Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله
Sign in to follow this  
RiseOrDie

2012 Hadith Timeframe, Possible Alignment

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

(salam)

Whats funny is that today, here in Canada(OTTAWA), we are experiencing the HOTTEST day of our Winter so far.

Usually this week was cold, reaching at about -10 degrees Celsius, while today we saw +10 Celsius..

STRANGE and even STRANGER that you mentioned the solar flares for today WOW

Edited by Abbas0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ one2look4

We still can't be too sure

for all we know 2012 could be another trap, for example they hype the people up about 2012 but then nothing happens. There will be such disapointment in 2013 that many people will abandon religion all together.

But so far 2012 hasn't been disapointing..

I don't think 2012 is a trap (altough it could definitivly be). What I think is that, Because Dajjal will stay on earth for 40 days:

"For forty days, one day like a year, one day like a month, one day like a week, and the rest of the days will be like your days".

If, as many say, The day like a year was when Dajjal ruled Britain, The day like a month was when Dajjal ruled America, so the day like a week must be when Dajjal ruled through Israel. AND I think that 2012 is the start of Dajjals "kingdom" in Israel.

This is an example of it : http://www.presstv.ir/detail/230503.html

A few years back it was always USA doing the job!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the Chinese Workers in Syria Are Back Home - March 7th 2012

This is exactly what the Chinese did just before NATO started their air strikes on Libya on March 19th 2011.

35,860 Chinese evacuated from unrest-torn Libya - March 3rd 2011

Iraq invasion by USA - March 19th 2003

Libya bombing by NATO - March 19th 2011

Iranian New Year festival of Nowruz on March 20th 2012

This festival is also celebrated by Alawites.

President Assad is an Alawite.

Syria military intervention to coincide with Eve of Ostara (Ishtar) or Vernal Equinox ritual

between March 19th - March 21st 2012

According to some researchers, in Illuminati lore, the Spring Equinox is considered a Minor Sabbath but still requires human sacrifice. March 21-22 is dedicated Goddess Ostara (Ishtar, also spelled, “Eostre”), for whom “Easter” is named. March 21 is one of the Illuminati’s Human Sacrifice Night. Ishtar was the Babylonian goddess of fertility, love and war. Her name derives from the words for “Dawn”.

Is it a coincidence that the name of the military operation in Libya is “Operation Odyssey Dawn”? Are we looking at another mega-ritual?

WORLD Al-QUDS MARCH/RALLY ON 30-MARCH-2012, IN WHICH 1 MILLION PEOPLE FROM AROUND THE WORLD WILL OBSERVE PROTEST-MARCH TO PALESTINE.

WORLD Al-QUDS MARCH/RALLY ON 30-MARCH-2012, IN WHICH 1 MILLION PEOPLE FROM AROUND THE WORLD WILL OBSERVE PROTEST-MARCH TO PALESTINE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How Iran might respond to Israeli attack

_58884019_58884015.jpg

Iran has the largest and most diverse ballistic missile arsenal in the Middle East

Iran nuclear crisis

Iran has made it clear that if it is attacked either by Israel or the United States it will respond in kind. But just what could Iran do to strike back?

What would be the consequences, both in the region and inside Iran itself?

Indeed, could the potential consequences of an Israeli strike be so serious as to make military action the least preferable option in terms of constraining Iran's nuclear programme?

Long-distance missiles

"Iran's ability to strike back directly against Israel is limited," says Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Programme at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).

"Its antiquated air force is totally outclassed by the Israelis and it has only a limited number of ballistic missiles that could reach Israel."

_58891378_mig29.jpg

Iran's air force, which includes Mig-29s, is not seen as a match for its Israeli or US counterparts

Mr Fitzpatrick says Iran's missile arsenal includes "a modified version of the Shahab-3, the Ghadr-1, which has a range of 1,600km (995 miles), but Iran only has about six transporter-erector launchers for the missile".

"Iran's new solid-fuelled missile, the Sajjil-2, can also reach Israel, but it is not yet fully operational," he adds.

But, Mr Fitzpatrick argues that "both of these missiles are too inaccurate to have any effect against military targets when armed with conventional weapons".

"Nor are they a very effective way to deliver chemical or biological weapons, and Iran does not have nuclear weapons."

In summary, he believes that "an Iranian missile strike would be only a symbolic gesture".

Enlisting allies

_58891201_58891200.jpg

Hezbollah is said to have thousands of rocket launchers in Lebanon

Mr Fitzpatrick believes Iran is more likely to respond against Israel "asymmetrically, and through proxies". Its ally, the Shia Islamist group Hezbollah, has more than 10,000 rocket launchers in southern Lebanon, many of them supplied by Iran.

"These are mostly 25km-range (16-mile) Katyushas, but also Fahr-3 (45km; 28 miles), Fajr-5 (75km; 47 miles), Zelzal-2 (200km; 124 miles) and potentially Fateh-110 (200km) plus about 10 Scud-D missiles that can pack a 750kg (1,653lb) payload and hit all of Israel."

He says that the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, could also attack Israel with shorter-range rockets.

The great danger here is of a more extensive conflict breaking out either between Israel and Hezbollah, or Israel and Hamas.

With so much instability in the Middle East - not least because of the Syria crisis - there is a very real risk of an Israeli strike sparking a much broader regional conflagration.

Naval action in the Gulf

The Iranian Navy, and especially the naval arm of its Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), are well-equipped with small, fast craft capable of laying mines or swarming attacks against larger vessels.

Iran also deploys capable land-based anti-shipping missiles.

_58890963_strait_hormuz_464map.gif

These could all be used to close off the vital oil artery - the Strait of Hormuz.

The US Navy is confident that it could re-open the Strait. But this risks an extended naval conflict between the US and Iran, and in the short term, there could be a significant impact upon oil prices.

Covert action

Daniel Byman, a counter-terrorism expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington, says there is also "considerable concern that Iran and groups like the Lebanese Hezbollah might engage in terror attacks in the wake of an Israeli air strike".

"Iran has at times used such attacks to strike out at enemies, particularly those it cannot hit by other means," he adds.

There is already, he points out, a kind of clandestine war under way.

"Israel and Iran are already striking at each other (Israel with more success and doing so in a way that is more targeted)," Mr Byman explains, referring to the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists.

"I'm not sure Israel would increase attacks in the wake of a strike," he notes, "but Iran would."

Continue reading the main story

Iran's ballistic missile arsenal

Shahab-1 - Based on the Scud-B. Has a range of about 300km (185 miles) and uses liquid fuel, which involves a time-consuming launch

Shahab-2 - Based on the Scud-C. Has a range of about 500km (310 miles)

Shahab-3 - Based on the North Korean Nodong missile. Has a range of about 900km (560 miles) and a nominal payload of 1,000kg (2,205lb)

Ghadr-1 - Modified version of the Shahab-3, with a range of about 1,600km (1,000 miles). Carries a smaller, 750kg (1,654lb) warhead

Sajjil-2 - Surface-to-surface missile with a range of 2,200km (1,375 miles). Uses solid fuel, which offers strategic advantages, and carries a 750kg warhead

Mr Byman is uncertain about how effective such Iranian operations might be.

"Iran's reported attempted attacks in India and Thailand show it remains determined to strike at Israel, presumably in retaliation for Israeli killings of Hezbollah figures like Imad Mughniyeh and the suspected attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists."

"However, these recent attacks were not well executed, suggesting that Iran's services' professionalism is uneven," he argues.

Overall, experts believe that the Iranian government is going to have to calibrate its response to any attack carefully.

Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told me: "If they respond too little, they could lose face, and if they respond too much, they could lose their heads."

"Iran will want to respond enough to inflame the regional security environment and negatively impact the global economy - in order to bring down international condemnation of the US or Israel - but stop short of doing anything that could invite massive reprisals from the United States."

"Frankly," Mr Sadjadpour says, "I'm not sure how they do that. If Iran tries to destabilise world energy supplies - whether launching missiles into Saudi Arabia's oil-rich eastern province or attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz - the US isn't going to stand aside idly."

In the wake of any attack on its facilities, Iran might well, of course, go to the UN to seek some kind of diplomatic redress. This highlights a crucial set of legal questions relating to any military operation.

International law

For all the uncertainties as to whether Israel would attack Iran and indeed how Iran might respond, one thing is clear - in terms of international law, such a strike would be illegal.

_58891197_58891196.jpg

The US-led invasion of Iraq resulted in a conflict that cost thousands of lives and cost billions of dollars

Professor Mary Ellen O'Connell, professor of international law at the University of Notre Dame, says for it to be considered legal, "the UN Security Council would need to authorise such a strike, because Iran has not launched an armed attack on either Israel or the United States".

"The UN Charter," she says, "makes clear that the use of force is generally prohibited unless a state is acting in self-defence to an armed attack occurring, or has Security Council authorisation."

Israel, of course, would probably claim to be acting in some pre-emptive sense to forestall a future nuclear attack from Iran (though nobody yet believes Iran has a nuclear bomb). But Professor O'Connell says that an Israeli strike would still not be legitimate.

"There is a lively debate among international lawyers as to the point at which a state may respond to an armed attack: must it be under way or merely imminent?"

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

As some senior American military officials have said, bombing Iran is the fastest way to ensure an Iranian bomb”

End Quote Trita Parsi President, National Iranian American Council

"There is virtually no support among experts for attacking to 'pre-empt' a hypothetical future attack."

But surely countries do what they believe they have to do when vital interests are seen to be at stake?

For example, Nato attacked Serbia and Serbian forces in Kosovo, and the US and its allies invaded Iraq - both examples lacked UN Security Council approval.

Professor O'Connell says that in both cases, the illegal use of force came with costly penalties.

"Compare those two conflicts," she notes, "to the lawful use of force to liberate Kuwait after Iraq's invasion. The United States came out of that conflict with a financial and moral gain."

Casualties

Many will also raise the question of the potential casualties that any Israeli strike might cause, especially since the operation would not be sanctioned by international law.

_58891386_58891385.jpg

There is widespread support inside Iran for the country's controversial nuclear programme

Without knowing the targets to be hit, the timing of any strikes, and the likelihood of them being hit again, it is hard to determine potential casualty figures.

Experts say that the functioning nuclear reactor at Bushehr is unlikely to be a target due to the fact that it has nothing to do with a potential military programme and radiation leakage could cause widespread civilian casualties. But, of course, aircraft can be downed and bombs and other air-launched weapons can go astray.

There are, in addition, another set of Iranian reactions to any strike that matter.

How would Iranians themselves respond to any attack? What would be the impact upon Iran's nuclear programme? And what would be the implications for the Islamic regime in Iran itself?

For now, it seems unclear that Iran has actually yet taken any decision to press ahead with a nuclear weapons programme.

Domestic factor

But Trita Parsi, author of the recently published, A Single Roll of the Dice - Obama's Diplomacy With Iran, says that if Israel attacks, Iran's position will change considerably.

"I have not come across any observer who does not believe that the Iranian government's determination and desire for a nuclear deterrent would increase several-fold if Iran is attacked."

_58890965_58890964.jpg

A military strike might rally Iranians around Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

The US assessment, he says, is that in the wake of an Israeli attack "the Iranians will push their program further underground, exit (or threaten to exit) the Non-Proliferation Treaty, kick out the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors and dash for a bomb".

"As some senior American military officials have said, bombing Iran is the fastest way to ensure an Iranian bomb," he adds.

Mr Parsi, who is president of the National Iranian American Council, also says that an Israeli attack would have political implications inside Iran too.

"The Iranian regime is deeply unpopular and the wounds from their massive human rights abuses since the 2009 election are still open and bleeding."

The regime, he adds, "has thus far failed to overcome this division with the people".

"However, an attack on Iran, particularly if the bombing campaign also results in high civilian casualties, will likely unite warring factions in Iran against the external aggressor."

"This is what happened in 1980 with Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran."

"The attack helped consolidate Ayatollah Khomeini's grip on power, fuel nationalism and revolutionary zeal, and suspend the internal power struggles. The Iranian regime didn't survive in spite of Saddam's attack, but because of it."

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

How do you reach a rapprochement with a regime that needs you as an adversary for its own ideological legitimacy?”

End Quote Karim Sadjadpour Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

That should be a sobering thought for Western and Israeli policy-makers, who from time to time flirt with the idea of regime change in Iran.

It all suggests a stark conclusion - even a militarily successful attack from Israel's point of view will only delay Iran's nuclear programme for a few years.

It might indeed confirm Iran in its desire to obtain a nuclear weapon. It might rally the Iranian population around the regime. And the regional consequences of any air strikes could be considerable; at worst precipitating conflict in the Gulf and on Israel's own borders.

Diplomacy

No wonder, then, that the Obama administration seems to be trying to dissuade Israel from any attack - at least for now.

Many experts believe that there is still mileage in allowing sanctions to take their course but also - even now - in reaching out diplomatically to Tehran.

"Diplomacy has certainly not been exhausted," Trita Parsi told me. "The diplomatic efforts in the past few years have been few and short-lived," he notes.

"Political space for the type of sustained talks that are needed to generate a breakthrough has not existed in Washington or in Tehran. Rather than real negotiations, we have seen an exchange of ultimatums."

Karim Sadjadpour also thinks it may be worth another diplomatic push. But he feels the potential results will inevitably be limited.

"How do you reach a rapprochement with a regime that needs you as an adversary for its own ideological legitimacy?" he asks.

"Realistically," he concludes, "I think dialogue with Tehran can at best contain our differences with Iran, but it won't resolve them."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ i don't buy this analysis .. sounds like a very hopeful israel sympathizer ..

And the regional consequences of any air strikes could be considerable; at worst precipitating conflict in the Gulf and on Israel's own borders.

that's a very optimistic statement on their behalf ..

i don't know how much longer Allah will let His enemies play around, but i sure have hopes that the only Islamic country will put a lid on it soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the Chinese Workers in Syria Are Back Home - March 7th 2012

This is exactly what the Chinese did just before NATO started their air strikes on Libya on March 19th 2011.

35,860 Chinese evacuated from unrest-torn Libya - March 3rd 2011

Iraq invasion by USA - March 19th 2003

Libya bombing by NATO - March 19th 2011

Iranian New Year festival of Nowruz on March 20th 2012

This festival is also celebrated by Alawites.

President Assad is an Alawite.

Syria military intervention to coincide with Eve of Ostara (Ishtar) or Vernal Equinox ritual

between March 19th - March 21st 2012

According to some researchers, in Illuminati lore, the Spring Equinox is considered a Minor Sabbath but still requires human sacrifice. March 21-22 is dedicated Goddess Ostara (Ishtar, also spelled, “Eostre”), for whom “Easter” is named. March 21 is one of the Illuminati’s Human Sacrifice Night. Ishtar was the Babylonian goddess of fertility, love and war. Her name derives from the words for “Dawn”.

Is it a coincidence that the name of the military operation in Libya is “Operation Odyssey Dawn”? Are we looking at another mega-ritual?

WORLD Al-QUDS MARCH/RALLY ON 30-MARCH-2012, IN WHICH 1 MILLION PEOPLE FROM AROUND THE WORLD WILL OBSERVE PROTEST-MARCH TO PALESTINE.

WORLD Al-QUDS MARCH/RALLY ON 30-MARCH-2012, IN WHICH 1 MILLION PEOPLE FROM AROUND THE WORLD WILL OBSERVE PROTEST-MARCH TO PALESTINE.

Interesting

Have you heard about the 188 days cycle?

Like a major earthquake happens every 188 days since 2009.

FIJI QUAKE 9/15, 188 days after the JAPAN QUAKE 3/11, 188 days after the CHRISTCHURCH QUAKE 9/3, 188 days after the CHILE QUAKE 2/27

the next 188 days is expected at MARCH 21, 2012.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting

Have you heard about the 188 days cycle?

Like a major earthquake happens every 188 days since 2009.

FIJI QUAKE 9/15, 188 days after the JAPAN QUAKE 3/11, 188 days after the CHRISTCHURCH QUAKE 9/3, 188 days after the CHILE QUAKE 2/27

the next 188 days is expected at MARCH 21, 2012.

Yes, I also guess that Israel/USA might attack Iran on their Nowroz Day i.e. around 21-March-2012, so 188 days be completed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can somebody PLEASE explain who Ahmad Al Hassan Al Yamani is? He's everywhere on youtube, and it seems like people are acctually following him.

A-salamu-alaykoom (salam)

Ahmad Al Hassan Al Yamani is a dajjal(meaning he is a deceiver) who's lying to shias claiming he's the son of Imam Mahdi (aj) and the prophesied Al Yamani spoken about from our beloved Ahlul-Bayt.

Imam Ali (pbuhaf): said "... And be careful of the Dajjals from the children of Fatima. Indeed there are some from the children of Fatima who are Dajjals. One Dajjal will come from the river of Basra, and he is not from me, and he is the first of all the Dajjals."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have also been researching on illuminati and other things from the past few years. but u got a good job and done very good research according to hadith. i know maximum portion u explain but i didnot research it linking with hadith .may Allah help u more . i have one question what will be the role of Pakistan in the scenario.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am expected attack in London this year

That is too!

Mayan Empire Collapse-Warning for Us

Climate change may have caused Mayan civilization's collapse.

For unknown reasons, the ancient Mayan civilization then disintegrated more than a millennium ago. The number of people declined catastrophically to a fraction of the empire's former size, and the ruins of its great cities are now largely overgrown by jungle.

0224-mayan_full_380.jpg

MEXICO CITY, Feb. 24 (UPI) -- Relatively mild drought may have caused the collapse of the classic Maya civilization in what is now southern Mexico and Guatemala, researchers say.

It had long been believed that prolonged severe drought caused the collapse of the civilization in around 950 A.D, but Mexican and British researchers now think seasonal water supplies in the region could have been exhausted by a small but sustained drop in rainfall.

Researchers from Britain's University of Southampton collaborated in the research with the Yucatan Center for Scientific Research in southern Mexico.

http://globalrumblings.blogspot.com/2012/02/mayan-empire-collapse-warning-for-us.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should you be alive at that time, for India and Pakistan it will be easier for you to join the Khorasani Army if your family's survival and secuirity are both assured.

Next month is Jumada Al Awal, and then Jumada Al Thani and then Rajab.

Anyway check this Freemason Albert Pike

Another%20Albert%20Pike.jpg

Albert Pike received a demonic vision, described below. On January 22, 1870, Pike and one of his international co-conspirators, Guiseppe Mazzini, published the Plan which would establish the New World Order. This Plan was kept very secret, only within Freemasonry circles since the time of its inception, known only to fellow occult Illuminist conspirators. (This information is taken from a book from a former Luciferian Illuminist, Doc Marquis. His book is "Secrets of the Illuminati" and reveals much formerly hidden detail known only to Illuminists).

The secret Pike plan to control the world foresaw the need for three world wars. Stop here for a moment to remember the date of this prediction: January 22, 1870. This date is 44 years before the beginning of World War I. Once you understand the facts we are about to share with you and realize the length of time between this prediction and the beginning of its fulfillment, you can understand how supernatural forces were truly in command. Further, January 22, 1870, is occulticly significant also. The number 22 is one of the three important occultic primary numbers (11, 22, and 33).

The Pike Plan to overthrow the Judeo-Christian Old World Order, and establish the Satanic New World Order foresaw the need for war. However, this war was not the type of warfare the world had seen historically. This war was to be on a much larger scale than history had ever recorded. This war was to be global, or world-wide.

The details of this Pike Plan for three (3) World Wars to establish the New World Order is as follows: (As you are reading this demonic prophecy, remember the occult concept of Thesis battling Antithesis to produce the new system, Synthesis, as covered in NEWS1007, http://www.cuttinged...news/n1007.html .

World Wars I & II were fought to establish Antithesis, to set up the Cold War, that "controlled conflict or threat of conflict" that would produce the new system, Synthesis, the New World Order).

I. The First World War was designed to enable the Czarist Government in Russia to be finally and completely overthrown. The new Russian government was foreseen to be atheistic and militaristic. Further, Pike specified that this new Russian Government was to be Communistic. Karl Marx had published his Communist Manifesto in 1848, exactly 22 years before this occultic prophecy through Albert Pike. Isn't it interesting that the occultic number 22 keeps popping up?

History records that this First World War did, indeed, occur just as listed, above. The Western powers in Europe, in conjunction with the United States, financed Lenin's expedition into Russia, they financed his government consistently, and we have financed Russian Communism at least once per decade since then, just to keep it afloat.

II. The Second World War was foreseen to originate between Great Britain and Germany. However, one of the planned results of this war was to strengthen the new Communist Russian government, so that it could weaken and destroy other governments and religions.

History again records that the Second World War did, indeed, accomplish this objective. The war started when Germany invaded Poland, causing Great Britain to declare war on Germany. Very soon, the troika (3's) of powers were set up to wage this war. The Black Magick occultists allied themselves when Germany linked with Italy and Japan; the White Magic occultists allied themselves together as Great Britain linked with the United States and Russia. Do not be deceived. This war was fought between two (2) New World Order forces, the "evil" alliance of the Axis Powers and the "good" alliance of the Allied Powers; the war was between the Black Magick forces against the White Magic forces.

Certainly, the Pike vision of the Second World War building Russian Communism into a super power was fulfilled to a startling degree. Historians have always been mystified as to how Churchill and Roosevelt could have given away all of Eastern Europe to the Soviets, when the preponderance of power was clearly against the Soviets. Clearly, when Roosevelt and Churchill ceded all of Eastern Europe to Russia, the Communist Government of Russia, now known as the U.S.S.R. {Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) completed its transition to a super power, exactly as Pike's vision had foretold. And, let us not forget that the Second World War had given Russia capabilities it had not possessed before the War. Not only did we build up the Russian military to a frightful degree, but we had also built entire factories East of Moscow that gave Russia an instant manufacturing base. Even though Russia had paid dearly in human lives during the War, they came out of the conflict a superpower. Thanks to Roosevelt, Russia now had a kingdom to go along with its new military and industrial base.

Now, you know that Freemason President Roosevelt gave this territory to Russia simply and only because he was being true to Pike's vision of 1870!! You will never read this true history in any of your books!!

III. The Third World War was foreseen to be between Judaism and Islam. This prophecy is incredible in many ways, beginning with the understanding that this prophecy of a third world war occurred in 1870, a time when Israel did not exist as a nation, and when no one except Fundamentalist, Bible-believing Christians believed it would ever exist again.

Watch the events in Israel very carefully, because the final chapter is being written there. The demonic 'guiding spirits' of Freemasonry, of the leaders of the New World Order Plan, are planning a final, definitive Third World War, which will begin between Israel and her Arab neighbors and spread to the entire world. Literally, out of the smoke and destruction of this Third World War, Antichrist will come striding!

Now, we can return to our current article, with the basis of understanding needed to comprehend the situation for what it truly is, i.e., the final stage being prepared for the planned World War III.

"Pakistan will have fulfilled its role as incubator for the Islamic Nuclear Bomb. It is expected that Syria will be the planned spark that ignites the war by bringing its troops close to Israel's borders on the Golan and Lebanon, provoking Israel into a no-choice preemptive strike. This will provide the justification for the other war pact members to join Syria while giving the West an excuse to not protest the Arab armies' assault."

http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1056.html

This article was written prior to the Arab Spring, but they still insisted that the spark for world war 3 would be Syria.

I also would like to add; that Communism and the USSR were just zionist puppets, this explains why Hitler attacked the Soviet Union in 1941, he knew that if he doesnt then they will attack him. Later they used the Soviet Union to start a weapons arms race only objective was to make the US only stronger and arm the world. when the US was built militiraly, they collapsed the USSR.

the Red marked bit is interesting, So their Antichrist will not be the same dajjal we believe in, their Antichrist will be a Muslim who will rule for 7 years. And he comes after world war 3... this people are deluded

this people dont joke around, they want their dajjal and they want him now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the book Epoch Of Appearance, Mr. Ali Korani mentions that Sufyani LA exits from the beginning to the end, would take fifteen months. Since March 2011, there has been unrest in Syria. 15 months later, Sufyani LA will show himself, as Ahadees mention that Sufyani LA will appear in Rajab. Well, 15 months from March 2011 is May 2012, which is Rajab 1433 this year. Just speculations, wait and watch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ that's an interesting one !! mashaAllah

.. ironic isn't it ?!?! we are kind of looking forwards to the evilest man to emerge to get it over with .. because once he's out we can b sure the mahdi will follow shortly thereafter right ?? i don't know the exact sequence ( of who comes out first .. it's the sufiani right?? ), but let's hope that it all plays out soon, and that all our loved ones and families remain safe and Allah takes care of us in this world and the next inshaAllah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It does Not make sense to me why everyone is waiting For Imam Mahdi(May Allah Hasten His Return)...Why can't everyone seek ILM and Prepare for the Judgement Day :donno: :donno: :donno: :donno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So wait , Its a Matter Decreed , Insha Allah Shall Happen...

But Waiting Will Not be Enough For You...Niether for Me...

We Need To Prepare Ourself

I mean when I say Seek ILM...You prepare Yourself...So that ye receive your Imam.. :donno:

If you won't have much Proper ILM ...You shall Reject Him...

I do not need to give Examples.

History itself is the Proof

Prophet Moses Rejected By Pagan Egyptians (Lacked Knowledge)

Prophet Esa Rejected By a Part of Foolish Jews(Lacked Knowledge)

Prophet Muhammadh Rejected By Pagans Of Arabs

And These were Prophets(Peace Be Upon Them All)

He is Just a Imam / Caliphate

and

Not a Prophet.

So see How Much Tougher For Him...

I Hope I make Clear what I mean't.... :donno: :donno: :donno:

ateef,

your post does not make any sense to us, so we are anxiously carry on waiting for our beloved Maula ASWS AJTFS, and ofcourse by doing good deeds.

Whats the Best Deed's You Speaking About ???? Like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard that syed khorasani have a sign in his right hand .many people think he may be ayatullah Khamenai because his right hand is paralyzed due to bomb attack in 1981.whats your opinion on that.Allah know best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard that syed khorasani have a sign in his right hand .many people think he may be ayatullah Khamenai because his right hand is paralyzed due to bomb attack in 1981.whats your opinion on that.Allah know best.

Might be possible, Allaah knows the all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard that syed khorasani have a sign in his right hand .many people think he may be ayatullah Khamenai because his right hand is paralyzed due to bomb attack in 1981.whats your opinion on that.Allah know best.

(bismillah)

I also heard lot about that...

Can someone please post a source of above hadiths/riwayat.....Thanks.

Edited by ali313

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(bismillah)

I also heard lot about that...

Can someone please post a source of above hadiths/riwayat.....Thanks.

امام محمد باقر (ع) فرمود: جوان (مردی) از بنى هاشم كه نشانی در دست راست خود دارد با بيرقهاى سياهى از طرف خراسان خروج ميكند كه شعيب بن صالح در جلو او خواهد بود و با پیروان سفيانى جنگ كرده آن‏ها را شكست ميدهد

(الملاحم و الفتن- ص52- باب97)

امام الباقر (علیه الیلام) قال: يخرج شاب من بني هاشم بكفه اليمنى خال من خراسان برايات سود بين يديه شعيب بن صالح يقاتل أصحاب السفياني فيهزمهم

Imam Baqir (as) said: A young (faced) man will rise from Bani-Hasheem with a sign in his right hand and will come from Khorasan with black flags; in front of him is Shuaib bin Saleh fighting with Sofiani followers and defeating them. (Malahem va Fetan- P52- B97)

Edited by RiseOrDie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

امام محمد باقر (ع) فرمود: جوان (مردی) از بنى هاشم كه نشانی در دست راست خود دارد با بيرقهاى سياهى از طرف خراسان خروج ميكند كه شعيب بن صالح در جلو او خواهد بود و با پیروان سفيانى جنگ كرده آن‏ها را شكست ميدهد

(الملاحم و الفتن- ص52- باب97)

امام الباقر (علیه الیلام) قال: يخرج شاب من بني هاشم بكفه اليمنى خال من خراسان برايات سود بين يديه شعيب بن صالح يقاتل أصحاب السفياني فيهزمهم

Imam Baqir (as) said: A young (faced) man will rise from Bani-Hasheem with a sign in his right hand and will come from Khorasan with black flags; in front of him is Shuaib bin Saleh fighting with Sofiani followers and defeating them. (Malahem va Fetan- P52- B97)

(salam)

With that being said.. We can only assure that Isreal probably won't attack Iran, but will have the SUFYANI to do so when he rises, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...