(bismillah) (salam)
Don't just look at the intro and run away; actually see what Qazwini has to say. One of these days can we have a serious discussion about tahreef and the narrations concerning it? We would be lying if we said there was no such hadith; there's many. And what if the narrations are authentic by our standards? What would that say about the Shia school? Do the modern 'ulema who reject tahreef do so to appease Sunnis? Or because they view the hadiths as actually weak? Any tho
Salams Firstly, I think we have to clarify this stupid dogma that if a sanad of a narration is sahih, the narration itself becomes reliable and trustworthy and is always used by scholars to reach to conclusions/decisions. Science of Rijaal is just a tool/part of shia science of hadith. Just because the sanad is correct, doesn't mean the content is correct. It is common sense.... We had a lengthy discussion about tehreef of Quran (with lots of references and information) and lots of scholarly opi