Call to action

[Haji 2003]

 

[Northwest]

It appears that StopFundingHate is sponsored by George Soros and promotes LBGTQ+I propaganda. I wouldn’t consider it a credible source.

Edited July 22, 2020 by Northwest

[ZethaPonderer]

That is pure wickedness and irrational for what these Non-Muslims are doing. Just because a particular bad apples within the Muslim Community in India spread hatred, violence and malice amongst the Hindus. Muslims are not perfect people Hindus, but this is no excuse for you Hindus to justify this right of yours to get even with the Muslims. Being an Anti-Islamist is one thing, but being an Anti-Muslim is now another matter entirely that can result in bigotry and racism from a cultural perspective. Hindus. Imagine if the headline was switched to this,

Quote

Since Kosher is Legal, Non-Jews (AKA Gentiles) have the right to advertise that they don't hire Jews: Here is why

Or even better,

Quote

Since Meat-Eating is Legal, Vegans and Vegetarianists have the right to advertise that they don't hire Meat-Eaters: Here is why

This discrimination against Muslims must STOP. You Non-Muslims are making FOOLS of yourselves if any of you consider this to be justifiable. This is appeal to minority fallacy. And Non-Muslims like YOU are relying deep upon this fallacy to exercise YOUR hatred and bigotry against Muslims are no different than the bad apples within the minority of Muslims exercising their violence, hatred, and malice against you. I don't give a DAMN if you're An Anti-Islamist. You have your reasons for hating on Islam. Whoop dee doo. But I do give a DAMN if you're an Anti-Muslim Bigot. No difference to being an Anti-Christian Bigot, Anti-Hindu Bigot, or an Anti-Semitic Bigot. Not all Muslims have anything against you Hindus nor with anyone.

The Meat Eating Industry of USA and how most Non-Muslims practice are filled to the brim with all kinds of worst ways of killing All kinds of Animals for their Meat. At least Kosher and Halal, are FAR less offensive than what Non-Muslims practice for their humane slaughter of Animals.

Edited July 22, 2020 by ZethaPonderer
Adding furthermore in bold.

[Haji 2003]

5 hours ago, Northwest said:

It appears that StopFundingHate is sponsored by George Soros and promotes LBGTQ+I propaganda. I wouldn’t consider it a credible source.

You don't have to consider it a credible source. All you have to do is check out the link for yourself and make an assessment as to whether you would appeal to those advertisers to stop. Anyway it seems to be working, I can't see any ads there right now.

[Guest Away for a while]

Hi, 

Like many other news outlet, OpIndia is government's pup and since Modi government get votes through Hindu - Muslim hatred, they are all over internet spreading bigotry among people. 

[Haydar Husayn]

On 7/22/2020 at 4:46 AM, Northwest said:

It appears that StopFundingHate is sponsored by George Soros and promotes LBGTQ+I propaganda. I wouldn’t consider it a credible source.

Just because an organisation generally promotes an agenda you disapprove of, it doesn’t mean everything they say is unreliable. As the Qur’an says, you should investigate it.

O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful. [Qur’an 49:6]

[Northwest]

17 hours ago, Haydar Husayn said:

Just because an organisation generally promotes an agenda you disapprove of, it doesn’t mean everything they say is unreliable. As the Qur’an says, you should investigate it.

O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful. [Qur’an 49:6]

No, but I would prefer to obtain information from sources that are less compromised by “conflicts of interest.” Generally speaking, Soros-funded sources have a record of such dishonesty that the level of truth in them is comparatively negligible. For example, I’ve seen IRI-linked news sources rely on Soros-funded organisations to promote the notion that refugees face discrimination in Europe and therefore the EU must retain “open borders,” even though many of the “refugees” in the EU are actually linked to criminal networks and (predominantly Wahhabi–Salafi) terrorist organisations. This manipulative, inconsistent use of identity politics disgusts me, especially as the IRI would not adopt “open borders,” and for good reason, given the threat of crime and subversion, as the experience of Native Americans with mass European influx demonstrated. Soros-funded sources manipulate perception to such a degree that the truth ends up being very far from what is presented, while posing as defenders of their audiences’ best interests.