Zurarah = Wasil

[Lord Botta]

Here is a set of words that I've noticed Zurarah use in posts that he's been making recently. Keep in mind, they are transliterations, and with these things, people usually spell these words differently. For example, something as simple as "salam alaykum" can be spelled as "assalamu alaykom", etc.

In any case, I believe that my previous posts in other threads have proved that Zurarah is ex-member Wasil, but I still would rather clear the doubts that some may have about this guy.

It was in this initial post where I first drew the connection. It was his word choice that caught my eye:

Not too long after, I caught him stealing material from Wasil:

Of course, I don't really believe that he is stealing the material, he's just borrowing his own work from another forums. Any way, this isn't sufficient for one to be decisive about him truly being Wasil, however, by examining the writing styles and word choice, and especially transliterations, one can be sure that these two men are the same. Please, help yourself and click on the links below to compare the transliterations of Wasil and Zurarah. You be the judge.

Transliterations by Zurarah:

Muawya

Ayesha

Lanatollah

ibn taymyyah

darqotni

astaghfirollah

mujassimah

page__view__findpost__p__2063250

fadhlallah

al-qommi

3ar3our

ibn habban

ibn mueen

Transliterations by Wasil:

ibn taymyyah

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/exposing-salafis-and-nawasib-f19/ibn-taymyyah-lack-of-knowledge-of-hadith-t644.htm?highlight=taymyyah

lanatollah

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/search.forum?search_keywords=lanatollah&typerecherche=interne&show_results=topics

3ar3our

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/exposing-salafis-and-nawasib-f19/3ar3our-said-drinking-wine-and-smoking-is-better-than-talking-to-shia-t658.htm?highlight=3ar3our

darqotni

ibn habban

ibn mueen

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/shia-non-shia-discussion-f9/efendi-versus-wasil-t403.htm?highlight=wasil'>http://shiachat.forumotion.com/shia-non-shia-discussion-f9/efendi-versus-wasil-t403.htm?highlight=wasil

al-qommi

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/quran-and-hadith-f16/hadith-i-reject-because-of-sanad-and-matn-t684.htm

tabrassi

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/defence-of-true-shi-ism-f17/scholars-we-reject-and-scholars-we-love-t687.htm

fadhlallah

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/defence-of-true-shi-ism-f17/scholars-we-reject-and-scholars-we-love-t687.htm

astaghfirollah

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/defence-of-true-shi-ism-f17/raj-a-is-against-quran-and-hadith-sahih-t586.htm

mujassimah

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/shia-non-shia-discussion-f9/salafi-aqeedah-tajseem-t11.htm?highlight=tajseem'>http://shiachat.forumotion.com/shia-non-shia-discussion-f9/salafi-aqeedah-tajseem-t11.htm?highlight=tajseem

Ayesha

Muawya

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/shia-non-shia-discussion-f9/

=====================

Unfortunately, he is so afraid of ruining his reputation, that he chose to use the name of Allah in vain and lie about his identity:

wallahi allashi lailaha illahuwa i'm not wasil and i didn't lie when i said i am not wasil.

This is haram dude.

Shias, don't take your religion from this guy. He will lie in order to convince you of his views.

If you'd like to know more about his views of Ayatollah Sistani and Shirazi, as well as other major Shia scholars, then this will definitely interest you:

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/defence-of-true-shi-ism-f17/scholars-we-reject-and-scholars-we-love-t687.htm

=========

Note: Even though I usually hate liars, I'd hope that the mods don't ban this previously banned member because he is very entertaining. Thanks.

[Zurarah]

one word: pathetic !

[haideriam]

(bismillah)

(salam)

still on with games,

man you are so lost and frustrated

bro zurarah has completely baffled you and destroyed your empire

for once???? you are getting petty

ever since the ibn taymiya thread you seem to have lost your footing

and now bros who thought you were sincere are beginning to have doubts

i am/was the first one

see i supported you initially

but guess you are all the same

keep on exposing yourself

need some m&m to boost up the energy level

(wasalam)

ps. m&m = muhammad mufti

Edited June 27, 2010 by haideriam

[lotfilms]

(bismillah)

(salam)

Yea i noticed this too lol but tbh, i don't mind him being back. He makes interesting posts and it's good to have someone here with a good level on knowledge of hadiths.

There was a problem with akhlaq before; getting mad at certain people on this forum and asking God to curse them wasn't productive, but if he is beyond this, i would love for him to stay on this forum.

Botta, would you rather debate with him or your buddy in your sig? lol

as for the oath,

وَلَا تَتَّخِذُوا أَيْمَانَكُمْ دَخَلًا بَيْنَكُمْ فَتَزِلَّ قَدَمٌ بَعْدَ ثُبُوتِهَا وَتَذُوقُوا السُّوءَ بِمَا صَدَدتُّمْ عَن سَبِيلِ اللَّـهِ ۖ وَلَكُمْ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ

was salam

Edited June 27, 2010 by lotfilms

[haideriam]

Botta, would you rather debate with him or your buddy in your sig? lol

(bismillah)

(salam)

neither to be honest

they both have messed me up

and my reputation

signed

LB

(wasalam)

[Sunni4Life]

(bismillah)

(salam)

Yea i noticed this too lol but tbh, i don't mind him being back.

Even your own acknowledge this and he's still lying lol not to mention more importantly the material brother Botta (May Allah keep him steadfast on deen) has shown to prove this. So for the one that says Brother Botta is "losing" some kind of war is extremely laughable. Infact it's the other way round when you keep in mind what wasil is doing undercover and ontop lying in Allahs name. Astaghfirullah. Which prompts the question I ask to the Shias...can you seriously rely on a compulsive LIAR to prove points about your sect, regardless if you think he has good arguments against Sunnis, keeping in mind his foundations aren't correct as he's LYING?

Edited June 27, 2010 by Sunni4Life

[14infallibles]

can you seriously rely on a compulsive LIAR to prove points about your sect, regardless if you think he has good arguments against Sunnis, keeping in mind his foundations aren't correct as he's LYING?

(salam)

if a person is known to lie, it doesn't necessarily mean everything they say has become a lie. However, at the same time, now you cannot take anything from them until verification, because now they are not trustworthy.

So, if a liar says a certain argument for their religion, it is upon us to verify if this is a truthful argument, with sound sources, etc. But we shouldn't reject a liar completely just because they are known to have lied in the past.

[Zurarah]

Even your own acknowledge this and he's still lying lol not to mention more importantly the material brother Botta (May Allah keep him steadfast on deen) has shown to prove this. So for the one that says Brother Botta is "losing" some kind of war is extremely laughable. Infact it's the other way round when you keep in mind what wasil is doing undercover and ontop lying in Allahs name. Astaghfirullah. Which prompts the question I ask to the Shias...can you seriously rely on a compulsive LIAR to prove points about your sect, regardless if you think he has good arguments against Sunnis, keeping in mind his foundations aren't correct as he's LYING?

subhanallah ! just joined and you think u know me !

where did i lie ? because saying i'm compulsive liar means i lie all the time so where did i lie ??

[Lord Botta]

Botta, would you rather debate with him or your buddy in your sig? lol

Yup, this one is a no brainer. I'd easily go for Wasil.

[master_ier]

LORD BOTTA, i didn't expect this from you. PITIABLE.

[serious-sam]

one word: pathetic !

Adding more similarities. I just googled "pathetic shiachat.forumotion" & found many things:

1. http://shiachat.forumotion.com/exposing-salafis-and-nawasib-f19/must-readefendi-s-lies-about-hadith-of-following-abu-bakr-and-umar-t693.htm

Subject: Re: must read:Efendi's lies about hadith of following abu bakr and umar Sat May 15, 2010 1:02 am

I wanna add :

this hadith if it was authentic then it has the clearest appointment of abu bakr and omar as khalifat of rasool Allah so a logical person might ask:

-why was such fadhila not recorded by bukhari and muslim in their sihah and these two scholars were so keen on compiling sahih fadahail of sheikhain that are less important than this one

- why didn't omar and abu bakr use this hadith as the main weapon against the doubters in saqifah to say : look this is what rasool Allah said so there's nothing you can do ? but omar used other arguments.

i say one word: pathetic

2. Now i got some lies related to him i.e. denying that i am not walid etc.:

http://i slamic-forum.net/index.php?showtopic=11757

^^ this tells whole story.

& good thing to note: He deleted his posts to save his honour but he don't know posts can't be deleted from other mambers quote. ^_^

Firstly he said "who is walid"

http://i slamic-forum.net/index.php?showtopic=11757&view=findpost&p=80286

Then he said "i am walid the nightmare of enemies of ahlbait(as) and if you are a man publish this ( but i know u are a coward)"

http://i slamic-forum.net/index.php?showtopic=11757&view=findpost&p=80285

I think it is good to ask: Are you walid!

3. He feared of banning because he said many things:

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/news-and-current-affairs-f1/banned-again-from-shiachat-t402.htm

ubject: Re: banned again from shiachat Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:28 am

i ust noticed efendi was banned as well and it appears this is not the first time . indeed this shiachat must be called chitachat(chita is tarzan monkey ) as it's a forum full of monkeys.

what hurts me is that they are the biggest shia forum online and people who could reform the minds of

ghulat and expose them at least are banned .

their admin bintalhoda is a member here and we didn't ban her and we won't ban her just because

she has different opinion

^_^

Edited June 27, 2010 by serious-sam

[Lord Botta]

Oh! I also would like to mention that I found out some stuff about the backgrounds of both Wasil and Zurarah:

Zurarah said:

I was student in al-azhar and have qualifications about madhahib al-islamyyah from there

i was also student of hawza for three years !

is that enough for you?

Wasil said:

I am no scholar brother , i am just a lover of ahlbait (as) and on top of them rasool Allah (saww) and i studied in azhar for ssome time and i also studied in hawza for sometimes.

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/general-discussion-f15/is-this-sanad-sahih-t633.htm

Mashallah! So, both of these men went to Al-Azhar then studied at a Hawza! Another coincidence! =)

[doobybrother]

Lord Botta, I initially had lots of respect for you. Then the respect started to fade away after the ibne Tamiyah and the Muawiya thread. I still admire your knowledge of hadith, but starting this topic about br zurarah, its a real cheap shot.

If you'd like to know more about his views of Ayatollah Sistani and Shirazi, as well as other major Shia scholars, then this will definitely interest you:

divide et impera

[Lord Botta]

I find it really strange that you folks would defend the person that lied about his identity and instead accuse me of taking cheap shots. Is Wasil really that important to you?

I don't see many people condemning the liar. This is very shameful. What happened to those that stood up for truth no matter where it was?

[serious-sam]

I find it really strange that you folks would defend the person that lied about his identity and instead accuse me of taking cheap shots. Is Wasil really that important to you?

I don't see many people condemning the liar. This is very shameful. What happened to those that stood up for truth no matter where it was?

Looks gone. really it is strange.

[haideriam]

I find it really strange that you folks would defend the person that lied about his identity and instead accuse me of taking cheap shots. Is Wasil really that important to you?

I don't see many people condemning the liar. This is very shameful. What happened to those that stood up for truth no matter where it was?

(bismillah)

(salam)

condemned you alright

(wasalam)

[akamp]

I find it really strange that you folks would defend the person that lied about his identity and instead accuse me of taking cheap shots. Is Wasil really that important to you?

I don't see many people condemning the liar. This is very shameful. What happened to those that stood up for truth no matter where it was?

Lord Botta, I really had loads of respect for you when I first observed you (but for a very small period of time).

Initially, I thought someone as knowledgeable as you would easily find the true path.

The respect that you had... started to fade with threads on Taymiyya, and Muawiya.

I say why don't you try to attack Zurarah academically. You have taken so much time and put so much effort in this thread; I wonder why could not you exert the same amount in refuting Zurarah's arguments or defending your's. You are trying utmost to get him banned. Are you afraid of his presence on this board.

It's really sickening to the stomach. Buddy I will say the same to anyone who acts in this manner whether from our sect or not.

If there was a rule for getting banned on taking cheap shots; you will be the first one to get banned on this forum.

I have advised you sincerely in the past too: Dear it looks bad on you; it definitely does not help your cause here.

I am sorry that it had to come to this.

Edited June 27, 2010 by akamp

[aladdin]

Shias, don't take your religion from this guy. He will lie in order to convince you of his views.

Yes, the Shias should take the religion from a Wahhabi like yourself, who has been caught lying, deceiving, cheating and so forth.

Note: Even though I usually hate liars.

If you hate liars then the first person you should hate is yourself, who has been caught lying, deceiving, cheating and so forth.

And, who is this Muhammad Mufti? Shall we expose him?

(salam)

So, if a liar says a certain argument for their religion, it is upon us to verify if this is a truthful argument, with sound sources, etc. But we shouldn't reject a liar completely just because they are known to have lied in the past.

You mean someone like Lord Bottah, or Muhammad Mufti?

[Lord Botta]

I say why don't you try to attack Zurarah academically. You have taken so much time and put so much effort in this thread; I wonder why could not you exert the same amount in refuting Zurarah's arguments or defending your's. You are trying utmost to get him banned. Are you afraid of his presence on this board.

It didn't take much of an effort at all. All one needs to do is use a search engine. If you have bothered to look up my posts against him, you will notice that it is him that has been trying to avoid my arguments, but I guess one would need to be objective to see that.

Regardless of the above, instead of condemning him for lying, you are condemning me for my "cheap shots".

So, let me ask you this. Do you believe that Wasil is Zurarah? Do you believe that he lied about his identity? Do you condemn him for lying about his identity?

[aladdin]

I find it really strange that you folks would defend the person that lied about his identity and instead accuse me of taking cheap shots. Is Wasil really that important to you?

I don't see many people condemning the liar. This is very shameful. What happened to those that stood up for truth no matter where it was?

Do we condemn you? You have been caught on several occasions lying, cheating, deceiving and so forth.

You are the one who should be condemned.

[haideriam]

(bismillah)

(salam)

@botta

you see before the ibn taymiya thread everyone or most were intimidated by your knowledge

of ilm ur rijal

and hence you were pawning people left right and centre for it was somthing they did not know much about

it is like i have a discussion with a french guy

and i have not much knowledge of french

so every argument we have he forces the french language upon me

and only discusses in french

i will be pawned

till the ibn taymiya thread

and then your lot were being pawned left right and centre

by other brothers and sisters who started to speak french with you

and then you had to resort to cheap shots

(wasalam)

[Faris-Al-Hujjat]

It didn't take much of an effort at all. All one needs to do is use a search engine. If you have bothered to look up my posts against him, you will notice that it is him that has been trying to avoid my arguments, but I guess one would need to be objective to see that.

Regardless of the above, instead of condemning him for lying, you are condemning me for my "cheap shots".

So, let me ask you this. Do you believe that Wasil is Zurarah? Do you believe that he lied about his identity? Do you condemn him for lying about his identity?

your avatar says a lot about your current preceedings abt an individual who has beat you down ...inspite of white flagging your way out you are coming up with [Edited Out] that only you and your avatar seem to understand..

who cares if Zurara is Wasil / Wasil is Zurara...!!!

There is no lying going on here ...just the burning smell of a rotten lost cause..!!!

condemn BotttaLord for his phiria Hoya Demaagh (phd)

Go join your peer and wali - Ibne Al Aas & Ashaári

[aladdin]

condemned you alright

LOL! It is like pot calling the kettle black!

Looks gone. really it is strange.

LOL! Look who is talking. The Wahhabi cum Missionary in Taqiyyah, who taught we didn't know him from day one. Played you like a fiddle, with kids gloves.

[haideriam]

LOL! It is like pot calling the kettle black!

LOL! Look who is talking. The Wahhabi cum Missionary in Taqiyyah, who taught we didn't know him from day one. Played you like a fiddle, with kids gloves.

(bismillah)

(salam)

bro aladdin

it is a very black pot bro which has been taken off of it's perch and is beginning to cry

could there be more

told you take care of the doubles

and sometimes of the not so doubles

(wasalam)

[GhulameSayyeda]

Asalaam Alaykom to all my brothers,

we are taught to not bring out in the open the sins of our brothers, and to give a thousand excuses to our brother even if we think he may have done some wrong.... to all those who started such a thread, your not my brother, because your not this man's

I dont know this brother, but I like him a lot, he has been willing to answer some few of my questions, and helped me when I asked of him, so whether or not Zurarah has ever had another ID here, he is at least a good brother to others and regardless on whether or not you agree with someone on any issues or all, you should be a good brother to him. I believe that is what islam teaches no? perhaps you should stop worrying about the rijal of all these ahadith and start reading up on all the whole controlling your nafs and patience and love of others and the basics of HOW to follow islam and what it might look like to do so. It has nothing to do with showing off that you might have some little knowledge, and a lot more to do with how you actually live.....

PS it seems that the admin does know this person therefore might not been someone else

[lotfilms]

(bismillah)

(salam)

I'm surprised no one saw this:

ayesha (ra)

if you ask any salafi then whoever insults ayesha (ra) or abu bakr and omar or any sahabi then he's kaffir.

Who is the only other Shia who adds "(ra)" to her name? The one who makes a thread " Public apolagy to omm al-momineen ayahsa(ra)"

http://shiachat.forumotion.com/shia-non-shia-discussion-f9/public-apolagy-to-omm-al-momineen-ayahsara-t776.htm#4541

one of the characteristics of the true believers is that they stick to the truth, even if it goes against them. and our Imams (as) warn us against partisanship where we stick to one of our own blindly, even if it goes against the truth, and we are threatened with hellfire for this.

But certain people here don't read Shia hadiths or the Quran; they're only interested in debating "the other side" and using whatever argument it takes it win.

May Allah(swt) punish the liars and those who use their oaths as a means of deceiving the people

Don't get me wrong, i love to have him here and he has many good posts, but c'mon people, it's something else when someone swears by their Creator. We have to encourage the good and discourage the bad.

was salam

Edited June 27, 2010 by lotfilms

[aladdin]

May Allah(swt) punish the liars and those who use their oaths as a means of deceiving the people

He is thousand times better than you. You not only make tafkir on Shias, but you have the guts to make tafkir on the Shia Ulemas and Marjas.

May Allah (swt) punish those who make tafkir on their fellow Muslims and their Ulemas/Marjas.

[haideriam]

He is thousand times better than you. You not only make tafkir on Shias, but you have the guts to make tafkir on the Shia Ulemas and Marjas.

May Allah (swt) punish those who make tafkir on their fellow Muslims and their Ulemas/Marjas.

(bismillah)

(salam)

bro aladdin, i am left confused about the comparitive and the superlative

i just don't know whether to call your post more or most appropiate

(wasalam)

[aladdin]

bro aladdin, i am left confused about the comparitive and the superlative

i just don't know whether to call your post more or most appropiate

LOL bro!

Even ibn Taymiyyah (la) will consider it the most appropriate, but then he will back down and call it the more appropriate and then write two pages around it to make it the least appropriate.

It is expected from khabeeth ibn Taymiyyah (la).

What boggles the mind, why the two so called Shias, Mr Zaveri and Mr. Lotfilms are against Zurarah.

Edited June 27, 2010 by aladdin

[lotfilms]

(bismillah)

He is thousand times better than you. You not only make tafkir on Shias, but you have the guts to make tafkir on the Shia Ulemas and Marjas.

May Allah (swt) punish those who make tafkir on their fellow Muslims and their Ulemas/Marjas.

aight, you're going on the block list now. Your dhulm is unbelievable.

read:

It makes you question the "shia" kaafirs who were inventing hadiths just to put Ahlul Bayt(as) in every little thing; especially the ones that are considered "thiqah"

Anyone who knowingly fabricate lies against the Prophet (pbuh), they can find their place in the hellfire; this is what our Prophet (pbuh) has told us and this extends to his successors (as)

But in your usual dishonesty, you have twisted my words to make it seem like i was cursing Qazwini or maraja or whoever you wanted. Qazwini got this hadith that he thought was authentic from a source he trusted; the sin is on the ones who fabricate hadiths.

And you have done this time and time again.

You take an innocent statement and twist it make the statement evil

I don't know if you lack basic reading comprehension

Or if you are poor with English

or if you evil heart is sealed

But fear Allah(swt) man, get past these petty arguments.

[aladdin]

Don't just look at the intro and run away; actually see what Qazwini has to say.

One of these days can we have a serious discussion about tahreef and the narrations concerning it? We would be lying if we said there was no such hadith; there's many. And what if the narrations are authentic by our standards? What would that say about the Shia school?

Do the modern 'ulema who reject tahreef do so to appease Sunnis? Or because they view the hadiths as actually weak?

Any thoughts?

My own personal comments are perfectly summed up in these verse:

(from 0:30 onwards)

But i would like to hear the views of both sides on this issues; particularly the brothers who are knowledgeable in haditrh

Where do you find all those Wahhabi/Salafi videos that you post all the time!

Anyone who knowingly fabricate lies against the Prophet (pbuh), they can find their place in the hellfire; this is what our Prophet (pbuh) has told us and this extends to his successors (as)

But in your usual dishonesty, you have twisted my words to make it seem like i was cursing Qazwini or maraja or whoever you wanted. Qazwini got this hadith that he thought was authentic from a source he trusted; the sin is on the ones who fabricate hadiths.

How do you know that the hadith is fabricated that you ready to pronounce tafkir!

[aladdin]

But fear Allah(swt) man, get past these petty arguments.

And, who is the most petty person who brought stuff from other site on brother Zurarah.

Boggles the mind, what you and Mr. Zaveri have against brother Zurarah. Why you and Mr. Zaveri against a Shia brother who has very valid and solid arguments against bottah!

What harm brother Zurarah has done to you that you went to great length to bring stuff from a different site!

Pity!

[akamp]

(bismillah)

(salam)

I'm surprised no one saw this:

Who is the only other Shia who adds "(ra)" to her name? The one who makes a thread " Public apolagy to omm al-momineen ayahsa(ra)"

http://shiachat.foru...a-t776.htm#4541

one of the characteristics of the true believers is that they stick to the truth, even if it goes against them. and our Imams (as) warn us against partisanship where we stick to one of our own blindly, even if it goes against the truth, and we are threatened with hellfire for this.

But certain people here don't read Shia hadiths or the Quran; they're only interested in debating "the other side" and using whatever argument it takes it win.

May Allah(swt) punish the liars and those who use their oaths as a means of deceiving the people

Don't get me wrong, i love to have him here and he has many good posts, but c'mon people, it's something else when someone swears by their Creator. We have to encourage the good and discourage the bad.

was salam

Lotflims. You should have noticed that every Shia has come out against picking on Zurarah if you had taken care to read the whole thread. You are calling him someone else for flimsiest of reasons. Why can't people take him on academically for Gods sake.

Why do we always find you standing on the other side of the fence. Why do you have to make anti Shia posts, and heck you don't even make sense in these posts of yours. The only Shia sounding post you made during the last 5 or 6 months that I observed was when you questioned Botta on Yazid and the event of Karbala.

And...

People have different styles of coming at things. Aladdin was just gross at this behaviour of yours. I too am saying the same thing.

Why is that a lot of Shia people have started to question Nader.

Why do you have to adopt this behaviour? Dear, I am disappointed at you.

If you are placing people on ignore list because of this matter, please place me in that list too.

[aladdin]

Anyone who knowingly fabricate lies against the Prophet (pbuh), they can find their place in the hellfire; this is what our Prophet (pbuh) has told us and this extends to his successors (as)

But in your usual dishonesty, you have twisted my words to make it seem like i was cursing Qazwini or maraja or whoever you wanted. Qazwini got this hadith that he thought was authentic from a source he trusted; the sin is on the ones who fabricate hadiths.

What do you think of a Marja. What are the qualifications of a Marja. How may years they have to study to get to this level. Do you really believe that Ayatollah Qazwini (ra) is so dumb that he cannot tell the difference in an authentic hadith from a trusted source.

Is your ilum higher than him that you can for sure say that the hadith was fabricated and that, "Qazwini got this hadith that he thought was authentic from a source he trusted; the sin is on the ones who fabricate hadiths."

And, then make tafkir on those people.

Why do we always find you standing on the other side of the fence. Why do you have to make anti Shia posts, and heck you don't even make sense in these posts of yours. The only Shia sounding post you made during the last 5 or 6 months that I observed was when you questioned Botta on Yazid and the event of Karbala.

Why is that a lot of Shia people have started to question Nader.

Why do you have to adopt this behaviour? Dear, I am disappointed at you.

If you are placing people on ignore list because of this matter, please place me in that list too.

[Zurarah]

salam alaykom

it's strange brothers and sisters that people claim to know me better than i know myself so i was labelled a liar and someone who don't fear Allah and uses Allah's name in vain!! and by Allah i never lied deliberately in matters of religion and i never used the name of Allah in vain and i swore to Allah that i'm not wasil and many people know my real name and they can tell u but the point is : some people here were having some good times lying to shias and about them and shia brothers can be sometimes trusting and when they feel someone is genuine even if he's not then they tend to respect him and that's because of their goodness not that they are naive astaghfirollah.

so when the salafi glass is shattered then they found no other alternatives but cheap shots that only show their cowardice , they just want me banned no natter what this cots them : even it costs them their honor and manhood (if they have any)

wassalam