Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله
Rasul

Challenge To Debate Sheikh Asrar Rashid Accepted.

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Mohamed1993 said:

Btw, do you know who took his lecture on radical Islam off YouTube?? Was it Sayed himself? I learnt quite a bit from it and I can't care if it offended some butthurt sunnis, we're not here to appease them at the expense of learning more about Shiism.

It's most likely been taken down by MKSI Leicester --- the channel who put it up --- after the uproar it caused. Or maybe it was flagged down. Re-uploads of the video were taken down due to copyright, but there is one still available: 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Mohamed1993 said:

Btw, do you know who took his lecture on radical Islam off YouTube??

It was on Safeer TV yesterday, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, magma said:

Giving a majalis does not automatically equate to giving a debate challenge, unless it's explicitly declared. Did he do that?

he didnt need to - did you not hear the content of his majalis? do you not think something as incendiary as that is going to illicit a response?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DigitalUmmah said:

He shouldnt have done the majalis in the first place if he couldnt back it up. Its the laws of any debate that any claim can be questioned, and the bakri know it

As I understand it, a majalis isn't supposed to be a platform for debate, and I too don't care if a Salafi/Barlevi/Wahhabi/Sunni  gets upset and blows a gasket, this is what happens when they  keep turtling around and put putting their heads in the sand about Radical Islam , this is what they get. People like Ammar doing speeches to the youth on Radical Islam instead. Incendiary my heel, they are just afraid of Shias, DU.  

Edited by Gaius I. Caesar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, magma said:

Giving a majalis does not automatically equate to giving a debate challenge, unless it's explicitly declared. Did he do that?

The first 11 seconds: 

Although I think that was said for rhetorical purposes. I don't think he expected all these invitations to debate when he said that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Vestige said:

Although I think that was said for rhetorical purposes. I don't think he expected all these invitations to debate when he said that.

how bad does it look that he issued such a majalis and then did not back it up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, magma said:

A formal, structured one-on-one debate requires a formal invitation and mutual agreement on terms. Otherwise it's just open airways on all sides.

er.....

 

 

1 hour ago, magma said:

Giving a majalis does not automatically equate to giving a debate challenge, unless it's explicitly declared. Did he do that?

 

11 minutes ago, Vestige said:

The first 11 seconds: 

@magma are you actually serving any function in this thread?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Those 11 seconds of the video is a general rhetorical statement on his part, because he didn't address anyone specifically by name to challenge. My second statement was a general statement, not referring to him specifically.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, magma said:

^ Those 11 seconds of the video is a general rhetorical statement on his part, because he didn't address anyone specifically by name to challenge. My second statement was a general statement, not referring to him specifically.

nevertheless, he can hardly be suprised to be challenged by bakris if he calls the caliphate of abu bakr the birthplace of islamic terrorism. and him refusing to respond looks terrible for our camp.

I watched that bakris response video. its a joke. but its the final word right now, and that counts for a lot in these matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, with all due respect to Ammar, why does he talk about this stuff if he's not going to back it up when challenged by someone from the opposing faction? It makes us Shi'as look like a laughing stock.

It also seems that most Shi'a clerics in the west are too busy nowadays on the unity brigade rather than actually stepping up to defend our faith when needed.

Where were the representatives of Agha Khamenei or Agha Sistani when all this was going on for the past couple weeks? Need I say more...

Luckily enough we do have some gems within the community who are able to engage in such polemics. Whatever people may think of Sh. Hassan Allahyari or Al-Habib, the fact of the matter is that they defend our faith and beliefs against nawasib left, right & centre when it matters.

Anyways, I hope the debate does go ahead and that it is an enlightening sincere & academic discussion where the masses can also benefit from InshaAllah.

For those who don't know, Asrar Rashid is a well known debater in the 'Sunni' circles here in the UK. He recently debated the Salafi scholar, Ustadh Abdurrahman hassan (Teacher of 'dawah man' Imran bin Mansur) on the issue of Mawlid which is also up on YouTube.

Edited by Al-Hussayni

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be realistic here, Nakshawani would get destroyed in a debate with any knowledgeable Sunni. Playing to the gallery in a Shia centre with cheap polemics is a million miles away from a formal debate with someone who knows what they are talking about.

I understand that people enjoy Nakshawani's lectures, and that's fine, as long as they realise it's just entertainment. This idea that he is some kind of fountain of knowledge is pure delusion. Contrary to what he loves to claim at the beginning of his lectures, his arguments are not 'academic', and for him to have any chance in a debate he would need to significantly backtrack or tone down many of the arguments he has made, because they just don't stand up to scrutiny.

As it is however, Nakshawani has little experience of formal debates, so he is wise to avoid them. Unfortunately, any debate between Muslims is unlikely to go well anyway, because after a certain point it always seems to descend into a shouting match (usually when one side realises they are losing).

I think some people here don't really understand how debates work. Who wins in a debate often has little to do with who has the stronger position (although it obviously helps, all else being equal). It's much more about the ability of the debater to make best use of the arguments he has, and to highlight the flaws in the opposing arguments. A skilled and experienced debater should usually win a debate with an unskilled debater no matter which position they take. I fear that too many people have read 'Then I was guided', 'Peshawar nights', or some such book, and imagine that armed with that knowledge they could take down any Sunni scholar themselves, so any debate with a Shia scholar must necessarily be a massacre. This is just incredibly naive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...