraged Meghan and Harry to "break free" from the monarchy.

This one comes courtesy of the New York Post, which reported Thursday that media mogul Winfrey, a friend to Harry and Meghan who is collaborating with them on a series about mental health for AppleTV+, encouraged the couple to "break free" of the royals and build their own "brand" in North America.

But Winfrey issued a statement to the "Today" show on Friday denying she had anything to do with #Megxit. 

"Meghan and Harry do not need my help in figuring out what’s best for them,'' Winfrey said in her statement. "I care about them both and support whatever decisions they make for their family." 


QAnon has a New Haven cop getting the word out to the public — podcasting conspiracy theories about how members of a Satan-worshiping international ring including China, billionaires, the Illuminati, Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates, and Oprah Winfrey are raping and drinking the blood of kidnapped children in pursuit of the “fountain of youth” while convincing people to risk their lives wearing masks in an orchestrated Covid-19 pandemic designed to, among other evil deeds, prevent President Donald Trump’s reelection.

Officer Jason Bandy has been promoting those theories with a weekly podcast called “For The Love.”



Prediction or illuminati connections? — Steemit





Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member
On 3/13/2021 at 12:28 PM, hasanhh said:

lf anything similar to this existed, it was nationalism which -as we think of that- began in the Napoleonic Era. 


No, as we had in school ... as l now remember, expressed and explained in Bronowski's Ascent of Man...and as l noted above, racism as we think of this began in the second half of the 19th Century.

As l remember offhand, the book The lnvention of Tradition, the title was contrived by the British Parliament.

There is hadith that says you cannot have the titles "shah" or "shahnshah" (king or king of kings/emperor).

l read a list of prominent Enlightenment philosophers to get up-to-speed to answer the question above. l am not aware of any "racial" comments by any of them. They were mostly interested in the rights of Man, gov't, a few for education. Not 'who' is a better person because of birth(which is aristocratic in nature).

The "White Man's Burden" started l believe in the 1890s.

Akhi, there seems to be some misunderstanding here.

It is not my intention to to argue if or not members of the British royal family are individually racist. It can be of no interest to me.

My point is that the image of the British crown, as we know it today here in the 3rd world, is inextricably linked with the colonial project.

It is two wings of the same imperialism, the traditional old-guard, and the new 'woke' variant, steeped in postmodern IdPol,locking horns- this is my contention.

Ma salama.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Forum Administrators

Every nation has its celebrities. The UK is special by state sanctioning some of theirs as public utility.

Harry and Meghan obviously know the private sector is more lucrative, so they used the royal connection to bypass the typical barriers to entry that other celebrities have to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...