Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jiraffe

  • Rank
    Level 1 Member

Previous Fields

  • Gender
  1. I also have known people who have been to myanmar and worked there, that'd how i know about ethnic groups there and history, and i know some burmese too.
  2. I posted my views here because alot of people like salafists are lying in order to initiate jihad against non muslims. When umar ibn al khattab attacked the byzantines, he didn't give bull[Edited Out] justifications like "the levant is arab muslim land and we owned it first", he made it a war of conquest and didn't lie about it. According to salafis, first sunnis are supposed to give dawah to non muslims and invite them to islam. Then if they reject, declared jihad until their land is conquered or they pay jizya, this way, the entire world is to become muslim by force. They aren't supposed to
  3. There are many non muslims in this forum, its the forum's policy to allow it and until it changes i don't need to explain why i am posting here. Most of the media is pro rohingya, and why would you debate people you agree with? That defeats the point of it.
  4. Most kurds are ahlul-sunnah and that didn't stop Saddam from killing them. Iran and Syria do not agree 100% on everything. iran supported shia mujahideen against the soviet union in afghanistan, while Syria was always a soviet ally and supported the kabul communist government. Iran also called the soviet union "little satan", while syria always were allies to the soviets.
  5. Um, you already accuses me of being a bamar so why are you asking about my religion now? I'm not burmese, muslim, or buddhist. The anti chinese pogroms were done because of political tensions with china with the burmese government. They attacked mostly non muslim chinese because chinese muslims are not politically tied to any government. They may not like the junta, since burma was restricted and they could not do alot of trade, but they are not being mass murdered or having their mosques torched. Right now burma wants to open up ties to the west, and if they are seen as committing mass murde
  6. A. If there is a systematic crackdown on all muslims, how come you are still posting from your computer? B. Everytime i go to the saudi or UAE funded gulf news or khaleejtimes, i find the same lies posted about mrauk u (not mentioned by that name but its obvious what they are referring to ) being a rohingya kingdom, and used as justification to claim that arakan is supposed to be an independent rohingya state. i even saw them boasting about how in 1948 some rohingya set up mujahideen outfits to create an islamic state in arakan when burma became independent, and they kept claiming that arakan
  7. Why should minority ethnic groups be running private armies?
  8. This is what i said Rohingya are claiming the kings of mrauk u were rohingya muslims, and that they were in arakan sincethe beginning of time. These are both lies. They try to deny that they were descendants of bengalis who moved into mrauk u 500 years ago and claim they were always native to the area. The rakhine king of mrauk u brought back bengalis after his stay in bangladesh. They ran the mint and thats why the shahada appeara on one side of their coins. There are white spaniards living in mexico, where their ancestors moved hundreds of years ago, no one said they should leave. But if th
  9. Except rakhine aren't illegally crossing borders into other countries and claiming that it was their land from the beginning of time and that they are natives of the area. There are rakhine in chittagong in bangladesh because that area used to be part of mrauk u, not because of illegal immigration. The rohingya got a high birthrate because they keep siphoning aid from NGOs so they can raise large families without working. Thats why the area of arakan near bangladesh is rohingya majority. Less than 100 people have been killed because its mostly villagers attacking each other, most of the "victi
  10. This is the video link with an excerpt from nasrallah's interview with assange http://www.mefeedia.com/watch/51021964 He said the usual bla blah about the need for one democratic state in palestine for muslims, christians, and jews, then said indirect channels of communication to israel were established in 1993 to avoid civilian casulaties.
  11. LOL, now you are claiming the having the shahadah on your coins make you a muslim. This was the coin of king offa of mercia, and anglo saxon king in medieval britain. It clearly says "la ilaha ila Allah" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Offa_king_of_Mercia_757_793_gold_dinar_copy_of_dinar_of_the_Abassid_Caliphate_774.jpg Now let the bull[Edited Out] flow about anglo saxon britain being a muslim state LOL. http://books.google.com/books?id=xP1pK8kA-ekC&pg=PA57&dq=mrauk+u+buddhists&hl=en&sa=X&ei=USOfUI3SNIeB0AG-t4CYBw&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q&f=false Mrauk u
  12. There are two separate things nasrallah said. He apologized for hitting an arab israeli house which killed two arab israeli children in the 2006 war. During his interview with julian assange, he said that hezbollah and israel had secret agreements not to target each others civilians dating from the 1990s. He never said anything about a jews house.
  13. Its one thing to ask for international help and for citizenship in the country you were born in. Its another thing to start a serial lying campaign in order to attract sympathisers to your cause. Many rohingya are lying and claiming that the rakhine buddhist mrauk-u state in arakan was a rohingya muslim state ruled by a rohingya. They are also claiming arakan was "indian land" for 1,000 years. This bull[Edited Out] was repeated by saudi and pakistani islamists, about mrauk-u being rohingya. The rohingya ARE descendants of bengalis who moved into mrauk-u when it was independent and during briti
  14. Heterotrophs (like cows) which feed on edible autotrophs (like corn or grain) are nothing but competitors to humans trying to produce more food, because ten pounds of corn going into feeding one cow only produces one pound of beef in that cow. Only when the heterotroph (cow) feeds on a non edible autotroph (grass, not edible to humans) is it serving a useful purpose, and only then if the grass is growing in an environment where we can't grow edible crops like wheat. Unfortunately, due to the rising demand for meat, farmers especially in western countries have taken to feeding perfectly edible
  15. There are holocaust denial laws in the european union, there is none in the usa because of the first amendment.
  • Create New...