Search the Community

Do you people even pay heed on what's going on in the world? Or are you busy with tiktok, instagram, facebook, video games, football games, or kardashian show? Your rights are being taken away day by day since the start of pandemic, people are literally being thrown into concentration camps, kids are being bribed to take the vaccine without parental consent, your movements are being restricted. Do you even pay heed on what's going on? unvaccinated are being treated like they have aerosol HIV. Have you not seen the massive protest taking place all over the world? Why are muslim, shia muslims who talk about justice and being against oppression every year not raised a single finger on this issue? This issue is not about whether vaccine is good or bad, it's about your human rights! Have this plandemic made you blind to your human rights? The way the state has built an enemy profile for unvaccinated is no better than the way nazi treated the jews. These nazis were also ordinary men, but progressively some of them turned into monsters. This is what will happen with the state, progressively they will take away all your rights. This is just the beginning. Say goodbye to raising your family as shia, these individuals are not profitable for the state. Enjoy what your religion says, but don't raise a finger against oppression, unless it's sided with the oppressors. - Modern day muslims. The same people that says they are followers of ahlul bayt, but blind to the oppression of the oppressors. How will you choose side during the return of your imam, when your state will build an enemy profile for him. How will you do it, when you can't even do it now! My god! open your eyes before you go fully blind.

Nowadays many colleges/universities and employers are asking for covid 19 vaccination for enrollment / employment. Many families will have to choose between taking the vaccine and keep their job or to not take the vaccine and not be able to provide for their families. This is zhulm on so many levels that I find it unbelievable that there has not been a single Muslim community raising their voice against this zhulm on vaccine free people I was hoping in this thread that we can help each other to write a religious / philosophical or medical exemption letter for the forced vaccinations. Even better if some reverend (sheikh) could assist you write religious exemption letter. One letter from your reverend and one personal letter explaining how vaccination goes against your religious beliefs. Civil Rights act of 1964: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the law that prevents employers from discriminating against an employee on the basis of their religion/religious beliefs/religious practices. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2021) Resolution 2361 7.3: 7.3.1. ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to be vaccinated if they do not wish to do so. 7.3.2. ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated. Nuremberg code: (1947) 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) Article 7: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (1997) Article 5: An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent to it. This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks. UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005) Article 6.1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. The World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics: A physician shall: Respect a competent patient’s right to accept or refuse treatment. The Medical Protection Society: Respect for patients’ autonomy is expressed in consent law; to impose care or treatment on people without respecting their wishes and right to self-determination is not only unethical, but illegal. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination#_ftnref226 https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=29004 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168007cf98 http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D31058%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-international-code-of-medical-ethics/ https://www.medicalprotection.org/uk/articles/consent-uk

The thread starter's post has been removed due to a request by them. Their question has been quoted just below: An atheist who knowingly rejects the truth can't be that good because: 1, They have been ungrateful to their creator and the creator of every other good thing. The source of all good. Even the atheist's ability to be good is from God. 2, Humans have been inherently designed to work better when they believe. A lack of belief causes humans to malfunction. Read: http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235010653-religious-ideas-make-atheists-into-better-people/ If an atheist rejects God knowing the above evidence, then they are committing an action which makes them more susceptible to doing wrong. Such a decision is immoral. 3, Belief brings peace to people. An atheist is being immoral by making people disbelieve in a caring God and an afterlife. Consider that belief is strongly hard wired in the fitra; thus it takes a lot to disbelieve.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_personality_disorder Multiple Personality Disorder is basically a subconscious shift into another alter ego and the alter ego gives itself a name and identity. There are some people who have more than 60 alter ego's and they can't control the random shift of these random aliases. One minute you're like a 3 year old sucking your thumb, the next minute you're like an ill mannered, illiterate teenager and the next minute you're an old person etc. Each distinct personality has its own pattern of perceiving and interacting with the environment. The question is, basically, doesn't this disorder infringe upon and negate the concept of freewill? Another interesting question is, why did God create such a disorder as this, for what purpose?