Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Kaniz e Zahra

Advanced Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Kaniz e Zahra

  1. CHAPTER 28 THE BELIEF CONCERNING THE RECKONING (al-hisab) AND THE SCALES (al-mawazin ). 194 Says the Shaykh Abu Ja'far: Our belief concerning the reckoning (al-hisab) is that it is real. Some of it will be undertaken by Allah, the Mighty and Glorious, and some by His Proofs (the Imams). The reckoning of Prophets and Imams, on whom be peace, will be undertaken by Allah the Glorious and Mighty; while every Prophet will be entrusted with the reckoning of his wasi (vicegerent, representative). And the vicegerents (awsiya') will take the reckoning of the whole of their communities. Allah, who is Bl
  2. How and where did Imam Ali, (as) learn to read and write? Kindly bring us the name of teachers? As for mutahree saying that is no hujjah when Prophet(saww) himself said so that ''I'' may write something, if He was going to dictate than any sahabi would have said let us write, moreover sunnis till now defend umar saying that he didn't want to trouble Prophet(saww) by letting Him write. And letters written by Prophet(saww) have no opinion that someone else wrote them since they had His signatures too. Why king of persia was enraged to see his name written above his. Poor bro pure eth
  3. What does this Hadeeth posted by br ibn Hussein 'himself' told them..وَكَانَ ذَلِكَ مِنْ آدَمَ قَبْلَ النُّبُوَّةِ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ ذَلِكَ بِذَنْبٍ كَبِيرٍ اسْتَحَقَّ بِهِ دُخُولَ النَّارِ، وَإِنَّمَا كَانَ مِنَ الصَّغَائِرِ الْمَوْهُوبَةِ الَّتِي تَجُوزُ عَلَى الأَنْبِيَاءِ قَبْلَ نُزُولِ الْوَحْيِ عَلَيْهِمْ. فَلَمَّا اجْتَبَاهُ اللَّهُ وَجَعَلَهُ نَبِيّاً كَانَ مَعْصُوماً لا يُذْنِبُ صَغِيرَةً وَلا كَبِيرَةً. قَالَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ: (وَعَصى‏ آدَمُ رَبَّهُ فَغَوى. ثُمَّ اجْتَباهُ رَبُّهُ فَتابَ عَلَيْهِ وَهَدى)‏ وَقَالَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ (إِنَّ اللَّهَ اصْطَفى‏ آدَمَ وَنُوحاً وَآلَ إِبْراهِيمَ
  4. Salam brother dabeast 313, here are the scholars who have mentioned it in Shia sources Sh Mufeed(ra) in al irshad says ''that Imam Ali(as) was born inside masjid ul Haraam on 13th rajab ,30 aam ul feel, and no one before or After Ali(as) will be born inside Kaaba'' Vol 1. pg 5 Sh sadooq(ra) in amali ,80 Ibne shehr ashoob(ra) in al manaqib 360 Syed ibne taoos(ra) in misbah ul zair Allama hilli(ra)in kashaf ul yaqeen 5(published in iran) and kashaf ul haq 109 Abul Hasan bin Esa irbili(ra) kashaf ul ghumma 19 Abul fateh al karajaki in kunz al fawaed 115 Shr
  5. ^Yes panzer saying that daughter of Imam Hussain, (as) had parties, husbands, danced nauzbillah and yet it was ''academic'' for you, and i am emotional. Ay sistani(ha) declared all such non sense as propaganda of enemies, he must be another emotional old guy for you. Well i am proud to be emotional for honor of Ahlebait, (as), which you certainly don't care for.I am pretty aware with your views, and its hallmark of your likes to call anything degrading for Ahlebait, (as) as academic.I share views of many maraaji so they are emotional too, because anything contradictory to your agendas is ''emo
  6. As for your personal attack on me, fyi yes i am Pakistani and Alhumdulillah proud of being 1st class citizen here instead of being 3rd class in US, or Canada. But i never did any 'zakireee' as your flawed feelings similar to your flawed reasoning told you. Alhumdulillah i have much better worldly prospects before me so no need to become a 'mullah' like you ,neither a charlatan Zakira anyhow. I also have a feeling about you, that you only joined Hawza to strengthen your preconceived notions whose expressions i had seen well before you went there even So certainly you didn't go there to learn
  7. This happened before Adam's Prophethood. It was not a major sin to make him deserve to enter the Fire. But it was a minor sin which God forgives. Such sins are also permitted for the Prophets before their appointment. Once God appointed Muhammad (s) to Prophethood, he became innocent and did not commit any minor or major sins. God says, ‘... Thus did Adam disobey his Lord, and allowed himself to be seduced. But his Lord chose him (for His Grace): He turned to him, and gave him guidance.’ God also says, ‘God did choose Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of Imran above all peop
  8. He didn't like them to do what He compelled some to do,they couldn't make voluntary mistakes but enforced ones. okay fine, lets agree to disagree.Wassalam.
  9. Brother, He(saww) was a Prophet(saww) not a layman, who could be so negligent of His obligations. If waking up had been so hard ,Allah won't have made it incumbent upon every Muslim. Everyone will use same excuses that we didn't know its fajr time after reading this narration, Why would Allah encourage others to take it easy? I know we unintentionally miss it at times but we don't posses our nufoos as they did. Imam Ali, (as) said that ''He loved two worships most, fajr in winters and fasting in summers''. You know how hard are both, and none of our Aimma, (as) ever missed morning prayers. How
  10. Brother i am not saying that Allah is compelling them to do, that is what others said for sehw, and missing prayers thing, i was just posing it as a hypothetical question, now got it?...Those narrations about missing prayers say that it was blessing from Allah so when Allah doesn't like turk e awla and punish Prophets then why would He make any of the Prophet(saww) sleep and miss waajib prayers so anyone deliberately miss it and take it as an excuse?..As i said above ,i don't have issues with previous Prophets having turk e awla instances but that can't be said for Last Prophet(saww) and Aimma
  11. BTW I don't have issues with turk e awla from previous Prophets, but whenever they did one, they were punished, which shows that Allah doesn't even want to see turk e awla in his Prophets on the name of bashariyyut let alone will compel them to err or miss prayers. These turk e awla incidents negate the whole theory of sehw.The best Of Men(saww) never even had turk e Awla let alone missing obligations even that by will of God, who didn't tolerate Yousaf(as)'s delay or Adam(as)'s eating fruit.
  12. I wrote very clearly, such analogies will bring in such confusing deductions. You say it was turk e awla, ok but he was punished for that, you don't say he was compelled to do turk e awla by Allah to show him as bashar and it was a blessing.The argument used for sehw e Nabi(saww)is that it was from God that He missed prayers etc. Why would He make one Prophet err and penalize others for erring. Something against the justice of God. Why didn't he appreciate Yousaf(as) that he proved himself bashar by making errors. Because you people believe He made our last Prophet(saww) err nauzbillah. Punish
  13. ^Our scholars have discussed such narrations at length, and rejected that Prophets(as) could act this way.Anyways, suppose if it happened then he was punished for ''error'' not that error was glorified , declared a blessing, or that Allah is one compelling him to do so, very irrelevant example ,and doesn't prove sehw or missing prayer argument anyways.Yousaf, (as) should have been applauded for his bashree behavior since every Prophet needs to exhibit some 'bashree' errors otherwise God compel him to do one, but if he does it on his own then He punishes him,because its Divine task to make them
  14. Brother pure ethics, you are hitting your head against the wall. People here will keep considering their ideas as ''intellectual'' and others heretical no matter how many arguments you give, or how many ulema e haq supported them, its beyond their westernized notion of rationality. Missing waajib prayer is no flaw, or imperfection for them but they won't mind telling how eating fruit was so big a flaw that a Prophet (as) had to be thrown out of the Heaven, naked, separated from his wife. They won't mind telling why Sun returned twice so a Masoom,(as)'s prayer may not be missed, when missing th
  15. Some people has said that turk e awla is sugary coating for mistake. Ok, for the sake of argument, fine but then why Allah dispelled Adam(as) and Eve(as) from Jannah for one tiny, ''basharee'' mistake? Missing Fajr ,which is much ''graver'' a mistake is, than eating a fruit from a tree, that should be made sunnah whereas Adam(as) had to suffer grave consequences. In fact you people have pre conceived notions, in order to prove them you can make justice of God looks suspicious. Many of our scholars believe Ahlebait, (as) are protected from turk e awla even, so if that is an argument that who be
  16. ^Brother turk e oola isn't sin, or error but leaving(tark) a preferred(oola) act. Adam(as) 's eating from forbidden tree is proven from Quran. And yes most of our scholars don't share opinion of sehw and error of sh Sadooq ,it wasn't only Sh Mufeed, who disagreed. Now they all are aware of these narrations and know where the root of these traditions lie. Moreover the definition of ghuluw by few scholars isn't accepted by majority, and they have stronger arguments certainly.
  17. Sh Sadooq® in his Shia creed's chapter regarding Arsh e Illahi says..''The 'arsh which means knowledge is borne by four amongst the ancients and four amongst the later ones; the former ones are Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus, on all of whom be peace; and the later are Muhammad, 'Ali, Hasan, and Husayn, the blessings of Allah upon them. This is what has been handed down from the Imams by a reliable chain of authorities concerning the Throne and its bearers. Now the reason why these persons became the bearers of the 'arsh, that is the knowledge (of Allah), is that the ancient prophets, who lived
  18. First of all, i would like to address those points which say that ''defending your wife and family is natural, and Allah won't choose an Imam, (as) who can't defend His family''..Would they like to elaborate that how they believe in Imamah of Imam Zain ul Abideen, (as) before whom His womenfolk were arrested, men entered their tents ,put them ablaze , brought those Holy Ladies, (as) with veils removed before throngs of drunkards, and yet an Imam, (as) was accompanying them? Now some people will say, He(as) was sick, imprisoned etc then will they mind telling that didn't Allah consider His pray
  19. Brother, these people are totally jaahil and many of them are beyond redemption. Instead of understanding an argument, they easily label a normal Shia as muqassir. I have spend time on some controversial groups of both kinds, the exaggerators and those who undermine the status of Ahlebait,(as). Both are dangerous and really stubborn ,one will label you ghaali whereas another one muqassir, whenever they fall short of arguments, I feel tired of them. BTW ghuluw and taqseer isn't as prevailant in real society as much as its on internet. Anyone can use multiple ids, etc. But the real number isn't
  20. That was exactly my point brother, i agree with your points.
  21. ^Yes and Maula Ali, (as) won't have conquered byzantine with defensive strategy but with same tactic with whom Prophet,(saww) of Allah spread Deen in Makkah, and Madinah. Conquest of Makkah wasn't done with sword, Madinah wasn't converted by force, His,(saww) kingdom, first Islamic government was established with peace not war,the victories you brag about could be done by any Alexandar the great ,or Genghez khan,hearts are won by swords of character not with bloodshed. People know anything about ways of fallibles but not of their Prophet,(saww), when did He invade any country without provocati
  22. Obviously these matters aren't known to anyone except Allah ,but ghayb literally mean unseen , if one knows something which is hidden from ordinary people's eyes ,they would generally refer it as ghayb. I don't recall the Ayah no. but there was something like that ''Your Prophet,(saww) gives you news of unseen(ghayb)'', can you elaborate which Book is meant here? and how it reports on unseen things ? and regardless if we change the terminology but telling things which are unseen ,would automatically be known as one, though i don't say they had it automatically but anything which Allah wants t
  23. Barelvis are majority ,but wahabi cult barely tolerate them, oppressed in way that they have been targeted and killed by lej as well, so ignorant is you, not me. Youtube isn't working here, and i am not advocate of barelvis but they get killed by lashker e jhangvi too, and many of them stood by us when nawasib were raising hue and cry over Azadari. Yes i believe they were given authority over a knowledge which is far fetched from all of us, but they weren't Alim ul Ghayb, and Sh Mufeed, (ra) believed in it as well, he himself quoted a letter from Imam e Zamana, (as) in which He, (as) said He i
  24. I didn't go against any of my words, Siffeen was defensive, forced upon Him, (as) that is the difference between you and us, you think terrorism is jihad, we believe otherwise.And when Shias went to jihad last time? then answer is google it where your takfeeris are getting beaten up worst? You'll know automatically..Which group defeated Israel whom your whole bunch of Arab countries couldn't ,leaving off their shoes in Sinai desert they ran away... We Shias do 'baraat' with kind of jihad you dream of, barbaric, killing innocent people, kids, women, playing with heads , blowing up themselves bu
  • Create New...