.png.8a406d04c759601a15bea7e1a3ffe828.png)
|
|
|
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'imam ali as'.
Found 6 results
-
Read the Reddit comments to understand what the thread was about, since the post has since been deleted. ....................................................................................... I'm so tired of the utterly nonsensical and VERY COMMON Sunni notion of 'I am happy to seek unity with Shias as long as they don't curse/insult/abuse any Sahaba, and especially NOT Aisha, Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman. Firstly, any Shia claim regarding the sahabi that happens to go against the Sunni narrative is considered insulting. Secondly, and more importantly, is that the same notion is true for Shias... You are insulting the Ahlul Bayt by not accepting them as divinely appointed leaders of Allah, and infallible individuals, and perfect preservers of the religion of Islam, and a high means of seeking closeness to Allah (intercession). Not only are you insulting revered Shia figures by not following them, you are commiting MAJOR shirk by giving a false attribute to Allah, by saying that Allah has not always appointed an infallible leader on this Earth, and that there currently isn't an infallible leader. Furthermore, the real kicker is that plenty of revered Shia figures, such as Abu Talib (رضي الله عنه), are considered kuffar by Sunnis. Is this not insulting? So, how can we Shias unite with Sunnis based on their own fallacious logic? Shias are the minority, and Sunnis are the majority. It makes Sunnis think that they are Orthodox and that they have to unite with Heterodox for political and humanitarian reasons, and that Shias must make [ridiculous] compromises. Shias are far more receptive to the unity message, because we actually understand Sunni Islam, and can see the commonalities. We understand that we can't make Sunnis compromise on their beliefs. Simply by being the minority within Islam, by nature we Shias already understand Sunni beliefs, whereas Sunnis have a basic strawman understanding of Shia beliefs... which is natural, considering that they are the majority. Anyways, the point of my post is the following: Let's compile a list of revered Shia figures that are not given their proper status by Sunnis, according to Shia Islam... with an explanation given. ...This is to show that we Shias and Sunnis can unite, but we cannot unite upon revered figures and imamah. ...This will also serve as a way of showing Sunnis that this argument of theirs makes no sense. Another important question we may ask is "What about commonly revered figures like Imam Ali (عليه السلام) who is given different status in both sects? Can we unite upon Imam Ali (عليه السلام)?" ...a common Sunni criticism of political unity is that "Ali ibn Abi Talib (رضي الله عنه) is given an improper status in Shia religion because they call upon him... tawassul (intercession) of the 'dead' is Shirk! So there is absolutely no room for unity since we can't even agree on the status of the sahabi" [yes, I am aware that the Imams (عليه السلام) are still alive, but Sunnis don't believe this...] I would love to hear your thoughts. Wassalam. JazakAllah Khair. Fi sabilillah. -
Aiming to spread the message of the Ahlulbayt (A.S) as far and wide as possible inshaAllah :) FOR SHIA WALLPAPERS http://syedalirj.weebly.com/shia-wallpaper.html
- 2 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- MUHARRAM
- HUSSAIN AS
- (and 5 more)
-
How are the sunni's of the time after Imam Hussien (as) different or the same? After Mokhtar el thaqifi killed all the people from Ashura, the people that came after him where all against ahullybat (as) and they made sure that no Mokhtar el thaqifi will come back again to take revenge for the shia of Imam Ali (as). the question again is how are they different or the same?
-
Asalamu Alaikum brothers and sisters,, i am writing this topic on behalf of a friend who doesnt have ShiaChat,, anyway is there any Authentic Hadiths about the man helping out around the house,, or helping with the children,, does anyone have any references as well,, iv heard some Hadiths about Imam Ali AS helping Bibi Fatima Al Zahra AS JazakAllah Kheir :))
-
Asalamu Alaikum brothers and sisters,, i have heard this hadith,, im pretty sure its from Imam Ali AS,, and i wanted to see if anyone has a source for it,, or is able to give me a similar Hadith to this one,, "someone came to the Imam and asked him,, how can we follow you if your unable to sin,, the Imam replies and says that its not that we are unable to sin,, its that we dont allow ourselves to sin,," W/Salam- 13 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- Imam Ali AS
- Imam
- (and 3 more)
-
(bismillah) Al Hamdulilah hir rabil ala meen Wa salatu was salamu ala Sayyidna wa Nabeyna Abal Qasim Muhammad , wa Ahlelbayt at tabiyeen at tahireen wa ashabil ghuril Mayameen (salam) Brothers and sisters, I NEED YOUR HELP IN MY PERSONAL STUDY(COURSEWORK)!!FOR HISTORY A LEVEL I have been asked by my college to do my own study on a topic which would cover a period of 100 years.I need to make a question and than present my whole essay in answering the question as I go along also providing arguements etc.I need to show some key concepts such as causation , continuity , change , consequence and significance. I want to do something unique and something Im good at which is why I have chosen to work on our Islamic History. I have come up with the following question so far , The Ummayads:A golden period of Islam or an era of destruction? OR The Abbasids:A golden period of Islam or an era of destruction? What would you advise which one shall I go for The Ummayads or The Abbasids and why? Any other suggestions are welcomed regarding the QUESTION which would come under the topic of Islamic , Shia History etc. I NEED TO TELL MY TEACHER BY TOMORROW!!!!!!!!!! :sick: :no: (salam) :yaali:
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.