For what reason Saddam Hussain was Hanged?

[Forgottenthinker]

STORY TIME

Its been said that a senior officer was invited to Saddam's office and while in there he saw Stalin memorabilia. The officer asked Saddam I thought you were against the Communist ideology why do you have all these things Sir? Saddam smiled while in his chair with a lit cigar and asked him back, "Do you really think Stalin was a communist?"

Its to show he used the Baathist party and the Iraqi people's hopes to get into power just as Stalin used the Russian Communist party to get into power but then both showed their true colors.

[Hamodiii]

7 minutes ago, Mishael said:

There's no evidence female infanticide was practiced en mass in Arabia at the time this all comes from Islamic sources who were the only ones who recorded pre Islamic Arabia. While Assyrian records show Arabs had female queens who would both lead their armies themselves and function as the high priestess of the kingdom and we have queen Mavia the pre Islamic Arab warrior queen so I don't think women needed protection plus even early Islamic era attests the some women would fight in jihad proves that oppression of women only started as Islam spread more and more.

Well, in mecka it was different! They were buried alive, and for no reason, and Islam brought respect to the woman, why do you think Rassol only got a daughter? He got a daughter to show us the value of a woman! There are hadiths about him getting a son, and he died. They laughed at him cause he would never get his bloodline to continue, and all that. 

 There is reason for everything! Al-hamdiruillah shukr.

6 minutes ago, Mishael said:

Back then people had multiple wives and concubines for the sole pleasure of having multiple wives and concubines it was a norm.

Yeah, that is why we can have four wives, but that is impossible, any man who had experience with women should know this. She is literally impossible to control, just having one wife is hard enough, and you want me to be just to four wives?

Edited February 9, 2018 by Hamodiii

[Ya Allah]

This dictator rose to power after the fall Shah Iran to remain an ambassador for the American regime. This puppet was the very reason Iraq was invaded.

[Anonymous2144]

15 hours ago, Shah Khan said:

Really Brothers. I Thought he was a Good Leader and Shias Killed him. But here in ShiaChat I find another story. Can anyone please tell me what was the Actual reason? 
 

 

No1. If you support him you secretly support terrorist

No2. Why? Because he killed innocent people and hated Shias very much and his kids are basically the sons of Shaitan because they didn’t stop hurting a person until they saw blood and they were addicted to that and also raped women and Saddam killed any person whom he didn’t like even though he didn’t do anything and he also made the country starve because they didn’t have much food and it was very expensive and all the food the came to Iraq most of it was sent to him. And also try to destroy the shrine of Imam Hussain a.s 

[Sisterfatima1]

7 hours ago, shiaman14 said:

does anyone else think this is just a post to incite people?

We will all be raised with our leader on the Day of Judgement so I sincerely hope that my good brother @Shah Khan is raised with his good leader Saddam. Unlike Saddam using highly poisonous chemical gases on his own people, the good leader and his devotees can attack each other with laughing gas for the merriment of all.

Look there is even a shrine for the good leader...

 

Yes I did think this post was just to upset people 

 

[Wholehearted Shi'a]

[Shah Khan]

What is the WORLD IS THIS now ?????

[Husayni]

40 minutes ago, Shah Khan said:

What is the WORLD IS THIS now ?????

Resting place for the slave of Yazid (la)

[Shah Khan]

1 minute ago, Hussaini624 said:

Resting place for the slave of Yazid (la)

Woah !! Slave of Yazid is respected. WOW

[Gaius I. Caesar]

7 hours ago, Shah Khan said:

What is the WORLD IS THIS now ?????

Inappropriate tomb for a insidious man.

[Ashvazdanghe]

13 hours ago, Mishael said:

Arab warrior queen so I don't think women needed protection plus even early Islamic era attests the some women would fight in jihad proves that oppression of women only started as Islam spread more and more.

You can still find women like Nasiba that fights along prophet (pbu) that will be from 313 persons that gather Imam mahdi (aj)

even um wahab is one of matyrs of Karbala 

women in Imam Mahdi (aj) army 

 in 

[Hamodiii]

Can a mod close this topic, please? Or delete it? It makes me uncomfortable.

[ShiaMan14]

I think Mods should leave it open. Topic separates haqq from batil quite clearly.

[Gaius I. Caesar]

1 minute ago, shiaman14 said:

I think Mods should leave it open. Topic separates haqq from batil quite clearly.

I agree with you, brother.

[Hamodiii]

4 minutes ago, shiaman14 said:

I think Mods should leave it open. Topic separates haqq from batil quite clearly.

You are insulting the human being? Someone seeing Saddam as haqq is obviously far astray.

[ShiaMan14]

9 minutes ago, Hamodiii said:

You are insulting the human being? Someone seeing Saddam as haqq is obviously far astray.

sorry, who did I insult? I just said it separates haqq from batil.

If someone loves Saddam and someone hates him, clearly one is on haqq and one is on batil. That's all I said.

Edited February 9, 2018 by shiaman14

[Hamodiii]

49 minutes ago, shiaman14 said:

sorry, who did I insult? I just said it separates haqq from batil.

If someone loves Saddam and someone hates him, clearly one is on haqq and one is on batil. That's all I said.

No, that wasn't what I meant, I meant that how can people think that he is good. It's an insult for a human being that he can't manage to understand that killing is wrong. The thought of him being good shouldn't exist.

Edited February 9, 2018 by Hamodiii

[ShiaMan14]

3 minutes ago, Hamodiii said:

No, that wasn't what I meant, I meant that how can people think that he is good. It's an insult for a human being that he can't manage to understand that killing is wrong. The thought of being good shouldn't exist.

there are people who think Hitler was good. What can I say!!!

All I can do is pray that brother @Shah Khan has the same fate as Saddam in the afterlife. May they take long strolls together, singing kumbaya and playing yahtzee...and don't forget the laughing gas.

Edited February 9, 2018 by shiaman14

[Hamodiii]

1 minute ago, shiaman14 said:

there are people who think Hitler was good. What can I say!!!

All I can do is pray that brother @Shah Khan has the same fate as Saddam in the afterlife. May they take long strolls together, singing kumbaya and playing yahtzee...and don't forget the laughing gas.

Well, I hope he becomes knowledgable! And changes his mindset, Inshallah.

[Ashvazdanghe]

Salam a documentary about Saddam & CIA

[Karbalai110]

On 2/9/2018 at 11:27 AM, Shah Khan said:

Woah !! Slave of Yazid is respected. WOW

Brother when yazeed (la) can be praised then no wonder his slaves (la) can be praised too, no surprises.

Zakir Naik (la) praised yazeed (la) by saying may Allah be pleased with yazeed (la).

You will never see HAQ praising baatil and you will always see one ملعون praising another ملعون.

[Ashvazdanghe]

The story of Masoud & Saddam (Warning contains Graphic media)

[Shah Khan]

On 2/17/2018 at 8:55 PM, Karbalai110 said:

Brother when yazeed (la) can be praised then no wonder his slaves (la) can be praised too, no surprises.

Zakir Naik (la) praised yazeed (la) by saying may Allah be pleased with yazeed (la).

You will never see HAQ praising baatil and you will always see one ملعون praising another ملعون.

But Brother, Dr. Zakir Naik praised Yazeed only once. I hope he changed his mindset about Yazeed.

[Waseem162]

41 minutes ago, Shah Khan said:

But Brother, Dr. Zakir Naik praised Yazeed only once. I hope he changed his mindset about Yazeed.

You change your mindset about Saddam otherwise You are going to be in Great trouble my dear friend. I have read such ahadeeth which says that Even the liking of an oppressor in a person's heart is very very dangerous for his aakhirah.

[Shah Khan]

2 minutes ago, Waseem162 said:

You change your mindset about Saddam otherwise You are going to be in Great trouble my dear friend. I have read such ahadeeth which says that Even the liking of an oppressor in a person's heart is very very dangerous for his aakhirah.

Brother, I have already changed my view of Saddam Hussain days ago.

[Husayni]

On 2/9/2018 at 12:27 PM, shiaman14 said:

there are people who think Hitler was good. What can I say!!!

All I can do is pray that brother @Shah Khan has the same fate as Saddam in the afterlife. May they take long strolls together, singing kumbaya and playing yahtzee...and don't forget the laughing gas.

What are you saying? Do you see yourself?

[ShiaMan14]

1 hour ago, Hussaini624 said:

What are you saying? Do you see yourself?

Obviously I was being sarcastic. Anyone who reveres Saddam deserves nothing better than ending up like him.

However, since the original message my brother @Shah Khan has changed his views of this monster and I commend him for it.

[Karbalai110]

8 hours ago, Shah Khan said:

But Brother, Dr. Zakir Naik praised Yazeed only once. I hope he changed his mindset about Yazeed.

You 'hope so' brother, if his mind is changed then he should tell it to the people about who yazeed(la) is or give a statement saying he was wrong about yazeed(la)

Edited February 24, 2018 by Karbalai110

[ali_fatheroforphans]

@Shah Khan Be careful who you consider a 'good leader'. On the day of judgment we'll all be raised up with a leader who we idealize.

My advice to you is that you take Imam Zamana (atf) as your true Imam and you won't even feel the need to go to these mass murderers.

I know for sure that there is no way Saddam Hussein will be in the army of Imam Mahdi (atf).

[Waseem162]

10 hours ago, Shah Khan said:

Brother, I have already changed my view of Saddam Hussain days ago.

Change that of Zakir Nayak the Hellish person too!

He is the servant of Yazeed who praises him and denies the tragedy of Karbala as a Divine Message.

He is the outcome of the teachings of Hellish people like Abd al Wahhab (l.a)

[Waseem162]

@Shah Khan What is the problem with you dear brother? Why can't you differentiate between Clear Truth and Falsehood. Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى has given you Aql. Use it.

See who are Baatil. Not every preacher and ruler is sane and truthful. Haven't you read Islamic History?? 

Accept truth from wherever you get it.

Reject falsehood from wherever you get it.

[Shah Khan]

1 minute ago, Waseem162 said:

Accept truth from wherever you get it.

Reject falsehood from wherever you get it.

At least someone in ShiaChat.com Understands me .
I am using this Formula for a long time and still using it.

[Waseem162]

5 hours ago, Shah Khan said:

At least someone in ShiaChat.com Understands me .
I am using this Formula for a long time and still using it.

Don't confuse it with Pluralism. That is different than what the hadeeth says.

Search for the Complete Truth. And don't reject parts of truth you find elsewhere. That is what the hadeeth said. If you keep randomly picking up parts of truth then you're not going to reach your destination.

 

Wahhabism for me is 100% falsehood.

 So are all the followers of Wahhabism.

[Ashvazdanghe]

17 hours ago, Shah Khan said:

But Brother, Dr. Zakir Naik praised Yazeed only once. I hope he changed his mindset about Yazeed.

کن محبّاً لآل محمد و ان کنتَ فاسقاً و کن محباً لمحبّیهم و ان کانوا فاسقین

رجال کشی، ص 426

Be a friend of the Prophet's family, though you are a disobedient and be friend of the lovers of the Ahlulbayt, though their lovers are corrupt. "

Rejal Kashi p426

http://balagh.mihanblog.com/post/2

مَن واصَلَ لَنا قاطِعًا أو قَطَعَ لَنا واصِلاً أو مَدَحَ لَنا عائِبًا أو أکرَمَ لَنا مُخالِفًا فَلَیسَ مِنّا ولَسنا مِنهُ

 صدوق، محمدبن علی، صفات الشیعه : ۸۵ / ۱۰ عن ابن فضّال

Imam Reza (AS): Anyone makes a relationship with someone who has broken us, or broken from someone who has ties with us, who admires who condemns us, or praises who disagrees with us, he is not from  us and We are not from him.

Saduq,Muhammad ibn Ali .Sefat Al Shia :85/10 from ibn Fazzal

http://www.altashayo.tv/fa/تولی-و-تبری/

«حُبُّنَا إِيمَانٌ وَ بُغْضُنَا كُفْر» (مجلسی/ بحارالأنوار/ ج27/ ص:73

Imam Reza (AS): The one who loves us has both faith and piety, and the one who is our enemy  is hypocrite and infidel.

Majlisi ,Bihar Al Anwar v27 p73 

http://rcb.ir/سخنرانی-استاد-فرحزاد-با-عنوان-حب-و-بغض-اهل-بیت-علیهم-السلام__a-425.aspx

 

Edited February 24, 2018 by Ashvazdanghe