|
|
In the Name of God بسم الله
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'saqifah'.
Found 4 results
-
Excerpt from Tarikh Tabari, Vol 9. Read the footnote as well. Draw your own conclusions.
- 1 reply
-
- 3
-
-
-
- saqifah
- ali fatima caliphate
- (and 1 more)
-
Most of us have heard that the foundation of Karbala was laid at Saqifah. Here is how: 01. Abu Bakr became Caliph at Saqifah (632 AD) 02. Caliph Abu Bakr made Yazid bin Abu Sufiyan a general for the invasion of Roman Syria (634 AD) 03. Caliph Umar and Abu Sufiyan were extremely close (throughout the Meccan years of the Prophet (saw) and post Mecca victory) 04. Caliph Umar made Yazid bin Abu Sufiyan the governor of Syria (639 AD) 05. Caliph Umar made Muawiya bin Abu Sufiyan the governor of Syria after the death of Yazid bin Abu Sufiyan (639 AD) 06. Caliph Umar left Muawiya bin Abu Sufiyan unchecked while rotated all other governors (639 - 656 AD) 07. Marwan bin Hakam and Muawiya heavily influenced Caliph Uthman reign (644 - 656 AD) 08. Muawiya was able to create a huge army and amass a tremendous amount of wealth under caliphs Umar and Uthman (639 - 656 AD) 09.Muawiya broke the treaty with Imam Hasan (as) and made his son Yazid caliph (680 AD) 10. Karbala happened (680 AD)
- 16 replies
-
- 4
-
-
-
- saqifah karbala
- karbala
- (and 4 more)
-
Is this Saad Ibn Ebadah who started Saqifah? there is a nice statement said by Imam Ali saying that when Al-ansar felt that Sahabah would not leave Khilafat for me as a successor of prophet they rushed towards Saqifah saying that our head - Saad Ibn ebadah - is better that others to become Khalifah المسترشد في إمامة علي بن أبي طالب عليه السلام، ص: 410 فَلَمَّا أَبْطَئُوا بِالْوِلَايَةِ عَلَيَّ، وَ هَمُّوا بِإِزَالَتِهَا عَنِّي، وَ ثَبَتَ الْأَنْصَارُ وَ هُمْ كَتِيبَةُ الْإِسْلَامِ، فَقَالَتْ: إِذَا لَمْ تُسْلِمُوهَا لِعَلِيٍّ فَصَاحِبُنَا سَعْدُ بْنُ عُبَادَةَ أَحَقُّ بِهَا مِنْ غَيْرِهِ!. If we do not consider the validity of the book and have this as a theory on Saqifah yet we see there are many proofs in Sunni books supporting this idea. with this argument we should stop calling Saad Ibn Ebadh the first one who forgot the will of prophet on Ali as he wanted to retake his share.
-
(salam) I found this beautiful admission by the Ahl al-Sunnah on what really happened at Ghadeer Khumm: “According to the elders of our family, namely Mawlana Ghulam ‘Ali Qadiri, in his Mishkaat an-Nabuwat, the Prophet’s declaring Hadrat ‘Ali as the Master (Mawla) of all Believers was the statement which identified Hadrat ‘Ali as the possessor of the Khilafat i-Akbar (Major Khilafah). Hadrat ‘Ali was appointed by Rasulullah (S) as a Khalifa, while Hadrat Abu Bakr was appointed by Hadrat Umar as a Khalifa. While both Khilafahs are valid, they are not the same”. http://ahmedamiruddi...-the-shaykhayn/ Does any Sunnee here think these people made a mistake? If yes, what are your reasons? Thanks.
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.