If Nasrallah And Khamanei Condemned Assad.

[MysticKnight]

To those whom follow Nasrallah and Khamanei, if these two condemned Assad, would you have condemned him also? Or would you condemn their decision on doing so?

[Seeker_Of_God]

i already condemn him. I don need to see what my leaders say before i make my own thoughts

[Schrodinger]

Whoever would change his mind based on what a leader says rather than judging the actions and intention of someone, deserves condemnation themselves.

You've milked this situation for all its worth.

***

Edited September 3, 2011 by Haji 2003
Unacceptable language

[Ya Aba 3abdillah]

To those whom follow Nasrallah and Khamanei, if these two condemned Assad, would you have condemned him also? Or would you condemn their decision on doing so?

[MysticKnight]

I appreciate Assad's support of Hizbollah, but don't you think, all good people would set up a democracy for their people? That good people want a democracy for their people and not a dictatorship?

So shouldn't he be told that he should set up a democracy for the people?

I basically condemn solely on this fact. I condemn all dictators. That doesn't mean I think Assad is all evil.

Also, I'm not saying there isn't people causing chaos and may have intent of undemocratic government... but why not say it's wrong for all leaders to impose dicatorship and all people have the right to democracy?

I honestly don't understand the mind of people. I'm sure everyone before Nasrallah supported Assad believe every people have right of democracy and dictatorship is wrong. I understand Nasrallah wanting Assad to stay in power for support in hizbollah, but that's not a sufficient ground to say a democracy shouldn't be set up for the people.

If the people love Assad, then I'm sure if they elect a democratic governemtn, they will support hizbollah, since according to people, Syrian people love hizbollah and Assad.

I'm just saying...even if it's a minority wanting a democracy, aren't they right for their people?

What if Assad dies and is inherited by someone evil? What if someone whom is against hizbollah inherits the power?

To be honest, the best thing hizbollah could have done is thank him for his support but say democracy is the right way and he should give to the people democracy.

Why is it everyone should have democracy but Syria per people's view?

Edited September 1, 2011 by MysticKnight

[Ya Aba 3abdillah]

^ there is destructive transition and there is constructive transition just as there is destructive criticism and constructive criticism. Constructive transition doesn't happen overnight, especially when you got the GCC dogs attempting to destroy you and cut you to pieces. No one is disagreeing that reforms aren't needed. No one is disagreeing that there isn't strife corruption. But reacting with panic and without thought will benefit nobody.

[Hussien]

lmao @ the cartoon lol

[alimohamad40]

why doesnt assad pull back and hold back and announce a referendum before those bloods were spilt?

doesn't he and nasrallah claim that majority of the syrian people support assad?

Either its untrue or that he is very incompetent which one?

why woudlnt you hold a referendum and if 60% said we want assad then the whole world would shut up and the fingers will start pointing at the rebels and no one would sympathize with them

why is it that khaminie and nasrallah said they "supported the revolutions against dictators" but when it came to assad they made an exception?

its no different that Qaradawi supporting all the revolutions except for Bahrain

imam khaminie said " syria is different because it is not a supporter of the super powers and zionism"

but he did claim that " support the revolutions against dictators" and by all definition al assad fits that and in order to exit form that defenition he needs to hold an election and who knows if he was honest about most people supporting him then he would just affirm and solidify his influence and legitimacy NO?

any way for iran and huzbullah who are islamic ideological groups assad's ideology should be condemned because bathism is anti religion ideology and mohamad baqir alsadr said that the bathis are kuffar

[MysticKnight]

^ there is destructive transition and there is constructive transition just as there is destructive criticism and constructive criticism. Constructive transition doesn't happen overnight, especially when you got the GCC dogs attempting to destroy you and cut you to pieces. No one is disagreeing that reforms aren't needed. No one is disagreeing that there isn't strife corruption. But reacting with panic and without thought will benefit nobody.

If you promise a democracy, you have plenty of time to set it up. It doesn't mean you have to rush and give the opposition power.

[Wahhabism4All]

Excellent question. I believe the Lebanese Shias would follow their leader (Nasrallah) and condemn Assad. Nasrallah is their master, and his master is Khameini.

For Lebanese-Hezbollah Shias, allegiance to Nasrallah is more important than reason and rationale.

[Basra]

Excellent question. I believe the Lebanese Shias would follow their leader (Nasrallah) and condemn Assad. Nasrallah is their master, and his master is Khameini.

For Lebanese-Hezbollah Shias, allegiance to Nasrallah is more important than reason and rationale.

We are against the Wahhabi terrorist gangs that are massacring civilians and brave Syrian soldiers (most of whom are Syrian Sunni Muslims) in Syria with RPGs, anti-tank missiles, and heavy machine guns. Again why would the Zionist entity military intelligence website debka.com (which is against the current Syrian government) "lie" or something in support of the Syrian government?! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debka.com

Western imperialists are liars just like you: http://www.examiner....pposition-group

I appreciate Assad's support of Hizbollah, but don't you think, all good people would set up a democracy for their people? That good people want a democracy for their people and not a dictatorship?

So shouldn't he be told that he should set up a democracy for the people?

I basically condemn solely on this fact. I condemn all dictators. That doesn't mean I think Assad is all evil.

Also, I'm not saying there isn't people causing chaos and may have intent of undemocratic government... but why not say it's wrong for all leaders to impose dicatorship and all people have the right to democracy?

I honestly don't understand the mind of people. I'm sure everyone before Nasrallah supported Assad believe every people have right of democracy and dictatorship is wrong. I understand Nasrallah wanting Assad to stay in power for support in hizbollah, but that's not a sufficient ground to say a democracy shouldn't be set up for the people.

"Democracy" is a myth and smokescreen used to excuse Western imperialists' aggression against peoples in the so-called "Third World". The only thing that is actual democracy is actual direct democracy (aka participatory democracy, Athenian democracy) that is not even currently practiced anywhere in the world today. The West only has puppet plutocracies where Zionist lobbies and mega corporations control everything and the people have no actual real "choice" at all (a puppet "Democrat" or a puppet "Republican", etc. also see the "electoral college" fraud that further takes power away from the people, fraud in the US alleged "elections", etc)

http://whatreallyhap...4votefraud.html

Edited September 2, 2011 by Basra

[Ali_Hussain]

Sayed Nasrallah is no ones fool, Hezbullah is the first priority, al Assad being in power clearly is good for Hezbullah, so the sayed supports them.

But if this isn't played right, all that Hezbullah have achieved could be for nothing, if they are seen to offer too much support to the Assad regime, and it falls, chances are, the next lot in power will refuse to play ball, and if indeed syria is the channel iran use to get the money and guns to Hezbullah (?) this could be a major problem. Then on top of that, this will be christmas come early for the anti-shi'a brigade in terms of the propaganda they could use against Hezbullah and sayed Nasrallah who could go from being the most popular leader in the middle east to a figure of hate, who offered full support to a dictator who is responsible for the murder of sunnis. Now even if that is not the case, history is written by the winners.

I think, that if things start to look overly bleak in syria, Nasrallah might have to take a step or two back from his support for the Assad regime, and put the future of hezbullah first.

Also, if the regime in syria falls, what will happen to the shi'a over there, will they be viewed by the sunnis the way the shi'a of Iraq view the sunnis? I suppose there is no chance what so ever of any kind of civil war?

Edited September 2, 2011 by Ali_Hussain

[Basra]

Sayed Nasrallah is no ones fool, Hezbullah is the first priority, al Assad being in power clearly is good for Hezbullah, so the sayed supports them.

But if this isn't played right, all that Hezbullah have achieved could be for nothing, if they are seen to offer too much support to the Assad regime, and it falls, chances are, the next lot in power will refuse to play ball, and if indeed syria is the channel iran use to get the money and guns to Hezbullah (?) this could be a major problem. Then on top of that, this will be christmas come early for the anti-shi'a brigade in terms of the propaganda they could use against Hezbullah and sayed Nasrallah who could go from being the most popular leader in the middle east to a figure of hate, who offered full support to a dictator who is responsible for the murder of sunnis. Now even if that is not the case, history is written by the winners.

I think, that if things start to look overly bleak in syria, Nasrallah might have to take a step or two back from his support for the Assad regime, and put the future of hezbullah first.

Also, if the regime in syria falls, what will happen to the shi'a over there, will they be viewed by the sunnis the way the shi'a of Iraq view the sunnis? I suppose there is no chance what so ever of any kind of civil war?

The masses (that is the vast majority of the Syrian people and the vast majority of Syria's Sunni Muslims) support the current government of President Bashar al-Assad and many people simply desire a process of reforms to make Syria better.

The terrorist gangs that are massacring Syrian civilians (and Syrian government supporters) are either openly Zionist controlled fools or are Wahhabis that are also tools of the kuffar Western imperialist nations and the Zionists. This has been the very history of Wahhabism that was founded (along with the al-Saud monarchy) by the colonialist British Empire to destroy the Ottoman Caliphate.

http://www.examiner....pposition-group

http://www.cbsnews.c...n20054781.shtml

The two main Syrian cities of Damascus and Aleppo (that contain by themselves the majority of the total Syrian population) are completely normal and the Zionist destabilization effort has been thwarted, insha'Allah. If we look at Syria demographically all the non-Sunni minorities of Syria together amount to a very sizable figure of about 25% of the total Syrian population; these minorities in Syria are the Alawi Muslims, the Twelver Shi'a Muslims (along with some Ismailis), Syrian Druze, and a significant population of Syrian Christians that has been well integrated into Syria under the government of President Bashar al-Assad. So about 75% of Syrians are Sunni Muslims but even among this 75% of Sunni Muslims in Syria most of them are pro-government and a large amount of them are middle class business people in the two major Syrian cities of Aleppo and Damascus. The majority of Syrian Sunni Muslims today are not Wahhabis, even the Grand Mufti of Syria (who is a Syrian Sunni Muslim) has given sermons like the following:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIbqCPOwCaI

Also all intelligent Syrian Sunni Muslims (who are mostly non-Wahhabis) understand that if the Wahhabi terrorist gangsters (backed by the US, Zionists, and the Saudi Wahhabi monarchy thugs in Riyadh) are able to gain any foothold by infiltrating into Syria (and meeting up with the small minority of despotic Wahhabis already in Syria) they will cause bloodshed, oppression, and chaos. This has already been seen before when Wahhabi terrorists (likely with US CIA and/or Zionist "Israeli" Mossad backing) did a terrorist bomb attack against the Syrian people of Damascus back in September of 2008: http://articles.lati...orld/fg-syria29

Also the first action the braindead Wahhabi minority would do if they, Allah forbid, were somehow able to usurp power in Syria would be to massacre and oppress not just Shi'a Muslims, Druzes, and Syrian Christians but also likely too massacre or severly oppress Syrian Sunni Muslims who would not go along with their Taliban-ish Wahhabism and its distorted, false view of the Islamic Shari'ah.

Edited September 2, 2011 by Basra

[alimohamad40]

basra

its true that there are wahabi terrorist gangs and they are calling for secterian strife but the bathists have not been innocent either

you say they killd more than 100 brave soldiers

how many protesters have been killed by the security? and were they all wahabi armed groups?

the syrian government killed more than a thousand or two thousand by now is that disputed?

if bashar is very popular then he is very stupid because he can announce a referendum right now and he will shut the mouths of the whole world in two or three months

if he is not popular then let it go its not for you to force yourself upon people

specially that they want to turn it into a sectarian war saying bashar is alawi and majority of syria is sunnies

bahrain is majority shia so its should be given to the shias and syria is majority sunnies so just give it to them and dont spill the blood just to cling to the throne

[5a49]

For me, Sayed Hassan Nasrollah and Sayed Ali Khamenei, know whats better for the Muslim Ummah.

Sometimes, they look at longer range.

So basically, although I might disagree in a few things, I would believe, they know better because they can analyze issues and know more, since they have more political documents between their hands, while we just watch tv. Thus, sometimes we think we are smart, when we are ignorant.

[Basra]

basra

its true that there are wahabi terrorist gangs and they are calling for secterian strife but the bathists have not been innocent either

you say they killd more than 100 brave soldiers

how many protesters have been killed by the security? and were they all wahabi armed groups?

the syrian government killed more than a thousand or two thousand by now is that disputed?

if bashar is very popular then he is very stupid because he can announce a referendum right now and he will shut the mouths of the whole world in two or three months

if he is not popular then let it go its not for you to force yourself upon people

specially that they want to turn it into a sectarian war saying bashar is alawi and majority of syria is sunnies

bahrain is majority shia so its should be given to the shias and syria is majority sunnies so just give it to them and dont spill the blood just to cling to the throne

You don't know the truth about what is happening in Syria (you seem to be influenced by Zionist liars lying about Syria), the claims of alleged "1000s" of deaths is only from Western propaganda Zionist groups that are not even in Syria they are much like the "Citizens for a Free Kuwait" back in 1990-1991 to support the Kuwaiti monarchy (not "Kuwait" is historically just a part of Iraq)! http://en.wikipedia....i/Nurse_Nayirah

The majority of Syrian Sunnis are middle class business people in the two main Syrian cities of Aleppo and Damascus and support the government and are opposed to the Wahhabi terrorists. Syria is nothing like Bahrain, the Syrian Sunni majority is the majority in every institution such as the military, government institutions, etc. however in Bahrain the Al-Khalifa monarchy's "military" is nothing but a bunch of imported Pakistani Sunni Muslim mercenaries paid by the Al-Khalifa monarchy (a US/Zionist puppet monarchy). The indigenous Shi'a Muslims of Bahrain are shut out of everything by the Al-Khalifa monarchy (from Najd), completely unlike the fairness that exists in Syria. Also the Alawi Muslims are part of Syria they are from Syria (aka they are indigenous), the Western backed Al-Khalifa monarchy is not even from Bahrain they came about 200 years ago from Najd (the same place in middle of the Arabian peninsula that the al-Saud Wahhabis are from) with the support then of the British colonialists and today the Al-Khalifa (and al-Saud) while still backed by the imperialist British are backed by the Amerikkkan imperialists also.

Edited September 2, 2011 by Basra

[jund_el_Mahdi]

Excellent question. I believe the Lebanese Shias would follow their leader (Nasrallah) and condemn Assad. Nasrallah is their master, and his master is Khameini.

For Lebanese-Hezbollah Shias, allegiance to Nasrallah is more important than reason and rationale.

Very sad you think this way.

May Allah guide you inshallah.

[Wahhabism4All]

Very sad you think this way.

May Allah guide you inshallah.

Please enlighten me as to why in the years Bashar al-Assad has been in power, he has not allowed a free election for the people to select their own leader? Explain why all the Lebanese members in this forum care more about the survival of Hezbollah than Syrian Muslims choosing their own leader? Where is their reason and rationale? Bashar has been in power since the year 2000.

[alimohamad40]

salaam

You don't know the truth about what is happening in Syria (you seem to be influenced by Zionist liars lying about Syria), the claims of alleged "1000s" of deaths is only from Western propaganda Zionist groups that are not even in Syria they are much like the "Citizens for a Free Kuwait" back in 1990-1991 to support the Kuwaiti monarchy (not "Kuwait" is historically just a part of Iraq)! http://en.wikipedia....i/Nurse_Nayirah

The majority of Syrian Sunnis are middle class business people in the two main Syrian cities of Aleppo and Damascus and support the government and are opposed to the Wahhabi terrorists. Syria is nothing like Bahrain, the Syrian Sunni majority is the majority in every institution such as the military, government institutions, etc. however in Bahrain the Al-Khalifa monarchy's "military" is nothing but a bunch of imported Pakistani Sunni Muslim mercenaries paid by the Al-Khalifa monarchy (a US/Zionist puppet monarchy). The indigenous Shi'a Muslims of Bahrain are shut out of everything by the Al-Khalifa monarchy (from Najd), completely unlike the fairness that exists in Syria. Also the Alawi Muslims are part of Syria they are from Syria (aka they are indigenous), the Western backed Al-Khalifa monarchy is not even from Bahrain they came about 200 years ago from Najd (the same place in middle of the Arabian peninsula that the al-Saud Wahhabis are from) with the support then of the British colonialists and today the Al-Khalifa (and al-Saud) while still backed by the imperialist British are backed by the Amerikkkan imperialists also.

Basra i know about Bahrain in details and even in bahrain where the opposition has every right to tale the power but violence sometimes did take place by the protesters

after the government made a massacre the people went on killing pakistanis

same happened in libya where every black is now in danger even though libya has always had 13% blacks who are native

in syria do not expect any different but tell me do you believe that the government is not shooting live bullets at the protesters with the full knowledge and approval of the high leadership?

i listen to aljazeera and just like the way aljazeera exposed the bahraini tyrants in a documentary that it produced it is exposing alot of the acts of the syrian government too

offcourse you will have wahabies assassinating soldirs and stuff like that... but you need to look at the full picture and what are the demands of the protesters and is it legitimate

also i heard that the syrian army has mainly alawi commanders and the sunni masses make up the army so its exactly like saddam who had sunnie commanders and shia masses making the army (the sheep)

if this is true its a pharonic system

also that al asads brother and his family control everything like the country is a farm that they inherited from thier grandfather!!! this is the typical ugly arab example like saddam, mubarak, qathafi and the gulf

Ikhwan al muslimeen are a huge part of the socity which you can not ignore and supress

i am afraid that this hate and sectarianism will lead to the appearance of the sufyani from syria so stop being sectarian and whitewashing crimes just to suit your allies

let me make it simple for you ,,, his first crime we dont need proof because he admits it

HE is a bathi

that in itself should make you distrust and not ally yourself with them blindly.

if al asad are majority i hpoe he will be competent enough to announce a referendum to keep him or not or announce parliamentary election immediately

its like israel, if they are serious about solving the problem they have to get out of the occupied territories immediately, its not hard

if they dont then they are not truthful

any why does bashar wait for people to rise in order for him to start removing the marshal law or start allowing other parties ? why is he budging to it ?

also to ya aba : mac ishaac had a good point that mohamad baqir al sadr regards bathists as KAFIRS so you can not support mohamad baqir alsadr and the assad family at the same time

note I appreciate the Syrian stance against the Zionists but if the majority of people don't want this you have to let it go

Edited September 3, 2011 by alimohamad40

[Basra]

salaam

Basra i know about Bahrain in details and even in bahrain where the opposition has every right to tale the power but violence sometimes did take place by the protesters

after the government made a massacre the people went on killing pakistanis

same happened in libya where every black is now in danger even though libya has always had 13% blacks who are native

in syria do not expect any different but tell me do you believe that the government is not shooting live bullets at the protesters with the full knowledge and approval of the high leadership?

i listen to aljazeera and just like the way aljazeera exposed the bahraini tyrants in a documentary that it produced it is exposing alot of the acts of the syrian government too

offcourse you will have wahabies assassinating soldirs and stuff like that... but you need to look at the full picture and what are the demands of the protesters and is it legitimate

also i heard that the syrian army has mainly alawi commanders and the sunni masses make up the army so its exactly like saddam who had sunnie commanders and shia masses making the army (the sheep)

if this is true its a pharonic system

also that al asads brother and his family control everything like the country is a farm that they inherited from thier grandfather!!! this is the typical ugly arab example like saddam, mubarak, qathafi and the gulf

Ikhwan al muslimeen are a huge part of the socity which you can not ignore and supress

i am afraid that this hate and sectarianism will lead to the appearance of the sufyani from syria so stop being sectarian and whitewashing crimes just to suit your allies

let me make it simple for you ,,, his first crime we dont need proof because he admits it

HE is a bathi

that in itself should make you distrust and not ally yourself with them blindly.

if al asad are majority i hpoe he will be competent enough to announce a referendum to keep him or not or announce parliamentary election immediately

its like israel, if they are serious about solving the problem they have to get out of the occupied territories immediately, its not hard

if they dont then they are not truthful

any why does bashar wait for people to rise in order for him to start removing the marshal law or start allowing other parties ? why is he budging to it ?

also to ya aba : mac ishaac had a good point that mohamad baqir al sadr regards bathists as KAFIRS so you can not support mohamad baqir alsadr and the assad family at the same time

note I appreciate the Syrian stance against the Zionists but if the majority of people don't want this you have to let it go

Brother, it is true the Syrian military (who are made up mostly of Syrian Sunni Muslims by the way) are using their weapons because they have to they are fighting an armed Wahhabi rebel/terrorist insurgency in their own country. I've shown already that the reality is that armed Wahhabi terrorists are inside Syria and are killing/slaughtering both Syrian civilians and Syrian military personnel (again most of these military personnel are Syrian Sunni Muslims themselves). These Wahhabi terrorists are armed with such deadly weapons as RPGs, anti-tank missiles, and heavy machine guns (there is even talk in imperialist Nazi NATO circles of arming these Wahhabi terrorist gangs with mortars and even more heavy weapons). This reality is again acknowledge even by the Zionist "Israeli" military intelligence website debka.com (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debka.com) that says the Syrian alleged "protesters" (again actually armed Wahhabi terrorist gangs) have RPGs, anti-tank missiles, and heavy machine guns. Why on earth would the Zionist "Israelis" and their military intelligence groups allegedly "lie" to SUPPORT Bashar al-Assad's government?! The Zionist "Israelis" want the downfall of the Assad government as this would be a blow to the resistance bloc (of Hezbollah, Hamas, President Assad led Syria, and the Islamic Republic of Iran) these Zionists are buddy-buddy with the Zindeeq "Brotherhood" misnamed the "Muslim Brotherhood". The so-called "Muslim Brotherhood" is a slave of the Zionists, West, and usury doing World Bank establishments like the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and World Bank (both headquartered in Washington, D.C. in Amerikkka).

See links:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25955

A "Humanitarian War" on Syria? Military Escalation. Towards a Broader Middle East-Central Asian War?

Part I of a three part series

by Michel Chossudovsky

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26043

The Pentagon's "Salvador Option": The Deployment of Death Squads in Iraq and Syria

by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26351

The Al Qaeda Insurgency in Syria: Recruiting Jihadists to Wage NATO's "Humanitarian Wars"

PART III

by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

Wahhabi terrorist gangs terrorizing Syria:

http://www.dp-news.com/en/detail.aspx?articleid=87293

Wahhabi terrorist gangs arson in Daraa

"Democracy" is a myth and doesn't exist anywhere in the world. Only true democracy would be actual direct, participatory democracy (aka Athenian democracy). Also we must first democratize the means of production and create a true society of social justice without evil class systems.

The Syrian people support their government!

[south-lebanon]

offcourse you will have wahabies assassinating soldirs and stuff like that...

you say "ofcoarse" like you have absolutly no knowledge on whats occured in Iraq just a couple of years ago. wahabis are a dangerous element who swoop below animal expectations in trying to bring about their aims, they prey on anything to expand their influence, they'll even strap a handicapped child with explosives to cause mayhem and bring people under their control.

Bashar would be a fool if he gives into this evil plan to give up his POPULAR leadership inorder to give way to a racist ideology who wants to implament a plan to eliminate the mid east of all minorites.

Just look at Basra's photo's noone forced these people top come out in support of Bashar, but look million upon millions are supporting him.

I can never imagine any arab leader doing this other than Bashar...The others are just tooooo racist!!!

This is what Israel and the US dont like, the realisation to the rest of the world that Christians are free to practise their faith in the supposed enemy extremist land that only care about 72 virgins in the afterlife.

The plan woked in Iraq, most christians left, even though their communities themselves are older than any muslim community.

The wahabis once captured karbala, and you know what they did then, look what they did in baqee, what do you thnk theu would do to the Zeinab Shrine.

It realy peees me off how some shia think they are being humaniterian and all but really they are bending over for a bu3sa!!!

Edited September 3, 2011 by south-lebanon

[MysticKnight]

He doesn't have to give away his authority to Wahabis, he can set up a democratic government, and the people can elect a non-wahabi.

He doesn't have to surrender authority to the opposition.

[Ugly Jinn]

This is like the game Monopoly.

You need 3 properties of the same color to build hotels. The 3 properties are Iran, Syria, and Hizbullah (Lebanon).

If you lose one property, you lose ALL the hotels.

This is a game, nothing more than a political version of Monopoly.

And when you play Monopoly, principles, fairness, justice, etc., aren't part of the rules. The goal is the win.

[alimohamad40]

This is like the game Monopoly.

And when you play Monopoly, principles, fairness, justice, etc., aren't part of the rules. The goal is the win.

yes this is the problem

imam Ali Also lost but he didn't loose his principles

Muawyah prevented water but imam Ali refused to do the same, his people told him we will loose and we should do the same Imam Ali replied: I am fighting them about these principles and you want me to forsake them? I might as well go and join their army and not even bother fight them!!!

principled people don't care about the temporary winning and hence the aims do not justify any means.

south lebanon:

Staying with principles is not bending over. islam is all about principles and sticking to them

if Bashar is popular wahabies will not take it and if they are popular then they should take it

it will be the biggest help for their cause if they are majority and you deny them the rule so many people will join them and they will eventually take it and once they take it then they will take revenge from hizbullah and create a massacre in lebanon and impede the work of the resistance... they will say you stood with bashar who was a dictator and secular which is true

in our religion we should prioritize religious people over secular ones because we claim to be religious

a religious sunnie should be closer to us than a bathist or a communist or a capitalist no?

i know that bashar al asad seems like a humble person and is knowledgeable and has a very good stand against the world zionism that no other arab leader has but he is not handling this properly in my opinion which is making me think that he is just like the other arab leaders

i know he is not like saddam or qathafi but still why does he think he cant have election?

i am afraid that this is the fitnah of the sufyani because they say he comes from hawran which is one of the cities troubled now next to jordan.

basra

same thing its so simple if he is popular just announce referendum like the khoomainy did

the government is in his hand so what excuse he has not to announce referendum?

Edited September 4, 2011 by alimohamad40