Search the Community

A very logical reply to those who say that it is an honour for Abubakr that he was in the cave along with Holy Prophet (saws) ------ Please Watch CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5sHS_9iVz0&feature=player_embedded

DEBATE OF FUZZAL BIN HASAN WITH ABU HANIFA ABOUT ABUBAKR Once Fazaal bin Hassan (Companion of Imam Jaffar e Sadiq as ) was walking through the streets of kufa with his friend. He saw that Imam Abu Hanifa was surrounded of some people and those people were asking some religious questions from him. Fazaal Bin Hassan said to his friend: ‘Today i will not let him (Abu Hanifa) go without unveiling him.’ Friend of fazaal Bin Hassan said: ‘But he is very intelligent man in religious point of view.’ Fazaal Bin hassan Said: ‘Now you will u see how intelligent he is .’ And then Fazaal bin Hassan approached to Abu Hanifa said to him: “O! Abu Hanifa, there is my brother who use to say that after Rasoolullah, Hazrat Ali is best among the people. But I say that there is Abu Bakr and then Umar” What do you say in this regard? Imam Abu Hanifa thought for some moments and then replied: “For the superiority of these two (Abu Bakr and Umar) this is sufficient that they got burial sites next to Rasoolullah. Don’t you know?” Fazaal Bin Hassan said: ‘Yes I know , when I said this point to my brother he said: “Either, the place where they (Abu Bakr and Umar) are buried was the property of Rasoolullah . Hence, it not legal for anyone to bury someone on that place without the permission.” Or. “It was property Of Abu Bakr and Umar they gave it to Rasoolullah. So again it is illegal for them to interfere in the gift which they gave to Rasoolullah.” Abu Hanifa again thought for some moments and then replied: It was property of Rasoolullah. But both Abu Bakr and Umar are buried in the shares of their daughters (Ayesha and Hafsa) . Because that place was the property of Wives of Rasoolullah after his Wisal (death). This is why Abu bakr and Umar are buried there. Fazaal bin Hassan Said: Yes I know I also told him that thing but my brother said : Rasoolullah left nine wives after his death. So every wife had equal right over that place. AND SECONDLY IF THE WIVES OF RASOOLULLAH CAN INHERIT THAT PLACE FROM HIM, THEN WHY ABU BAKR REFUSED TO GIVE FADAK TO JANABE SAYYIDA AND SAID THAT PROPERTY LEFT BY PROPHETS GOES IN CHARITY? After listening this Abu Hanifa said to his men. Kick him out of here he is Shia. ( EHTIJAJ TABARSI pg: 207) FOR MORE ARTICLES REFER TO LINK BELOW http://abubakr-ibn-abi-quhafa.blogspot.in/

When Hazrat Ali (a.s.) completed the burial of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.), he busied himself in those works, which the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.) had entrusted him with. He remained within the confines of his house.[1] Few members of Bani Hashim, some Ansar[2] and some Mohajirs presented themselves before him. Amongst these were Abbas[3], Zubayr[4], Miqdad[5], Talha[6], Sa’ad ibn Abi Waqqas[7] and No’man. These people were displeased with the bay’at (allegiance) to Abu Bakr and wished to free themselves from it.[8] They desired to express their disapproval of the same[9] and wanted to pledge their support to Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s.).[10] Mu’awiyah has pointed towards this incident in one of his letters to Hazrat Ali (a.s.). He wrote, “You harbored jealousy in your heart towards Abu Bakr. You did a mischief against him. You tried to spread terror against him. While seated in your house, you tried to deviate the people so that they would not pledge their support to Abu Bakr.”<a href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=7152126183321118029#_ftn11" name="_ftnref11" title="">[11] Umar gathered all those who had paid allegiance to Abu Bakr – these included Sayyed Ibn Hazeer, Salmah ibne Salaamah – and they met the group of people who were agitated. They insisted that since all the people had accepted Abu Bakr as the caliph, this group should follow suit and do the same. On hearing this, Zubayr drew his sword to fight. At this Umar said, “stop this dog and protect us from his evil.” Salmah ibne Salaamah grabbed Zubayr and disarmed him. He handed over his sword to Umar who promptly threw it on the ground and broke it.[12] [1] Isbaat ul Wasiyyah, page 155-156 [2] Taarikhe’ Tabari, volume 3 page 202; Taarikhe’ Yaqoobi, volume 2 page 126; Nahjul Haq, page 271 [3] Eqdul Fareed, volume 2 page 259 [4] Taarikhe’ Tabari, volume 3 page 202 [5] Shar’he Nahjul Balagha, volume 2 page 56 [6] Taarikhe’ Tabari, volume 3 page 202; Kamil ibne Aseer, volume 2 page 325; the narration of these 4 persons is found in Seerate’ Halbiyah, volume 3 page 360 [7] Shar’he Nahjul Balagha, volume 2 page 56 [8] Riyaz un Nazarah, volume 1 page 241; Tareekhe’ Khamees, volume 1 page 169 [9] Al Hamal, page 117 [10] Shar’he Nahjul Balagha, volume 2 page 56 [11] Shar’he Nahjul Balagha, volume 15 page 186 [12] The writer says that the incident of incident of Zubayr of removing his sword, is reported in the second attack, prior to the third attack, with some differences. And then Zubayr swore allegiance under duress. Please note – Tareekhe’ Tabari volume 3 page 203; Kamil Ibne Aseer, volume 2 page 325; Shar’he Nahjul Balagha volume 2 page 45/50/56; Shar’he Nahjul Balagha volume 6 page 47/48; Al Mustarshid, page 378. But regarding the first attack, historians have clarified that Hazrat Ali (as) did not do bay’at. But answering Umar, Hazrat Ali (as) said, “By Allah! Neither will I submit to you, nor will I swear allegiance to Abu Bakr.” In another narration, it is reported that people were silent on hearing the reply of Hazrat Ali (as). Hence for the narrations regarding the first attack, please refer to these books – Al Ayzah, page 367; Al Mustarshid, page 381. In short, we can conclude the coming out of Zubayr with his sword raised has been misreported by the historians due to the confusion regarding the first and second attack.