Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
ShiaChat.com
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

The So Called Yemeni By Hashemstudios

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • Advanced Member

^^ The hadith is authentic and yes it will happen inshallah if Allah swt wills very soon.

It simply means Khorassani Yemani and Sufyani all rise on the same day for a big big battle that pretty much divides the war.

This would be the beginning to world war 3 between us Muslims.

We are soon to see why this will happen. I believe Yemani is Sayed Hassan Nasrallah and something will happen that'll involve Lebanon further into the Syrian conflict therefore leading him to rise on the same day the figure Sufayni will rise and Khorassani will come to aid the shias as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot makes such interpretations. Then we will have to say that Sufyani will not rise from Sham, but his native is from Sham. So we can perhaps then expect Sufyani to come from Saudi Arabia or India for all we can conjure up since his native is what matters. In hadith the rise of Sufyani from Sham and Yamani from Yemen has been put side by side. If you make such loose knots for one, you must lay the same possibilities for the other, unless all this then does not make sense for you anymore.

Edited by MAFHHM
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member

prophet mohamed peace be upon him and his familly said the depth man that Allah defeat the enemy tpon his hands his name is NASRE(nasre mean victory in arabic) and then rassul Allah said but was called victory(nasre) because Allah give him victory .i hope that i translate well 2 second hadith a man fighting at the gates of jerusalem (alkodss)im from me and im from him ( sayed HASSAN NASRALLAH is from imam hussayn) but called nasre(victory) because Allah write the victory on his hands . about yamani and who say that im seeing imam mahdi the imam mahdi said on his last testament before ghayba kobra who claim that im seeing me after that is a liar . O Ali Ibn Muhammad Samari! May Allah increase the reward of your brothers concerning you (i.e. your demise)! Death will come to you within the next six days. So you complete your works and do not nominate any person after you. The sequence of special deputies will come to an end and the Major Occultation (غيبت كبرى) will commence with your demise.

Now the reappearance will occur only with the permission of Allah, after a prolonged period and after the hearts of people are hardened. And such a period will emerge on my Shias when people will claim that they have seen me. Whoever makes such a claim before the advent of Sufyani and the heavenly voice, is a liar, an impostor. There is no strength and power save that of Allah, the High, the Great.”

As stated above, when the people enquired from Ali Ibn Muhammad Samari (r.a.) about his successor, he advanced this letter unto them. Shaikh Tabarsi (r.a.) narrates that some of these people noted down the contents of the letter and left. They returned on the sixth day and found Ali Ibn Muhammad Samari in a state of illness, grappling with death pangs. They enquired once again,

‘Who is your successor?’ He replied,

‘To Allah belongs the affair (of succession), He will fulfill it.’

These were the last words of his life.

One can refer to the following books for this Tawqee’: Al Ghaybah by Shaikh at-Tusi (r.a.), p. 593; Kamaaluddin vol. 2, p. 615; Al Ehtejaaj, vol. 2, p. 874; Bihar al-Anwar vol. 51, p. 63, vol. 25, p. 151 and vol. 35, p. 813; E’laamul Waraa’ p. 714; Yaumul Khalaas (Persian tr.) vol. 1, p. 403; Ayanush Shiah (Persian tr.) p. 55; Muntakhabul Asar (Old Edn.) p. 993; Yanaabiul Mawaddah (Urdu) p. 517.

Analysis of The Tawqee’

A meaningful investigation of the above Tauqee’ indicates that Imam (a.t.f.s.) has drawn the attention of Ali Ibn Muhammad Samari (r.a.) towards various important aspects. Apart from this, this Tauqee’ is also a conclusive proof of the existence of the Imam (a.t.f.s.) for those who deny it and ridicule the Shias for it.

Some of these aspects are noted here:

1. The prophecy made by Imam (a.t.f.s.) about the demise of Ali Ibn Muhammad Samari (r.a.) within six days. The accuracy of the prophecy proved that the Tauqee’ was issued from none other than Imam az-Zaman (a.t.f.s.).

2. Imam (a.t.f.s.) ordered Ali Ibn Muhammad Samari (r.a.) not to appoint any person as his successor. With this decree, Imam (a.t.f.s.) sealed the only door for all to meet him directly. The decree was a pointer to the fact that in the future (during the Major Occultation), none would be able to meet Imam (a.t.f.s.) as and when he pleased. It also implies that there would be no ‘designated’ special deputy during the Major Occultation, thus falsifying any claimant to that position.

3. The Tawqee’ marked the commencement of the Major Occultation.

4. Imam (a.t.f.s.) will not reappear but with the permission of Allah.

5. It made it abundantly clear that any person who claimed to meet or to be able to meet Imam (a.t.f.s.) at will would be a liar, an impostor.An Objection

There is a seeming contradiction in the Tawqee’. On one hand we see that if a person claims to meet Imam az-Zaman (a.s.), he is a liar. However, on the other hand, there are numerous incidents and events reported in books where not only scholars, but also ordinary people have met Imam (a.t.f.s.) and have reported such meetings.

Reply

Allamah Majlisi (r.a.) has replied to the above objection at two places in his book, Bihar al-Anwar. His reply is beneficial even to the scholars after him. We clarify his position on the above issue as follows:

1. As reported by illustrious scholars, one reason could be that the one who claims to have met Imam (a.t.f.s.) would use this claim to place himself as a special deputy and cheat the people. Since there are several incidents of people having met Imam (a.t.f.s.), it is clear that the scholars believe that the Tawqee’ does not reject the possibility of meeting and seeing Imam (a.t.f.s.), it only rejects the appointment of a special deputy after Ali Ibn Muhammad Samari (r.a.).

2. It is also possible that the one who contends to be able to see Imam (a.t.f.s.) is a liar and an impostor if he maintains that he can get a meeting with Imam (a.t.f.s.) at will. Anyone who makes such a preposterous claim in the Major Occultation is a pretender and deserves to be snubbed.

So, meeting Imam (a.t.f.s.) is not rejected outright in the Tawqee’. It is just that in the Major Occultation, meeting Imam (a.t.f.s.) voluntarily is not possible. Rather Imam (a.t.f.s.) will meet whosoever he wants and hence, the choice of the meeting lies with Imam az-Zaman (a.t.f.s.) and not with the people.

<a name="9">The Conclusion of the Chain of Special Deputies

Ayatullah Baqar Al-Sadr (r.a.), writes, “The transformation of the Minor Occultation into the Major Occultation signifies that the objectives and aims of the Minor Occultation had been adequately fulfilled.

This elaborate programme protected the Shias from the difficulties arising from the occultation of Imam (a.t.f.s.) and gradually, they made a mental shift from the special deputies and accustomed themselves to referring their religious matters to the scholars.

Thus the responsibility to represent the Imam (a.t.f.s.) in the Major Occultation fell upon the just, religious jurisprudents and it became obligatory for the people to follow their rulings in worldly as well as religious matters.”

This viewpoint is endorsed by the famous tradition of Imam az-Zaman (a.t.f.s.) which is regularly quoted, ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member

w/s

aren't these the same guys who claim that Ayt. Sistani (may Allah protect him) is the dajjal (na'udhubillah!)

They say this about all Grand Ayatollahs. Sistan is just one of them but they believe that the heads of all of these scholars will roll because they rejectr their yemani.

I believe this movement is zionist in nature. Look at their symbol for the movement and you'll see its the zionist star.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...

You cannot makes such interpretations. Then we will have to say that Sufyani will not rise from Sham, but his native is from Sham. So we can perhaps then expect Sufyani to come from Saudi Arabia or India for all we can conjure up since his native is what matters. In hadith the rise of Sufyani from Sham and Yamani from Yemen has been put side by side. If you make such loose knots for one, you must lay the same possibilities for the other, unless all this then does not make sense for you anymore.

Good point, it will happen as said in hadiths khurasan from khurasan and yemen from Yemen....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...