Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Challenge To Debate Sheikh Asrar Rashid Accepted.

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 298
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Sheik Hassan Allahyari. Salam. Last week Sheikh Asrar Rashid issued at challenge to the Shia Ulema based in the West to debate him. I hereby accept the challenge. Having previously debated and de

Let's be realistic here, Nakshawani would get destroyed in a debate with any knowledgeable Sunni. Playing to the gallery in a Shia centre with cheap polemics is a million miles away from a formal deba

to summarise - sayed ammar nakshawani gave a majalis about 1 2 and 3, he was pretty derogatory towards them lol. this got the sunni in an uproar so king bakri debator, asrar rashid, immediately c

Posted Images

  • Advanced Member
31 minutes ago, DigitalUmmah said:

is this the challenge that sayed ammar nakshawani flopped & ran away from? 

thank god there are still some shia left in the world willing to take a stand

Yes!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member

I would like to challenge farid on here regarding his 1st three masters and his beliefs of the holy prophet (sawas). I have seen his arguments and rebuttals. they believe me, they are not strong refutations. Just because if someone writes a article or a refutation on something, then it does not mean that is right. I will rely mostly on sahih bukhari and muslim (other narration from sahih sitta will be used as well) and that should be sufficient. 

Edited by goldenhawk
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, goldenhawk said:

I would like to challenge farid on here regarding his 1st three masters. I have seen his arguments and rebuttals. they believe me, they are not strong refutations. I will rely mostly on sahih bukhari and muslim (other narration from sahih sitta will be used occasionally) and that should be sufficient. 

tag him in bro otherwise he cant see it

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Veteran Member
32 minutes ago, silasun said:

The Californian "mujahid" with psychological issues is now defending Shi'ism? How fantastic.

I would have a look at br. Al-Mufeed contributed:

 

To be fair, allahyari offered fadak tv the chance to debate him on this issue,  they turned him down.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Veteran Member
1 hour ago, DigitalUmmah said:

to summarise - sayed ammar nakshawani gave a majalis about 1 2 and 3, he was pretty derogatory towards them lol.

this got the sunni in an uproar so king bakri debator, asrar rashid, immediately challenged nakshawani to a face to face debate to discuss the things that nakshawani said in his majalis. 

nakshawani, to put it bluntly, "did an omar". 

as you can imagine, to the bakris, someone like nakshawani refusing to debate was basically 1000 eids all in one. twitter, facebook, whatsapp etc have been blowing up with bakris gloating how shia cannot argue against them when asked to provide proofs, all our beliefs are lies, our foremost speakers are cowards etc etc etc. 

sheikh allahyari has risen to the challenge, and will defeat them inshaAllah. this debate MUST take place now, to save further shia humiliation. Allahyari is good enough for them. and plus he calls sunni "followers of omar" so I might actually be in love with him

Did Nakshwani give a reason as to why he didn't accept the invite to a debate?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, silasun said:

The Californian "mujahid" with psychological issues is now defending Shi'ism? How fantastic.

I would have a look at br. Al-Mufeed contributed:

to be fair, he is good enough to defeat the bakris. 

and look around you: who from shiism stepped forward to meet the challenge?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
1 hour ago, silasun said:

The Californian "mujahid" with psychological issues is now defending Shi'ism? How fantastic.

Let's not forget that no one else stepped up to 'defend shi'ism'. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Forum Administrators
5 minutes ago, starlight said:

Let's not forget that no one else stepped up to 'defend shi'ism'. 

Are nonstop chatter chatter debates  and screaming on TV considered "defending Shiism"? This is all just a sports match for the already converted on all sides. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
2 minutes ago, magma said:

Are nonstop chatter chatter debates  and screaming on TV considered "defending Shiism"?

Well, then the same can be said for lot of discussions, many of them on Shiachat. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, shiaman14 said:

Salaam brother and zirat qabool inshallah.

I wouldn't tag it as SAN ran away. There could be a number of reasons for him not to engage with Sheikh Israr. For example, Imam Ali said one should not argue with an ignorant person, maybe that is why he is not engaging in this debate.

I think there are brothers/sisters on ShiaChat who could just as well defeat any bakri.

jazakAllah for your dua bro, and astagfirullah if I said anything wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Gaius I. Caesar said:

No, Ammar Nakshawani did an "Ali (as)" as in not replying to a fool and his foolish debate @DigitalUmmah

He shouldnt have done the majalis in the first place if he couldnt back it up. Its the laws of any debate that any claim can be questioned, and the bakri know it

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member

I would not waste my time debating with people who have no real intention of knowing the truth! His facebook post was VERY aggressive and he wanted to have a public spectacle and the comments were even worse, calling us shias all sorts of names, from this it is clear to me his only intention is to create a public scene, not to learn the truth. I am for debating someone who wants to know the truth and is genuine about engaging in intellectual discussion, unfortunately this dude seems to be a salafi at heart, even though he claims to hate them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member

Btw, do you know who took his lecture on radical Islam off YouTube?? Was it Sayed himself? I learnt quite a bit from it and I can't care if it offended some butthurt sunnis, we're not here to appease them at the expense of learning more about Shiism.

Edited by Mohamed1993
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Forum Administrators
25 minutes ago, DigitalUmmah said:

He shouldnt have done the majalis in the first place if he couldnt back it up. Its the laws of any debate that any claim can be questioned, and the bakri know it

Giving a majalis does not automatically equate to giving a debate challenge, unless it's explicitly declared. Did he do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, Mohamed1993 said:

Btw, do you know who took his lecture on radical Islam off YouTube?? Was it Sayed himself? I learnt quite a bit from it and I can't care if it offended some butthurt sunnis, we're not here to appease them at the expense of learning more about Shiism.

It's most likely been taken down by MKSI Leicester --- the channel who put it up --- after the uproar it caused. Or maybe it was flagged down. Re-uploads of the video were taken down due to copyright, but there is one still available: 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...