Search the Community

(Sorry Mods,Admin,Hammedeah, i hate to get thisoff my chest but hear it goes. As i notice when i get on muslim websitesand schalar websites(on and off sunni,/ shia ect) i get the shaft,i get ignored, looked over and even rudley unanswered!!!! Even on Sunni ai get sublimminally mocke, attacked and madefun of,What did i do wrong im not taken seriously, some body plays onthe phone when i call mulanasand shaykhs sunni and shia. Iget made of foolof,this isnot real islamto me!!!Im innnocent! Some man from london mocked me indirectly and said i dont know how to pray properly and say the shahadha!!!!and say non muslimskno more then me. I was told people ib=in my town caused fitnah and spread rumers and propaganda about me for no reason and havng me seen as a fool and a joke, now i cant trust my face around non muslim or even muslim communities, who knos what they have in store, wheb i contacted a masjid they were rude. Why has this happened again Hammeedah and mods dont punish me for saying this They accused me of Major Shirk for saying Ya hussainand claied im going to hell for ever and im a non muslim apostate now and my shahadah is dead!!!! now everyone kicks down me and mocks me too muslims and non muslims and they make a fool out of me. What happeded i heard my town caused fitnah with social media, and rumers now everyone thinksim a joke. I didnt worshio Imam Hussain(عليه السلام) i simply thought sayig that gave me interecession doing matam the first time, i did it again to see but i did not think Imam Hussain(عليه السلام) was equal to Allah or had indepent power. And they said imgong to hell forever, What should i do to get over this?

Cat is out of the Bag. This is amazing, a few weeks after Yasir Habib's new project for ME went on Shia Chat, a bill was tabled in USA Congress (Yes THE US CONGRESS) for a free Baluchistan region carved out from Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Here's the link -> http://www.examiner....f-determination US congressmen call for Baloch right to self-determination The hearing on Balochistan was convened by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican from California, in his capacity as the chair of the Oversight & Investigations Subcommittee of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. I'll repost the new ME map from the "Blood Borders" article I already posted in the beginning of this thread.

Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei says uprisings in the Middle East region are part of the battle against Zionist autocracy in the world. Ayatollah Khamenei said the Zionists, US, and Western powers feel weak in the face of Islamic Awakening and “this feeling of weakness and defeat will grow by the day.” The Leader said humanity is standing at a critical juncture and is on the verge of a “grand development.” “Humanity has passed all material and ideological schools such as Marxism, Liberal Democracy and Secular Nationalism and is at the beginning of a new era,” the Leader said. Ayatollah Khamenei further urged the revolutionary youths to vigilantly guard the fruit of their efforts and not allow arrogant powers to “hijack” and “derail” their revolutions. The Leader stressed that despite social, historical and geographical differences, Muslim nations are “everyone is against the satanic US and Israeli dominance and cannot tolerate the cancerous tumor of Israel.” Ayatollah Khamenei made the remarks in a meeting with foreign guests participating in the "Islamic Awakening and Youth Conference" in Tehran. The two-day event kicked off on Sunday with some 15-hundred participants from 73 countries. The conference mainly focuses on the pivotal role of the youth in the wave of Islamic Awakening that is sweeping through the Middle East and North Africa.

Saudi Arabia Under West’s Microscope - Part I Nedal Hamadeh The French Foreign Ministry has requested researchers for five studies on one question: Why has not the Saudi street moved yet? Nowadays, busy circles in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in France are unprecedentedly and actively pursuing the fast moving events in the Arab world, especially in the Middle East. Paris, stumbling since the beginning of the events and the Arab revolutions, is trying to gingerly work over these days. This is what is shown in dealing with the Syrian affair despite some statements here and there most of which are connected with internal squabbles in the house of the French decision making over what is going on in the Arab world. It seems that the French have decided to adopt a new policy namely the principle of reading what may happen or to prognosticate events that might be useful and beneficial for the role that France is considering to play in the " the evolving new Arab world, " as it was called by one of the diplomats working in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of France. This French stand has induced the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of France to request researchers at five different research centers and French universities to put forward five studies about the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia examining one question:" Why have not the Saudi masses moved out till today?" This question was reported by a researcher in the Middle East affairs at one of the French universities, who will participate in finalizing one of those studies which are urgently requested to be ready soon. The intensified logic of the events in the Arab region has induced the French politicians to question the real reason preventing the Saudi masses from moving out in the streets till now; mainly, first, because of the economic importance of this country, as it is known for all; second, its being the only Arab ally on whom the West depends in annoying Iran, the target of the Western countries and Israel which endeavor to prevent it from completing and developing its nuclear program; third, because of Saudi Arabia's commitment not to incite against Israel and refraining from using oil as a weapon in particular. Simultaneously, in connection with the Saudi affairs, and contrary to declared statements, major concern prevails in the French political circles about Saudi military intervention in Bahrain, which the French foreign policy stakeholders consider a reckless Saudi measure which will eventually serve the interest of Iran. They also consider such a measure will make Iran conceive of the Saudi Royal family feet sinking in the quicksand of the region, and that Iran is waiting for the opportunity and appropriate time to make Saudi Arabia pay for what it has done, according to an academic French source concerned about the affairs in the region. The French evaluation for the Saudi error in Bahrain, though it is not public, is not far from that of Iran's, which once described that intervention in Bahrain as a strategic awful error committed by Saudi Arabia. In addition, the conviction of the French says that the Saudi American relations as well as those of the Saudi European ones cannot go on with changes arising in the Arab region in case the Saudi regime remained on its current structure. France has also disagreement and reproach for Saudi Arabia resulting from the American - British veto on the sale of the French weapons; this makes France "Sarkozy", which relied heavily on Saudi Arabia in the marketing of aircraft Rafale, the French fighter in the Gulf, frustrated by the unlimited dependence and pledge of Saudi officials to everything America says, especially the weapons issue. "Saudi Arabia will not remain safe from the drastic changes despite its preemptive offensive in Bahrain and its intensive attempts to maintain, Ali Abdullah Saleh in Yemen." Thus say the majority of the French who have a direct relationship with the files of the Arab region; However, the timing of the movement, how it will spread, and where it is going to start remain the subject of the question. Because all of this could determine the outcome of any change both internally and externally, noting the surge in the transfer of funds from Saudi Arabia to abroad since the crisis in Bahrain, and this surge in money transfers according to French sources, includes dozens of princes in the Saudi royal family. Saudi Arabia under the West’s Microscope - Part II Nidal Hamadeh Part Two: The Reasons Why the Western Empathy and Interest Are Wearing off No sooner do you talk of Saudi Arabia in France than will the arguer think of Qatar. The echo of the invisible war between the two regimes has gone out of the ruling palaces and has reached the parlors of the Decision makers in the West. Although Saudi Arabia's officials have always underestimated Qatar and their Qatari peers before the West, the westerners have, simultaneously, always been following with interest everything released by Al-Jazeera Channel particularly that this channel has exclusively broadcast Osama Bin Laden statements, and it has placed Iraq as a priority in its coverage of the events supported by numerous work teams and gigantic capacities. Thus, due to Al-Jazeera success, there has been an influence on the view of the West toward the Gulf Arab countries particularly toward Saudi Arabia which is not considered anymore the only weighty force in the order of the emirates and the Gulf Sheikdoms. Subsequently, the role of Qatar has started to surface because of Al-Jazeera needed by the West, particularly, the U.S.A. to dampen, on one hand, the occupation in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and to gradually allow the incursions of the American political motives, on the other hand. This has been what evoked the Saudi wrath against Qatar; as a result, the Saudi officials have never attenuated instigating their peers in the West against Qatar. Such an act occurred several times in a private conversation with President Jacques Chirac of France as mentioned in the book "Dans le Secret des President" or " The Secrets of Presidents" by the French writer and journalist Mr. Vincent Nouzille; also, as Richard Lapavier the author of " The Secret Story of 1559 Resolution." In this context, the instigation triggered by the Saudis has extended to the U.S.A. and Britain. However, the western decision making circles, which have been working on making of Saudi Arabia a deterring force against Iran in the region after the Turks had refused negotiating the idea, have started to seriously consider and talk over the advantages of the Saudi model in the Arab region particularly after the Saudi military interference in Yemen which has shown the limitation of the Saudi military and political force in spite of the gigantic financial capacities. In this context, Fatiha Dazi, Senior Analyst Arabian Peninsula, Doctor in Political Science, Middle East Desk, Delegation of Strategic Affairs, Political Department, Dr. Fatiha Dazi-Heni Ministry of Defence, Paris, and author of the book " The Kingdoms of the Gulf" wrote that Saudi Arabia is a very affluent country, nevertheless, abundant affluence alone can never produce a strategic and significant role for such countries. Such fallback in the importance of the Saudi ruling regime was not limited to what was mentioned earlier, yet it reached the point of the conviction of the elite political figures in the West that the Saudi royal family has been the origin of extremism and its nurturing in the Islamic regions, in addition to its being based on a non-viable model of governance for long. This has been indicated by French Secret Service Head Alan Chouet of the (DGSE) who in turn lashed out an offense against the Saud royal family and the ruling regime in the Saudi Arab Kingdom accusing them of patronizing violence and that THEY are the country of extremism and Islamic fanaticism, not Iran or Iraq. He added at a conference held at the French Senate House and attended by several French, European, and American experts and titled "The Middle East during the Nuclear Time," one of whose lecturers was Mr. Khafier Solana, the previous General Secretary of NATO and the previous Commissioner of the European Diplomacy, along with several Arab and foreign diplomats in Paris, and in the presence of the ex-Secretary of State Mrs. Madeleine Albright: "This family has ruled since 1926 and has relied on the legitimacy of the sacred shrines and on escalating Islamic extremism and fanaticism in its governance after it had removed the Hashemites, the historically legal rulers and administrators for the sacred shrine affairs." The truth is that this Saudi family is the foundation of violence in the Islamic regions because it has relied on its continuity in ruling on the logic of extremism and auctioneering over others in every Islamic issue; all of this has been done in the hope of subduing any internal protesting movement and encountering others externally such as Iran or Iraq during Saddam Hussein's regime. In the light of lacking the human resources and because of the absence of an industrial infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, the Saudi family has relied in its political administration on paying funds, by funding societies and groups holding violent and extremist beliefs all over the world. However, the real reason for stability in Saudi Arabia and for the stable Saudi family regime originates from the agreement made in 1945 between the King( Abdel A'ziz Al Saud) and the American president (Franklin Roosevelt), which stated American protection for the Saudi regime in exchange of a guarantee by the ruling family to keep the oil flowing to America." Here Choeut words end. Now and after the Arab revolutions encompassing the Arab region, there is a geo-political redesign for the map both regionally and internationally according to the French Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Alain Juppé. The features of this aggressive map, as seen by the elite in the West, does not fit with the continuity of the regime in Saudi Arabia in its present form, because the Arab changes due would make the western countries' support for this regime a heavy burden on them, which subsequently would mean more hostility against the Arab nations, which in turn never fear their regimes anymore. "Undoubtedly, the changes are going to extend to Saudi Arabia," a French academic expert in the Arab affairs says adding, " The new concepts and the current variables must collide on with the Saudi hard regime and they will topple it."