Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله
Sign in to follow this  
Adam++

Dialouge With Maula Dha Mallang

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

If you had the choice of being something other than a human being, what would it be?

Anything that you wish you can do, but you aren't capable of doing it?

What would be your initial reaction if your plane was to crash in the middle of no where?

Do you hate being wrong about things?

If you had the chance to go back in time, what would you change?

Look to your left, what do you see?

errrm thats all...for now ^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever fought a duel?

What would constrain you fight one?

What would be your choice of weapons, if you commanded the choice?

Who would you choose for a second?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you had the choice of being something other than a human being, what would it be?

a snow wolf as part of a huge wild hunting pack

Anything that you wish you can do, but you aren't capable of doing it?

speaking fluent urdu in public its a source of mortification for me.

What would be your initial reaction if your plane was to crash in the middle of no where?

initially...probably "holy [Edited Out] im alive!!!"

Do you hate being wrong about things?

not at all, im probably wrong more times than im right

If you had the chance to go back in time, what would you change?

nothing man, lifes messed up major sometimes but its made me the freak you see before you :)

Look to your left, what do you see?

my library wall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you ever fought a duel?

to the death? no. until one of us was a piece of meat? many, many times. weapons and open hand.

What would constrain you fight one?

if i was threatened, or i thought someone around me was in danger, when i was wilder also if i was desperate for a release from anger

What would be your choice of weapons, if you commanded the choice?

twin short sticks/ batons.

Who would you choose for a second?

an extendable metal baton or nunchakus. i have this beautiful extendable set that snap from about 4 inches to twelve inches at a flick, i would love to try them out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A second is a person that backs one up in a traditional duel

ah apologies i misread. my first choice would be my one time best friend farhan. we fell out because he left me to (as far as he knew) die once, but he was volatile, mentally fractured, solid as a rock, completely impervious to pain and absolutely maniacally violent. the two years i was close to him sure were crazy. one time he started "dating" this hindu girl who lived in middlesborough (about 195 miles away). her community found out and beat her up. i didnt know any of this, he said he wanted to go on a trip to m'boro and beat up some guys, i was like...ok. we got to the place (after 4 hours of travelling), only to be met by a HORDE of hindus running towards us baying for our blood.

man i wonder what hes doing right now.....

If you were given the choice when to die what would you choose?

after seeing the face of imam ali and going to battle in kerbala

^

Essentially she is asking if you were given the choice to live as long as you want, how long would you want to live?

hmm...i want to live through the war imam mehdi will bring. i cant wait for the raj'ah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The EU is a very good example of political barriers coming down, but even in Europe, the modern nation state as we know it is far from withering away [an ideal of the communists]. Do you see the nation state withering away, or even simply Surope moving to a single statehood? If so, could you project any timeline and give some reasons why you feel it will happen as per the timeline you give?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salam Mola Ali Madad MDM :)

Yo ma man, you being tagged as SC celebrity B) Cool!

OK, here are few from me....

1) What type of girl you looking (or got one already), I mean both character wise and physique (you don't have to go in detail) ;)

2) What drives you towards the goals you have set for your life?

3) The most hated personality?

4) The most beloved personality?

5) Describe yourself eloquently in few sentences!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The EU is a very good example of political barriers coming down, but even in Europe, the modern nation state as we know it is far from withering away [an ideal of the communists]. Do you see the nation state withering away, or even simply Surope moving to a single statehood? If so, could you project any timeline and give some reasons why you feel it will happen as per the timeline you give?

my own personal views of the current/future state of the EU are that the general populations apathy and general ignorance will lead to the one nation state of europe. the UK and the rest of europe are already run from people they didnt even elect in europe with a few figurehead british representatives. the level of rule has gone down to literally the size/weight of tomatoes you are allowed to sell in a market stall, what days you put the rubbish bins out for the binmen, and the justice system in general. personally? i think we are already there in all but name.

think about it - we have 1 currency, the euro (which is valid tender in the UK already), rule from 1 place - brussels, all nations are members, its control and influence is growing day by day, it already has its own monarchy - the habsburgs, its own religion - led by the vatican and we, the sheeple, are just sleeping our way into it.

i think the EU is nothing more than a ressurected "holy roman empire" of olden days just under a different name. the same people running it and the same policies.

we are very close to this, i couldnt put a detailed timeline together but definately within the next 10 years we will see the unified 1 nation state. i forsee that we will still be called by our national names, but thats all they will be, names. we will be the state of europa.

favourite cartoon?

bugs, tom n jerry, simpsons, futurama, tazmanian devil

Salam Mola Ali Madad MDM :)

Yo ma man, you being tagged as SC celebrity B) Cool!

lol innit, i feel all loved

OK, here are few from me....

1) What type of girl you looking (or got one already), I mean both character wise and physique (you don't have to go in detail) ;)

man shes gotta be a mallangani non taqleedi. or if she is a taqleedi, a muqallid of a marja who allows azadari our way. ive lived a pretty wild life but ive calmed down a lot these last few years; someone who understands that im not masoom, ive sinned and ive hurt people, but im trying to improve myself. a girl that doesnt have her head in the bollywood clouds, and who can be a decent mother to our mallang kids.

2) What drives you towards the goals you have set for your life?

nothing really, my life is pretty random, i dont have many goals apart from the obvious ones (save money, get married, have kids etc). if something seems cool then i do it. thats about all the criteria i have lol.

3) The most hated personality?

bilal philips for calling maula hussain a baghi and hell bound. i swear by the name of ghazi abbas (as) i will kill him the first opportunity i have. im fully prepared to go to jail if it means humanity is free from filth like him.

apart from that, there are a few guys who apparantely have said MY life is in their hands. to be honest i deserve their hatred and i walk down the street with one eye in the back of my head expecting attack.

4) The most beloved personality?

my grandmother for converting 2000+ salafis into mallangs completely single handedly and knowing i would be born days before i was and coming to england to raise me (no one told anyone my mother was pregnant because she was very ill), my father for educating me, raising me and making me into a man, my mother for her support and love even when i screwed up stuff major.

5) Describe yourself eloquently in few sentences!

lol erm i dunno about a few sentences but how about this...

when love is not madness, it is not love

because i love loads of people in loads of different ways, and each way is mad lol :blush:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
my own personal views of the current/future state of the EU are that the general populations apathy and general ignorance will lead to the one nation state of europe. the UK and the rest of europe are already run from people they didnt even elect in europe with a few figurehead british representatives. the level of rule has gone down to literally the size/weight of tomatoes you are allowed to sell in a market stall, what days you put the rubbish bins out for the binmen, and the justice system in general. personally? i think we are already there in all but name.

think about it - we have 1 currency, the euro (which is valid tender in the UK already), rule from 1 place - brussels, all nations are members, its control and influence is growing day by day, it already has its own monarchy - the habsburgs, its own religion - led by the vatican and we, the sheeple, are just sleeping our way into it.

i think the EU is nothing more than a ressurected "holy roman empire" of olden days just under a different name. the same people running it and the same policies.

we are very close to this, i couldnt put a detailed timeline together but definately within the next 10 years we will see the unified 1 nation state. i forsee that we will still be called by our national names, but thats all they will be, names. we will be the state of europa.

You have the Eurobank, but the fiscal and Monetray policies are still determined by the Central Banks of the constituents countries?

In you opinion the economy of Europe is moving towards a fully centrally planned economy? Correct me if I am wrong.

THere is NATO, but not one unfied European armed forces. What does this sifnify in the broader context of the EU?

Do you not think a planned, sensible and sensitive dividion of labour in the EU would be better in long run?

The Schengen Agreement has also opened up Europe more to the rest of the world. What impact will this Agreement have on the EU in the mid and long term?

Edited by Rawshni

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have the Eurobank, but the fiscal and Monetray policies are still determined by the Central Banks of the constituents countries?

In you opinion the economy of Europe is moving towards a fully centrally planned economy? Correct me if I am wrong.

THere is NATO, but not one unfied European armed forces. What does this sifnify in the broader context of the EU?

Do you not think a planned, sensible and sensitive dividion of labour in the EU would be better in long run?

The Schengen Agreement has also opened up Europe more to the rest of the world. What impact will this Agreement have on the EU in the mid and long term?

to be honest when we talk about trade improving with the EU, we arent talking about SME's, were only talking about the larger corporations. its now cheaper to import products from EU countries then from within the UK itself so its driving many smaller businesses out. for example a staggering statistic is that, out of every 11 pounds spent by the public in the UK, £1 goes to a single company - tescos. so a single company owns 1/11th of all uk retail!!! (tescos sources pretty much everything from outside the UK)

i can only talk about the bank of england, and thats as much tied to the strength of the euro and trade as anything else when setting interest rates etc, so if anything thats more or less controlled by the EU already.

its only a matter of time before we have a unified euro army - theres already "eurofighter jets" available for all EU countries (check it out here) which is the first step, current conditions (uk army being sent to iraq without boots because the government cant afford them) is just going to bring this about more quickly. NATO is on its way out if you ask me, it has a limited budget and increased conflicts are straining it almost to breaking point.when it goes, expect the EU army to suddenly appear as if by magic.

im going to be talking more about the EU in the david icke thread i started in the politics forum, but things like the Schengen Agreement are just stepping stones to a 1 nation state. if you look behind the scenes and who is pushing this, you will see the same names cropping up time and time again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MDM

WE will be talking a lot about Europe , but for the moment, do you think

Russia will become the decisive force in the Atlantic Alliance?

A probable WW III would be Europe vs the USA with Russia calling the shots in Europe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree so far as i think Russia wont be alone here, but it will be central to the upcoming war. historically russia has been no friend with muslims or western europe, so dont see europe vs the US, but i think russia more and more it sees our world as the "lesser of two evils".

this whole georgia fiasco i think was russia giving a warning shot. the pipeline that runs across georgia is an asset to both sides. i suspect russias activities over the next few months/ years will be near to other major pipelines in the region in order to control them - if it DOES have control of them, what choice does the US/western europe HAVE but to start kissing russias rear end, cos we all know they wont do anything militarily cos russia will annhialate them.

as far as im aware russia has close links with pakistan, china and iran? if so i forsee the war being between the US and western europe, versus a russia/iran/china alliance.

im worried about pakistan. while mushy is still in control i assume he will be on the side of the alliance. i get the impression he used the west in order to help pakistan, but is rebelling against them so thats why everyone is so desperate to get rid of him. if imbeciles like nawaz shareef and slimeballs like zardari get in control, well, we both know who calls the shots for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russia is and historically has been closer to India than either China or Pakistan.

Russia has been close to, very close to Iran, since the time of the Shah. Iran's steel industry, in the most part is of Russian origin, as well many power plants.

Pakistan:

Musharraf toppled Nawaz Sharif because Nawaz waz sacking him. The west just turned a blind eye, until 9/11/01. Then they used the carrot and stick on Musharraf.

Had not Musharraf goofed he would have gotten far more out of the US than he did.

In my opinion, the American attack on Afghanistan was totally justified and opposition to Musharraf on that count enturely misfounded. There were, of course, and still are, many other reasons to oppose Musharraf.

Zardari is the most maligned politician in Pakistan. And most unjustly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ah i see, thanks for clearing that up. so its a russia/iran alliance that is more likely, instead of a russia/china/iran one? even then that would be an absolutely formidable force, dont see india coing to the muslim worlds aid ny time soon.

ill have to disagree with you about zardari, the fact that as a shia he even considered teaming up with filth such as the pro wahabbi shareef clique shows how much his faith means to him. its like hezbollah teaming up with al qaeeda, its unthinkable for dece shia to do that.

on top of that, as a "deomcratic" party how on earth could he agree to his son being the heir- apparent to the bhutto party without being elected? does this not show his double standards? wifes will or not, isnt this a not so subtle move which basically puts him in full control of the party while his son is alive, and his puppet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First the geo-strategic situation. Russia has been a very long time ally of India; and this alliance with India serves two Russian purposes; it keeps China's southern [generally] flank vulnerable, and helps contain Pakistan by tieing down its forces on a very long front.

Pakisatn has never had chummy relations with Afghanistan, except an on again off again chumminess in the 1990s.

Pakistan and Iran were natural allies, till 1979. Relations between the two have not been as cordial as they were prior to 1979.

Now the internal politics:

I agree with you in principle, that the PPP should not have entered into an alliance with Nawaz Sharif. I have said, earlier, that the PPP should not have observed abstinence from canvassing during the 40 day mourning they observed for BB. Had they not done so, they would have swept the polls with a super landslide. They left the field vacaaant for the others; this something that is never done in electoral politics.

Now try to understand. Both the PPP and the Nawaz League, in their own ways are pitted against two of the most organized and disciplined forces in the country, the military and the mullahs. One of them is armed too. You see the equation.

It was a necessity for either party to work out such an arrangement that they could pit the maximum number of people [street power] against the regime.

The succession.

In times of crisis, leadership and directives always come from the top. In normalcy, leadership is thrown up from the ranks, and policies are arrived at by discussion and debate from the base to the apex.

What I have said holds true historically for every popular party.

The PPP has been in in one crisis after another since the ouster of ZAB's government by the la'een Zia ul Haq in 1977.

I will once again say, Zardari is Pakistan's most maligned politician, most unjustly so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm youve given me a lot to think about - to be honest i equated zardari as equal to shareef ever since they became a tag team.

let me mull over this and read around the subject before i speak any further, there seems to be a hole in my knowledge that needs filling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok fine.

my views of the world at large and current geo politics are a bit skewed; ill be the first to admit. there are people who believe that everything that happens in the world is due to coincidence, cause and effect and the world is stumbling from one major event to another.

i am not one of those people lol. if you scratch not too far at all beneath the surface you will always see either one of a few surnames cropping up all over the world, or steps towards a bigger plan.

for this reason i do not believe that the war on afghanistan was justified, on the pretext of their help in the 9/11 demolitons of the twin towers and WTC7. planes didnt bring those damn towers down and neither did bin ladens homeboys. mind you anything that kills large numbers of talibans and al qaeedas is good in my eyes whatever the reason.

i believe that afghanistan was invaded due to their pulling out of the TAPI oil/ gas pipeline at the last minute jeapordising the whole multi billion deal. pakistan stuck to their agreement so were safe. for this i am only grateful to mushy. theres a time and a place to grow a backbone, and that wasnt it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if mushy resigns and replaces his position with one of his people (*cough* GILANI *cough*) then i see no reason to be worried, hes still pulling the strings. look at when he stepped down from being head of the army, does anyone think he lost any of his influence?

if he is assassinated or the shareef/zardari get in. we are majorly screwed. pakistan will become just another us foreign policy ruled [Edited Out] of humanity and the mullahs will return in full force. imagine a nationwide NWFP for shias.

the situation for shias right now is horrific, but i think it is only mushy that has stopped it going any further, shareef wont care and zardari wont do anything unless for a PR stunt or he gets paid. zardari would never have done a laal masjid (sorry sis rawshni...you know i think he has betrayed shias by teaming up with shareef)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He has explained it before. Its ..

i have no idea..

malang of imam Ali.

or ..

Slave of Imam Ali

or..

Devotee of Imam Ali..

they are ALL right :D

bro its this

Maula (master ali) Dha (of) Mallang (lose my senses in his love and devotion)

so i am someone who loses all sense of myself and the world in my love and reverence of my master ali (as), and attach myself as closely as i can to him and his beliefs and his family before anyone or anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MDM! what u have done in response of the strong propaganda against Malang.

I have fed up this propaganda

1.Malangs dont care salat

2.Malang use drugs

3.Malangs get money for matam.

This propoganda is promoted trough mimbers with full throtle.Behind this propaganda they are saying all shias who believe in third shadat and zangeer zani are lies in this catagory.

Thier agents openly saying on mimber "Dont do Tabrra,because our prophet had forgive thier enemies"

I AM WITNESS OF ALL ABOVE FACTS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MDM! what u have done in response of the strong propaganda against Malang.

brother all i can do is lead by example. i just hope people see me and realise mallangs are not what they think, nor are we the enemies and haters of ulema, nor are we mindless drugees, nor do we hate namaz and waajibaats.

I have fed up this propaganda

you should have been on shiachat a few years ago. this propaganda is NOTHING compared with the hatred against mallangs on shiachat back then. unfortunately most of those mallangs whose duty it was to defend us, were the worst ones able to do it.

1.Malangs dont care salat

come to the 404 jaloos or any majalis where many different sangats gather. EVERYONE reads namaz, more so than the non mallangs who are too busy fighting over niaz.

2.Malang use drugs

there are many mallangs who do drugs, in particular LSD and chars. all we could do was remove them from our sangats and not allow them in our idaras.

3.Malangs get money for matam.

what rubbish. what lies people tell!!!! wa la hawla wa laa quwwata illah billah hil aleeyil azeem, people BELIEVE that nonsense???

Thier agents openly saying on mimber "Dont do Tabrra,because our prophet had forgive thier enemies"

I AM WITNESS OF ALL ABOVE FACTS.

i will do tabarra every hour of my life until i die. ask those people - have they ever read the translation of ziarat ashura, or read bibi paaks (sa) life when she cursed the first 2 in every prayer? or read the QURAN?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok fine.

my views of the world at large and current geo politics are a bit skewed; ill be the first to admit. there are people who believe that everything that happens in the world is due to coincidence, cause and effect and the world is stumbling from one major event to another.

i am not one of those people lol. if you scratch not too far at all beneath the surface you will always see either one of a few surnames cropping up all over the world, or steps towards a bigger plan.

for this reason i do not believe that the war on afghanistan was justified, on the pretext of their help in the 9/11 demolitons of the twin towers and WTC7. planes didnt bring those damn towers down and neither did bin ladens homeboys. mind you anything that kills large numbers of talibans and al qaeedas is good in my eyes whatever the reason.

i believe that afghanistan was invaded due to their pulling out of the TAPI oil/ gas pipeline at the last minute jeapordising the whole multi billion deal. pakistan stuck to their agreement so were safe. for this i am only grateful to mushy. theres a time and a place to grow a backbone, and that wasnt it.

The war on Afghanistan was justified because:

The US had reason to believe that Osama bin Laden, and Al Qaedeh, the outfit he heads, were involved in the 9/11 attack

It had been earlier demonstrated, and Al Qaedeh itself had assumed responsibility of similar terrorist attacks

The US repeated demanded of Afghanistan to hand over Osama bin Laden

The Taliban refused and stuck to the refusal

Not attacking Afghanistan would have meant encouraging further, even more devastating attacks

The Taliban occupied Afghanistan [though the US had a BIG part in the Taliban coming to power] was a rogue state anyway and should have been brought to heel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The war on Afghanistan was justified because:

The US had reason to believe that Osama bin Laden, and Al Qaedeh, the outfit he heads, were involved in the 9/11 attack

while i agree that the tali tubbies and afghanistan needed to be brought to heel, i very strongly doubt they had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks. in fact i would say they were as much responsible for bringing down the towers as lee harvey oswald was for shooting jfk with a magic bullet.

- wheres the plane they "flew" into the pentagon? show me even a single picture of the wreckage

- how did they bring down tower 7 in EXACTLY the same way without so much as a flaming CESSNA hitting it?

- how did they make aviation fuel melt millions of tonnes of structural steel in less than an hour?

- how can a few guys armed with BOX CUTTERS over power a plane full of 300+ people? have you seen box cutters? theyre mostly plastic and rubber!!

finally, what are your views about the TAPI pipeline?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^

These above questions were raised much after the 9/11 thing happened. What there answers are, and whether the questions themselves even have any investigative merit, I do not know.

What I know is:

Osama bin Laden is a terrorist

The organization that he heads, Al Qaedeh, is a terrorist outfit

THat Al Qaedeh had assumed responisbility of earlier terrorist attacks

That Osama and other key Al personnel WERE in Afghanustan when 9/11 happened.

That the US demanded Osama from the Afghans and kept on demanading for four weeks, before they initiated military actitary action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...