Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله
Sign in to follow this  
Laayla

Fassad Book

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Bismehe Ta3ala,

Assalam Alikum.

Why have you allowed fassadbook as a way to log in Shiachat?

Now government agencies will be able to look at the history of the posts members have posted since day one of shia chat.

Has Shia chat merged with fassadbook? It's my right to know, because if you have I'm unsubscribing. I like my right to privacy, thank you very much.

M3 Salamah, FE AMIN Allah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. No, you can choose to log in with facebook if you want

2. It's under testing

3. If you think the government can't check your entire history (be it here or facebook) already....then i would like to welcome you to 2014

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bismehe Ta3ala,

Assalam Alikum.

Brother Abu Hadi, please if you read this, answer my OP.

I never created an account on Fb. Or any social media as a matter of fact. I don't even have a cell phone.

Testing for what? Why didn't you make an announcement about it?

I really need to know if shiachat is giving information about members to fassidbook. I appreciate your honesty in this matter. When I signed up for Shia chat I agreed to those conditions at the time. Are there new conditions on shia chat that I'm not aware of?

M3 Salamah, FE AMIN Allah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...what do you have to hide , Laayla ?

 

we are against terrorism, against violence, against every cruelty in the world..  We are shia, not wahabis.  The CIA is welcome to look at my history.

 

It's not about hiding something; it's about not letting any state spy agency to invade our privacy in ways we can't even know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bismehe Ta3ala,

Assalam Alikum.

Brother Abu Hadi, please if you read this, answer my OP.

I never created an account on Fb. Or any social media as a matter of fact. I don't even have a cell phone.

Testing for what? Why didn't you make an announcement about it?

I really need to know if shiachat is giving information about members to fassidbook. I appreciate your honesty in this matter. When I signed up for Shia chat I agreed to those conditions at the time. Are there new conditions on shia chat that I'm not aware of?

M3 Salamah, FE AMIN Allah

 

I didn't make an announcement because im still testing it. You don't have to worry about anything, it's simply: you can log on with your facebook user instead of making a user. What i'm trying to figure out is if a facebook user can "like" a post and share it etc. 

 

If anyone has facebook, please try it an give me feedback. Check for things like privacy, information sharing etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bismehe Ta3ala,

Assalam Alikum.

Why have you allowed fassadbook as a way to log in Shiachat?

Now government agencies will be able to look at the history of the posts members have posted since day one of shia chat.

Has Shia chat merged with fassadbook? It's my right to know, because if you have I'm unsubscribing. I like my right to privacy, thank you very much.

M3 Salamah, FE AMIN Allah

 

 

(bismillah)  (salam)

 

1, If the government agencies wanted to search through your posts, they would just sign up using a normal account. There is no need to use FB logins.

2, ISP and web browser companies already know the FB accounts of SC members. That is very easy for them. Unless you encrypt everything and take other security measures.

3, It was implemented to make it easier to register. If people don't want to use it then they can use the normal registration system. That way FB will not be able to link the SC profiles to the FB ones.

Edited by Muhammed Ali

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i use facebook when I log into shiachat. it asks my email, and then if my email is compatible with the same email i registerd on shiachat, then i can access my same 'enlightened' account

 

if someone has multiple emails ,they can access shiachat under two different usernames

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam) sister,

 

The government agencies can track EVERYTHING, from your phone calls to your entire life story if it wants, not making you paranoid or anything but it is a fact.

 

Even the camera in my phone or computer can turn up whenever it wishes to should an employee of a government agency wants, and this isn't even hidden, it is right in your user agreement which we are so eager to click 'I have read the terms and conditions' on.

 

Again, not to make you paranoid but airports have some of the highest security measures, and they can see a person's body shape right down to whatever (not naked; all curves I meant) and such measures are carried out in the West, the Far East, and even GCC countries, such things are primarily done for transportation of narcotics, and even making makeshift weapons and putting inside their bodies.

 

What I am getting at is, they can see you wherever you are, however you are, in whatever state you are, the surveillance is extremely powerful, and your local government will always comply with it.

 

You would have to go 'off the grid' in Antarctica, North Siberia, Amazon or anywhere that is not touched by humans to escape it.

 

But then again, why should we be worried?

Anyone can go through my entire history (and I am extremely active on the internet), there is no dirt, we aren't 'Islamic'Awekening where members start getting nervous when they see some anonymous guest logins, heck they even have an entire sub-section of the forum addressing their imprisoned brothers.

 

We are cool and should not be nervous against such things, and frankly, we actually can't escape it.. no matter what.

Edited by GreyMatter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  (salam)


 


Laayla does have a point -- ShiaChat shouldn't be integrating with Facebook.


 


There are 2 issues here... (1) the login issue, and (2) any further integration with Facebook features.


 


 


1) For your question about the login, Laayla, I don't think the login option is a concern.  ShiaChat isn't the one that is giving out login information... it's Facebook that's "leaky" with their info.  ShiaChat's username & password database stays separate... it's Facebook that is letting ShiaChat have access to Facebook login information (although it's encrypted, so that ShiaChat operators can't see any of it).


 


However, there are other issues with doing this.  To some extent, forum operators should help people avoid making unwise choices.


 


Already, sometimes people sign-up on SC with their real name and then post about sensitive personal/family topics, which is problematic enough (and they may later realize it's not good, but because of how the forum system works with old quoted posts, even changing the username doesn't fully wipe out their old username from the posts).  


 


I notice that when I click the "View New Content" link at the top-right, sometimes it ends up showing me the newest members who have signed up.  And I'm often surprised at how many of the new members have actual names, instead of names like Neo or Trinity.  And now I'm guessing that it's because they use the Facebook login option, and simply go along with using their default name info for their login.


 


For this issue, perhaps ShiaChat should put a reminder on the sign-up page that a person should consider whether they want to use their real name.  


 


Or better yet, remove the Facebook login option.  From a philosophical perspective, SC shouldn't contribute to (or at least condone) FB's control/dominance on the web (especially considering so many terrible things FB does, as I'll mention a bit about below... although they do a ton more too).


 


 


 


2) Another issue is further integration with Facebook features -- one common feature is the "Like" button.


 


ShiaChat shouldn't be doing any further integration with Facebook.


 


Sites that place the Facebook "Like" button on their web sites help Facebook track people across the web. ShiaChat shouldn't be an accomplice in this.


 


Some info about how that works is here:


www.propublica.org/article/its-complicated-facebooks-history-of-tracking-you


www.abine.com/blog/2012/how-facebook-buttons-track-you/


www.abine.com/blog/2014/facebook-tracking-browsing/

bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/as-like-buttons-spread-so-do-facebooks-tentacles/


 


The "Like" button helps Facebook track its members across the web even if they're not logged-in (and even if you don't click on the button).  They even applied for a patent on their tracking techniques.


[To some extent, the tracking apparently even works on non-Facebook members... but if you frequently clear your cookies and change your IP, that minimizes the issue for members + non-members.]


 

However, the current "Like this" button you see at the bottom of posts is simply a forum feature though, not related to FB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

or possibly the FB integration allows ease of access and permutation of behavior.

 

Laylaa, I don't even know you, but from memory I can state you are an Ex part, living in Leb, two kids, and were recently thinking of what to do with your 1k, Gold or Hajj for father.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As for people who say "I have nothing to hide, etc. etc.", that's not a valid argument.  
 
There are lots of things people can say which are true, but stating them can create issues/problems (or simply a hassle that isn't worth dealing with).  
 
As I mentioned above, some people post about personal/family issues on SC.  But also, there are lots of "controversial topics" where stating one's opinion can create problems if it becomes widely known, even though the statements are true and correct (lots of political issues, comments about a certain country, etc.).  
 
There's an old saying about not talking about religion & politics with friends, because it often will lead to arguing.
 
Attaching your name & broadcasting such comments on the web can create problems (whether on FB or Twitter, or a forum site like SC)... whether with your neighbours, or at work, or perhaps in extreme cases, even with authorities, and the next thing you know, you have trouble taking a flight or crossing a border.  
 
As one example: 20 years ago, being against gay marriage was normal, but nowadays, if you're not in favour of gay marriage, you may get treated badly by others... so having it known that you're against it can lead to even worse. 
 
So privacy and anonymity have their role.
 
 
 

I didn't make an announcement because im still testing it. You don't have to worry about anything, it's simply: you can log on with your facebook user instead of making a user. What i'm trying to figure out is if a facebook user can "like" a post and share it etc. 

 

If anyone has facebook, please try it an give me feedback. Check for things like privacy, information sharing etc. 

 

Is the issue of Facebook integration something one administrator decides on his own?
 
Or is it discussed among all administrators and moderators first?   
 
 
My feedback is:
 
1) These issues should first be considered by all admins & mods, and users should have some input.  
 
2) SC shouldn't integrate any FB features.  And I think if more people knew about FB's history and what they're capable of, they would also be more cautious about them.
[As an aside, some people feel comfortable with their FB privacy settings... but then they give FB apps/games access to all their info:
www.toucharcade.com/2013/11/26/quizup-is-the-latest-example-of-why-you-should-be-cautious-about-facebook-integration-in-games/ 
 
 
Regarding what a few people have said:
Yes, surveillance is widespread, and in many jurisdictions, you can be snooped upon without a warrant.  
 
However, implementing features like the FB "Like" button is similar to inviting them in for tea & biscuits 24/7 (and inviting FB too, which otherwise wouldn't get that info).   In that analogy, yes, the authorities can always just walk-in anyway, but why make it easy for them & condone what they do?  
 
It's already known that some US government agencies use backdoor access to Facebook and Google and other major companies.  Integration of FB features simply adds to the treasure-trove of info (surfing habits, sites you visit, topics you view, even how long you stay on a page) that will be at their fingertips... and SC shouldn't assist in that.
Edited by Bright

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...