GRAPHIC: Leaked video from rebel cellphone shows Syrian rebels brutally beating army prisoners

[RiseOrDie]

 

 

[em]

...and these are the people the US supports and calls "moderates". Dissapointing. These so called moderates are like isis under a different name. 

[SayedShuhada]

My Allah have mercy on their souls. They fought for their country and are killed by outsiders.

[Umayyad]

When the Rebels capture you they slap you around. When Bashars soldiers capture you they bury you alive and make you say "La Illaha ila Bashar"

 

 

 

[SayedShuhada]

5 hours ago, Umayyad said:

When the Rebels capture you they slap you around.

 

No they behead you, burn you, shot you in the head, drag you behind their car, roll a tank over you.....

 

That's what they do.

[Umayyad]

23 minutes ago, SayedShuhada said:

No they behead you, burn you, shot you in the head, drag you behind their car, roll a tank over you.....

 

That's what they do.

Like this? Ohh no wait these are Assads soldiers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[SayedShuhada]

The thing is that you have so much of these video while a have a nearly infinite number of the barbaric way of your moderate rebel.

This video are so old. It was at first in the early day of the conflict. Now their is no video of that they have stopped doing this. But you keep beheading, burning and killing people on a regular basis and you find this right and halal to do it.

Disgusting

[SayedShuhada]

http://www.bestgore.com/beheading/syria-man-swift-beheading-al-nusra-jihadists/

http://www.bestgore.com/beheading/moderates-jabhat-al-nusra-beheading-two-young-syria/

http://www.bestgore.com/execution/woman-public-execution-jabhat-al-nusra-prostitution/

http://www.bestgore.com/beheading/man-being-beheaded-jabhat-al-nusra-idleb-syria/

 

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/06/201369175918244221.html

https://www.naij.com/690384-islamic-state-militant-executes-mother.html

[Umayyad]

Moderate rebels?  Why are you posting ISIS only photos and Nusra only videos [profanity removed, member warned]. 

[SayedShuhada]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Front_of_the_Free_Syrian_Army

 

Southern front. A ''moderate group'' linked to Jabhat al Nusra, they took the city of Idlib togheter not long ago. The only reason Jabhat al Nusra is not a permanent member of the Southern front is because of western support.

Nusra is linked to alquaeda and southern front get weapon and money from ''western allies''. 

 Go educate yourself. These are moderate rebels and Nusra is the only real fighting force in Syria along with Islamic front. All the other ''brigade'' of the free syrian army with 5 member lol aren't doing anything but getting money from the US and the Saudi. 

 

if your argument of saying these are not moderate well i would say these are not Syrian Soldier but Shabiha that did this only for themselves. 

[Umayyad]

21 hours ago, SayedShuhada said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Front_of_the_Free_Syrian_Army

 

Southern front. A ''moderate group'' linked to Jabhat al Nusra, they took the city of Idlib togheter not long ago. The only reason Jabhat al Nusra is not a permanent member of the Southern front is because of western support.

Nusra is linked to alquaeda and southern front get weapon and money from ''western allies''. 

 Go educate yourself. These are moderate rebels and Nusra is the only real fighting force in Syria along with Islamic front. All the other ''brigade'' of the free syrian army with 5 member lol aren't doing anything but getting money from the US and the Saudi. 

 

if your argument of saying these are not moderate well i would say these are not Syrian Soldier but Shabiha that did this only for themselves. 

Ohh my you poor thing, you are such a victim of propaganda .

 

First Southern Front are against and have fought against nusra.

Quote

the Southern Front’s battles were mainly with the regime, the NDF, and Hezbollah as well as with Jabhat al-Nusra. Today, most of the Southern Front’s battles are against ISIS, though the Front is also continuing its offenses against regime targets, as seen in its recent takeover of the Syrian Army’s Base 52.

http://www.nationalinterest.org/feature/syrias-last-best-hope-the-southern-front-13263

As for your claim that Nusra and ISIS are the only fighting force that of demonstrates your bias and ignorance on the topic so nothing more to add to that ^_^ 

 

 

[SayedShuhada]

6 minutes ago, Umayyad said:

 

As for your claim that Nusra and ISIS are the only fighting force that of demonstrates your bias and ignorance on the topic so nothing more to add to that ^_^ 

 

Why are you lying about what i said ? What i said is exactly this '' These are moderate rebels and Nusra is the only real fighting force in Syria along with Islamic front.  ''

Islamic front isn't the islamic state lol. That show how uneducated on the subjet you are. You don't know anything about syria in your head is ''radifi alawi'' thing.

Also southern front NEVER fought with al Nusra. Memeber of southern front fought against one another then they created this comon front and never fought Nusra.

 

[Noah-]

On 1/24/2016 at 11:23 AM, Umayyad said:

Moderate rebels?  Why are you posting ISIS only photos and Nusra only videos [profanity removed, member warned] . 

The difference between you (Sunni) and us, is that we don't support any Assad army if abusing or torturing prisoners of war or civilians.... which in most cases they are Takfiri criminals with guns and bombs....while you and majority of your people support the rebels' atrocities where they carry not only against Assad army but also against civilians.

It is in their rules and they are not shy to declare it publically on videos that every single 'Alawite, Shia, and those Sunni who support the government' is a target and they do mass-murder in most brutal way the civilians of different sects if they get an hand on them.  What kind of religion you have? From moderate to extremist make videos and say: we will kill every single Rafidhi and Alawite and etc.... in Syria... 100s of speeches and videos are online testifying for this...

One example was Zahran Alloush, who was sent to hell by Syrian army a few weeks ago, the leader of the so called moderate rebels in Damascus... in all of his speeches he has nothing but hateful sectarian speeches of what he is going to do to people especially of other sects... a garbage so called Islamists who now will burn in hell inshallah forever. But, this guy was one of the heroes for you Sunnis, including for the governments of Turkey and Saudi.

 

 

[Noah-]

Oh Mr. Umayyad, I forgot to point out your hypocrisy! When you go under (Shia militias in Iraq) topic you blame the Shias for not discussing the actual topic and instead they are bringing in Saddam crimes and talking about Shia bombings, but in reality that is YOU who just doing it here... instead of discussing this topic you are shooting on Assad army's crime?

On ‎1‎/‎24‎/‎2016 at 6:41 AM, Umayyad said:

Extreme bias in here. Whenever the topic is about Shia crimes users seem to turn it into "Well Saddam did this", "Well shia in pakistan are getting killed" or "Its all the Wahabis fault". 

 You see your behavior? You accuse ppl of doing things while you think it's perfectly fine if you do the very same thing or worse than that... that is actually how most Sunnis are! Why don't you talk about Takfiris crimes in Syria and instead  "seem to turn it into Well [Saddam Assad] did this"

 

 

[Umayyad]

 

Quote

Why are you lying about what i said ? What i said is exactly this '' These are moderate rebels and Nusra is the only real fighting force in Syria along with Islamic front.  ''

Islamic front isn't the islamic state lol. That show how uneducated on the subjet you are. You don't know anything about syria in your head is ''radifi alawi'' thing

No my excited ignorant friend. I misread IF as ISIS. I did not equate IF with IS. If you used you heard you would have seen it was a misread on my part instead of getting excited like a self lamenting rafidi 

Quote

Also southern front NEVER fought with al Nusra. Memeber of southern front fought against one another then they created this comon front and never fought Nusra

My ignorant rafidi friend. You said SF were linked to Nusra at first, ive demonstrated that to be wrong. Even if they never fought and have worked against the regime the SF position is very clear. 

 

Quote

"We must announce our clear position: neither the Nusra Front or anything else with this ideology represents us," said Bashar al-Zoubi, head of a rebel group called the Yarmouk Army.

"We can’t go from the rule of Assad to Zawahiri and Nusra," said Zoubi referring to the al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Aboul Majd al-Zoubi, head of a Southern Front-linked Syrian Media Organisation, said the aim is to isolate Nusra. "The door is open for Nusra Front fighters to defect and to join the factions of the Southern Front," he said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-south-idUSKBN0N511N20150414?irpc=932

Dont lie about the rebels again.

As for uneducated and ignorance. You have proven you are a champion of such. By Posting picture of ISIS in Iraq under "moderate rebels" in syria [profanity removed, member warned] 

[Umayyad]

2 hours ago, Noah- said:

The difference between you (Sunni) and us, is that we don't support any Assad army if abusing or torturing prisoners of war or civilians.... which in most cases they are Takfiri criminals with guns and bombs....while you and majority of your people support the rebels' atrocities where they carry not only against Assad army but also against civilians.

It is in their rules and they are not shy to declare it publically on videos that every single 'Alawite, Shia, and those Sunni who support the government' is a target and they do mass-murder in most brutal way the civilians of different sects if they get an hand on them.  What kind of religion you have? From moderate to extremist make videos and say: we will kill every single Rafidhi and Alawite and etc.... in Syria... 100s of speeches and videos are online testifying for this...

One example was Zahran Alloush, who was sent to hell by Syrian army a few weeks ago, the leader of the so called moderate rebels in Damascus... in all of his speeches he has nothing but hateful sectarian speeches of what he is going to do to people especially of other sects... a garbage so called Islamists who now will burn in hell inshallah forever. But, this guy was one of the heroes for you Sunnis, including for the governments of Turkey and Saudi.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Noah- said:

Oh Mr. Umayyad, I forgot to point out your hypocrisy! When you go under (Shia militias in Iraq) topic you blame the Shias for not discussing the actual topic and instead they are bringing in Saddam crimes and talking about Shia bombings, but in reality that is YOU who just doing it here... instead of discussing this topic you are shooting on Assad army's crime?

 You see your behavior? You accuse ppl of doing things while you think it's perfectly fine if you do the very same thing or worse than that... that is actually how most Sunnis are! Why don't you talk about Takfiris crimes in Syria and instead  "seem to turn it into Well [Saddam Assad] did this"

 

 

Not taking the bait dear. Thanks for wasting 15min on those 2 essay above that i didnt bother to read 

[SayedShuhada]

41 minutes ago, Umayyad said:

No my excited ignorant friend. I misread IF as ISIS. I did not equate IF with IS. If you used you heard you would have seen it was a misread on my part instead of getting excited like a self lamenting rafidi 

Proving how ignorant you are on the subject. You ''misread'' it because of what you see and how you want to see it. Do you think i get offended if you call me a rafidi haha? Call me rafidi i will call you takfiri and we won't advance in life. You ''view'' on syria is purely religous. You don't know anything like i said on the subjet for you it's only a religous matter.

Go get your own information. TV News are not telling you everything

[Umayyad]

On 1/25/2016 at 0:52 PM, SayedShuhada said:

Proving how ignorant you are on the subject. You ''misread'' it because of what you see and how you want to see it. Do you think i get offended if you call me a rafidi haha? Call me rafidi i will call you takfiri and we won't advance in life. You ''view'' on syria is purely religous. You don't know anything like i said on the subjet for you it's only a religous matter.

Go get your own information. TV News are not telling you everything

[Profanity removed, member warned] you have no reply. All you can do is cry about how i misread IF as IS. Anyways you have shown that you know nothing about this matter and have not nothing to offer but bias

[Noah-]

4 hours ago, Umayyad said:

 

Not taking the bait dear. Thanks for wasting 15min on those 2 essay above that i didnt bother to read 

Well, you read and you read them well... but hypocrites like you have no courage and not able to respond to my points. I exposed your hypocrisy just in a few mins of your stay on this forum. Go and 'debate' somewhere else.

[RiseOrDie]

Btw brothers, Nasibi takfiri scum will try to say that Southern Front is against Nusra

 

But here is the fact: Southern Front has not won a single battle on its own in the last 3 years without Nusra spearheading the attack, examples: Busra, Brigade 82, kafr shams, Nasib border crossing etc

And all battles without Nusra in the South have failed.

 

Today Nusra and FSA fight hand in hand in Shiekh Miskeen, which was liberated today. The strategic town of Shiekh Miskeen is back to Syria and the takfiri deathtoll is over 200+ according pro-rebel sources. 

Edited January 26, 2016 by RiseOrDie

[Umayyad]

On 1/25/2016 at 11:46 PM, Noah- said:

Well, you read and you read them well... but hypocrites like you have no courage and not able to respond to my points. I exposed your hypocrisy just in a few mins of your stay on this forum. Go and 'debate' somewhere else.

Not going to read them bro. I dont entertain blood thirsty rafidis who call for genocide. 

[repenter-gone4awhile]

So let me get this straight...........what is Umayyad actually saying? That since some idiots in Assads army are doing this and perhaps got away with it or not, it's ok for ISIS, Nusra or whoever the hell the dogs are to do it as well?
You don't really get it do you, who here has supported these actions? 

People in the army of the Prophet(p.b.u.h) probably did some bad stuff too and got away with it because they werent caught, same for First Khalif, Second Khalif and Ali(a.s). We don't curse the entire army of anyone based on what individuals or small groups do, we rather curse the small groups. 

ISIS ideology however, and the so called rebels, in it's entirety has been proven over and over again to be sub animalistic, and we shias curse them day in and day out, and we curse anyone that supports them, if that happens to be you, then we curse you too. 

So tell me, what exactly are you saying?

[guest050817]

4 hours ago, Umayyad said:

x

I'm a shia, i do not support Assad, but consider him a lesser evil to these alqaeda groups.

Lets put ISIS to one side, and lets also put jabhat al Nusra to another side.

Let us consider the next two powerful groups, or among the most powerful. Ahrar Asham, and Jaysh al Islam:

2. Ahrar-as-Sham:
Strength: 10-20,000 (the economist) Reference will povided on request.
It is considered one of the three most powerful rebel groups fighting in Syria - i will update it when i can: "
In February 2014, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence called Ahrar al-Sham one of the three most effective rebel groups in Syria."

1.Ahrar Asham are probably considered one of the closest allies to jabhat al nusra, and have very, very strong links to Alqaeda.
2. "It routinely cooperates with al-Nusra and, until relations soured in 2013, also worked with ISIS. In February 2014, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence called Ahrar al-Sham one of the three most effective rebel groups in Syria."

Leadership: "Abu Khalid al-Suri, also known as Abu Omeir al-Shami (Unknown to February 23, 2014): Suri was a co-founder of Ahrar al-Sham and acted as Ayman al-Zawahiri’s representative in Syria,"

"Suri's close ties with Al Qaeda became clear after his death, when AQ commander Ayman al-Zawahiri published a eulogy for the fallen Ahrar al-Sham leader and AQ posted a video documenting his participation in Al Farouq training camp in Afghanistan, including photos of him with Osama bin Laden and Zawahir"

"Ahrar al-Sham was founded by members of Al Qaeda and maintains links to AQ’s core leadership. [42] While neither group formally claims a partnership, senior AQ officials, including Ayman al-Zawahiri, openly mourned Ahrar al-Sham leader Abu Khalid al-Suri when he died.

http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappin...roups/view/523

[guest050817]

4 hours ago, Umayyad said:

x

Also, jaysh al islam:

Jaysh Al Islam

1. Considered a very powerful group in and around damuscus.
2. Their ex-leader who died a week or so ago, was Zahran Alloush, a man who openly praised Bin Laden, in addition to calling Jabhat Al Nusra their brothers, whom they praise and have close ties with.
3. Highly secterian language, called for the slaughter of those from other groups in the most vile and menacing language.
4. Put alawite women in cages and paraded them as human shields.

1. Here is a video of him, with subtitles, where he explicitly praises Sheikh Osama Bin Laden: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lcvz-sgyuu0
Watch 2:15 onwards!


2. Here is a video of him pledging his alliance with Jabhat al Nusra, the Al-Qaeda affiliate in syria designated a terrorist group:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zajo2GeKyV4

Here is a video of his millitia (Jaysh al Islam) parading women and men as Human Shields.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_R3Wmjl8e8

 

3. And here is a video of him, calling for the ethnic cleansing and genocide of alawites, and shia muslims - turning the whole syria issue into a secterian one (when the majority of Assads army are SUNNI'S):

 

 

 

[guest050817]

4 hours ago, Umayyad said:

Not going to read them bro. I dont entertain blood thirsty rafidis who call for genocide. 

No-one is calling for genocide.

The majority of Assad's syrian arab army are actually not shia's, nor alawites, they are sunni's. Assads wife is a sunni, Assad prays with his arms folded, the majority of Assads cabinet are also sunni's.

To add to this, no-one wishes Assad to remain in power because we paticularly like him.

Rather, the moment Assad falls, far worse groups, with dangerous secterian and violent ideologies, such as Daesh, Jabhat al Nusra, ahrar asham, and jaysh al islam among other takfiri fanatics will fill that vacuum and the bloodshed will get much worse.

It's more we consider him the lesser evil.

We want the syrian people to have their will, to vote and choose and govern for themselves - not have takfiri fanatics, israel, the US, turkey, gulf states playing proxy wars.

[Umayyad]

Well hello there mr Tawhid 313

You critize Ahrar and Jaysh for praising Osama Bin Laden and having Sectarian Language? This is your reply to the crimes of the Syrian Army? Hasd and the Iraqi army use just as secterian language. Calling the opposite side Ummayad and Yazid followers. What pisses me off about your rafidis is   you look at the speck of sawdust in the opposing side's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye. The shia millitia are commiting crimes against sunnis Iraq, the Syrian Army/HA/Russia are committing crimes in Syria against the sunnis yet you justify all this by saying "well the leader of ahrar or jaysh praised bin laden". Really that justifies the barrel bombings and the use of chemical weapons agains the sunni population? Are you maybe going to be a conspiracy nut case about that?

In March 2015 a report published by Physicians for Human Rights documented that the Assad regime was responsible for the vast majority of the deaths of 600 medical workers since the Syrian Civil War began; 88% of recorded attacks on hospitals and 97% of killings of medical workers were attributed to Assad's forces.^[141]

For the last three years evidence compiled by the Commission for International Justice and Accountability (CIJA), made up of investigators and legal experts who formerly worked on war crimes tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and for the international criminal court, have cooperated with a team of 50 Syrian investigators to indict Bashar al-Assad and 24 senior members of his regime.^[142]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bashar_al-Assad#War_crimes_and_crimes_against_humanity

 

Then your Mr Tawhid go around every thread and say Bashar Assads wife is a sunni, who cares what his wife is? Does his wife define what ideology he holds?

 

Then you say Assad prays with his hands folded. So what? Nusayris pray like sunnis to get closer to the majority of syrians as we read

Barry Rubin has suggested that Syrian leader Hafez al-Assad and his son and successor Bashar al-Assad pressed their fellow Alawites "to behave like 'regular Muslims', shedding (or at least concealing) their distinctive aspects".^[89] During the early 1970s a booklet, al-`Alawiyyun Shi'atu Ahl al-Bait ("The Alawites are Followers of the Household of the Prophet") was published, which was "signed by numerous 'Alawi' men of religion", described the doctrines of the Imami Shia as Alawite.^[90] Additionally, there has been a recent movement to unite Alawism and the other branches of Twelver Islam through educational exchange programs in Syria and Qom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alawites

As for Assad Army they are alawite. Even if the majority of soldiers are sunni the leadership is at the hand of the Alawites/Nusayris and the vast majority of the career soldiers are alawi/nusayri.

The majority of the Syrian military are Sunni, but most of the military leadership are Alawites. Alawites make up 12 percent of the Syrian population but are estimated to make up 70 percent of the career soldiers in the Syrian Army.^[11][41] Of the 200,000 or so career soldiers in the Syrian Army, 140,000 are Alawites.^[42] A similar imbalance is seen in the officer corps where some 80 percent of the officers are Alawites. The military’s most elite divisions, the Republican Guard and the 4th Armoured Division, which are commanded by Bashar al-Assad's brother Maher, are exclusively Alawite. Most of Syria’s 300,000 conscripts were, however, Sunni but that number is speculated to be changing now.^[11][43]

^{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Armed_Forces}

As for your silly "Assad is the lesser of two evil excuse" then we know what the intention of the Rafidis are in Syria. Alhamdullilah the Syrian war has opened the eyes of the Sunnis and the sunnis see the shia for what it is. Those who praised HA for 2006 are now cursing them after they saw how they are aiding a monster like Assad. Those who sympathy for Iran are now cursing Iran with the worst of curses. So this war has opened the eyes of the sunnis and any dream the shiites have of a unity is all dead and gone. And the sunnis will never accept your rafidi doctrines nor your wilayat al faqih and they will oppose it. And we know this is what you want to spread in the land of sunnah. Just as the Nasrullah said in the 80s and the man in your picture have said, your agenda is clear. 

 

 

 

 

 

So you can remain in denial and justify your denial by talking about Assad wife or you can accept the truth Tawheed that is up to you. As for me i am all red pilled and i see past weak raifid rhetoric ^_^ .

 

Alhamdullilah there are some Shias who know the truth about your likes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[OnelifeliveIt]

11 hours ago, Umayyad said:

Well hello there mr Tawhid 313

You critize Ahrar and Jaysh for praising Osama Bin Laden and having Sectarian Language? This is your reply to the crimes of the Syrian Army? Hasd and the Iraqi army use just as secterian language. Calling the opposite side Ummayad and Yazid followers. What pisses me off about your rafidis is   you look at the speck of sawdust in the opposing side's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye. The shia millitia are commiting crimes against sunnis Iraq, the Syrian Army/HA/Russia are committing crimes in Syria against the sunnis yet you justify all this by saying "well the leader of ahrar or jaysh praised bin laden". Really that justifies the barrel bombings and the use of chemical weapons agains the sunni population? Are you maybe going to be a conspiracy nut case about that?

In March 2015 a report published by Physicians for Human Rights documented that the Assad regime was responsible for the vast majority of the deaths of 600 medical workers since the Syrian Civil War began; 88% of recorded attacks on hospitals and 97% of killings of medical workers were attributed to Assad's forces.^[141]

For the last three years evidence compiled by the Commission for International Justice and Accountability (CIJA), made up of investigators and legal experts who formerly worked on war crimes tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and for the international criminal court, have cooperated with a team of 50 Syrian investigators to indict Bashar al-Assad and 24 senior members of his regime.^[142]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bashar_al-Assad#War_crimes_and_crimes_against_humanity

 

Then your Mr Tawhid go around every thread and say Bashar Assads wife is a sunni, who cares what his wife is? Does his wife define what ideology he holds?

 

Then you say Assad prays with his hands folded. So what? Nusayris pray like sunnis to get closer to the majority of syrians as we read

Barry Rubin has suggested that Syrian leader Hafez al-Assad and his son and successor Bashar al-Assad pressed their fellow Alawites "to behave like 'regular Muslims', shedding (or at least concealing) their distinctive aspects".^[89] During the early 1970s a booklet, al-`Alawiyyun Shi'atu Ahl al-Bait ("The Alawites are Followers of the Household of the Prophet") was published, which was "signed by numerous 'Alawi' men of religion", described the doctrines of the Imami Shia as Alawite.^[90] Additionally, there has been a recent movement to unite Alawism and the other branches of Twelver Islam through educational exchange programs in Syria and Qom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alawites

As for Assad Army they are alawite. Even if the majority of soldiers are sunni the leadership is at the hand of the Alawites/Nusayris and the vast majority of the career soldiers are alawi/nusayri.

The majority of the Syrian military are Sunni, but most of the military leadership are Alawites. Alawites make up 12 percent of the Syrian population but are estimated to make up 70 percent of the career soldiers in the Syrian Army.^[11][41] Of the 200,000 or so career soldiers in the Syrian Army, 140,000 are Alawites.^[42] A similar imbalance is seen in the officer corps where some 80 percent of the officers are Alawites. The military’s most elite divisions, the Republican Guard and the 4th Armoured Division, which are commanded by Bashar al-Assad's brother Maher, are exclusively Alawite. Most of Syria’s 300,000 conscripts were, however, Sunni but that number is speculated to be changing now.^[11][43]

^{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Armed_Forces}

As for your silly "Assad is the lesser of two evil excuse" then we know what the intention of the Rafidis are in Syria. Alhamdullilah the Syrian war has opened the eyes of the Sunnis and the sunnis see the shia for what it is. Those who praised HA for 2006 are now cursing them after they saw how they are aiding a monster like Assad. Those who sympathy for Iran are now cursing Iran with the worst of curses. So this war has opened the eyes of the sunnis and any dream the shiites have of a unity is all dead and gone. And the sunnis will never accept your rafidi doctrines nor your wilayat al faqih and they will oppose it. And we know this is what you want to spread in the land of sunnah. Just as the Nasrullah said in the 80s and the man in your picture have said, your agenda is clear. 

 

 

 

 

 

So you can remain in denial and justify your denial by talking about Assad wife or you can accept the truth Tawheed that is up to you. As for me i am all red pilled and i see past weak raifid rhetoric ^_^ .

 

Alhamdullilah there are some Shias who know the truth about your likes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What land of the Sunnah? lol there is no land of the Sunnah. You guys want to preach about Sunnism and talk about oppression but remain silent on other oppression issues. Your Sunnah isn't from the prophet, its from the first three caliphs who were mislead with fame, money, fortune and mere adventurism - and of course tribal association. So really, all this talk of Shias trying to oppress the Sunnis as if Shias are the majority in the world, is a mere farce. You can talk all you want, post videos of men in turbans thinking they carry the same thinking as you, it doesn't really matter. I yawn in the face of people like you. 

[Umayyad]

21 hours ago, OnelifeliveIt said:

What land of the Sunnah? lol there is no land of the Sunnah. You guys want to preach about Sunnism and talk about oppression but remain silent on other oppression issues. Your Sunnah isn't from the prophet, its from the first three caliphs who were mislead with fame, money, fortune and mere adventurism - and of course tribal association. So really, all this talk of Shias trying to oppress the Sunnis as if Shias are the majority in the world, is a mere farce. You can talk all you want, post videos of men in turbans thinking they carry the same thinking as you, it doesn't really matter. I yawn in the face of people like you. 

Unable to reply you cry about the three Caliphs. 10/10 reply mate. 

[OnelifeliveIt]

On 1/31/2016 at 10:43 AM, Umayyad said:

Unable to reply you cry about the three Caliphs. 10/10 reply mate. 

What's there to reply to? If you spew jargon, you'll get jargon in return. Your post doesn't have much thought put into it. You haven't done background research of the guys you posted. You'll follow anyone that asserts their view and parallels it with yours. Hence, what happens in this case is sheer blind management. Have you even looked into the biographies of the guys in the videos? I mean, if I posted a Sunni cleric talking against the Sunnis of this day and their agendas, you'll call it hogwash. No cigar, hombre. 

[Umayyad]

7 minutes ago, OnelifeliveIt said:

What's there to reply to? If you spew jargon, you'll get jargon in return. Your post doesn't have much thought put into it. You haven't done background research of the guys you posted. You'll follow anyone that asserts their view and parallels it with yours. Hence, what happens in this case is sheer blind management. Have you even looked into the biographies of the guys in the videos? I mean, if I posted a Sunni cleric talking against the Sunnis of this day and their agendas, you'll call it hogwash. No cigar, hombre. 

"what you post is hogwash (even though i cant adress it) so i cry about the 3 caliph instead). You are doing good bro. Shows the intelligence of the rafida 

[OnelifeliveIt]

7 hours ago, Umayyad said:

"what you post is hogwash (even though i cant adress it) so i cry about the 3 caliph instead). You are doing good bro. Shows the intelligence of the rafida 

I'm thinking like your average Bakri. You know, posting YouTube videos of personalities that support your narrow viewpoint and then indulge in the whinging of playing the victim card of the so called Iranian agenda spreading in lands of this imaginary thing called " Land of Sunnah". I mean really, how do those video prove anything except what your mental capacity expects it to prove?

[OnelifeliveIt]

Also, wasn't the Umayyad empire a failed empire? Wasn't one of the reasons it fell was due to the lack of inclusion of non arabs in its empire? Racist isn't it? Well, good thing it no longer exists.

[Umayyad]

1 hour ago, OnelifeliveIt said:

I'm thinking like your average Bakri. You know, posting YouTube videos of personalities that support your narrow viewpoint and then indulge in the whinging of playing the victim card of the so called Iranian agenda spreading in lands of this imaginary thing called " Land of Sunnah". I mean really, how do those video prove anything except what your mental capacity expects it to prove?

 

38 minutes ago, OnelifeliveIt said:

Also, wasn't the Umayyad empire a failed empire? Wasn't one of the reasons it fell was due to the lack of inclusion of non arabs in its empire? Racist isn't it? Well, good thing it no longer exists.

Dismiss and deflect and cry. Oh my what a strategy you use here. Once you learn how to construct a proper argument i might feed you. 

[Miss Wonderful]

@Umayyad aka [EDIT] boi: why should I believe that the videos you posted are real and not rebel impostors who want to promote hate and propaganda against Assad.  You believed a woman's screams over her son's dead body were to be fake so what makes your videos more real than others? Also I see many times on your posts  were censored  by a mod because you chose  profanity as a comeback. Weren't you the same person who told me never to use emotions in an argument and that it will lead to fallacies on whatever?  Where is your cool as a cucumber, collectiveness now?

Edited May 30, 2019 by Hameedeh
[EDIT] Removed the name of an imageboard website that has inappropriate and dangerous content.

[Umayyad]

On 2/11/2016 at 3:01 PM, Miss Wonderful said:

@Umayyad aka [EDIT] boi: why should I believe that the videos you posted are real and not rebel impostors who want to promote hate and propaganda against Assad.  You believed a woman's screams over her son's dead body were to be fake so what makes your videos more real than others? Also I see many times on your posts  were censored  by a mod because you chose  profanity as a comeback. Weren't you the same person who told me never to use emotions in an argument and that it will lead to fallacies on whatever?  Where is your cool as a cucumber, collectiveness now?

My posts were censored because of links and acronym usage not profanity or insults as comebacks. You should have simply asked me why they were censored instead of  assuming the worst. But its ok I forgive you 

Edited May 30, 2019 by Hameedeh
EDIT in the quote