Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Thaqalyn

A Massive Challenge To Absolutely Every Sunni...

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately Sunni brothers, the truth about Ghadir Khum has been hidden from you, and the almost all of your ahadeeth and scholars say 'mawla' means first in authority, and more that 100,000 people were present (the lie is that it was a small dispute with a small group), and that there was no oath of allegiance: this is what they don't tell you on the pulpits. I strongly advise you to open your eyes.

THE FOLLOWING HADEETHS ARE ONLY SAHEEH SUNNI HADEETHS

Ghadir Khumm

The Messenger of Allah declared: "It seems the time approached when I shall be called away (by Allah) and I shall answer that call. I am leaving for you two precious things and if you adhere both of them, you will never go astray after me. They are the Book of Allah and my progeny, that is my Ahlul-Bayt. The two shall never separate from each other until they come to me by the Pool (of Paradise)." Then the Messenger of Allah continued: "Do I not have more right over the believers than what they have over themselves?”People cried and answered: "Yes, O’ Messenger of God.”Then Prophet (S) held up the hand of ‘Ali and said: "Whoever I am his leader (Mawla), ‘Ali is his leader (Mawla). O’ God, love those who love him, and be hostile to those who are hostile to him." Some of the Sunni references (there are hundreds):

(1) Sahih Tirmidhi, v2, p298, v5, p63
(2) Sunan Ibn Maja, v1, pp 12,43
(3) Khasa’is, by al-Nisa’i, pp 4,21
(4) al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v2, p129, v3, pp 109-110,116,371
(5) Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v1, pp 84,118,119,152,330, v4, pp 281,368,370, 372,378, v5, pp 35,347,358,361,366,419 (from 40 chains of narrators)
(6) Fada’il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Hanbal, v2, pp 563,572
(7) Majma’ al-Zawa’id, by al-Haythami, v9, p103 (from several transmitters)
(8) Tafsir al-Kabir, by Fakhr al-Razi, v12, pp 49-50
(9) Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthur, by al-Hafiz Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, v3, p19
(10) Tarikh al-Khulafa, by al-Suyuti, pp 169,173
(11) al-Bidayah wal-Nihayah, by Ibn Kathir, v3, p213, v5, p208
(12) Usdul Ghabah, by Ibn Athir, v4, p114
(13) Mushkil al-Athar, by al-Tahawi, v2, pp 307-308
(14) Habib al-Siyar, by Mir Khand, v1, part 3, p144
(15) Sawaiq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, p26
(16) al-Isabah, by Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, v2, p509; v1, part1, p319, v2, part1, p57, v3, part1, p29, v4, part 1, pp 14,16,143
(17) Tabarani, who narrated from companions such as Ibn Umar, Malik Ibn al-Hawirath, Habashi Ibn Junadah, Jari, Sa’d Ibn Abi Waqqas, Anas Ibn Malik, Ibn Abbas, Amarah,Buraydah,...
(18) Tarikh, by al-Khatib Baghdadi, v8, p290
(19) Hilyatul Awliya’, by al-Hafiz Abu Nu’aym, v4, p23, v5, pp26-27
(20) al-Istiab, by Ibn Abd al-Barr, Chapter of word "ayn”(‘Ali), v2, p462
(21) Kanzul Ummal, by al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, v6, pp 154,397
(22) al-Mirqat, v5, p568
(23) al-Riyad al-Nadirah, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, v2, p172
(24) Dhaka’ir al-Uqba, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, p68
(25) Faydh al-Qadir, by al-Manawi, v6, p217
(26) Yanabi’ al-Mawaddah, by al-Qudoozi al-Hanafi, p297 ... and hundreds more

LIE NO.1: 'Hadith is not Mutawatir': The Tradition of Ghadir is narrated in parallel (mutawatir) and is proven by the Sunnis to be from numerous chain of transmitters:

1. Ahmad Ibn Hanbal narrated it from 40 chains;
2. Ibn Jarir al-Tabari in more than 70 chains;
3. Abu Sa’id al-Sijistani from 120 chains;
4. Abu Bakir al-Jaabi from 125 chains;
5. al-Amir Muhammad al-Yamani (2nd century) had 150 chains;
6. al-Dhahabi has written a complete book on its chains and passed a verdict that it is Mutawatir; why do you accept the lies of your sheikhs when one of your best hadith scholars of all time wrote a whole book on it saying it is mutawatir?
7. Abul Abbas Ibn `Uqdah has narrated it through 150 chains.

LIE NO.2: Mawla means friend: Countless scholars of Qur’an, Arabic grammar, and literature have said the word mawla is, in this context, 'awla' which means "having most authority."

The following Sunni specialists all confirmed the above meaning: 

1. al-Wahidi (d. 468), in "al-Wasit"

2. al-Akhfash Nahwi (d. 215), in "Nihayat al-Uqul"

3. al-Tha’labi (d. 427), in "al-Kashf wal Bayan"

4. Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276), in "al-Qurtayan", v2, p164

5. al-Kalbi (d. 146, quoted in "Tafsir al-Kabir", by al-Razi, v29, p227)

6. al-Farra’ (as quoted in "Ruhul Ma’ani", by al-Alusi, v27, p178)

7. al-Nasafi (d. 701), in his "Tafsir", v4, p229

8. al-Tabari (d. 310), in "Tafsir al-Tabari", v9, p117

9. al-Bukhari (d. 215), in "Sahih al-Bukhari", v7, p271

10. al-Zamakhshari (d. 538), in "Tafsir al-Kashshaf", v2, p435

11. Qazi Nasiruddin al-Baydawi (d. 692), in "tafsir al-Baydawi", v2, p497

12. al-Khazin al-Baghdadi (d. 741), in his "Tafsir", v4, p229

13. Muhib al-Din al-Afandi, in "Tanzil al-Ayat"

14. Mu’ammar Ibn Muthanna al-Basri (as quoted in "Sharh al-Mawaqif", by al-Sharif al-Jurjani, v3, p271)

15. Abul Abbas Tha’lab (as quoted in "Sharh al-Sab’ah al-Mu’allaqah", by al-Zuzani)

16. Ibn Abbas, in his "Tafsir”written on the margin of Durr al-Manthur, v5, p355

17. Abu al-Saud al-Hanafi (d. 972), in his "Tafsir"

18. and many more such as Yahya Ibn Zaid Kufi (d. 207), Abu Ubaida Basri (d. 210), Abu Zaid Ibn Aus Basri (d. 125), Abu Bakr Anbari (d. 328), Abul Hasan Rummani (d. 384), Sa’d al-Din Taftazani (d. 791), Shaba Uddin Khafaji (d. 1069), Hamzawi Maliki (d. 1303), Husayn Ibn Mas’d (d. 510), Abu Baqa Ukbari (d. 616), Ibn Hajar al-Haythmai (d. 974), Sharif Jurjani (d. 618), Abdul Abbas Mubarrad (d. 285), Abu Nasr Farabi (d. 393) and, Abu Zakariya Khateeb Tarizi (d. 502),...

Only a couple try and cover it up and say it means friend, and you accept their lies. 

LIE NO. 3: Not many people were present so it can't have been that important Narrated by Zaid Ibn Arqam: Abu al-Tufail said: "I heard it from the Messenger of Allah, and there was no one there (out of the 120,000 people on the pilgrimage) unless he saw him with his eyes and heard him with his ears."

Sunni reference:

(1) al-Khasa’is, by al-Nisa’i, p21;

(2) al-Dhahabi said it is sahih (authentic), as said in:

(3) History of Ibn Kathir (sahih) , v5, p208

"The Messenger of Allah called at the height of his voice."

Sunni reference: Manaqib al-Khawarizmi, by al-Khawarizmi, p94

"There were with the Messenger (S) from the companions, Arabs, residents around Mecca and Medina one hundred and twenty thousand and they are those who were present in the Farewell Pilgrimage and heard this speech."

Sunni reference: Manaqib, by Ibn al-Jawzi.

LIE NO. 4: 'there was no oath of allegiance' After his speech, the Messenger of Allah asked every body to give the oath of allegiance to ‘Ali  (as) and congratulate him. Among those who gave him the oath were Umar, Abu Bakr, and Uthman.
It is narrated that Umar and Abu Bakr said:

"Well done Ali Ibn Abi Talib! Today you became the leader of all believing men and women."

Sunni references:

(1) Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v4, p281
(2) Tafsir al-Kabir, by Fakhr al-Razi, v12, pp 49-50
(3) Mishkat al-Masabih, by al-Khatib al-Tabrizi, p557
(4) Habib al-Siyar, by Mir Khand, v1, part3, p144
(5) Kitabul Wilayah, by Ibn Jarir al-Tabari
(6) al-Musannaf, by Ibn Abi Shaybah
(7) al-Musnad, by Abu Ya’ala
(8) Hadith al-Wilayah, by Ahmad Ibn `Uqdah
(9) Tarikh, by Khatib al-Baghdadi, v8, pp 290,596 from Abu Hurayra ... and more.

 

Brothers from Ahlul Sunnah, the conclusion for absolutely everyone is clear, the hadith is mutawatir, the Prophet  (pbuh) appointed Ali  (as) first in authority, there were at least 100,000 people gathered to listen to the announcement, and many of the companions pledged an oath of allegiance. 

 
I strongly advise you to open your eyes, and I challenge any Sunni to refute what has been written.
Edited by Thaqalyn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salaam

It is also mentioned in Hadith al sahihyain that Prophet S.a.w said after Me follow Quran and My Sunnah, in sunnah of Prophet S.a.w itself comes everything even method of loving Ahl al'Bait, which Ahl al'sunnah wa jamah follow till now there are also some deviated sects which loves only Sahaba or only Ahl al'Bait.

Shukran

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salaam

It is also mentioned in Hadith al sahihyain that Prophet S.a.w said after Me follow Quran and My Sunnah, in sunnah of Prophet S.a.w itself comes everything even method of loving Ahl al'Bait, which Ahl al'sunnah wa jamah follow till now there are also some deviated sects which loves only Sahaba or only Ahl al'Bait.

Shukran

 

Here is a logical refutation of why it could not be the word 'Sunnah'. Allah(s.w.a) is just and Rasoulallah(p.b.u.h) only speaks the truth. If he said, follow X and Y and you will never go astray, that is a huge statement and a clear ayat for us. Although we agree what the Quran is, there are many, many sects in Islam and each one of them will say 'We are following the Sunnah of Rasoulallah(p.b.u.h). So there is not agreement between muslims on what is 'Sunnah'. So how could it be that if we follow, the 'Sunnah', we will never go astray. Which Sunnah ? 

 

The Ahl Al Bayt(a.s), there is much more and almost universal agreement on who are the Ahl Al Bayt(a.s). The only difference on this issue between muslims is does the Ahl Al Bayt include the wives of Rasoulallah(p.b.u.h) or not. Other than that there is agreement. So exclusively from a logical perspective, 'Ahl Al Bayt' is much more likely. Also, if you look at the narrations, there are many more narrators who say 'Ahl Al Bayt' vs. 'Sunnah'. 

 

So we agree what X is. If Y=Sunnah, then the statement doesn't make sense. However, if Y=Ahl Al Bayt, then the hadith makes sense. And we know there is an X and a Y since every narration includes an X and a Y both. We need to use our aql on this. 

Edited by Abu Hadi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salaam

It is also mentioned in Hadith al sahihyain that Prophet S.a.w said after Me follow Quran and My Sunnah, in sunnah of Prophet S.a.w itself comes everything even method of loving Ahl al'Bait, which Ahl al'sunnah wa jamah follow till now there are also some deviated sects which loves only Sahaba or only Ahl al'Bait.

Shukran

You have know knowledge. 'Quran and Sunnah' It isn't even in the top six sahih (sihah al Sittah) books of yours, and its narrated with no chain of narrators and is extremely weak like your knowledge. Just look up how authentic it is and you'll find the truth. Even Uthman Khamees, one of the biggest wahaabis in the world admitted its weak. 

This can be easily refuted.

That's the challenge. If you think you can I welcome it.

Edited by Thaqalyn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salaam

It is also mentioned in Hadith al sahihyain that Prophet S.a.w said after Me follow Quran and My Sunnah, in sunnah of Prophet S.a.w itself comes everything even method of loving Ahl al'Bait, which Ahl al'sunnah wa jamah follow till now there are also some deviated sects which loves only Sahaba or only Ahl al'Bait.

Shukran

 

Please quote this where you brought up from

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please quote this where you brought up from

It is from the Muwatta' of Malik and it doesn't even have a chain of narrators. Its laughable how he narrates it. He says 'It was informed to me... . I think it is the only narration in his book without a chain. It is a clear fabrication.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ i had readen that Hadith in Sahih Bukhari hardcopy, not from any site that runs by google shaikhs, Insha'Allah i will find it and post

It is not in any of the sahihain or Sihah al Sittah brother. The only thaqalayn hadith that is present is 'I leave behind for you two weighty the things, the Quran and my progeny Ahlul Bayt, if you hold on to them, you will never go astray after me'- in Sahih Muslim and Jami' Tirmidhi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hadith of Quran and Sunnah is actually quoted in Sahih Burkhari, i have read it myself. However, the problem is its quoted with out chain of narrators.

Edited by power

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen debates and challenges but these things never changes what we expects, only signs and proofs of Allah makes changes which are yet to come, now only hallow people are living like body without souls

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant post, may Allah swt reward you!

 

Sunnis say 'But Mawla has so many meanings'

 

Ok, lets assume that:

 

1. Muhammed pbuh put the word in context.

 

Not only by using Awla before that, but...

 

If Muhammed pbuh said 'WHOMSOEVERS MAWLA I AM'.

 

Now tell me my sunni brothers and sisters, if Mawla can even mean servant, would Muhammed pbuh say 'whomsoevers servant i am'? , Therefore it is only logical that so many alternative meanings of the word Mawla are immediatly discounted.

 

What relationship did Muhammed pbuh have to the muslims? He was their Master.

 

Furthermore, Why would Hazrat Umar say 'congratultions today you become'.

 

If it really was a dispute, why did the Prophet Pbuh not call the people disputing privately, why stop tens and thousands?

 

Why not say 'I hear some among you hate Ali, but you muslims are brothers of one another'.

 

Hazrat Umar's reply clearly indicates it was so much more than that.

 

Think:

 

1. If Ali a.s was mistreated and this was just to clear his name - why would Hazrat Umar congratulate him? Congratulate him for what, something he already was?


It is not in any of the sahihain or Sihah al Sittah brother. The only thaqalayn hadith that is present is 'I leave behind for you two weighty the things, the Quran and my progeny Ahlul Bayt, if you hold on to them, you will never go astray after me'- in Sahih Muslim and Jami' Tirmidhi.

 

 

Someday (after his last pilgrimage) the Messenger of Allah (S) stood to give us a speech beside a pond which is known as Khum (Ghadir Khum) which is located between Mecca and Medina. Then he praised Allah and reminded Him, and then said: "O’ people! Behold! It seems the time approached when I shall be called away (by Allah) and I shall answer that call. Behold! I am leaving for you two precious things. First of them is the book of Allah in which there is light and guidance...The other one is my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. (three times)."

 

Sunni Reference:

 

• Sahih Muslim, Chapter of the virtues of the companions, section of the virtues of ‘Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v 4, p1873, Tradition #36.


It is not in any of the sahihain or Sihah al Sittah brother. The only thaqalayn hadith that is present is 'I leave behind for you two weighty the things, the Quran and my progeny Ahlul Bayt, if you hold on to them, you will never go astray after me'- in Sahih Muslim and Jami' Tirmidhi.

 

he Messenger of Allah (S) said: "I am leaving for you two precious and weighty Symbols that if you adhere to BOTH of them you shall not go astray after me. They are, the Book of Allah, and my progeny, that is my Ahlul-Bayt. The Merciful has informed me that These two shall not separate from each other till they come to me by the Pool (of Paradise)."

 

Sunni references:

1. Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 662-663,328, report of 30+ companions, with reference to several chains of transmitters.

2. al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, Chapter of "Understanding (the virtues) of Companions, v3, pp 109,110,148,533 who wrote this tradition is authentic (Sahih) based on the criteria of the two Shaikhs (al-Bukhari and Muslim).

3. Sunan, by Daarami, v2, p432

4. Musnad, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v3, pp 14,17,26,59, v4, pp 366,370-372, v5, pp 182,189,350,366,419

5. Fadha’il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p585, Tradition #990

6. al-Khasa’is, by al-Nisa’i, pp 21,30

Edited by Logical Islamic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hadith of Quran and Sunnah is actually quoted in Sahih Burkhari, i have read it myself. However, the problem is its quoted with out chain of narrators.

Allah will judge you because you know and I know it isn't in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hadith of Quran and Sunnah is actually quoted in Sahih Burkhari, i have read it myself. However, the problem is its quoted with out chain of narrators.

 

 

^ Since when is a hadith without isnaad and which only exists in your personal memory of any use at all in a debate like this? Why don't you find it and quote your scholars' opinions on that hadith instead? Might work.

Edited by Darth Vader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Salam)

Why do you, Sunni brothers, care more about a few narrations which state the word Sunnah rather than following the authentic Hadiths?

Okay, let's say it was Sunnah. Then what? You think our Prophet (pbuh) wanted people to follow his Sunnah & his Sunnah???

What I mean is, well, there's the famous narration where a companion of our Prophet (pbuh) asks Ayeesha about the Character of our Prophet (pbuh) . & Ayeesha replied: have you not read Al Qur'an? Whatever is in Al Qur'an is his character.

(In order words, his Sunnah) I think You all have enough sense to know that.

So Why would our Prophet (pbuh) ask us to hold on to the same thing?

Also, Sunnah is a vast term. Our Prophet (pbuh) had always been clear in his meanings of what he meant. He (pbuh) taught us things a father would teach to his little child by spoon feeding. Our Prophet (pbuh) clearly stated Al Qur'an & the Ahl Al Bayt (as)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hadith is ridiculously weak anyway brothers. There is no chain. Look at the corruption. Their main hadith is very weak, while our main hadith is in their books and is mutawatir. Before anyone challenges that, al Dhahabi who is one of the biggest wahaabis in history and supposedly a genius in the field of hadith, the student of ibn Taymiyyah who is probably the biggest wahabi in history, had to write a whole book about its authenticity. Thats how many sahih chains there are. Ok, so, 'Quran and Sunnah' has no chain, while 'Quran and progeny Ahlul Bayt' has

1. Ahmad Ibn Hanbal narrated it from 40 chains;

2. Ibn Jarir al-Tabari in more than 70 chains;
3. Abu Sa’id al-Sijistani from 120 chains;
4. Abu Bakir al-Jaabi from 125 chains;
5. al-Amir Muhammad al-Yamani (2nd century) had 150 chains;
6. al-Dhahabi has written a complete book on its chains and passed a verdict that it is Mutawatir; why do you accept the lies of your sheikhs when one of your best hadith scholars of all time wrote a whole book on it saying it is mutawatir?
7. Abul Abbas Ibn `Uqdah has narrated it through 150 chains.

 

 

The biggest hadith lie in the history of this religion is the 'Quran and Sunnah' hadith. Even if it was narrated, who do we get the Sunnah from? If it said, 'Quran and the first couple of Caliphs' then ok. But it doesn't. It says 'Quran and progeny Ahlul Bayt' so the authority after Rasullallah (pbuh) is the Quran and his progeny. The truth is so clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Allah will judge you because you know and I know it isn't in there.

 

 

Allah swt will judge me for reading a Hadith in Sahih Burkhari??  Well thats something that i have never come across before! Anyway, have you personally read every edition  of Sahih Burkhari ? That has  been published  over 200 years?? Are you even aware over the  past 100 years or so, that Sunni have been removing Hadith from there own books Including Sahih Burkhari?? Just because you haven't seen it or read it, it dose not mean it did not exist. 
 
I will find you  that  extract from Sahih Burkhari.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't you find it and quote YOUR scholars' opinions on that hadith instead? 

 

 

 
 
 
Your scholar?? What the hell are you implying? If any Shia person or Ullmas  quote's Sunni Scholars, they become their scholars ? It's quite shallow  of you to make such comment!!!
Edited by power

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...