Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


BillyJo last won the day on February 10 2012

BillyJo had the most liked content!

Contact Methods

  • Facebook
    Facebook is evil.
  • Website URL
  • Yahoo
    If you are dumb enough to put your email for all's view then you deserve to be hacked.

Profile Information

  • Location
    An Abandoned Warehouse
  • Religion
    Muslim - http://makarem.ir/

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

3,068 profile views

BillyJo's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)



  1. E wallah they make excuses for the companions but not the Prophet (P) [Yusufali 53:1] By the Star when it goes down,- [Yusufali 53:2] Your Companion is neither astray nor being misled. [Yusufali 53:3] Nor does he say (aught) of (his own) Desire. [Yusufali 53:4] It is no less than inspiration sent down to him: [Yusufali 53:5] He was taught by one Mighty in Power,
  2. What theology do you follow? Okay so we were talking about God sitting on the throne (estaqfir Allah) and you said you don't believe that so I will give you sahih narrations which says this الهيثمي - مجمع الزوائد - الجزء : ( 1 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 83 ) 274 - عن عمر (ر) : أن إمرأة أتت النبي (ص) ، فقالت : إدع الله أن يدخلني الجنة فعظم الرب تبارك وتعالى وقال : إن كرسيه وسع السموات والأرض وإن له أطيطاً ، كأطيط الرحل الجديد إذا ركب من ثقله ، رواه البزار ورجاله رجال الصحيح. الهيثمي - مجمع الزوائد - الجزء : ( 10 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 159 ) 17272- وعن عمر ( يعني إبن الخطاب ) قال : أتت إمرأة النبي (ص) ، فقالت ‏:‏ إدع الله أن يدخلني الجنة ، قال : فعظم الرب تبارك وتعالى وقال : ‏إن كرسيه وسع السماوات والأرض ، وإن له أطيط كأطيط الرحل الجديد إذا ركب من ثقله‏ ، رواه أبو يعلى في الكبير ورجاله رجال الصحيح غير عبد الله بن خليفة الهمذاني وهو ثقة‏.‏ الحاكم النيسابوري - المستدرك - الجزء : ( 2 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 364 ) - رقم الحديث : ( 3385 ) [ النص طويل لذا إستقطع منه موضع الشاهد ] 3342 - حدثنا : أبو عبد الله محمد بن يعقوب الشيباني ، ثنا : يحيى بن محمد بن يحيى ، ثنا : عبد الرحمن بن المبارك العبسى ، ثنا : الصعق بن حزن ، عن علي بن الحكم عن عثمان بن عمير ، عن أبي وائل ، عن إبن مسعود (ر) قال : جاء إبنا مليكة وهما من الأنصار فقال : يا رسول الله أن أمنا تحفظ على البعل وتكرم الضيف وقد وأدت في الجاهلية فأين أمنا قال : أمكما في النار فقاما وقد شق ذلك عليهما فدعاهما رسول الله (ص) فرجعا فقال : إن أمى مع أمكما فقال : منافق من الناس لي : ما يغنى هذا ، عن أمه إلاّ ما يغنى إبنا مليكة ، عن امهما ونحن نطأ عقبيه فقال رجل شاب من الأنصار : لم أر رجلاًًً كان أكثر سوآلاً لرسول الله (ص) منه يا رسول الله أرى أبواك في النار فقال : ما سألتهما ربي فيعطيني فيهما وإني لقائم يومئذ المقام المحمود قال : فقال : المنافق للشارب الأنصاري : سله وما المقام المحمود قال : يا رسول الله وما المقام المحمود قال يوم ينزل الله فيه على كرسية يئط به كما يئط الرحل من تضايقه كسعة ما بين السماء والأرض ...... ، هذا حديث صحيح الإسناد ولم يخرجاه وعثمان بن عمير هو إبن اليقظان. السيوطي - الدر المنثور - الجزء : ( 1 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 328 ) - وأخرج عبد بن حميد وإبن أبى عاصم في السنة والبزار وأبو يعلي وإبن جرير وأبو الشيخ والطبراني وإبن مردويه والضياء المقدسي في المختارة ، عن عمر : إن إمرأة أتت النبي (ص) ، فقالت : إدع الله أن يدخلنى الجنة فعظم الرب تبارك وتعالى ، وقال : أن كرسيه وسع السموات والأرض وأن له أطيطاً كاطيط الرحل الجديد إذا ركب من ثقله : ما يفضل منه أربع أصابع.
  3. Actually no because its not like they would use the same bottle which they gave the Prophet (P) and there is no evidence that they even took the so called medicine
  4. Thanks for the explanation. This is the Islamic story of Adam a.s [Pickthal 2:30] And when thy Lord said unto the angels: Lo! I am about to place a viceroy in the earth, they said: Wilt thou place therein one who will do harm therein and will shed blood, while we, we hymn Thy praise and sanctify Thee? He said: Surely I know that which ye know not. [Pickthal 2:31] And He taught Adam all the names, then showed them to the angels, saying: Inform Me of the names of these, if ye are truthful. [Pickthal 2:32] They said: Be glorified! We have no knowledge saving that which Thou hast taught us. Lo! Thou, only Thou, art the Knower, the Wise. [Pickthal 2:33] He said: O Adam! Inform them of their names, and when he had informed them of their names, He said: Did I not tell you that I know the secret of the heavens and the earth? And I know that which ye disclose and which ye hide. [Pickthal 2:34] And when We said unto the angels: Prostrate yourselves before Adam, they fell prostrate, all save Iblis. He demurred through pride, and so became a disbeliever. [Pickthal 2:35] And We said: O Adam! Dwell thou and thy wife in the Garden, and eat ye freely (of the fruits) thereof where ye will; but come not nigh this tree lest ye become wrong-doers. [Pickthal 2:36] But Satan caused them to deflect therefrom and expelled them from the (happy) state in which they were; and We said: Fall down, one of you a foe unto the other! There shall be for you on earth a habitation and provision for a time. [Pickthal 2:37] Then Adam received from his Lord words (of revelation), and He relented toward him. Lo! He is the relenting, the Merciful. [Pickthal 2:38] We said: Go down, all of you, from hence; but verily there cometh unto you from Me a guidance; and whoso followeth My guidance, there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve. [Pickthal 2:39] But they who disbelieve, and deny Our revelations, such are rightful Peoples of the Fire. They will abide therein.
  5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIQzlnbaSDo
  6. You're still alive! :D Now go answer the questions I asked you
  7. Look at my post http://www.shiachat.com/forum/index.php?/topic/234998801-our-holy-prophet-p-was-martyred/ Btw bro we believe all Prophet's were killed except, al-Khozr, Issa, and Mahdi
  8. In Bahar al-Anwar v, 82 p, 20 it is narrated that Abu Abdellah a.s said: "Do you know whether the Prophet died or was killed? Allah said (if then he dies or is killed will you turn back upon your heels?). He was poisoned before death. The two women poisoned him!" Then we said "they and their fathers are the most evil people created" Also in - Tafseer al-Ayashi - al-Burhan - Tafseer al-Safi Now lets see a couple of vids In Hadiths, even those reported by the Bakri sect, it is confirmed that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) was martyred. For example, Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Al-Tabarani and Al-Sanaani among other famous scholars of the Bakri sect, reported Abdullah Ibn Massoud, a companion to Allah's Prophet, saying: "I am willing to take an oath nine times that the Prophet was murdered, but I am not willing to take an oath even once that he was not. This is because Allah made him a Prophet and a martyr as well."(Refer: Masnad Ahmed, Vol I, Page 408; Mojam Al-Tabrani, Vol X, Page 109; Musannaf Al-Sanaani, Vol V, Page 268). How then was the Prophet murdered, and who were the perpetrators of such a heinous crime? In fact, it is from this point that the paths of Shiites and the Bakri sect diverge. While Bakri sect claim that the Prophet was poisoned by the Jews, Shiites stress that he was poisoned by his two wives Ayesha and Hafsa, as commanded by their fathers Abu Bakr and Omar. Let us take a look at the evidences of each party to decide which one is true. Bakri sect says that when the Prophet's army won the Kheibar battle defeating the army of the Jews, a Jewish woman, Zeinab Bint Al-Harith invited him and his companions to a banquet. That woman wanted to take revenge upon the Prophet because her brother Murhab Bin Al-Harith, who was commander of the Jewish Army, had been killed by Imam Ali (Peace be upon him) and this had led to the victory of the Muslim Army. The Jewish leaders used the woman's desire to take revenge and goaded her into assassinating the Prophet. She poisoned the meat she cooked for the Prophet and his fellows. The Prophet died after having the poisoned meat. This is the belief of Bakri sect, but it can easily be refuted by the following scientific evidence: Firstly, the Khaibar Battle took place in the seventh year of Hegira. While the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) died in the eleventh year. This means that there is a time gap of four years between the two incidents. It is very unlikely that a person dies because of a poison he had taken so many years ago. It is also because generally the effect of poison is immediate and even if it takes time it cannot exceed a few months in which the health condition deteriorates gradually. In the case of the Prophet, we notice that he had been in the peak of his health and throughout the said four years he had no unusual health complaints. He would participate in the battles to defend Muslims as usual. Thus, it defies any logic that his health deteriorated suddenly and he died of a poison he had had taken more than four years ago despite the fact that he enjoyed good health throughout that intervening period. Secondly, if we accept that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) consumed that poisoned food, it will be a proof of his not being a true Prophet– May Allah forbid! This is because it was the Jews and the woman who wanted to put the Prophet under trial by means of their scheme. Is he truly a Prophet who gets revelation from Allah? If he was a Prophet, he would know that this food was poisoned and would not consume it. If not, he would consume it. Authentic Hadiths provide that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) knew it and did not consume the food. He admonished his retinue not to consume it either. This was one of his miracles due to which the Jewish woman was so impressed that she converted to Islam, for that she earned the Prophet's forgiveness and exemption from punishment. Al-Bukhari and Al-Darami and other famous scholars of Bakri Sect relate that "When Muslims won the battle of Kheibar, the Jews invited the Prophet to a banquet in which they had served poisoned mutton. The Prophet ordered his followers to call up all the Jews to speak to them. When they were present, he asked them: "If I ask you something, will you answer me honestly?" "Yes", they answered. "Have you put poison in this mutton?" he asked. "Yes", they answered. "Why?" he wondered. "We wanted to know whether you are a true prophet or not" they answered. “If you are a true prophet, this would not hurt you. But, if you are not, we would get rid of you". (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol IV, Page 66; Sunan Al-Darmi, Vol I, Page 33). Al-Khateb relates: "A Jewish woman cooked poisoned mutton and offered it to the Prophet and his retinue. The Prophet said to his retinue: "Do not consume this food. It is poisoned. He then asked the woman: "Why have you done this?", to which question she answered, "So that I can tell whether you are a true or false prophet? If you are true, Allah will reveal you that this food is poisoned so you won't consume it. But, if you were false, you would eat it and die. Thereby, I would relieve people of you." (Refer: History of Baghdad, Vol VII, Page 384). Contrary to these Hadiths, there are other Hadiths that tell that the Prophet actually consumed some of that food. In the process, he admonished his followers to stop eating, and that one of them did really die. The Prophet ordered to have the woman killed. Obviously, these Hadiths are not authentic, and cannot be trusted. As we have already pointed out, this is because they mean that the Prophet was false, having discovered that the food was poisoned so late that one of his followers had already become a victim. It should be noted that Al-Baihiqi and Abu Dawood and other famous scholars of the Bakri Sect confirmed that the Prophet neither killed, nor punished Zeinab Bint Al-Harith. (Refer: Sunann Al-Baihiqi Vol VIII, Page 46; Sunan Abu Dawood , Vol II, Page 369). Al-Zohri, a great ancient scholar, confirmed that the Jewish woman was not killed although this was commonly believed by some people. Rather, she converted to Islam, and was forgiven by the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family). (Refer: Musannaf Al-Sanaani, Vol XI, Page 29, Prophet's Biography by Ibn Kathier, Vol III, Page 389). Third: a most significant Hadith as maintained by the Bakri sect to ascribe Prophet's sudden death to the poisoning attempt by the Jews four years ago, is one that was reported by Bukhari from Ayesha. She relates: "Allah's Prophet told me on his death bed, 'Ayesha, since I consumed that poisoned food after the Kheibar Battle, I have been in pain. Now it is the time for my heart to stop beating because of that poison." (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol V, Page 137). We cannot trust that Hadith for many reasons: one of which is the fact that Ayesha is an infamous liar. She would lie even to the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family). Al-Bukhari reported Ayesha saying: "Allah's Prophet was eating honey at Zeinab Bint Jahsh place. So Hafsa and I agreed to tell him, upon his return that he smelled of Maghafeer". (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol 6, Page 68. Maghafeer is a substance extracted from a tree. It has a sweet taste but very foul smell.) Ayesha knew that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) had taken honey from his other wife, Zeinab Bint Jahsh. Being jealous of her, she agreed with her friend, Hafsa, to hurt the Prophet by claiming that he smelled foul when he consumed that honey. Thereby, he would stop eating it, and consequently stop visiting his wife, Zeinab. That was a lie. A woman, who would not abstain from lying to the noblest prophet, would not abstain from lying to ordinary people, either. Therefore, the Hadiths reported by her cannot be trusted, especially when she, herself, was accused of being involved in the murder of the Prophet. Naturally, she would try to divert suspicion by pointing fingers at others. Let us not forget that the Holy Quran stated that Ayesha and Hafsa were sinful wrongdoers whose hearts deviated from the true path. Allah warned them that by merely marrying the Prophet, they would not be exempted from going to hell. This was set forth in the Chapter Al Tahreem: "If you both turn to Allah, then indeed your hearts are already inclined (to this); and if you back up each other against him, then surely Allah is his Guardian, and Jibreel and the believers that do good, and the angels after that are the helpers. (…) Allah sets forth an example to those who disbelieve the wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut: they were both under two of our righteous servants, but they acted treacherously towards them so they availed them naught against Allah, and it was said: Enter both the fire with those who enter." (66:10 &4) Two women who lie and receive harsh words from Allah in a full chapter would not abstain from lying. Undoubtedly, they were poised to commit any misdeed, even if it was the assassination of the Prophet himself. Let us not forget that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) had described Ayesha as "The spearhead of disbelief and the horn of Satan”. Ahmed Ibn Hanbal and other famous scholars of Bakri Sect related: "The Prophet, (Peace be upon him), emerged from Ayesha's room saying this is the spearhead of disbelief! It is from here that Satan's horn emerges"! (Refer: Masnad Ahmed, Vol II, Page 23). A woman condemned by Allah as wrongdoer, and threatened to be tortured in hell if she does not repent, and one described by the Prophet as the spearhead of disbelief and Satan's horn; one who confesses to having lied to the Prophet is a woman whose Hadiths cannot be trusted, especially if they seem to be in her favour. One of the reasons why we should not believe in Ayesha's Hadith about poisoning the Prophet is that she contradicts herself in another Hadith. She claimed that the Prophet did not die because of the Jewish woman's poison. Rather, the cause of his death was because of another disease! According to Abu Yoalla, Ayesha also said that: "Allah's Prophet, (Peace be upon him), died of an ailment Dhatul Janb"! (Refer: Masnad Abu Yoalla, Vol. VIII, Page 258. Dhadul Janb is an internal tumour that forms on man's side. It leads to death when it explodes.) Ayesha claimed that, although the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) had ruled out the possibility of the Prophet developing such a tumour due to its being a demonic one that a Prophet would not develop. The Prophet said of that tumour: "It is Satanic, and I cannot develop it because Allah has delivered me from any of Satan's powers". (Refer: The Beginning and the End, Ibn Katheir, Vol. V, Page 245). It seems that Ayesha was confused while putting her point before the general public with regard to the issue of Prophet's killing. When she claimed he died because of that Jewish woman's poison consumed four years ago, people did not find that very plausible. Therefore, she came up with another cause of death. Therefore, she made up another reason, namely that of the lateral tumor. Thereby, she contradicted herself. This confusion itself points fingers at her and even gives rise to suspicions about her. Now that we are sure of the implausibility of the Bakri version of the Prophet's murder (Peace be upon him and his pure family) due to the shortcomings, contradictions and poor evidence. Now, we can move on to the Shiite version. Generally, Shiite Hadiths are more credible. They are a set of the statements by the Imams from the Prophet's family (Peace be upon them all). Undoubtedly, those Imams were far better informed of their grandfather’s, the Prophet’s, history and of his religion. None of them may lie, because the Quran confirmed their innocence against the sins. The Prophet had ordered that their words and deeds be followed. All Muslims agree to the fact that those Imams were very truthful, noble, faithful and chaste. The Imams confirmed that their grandfather, the Prophet, had been poisoned in his last days by Ayesha and Hafsa, at the order of their fathers, Abu Bakr and Omar. Abu Bakr and Omar were conspiring to usurp the throne after the demise of the Prophet. However, the Prophet would also stress that his rightful successor would be his cousin, and the husband of his daughter, Imam Ali (Peace be upon him). He even coerced them once to pledge allegiance to him on the Ghadir Day. At the same time, the Prophet brought to light the fact that some of his companions and wives would turn against his successor. He warned his followers against this, stressing that it would be their test from Allah. Those who would show their allegiance to the rightful successor would pass the test and go to heaven. While those who would let him down and support the rebels, would go to the eternal hell since they would be apostates. That is, deserters who converted back to disbelief, even if they called themselves Muslims. Sometimes, the Prophet would confront Abu Bakr, Omar, Ayesha and Hafsa with the fact that they hated his heir, predicting in their presence that their conspiracy would succeed to oust him from power. The Prophet did that as ordered by Allah to put those four into a further test. One of the famous ancient Shia interpreters of Quran relates a Hadith as reported by the Imams that further elaborates on the Prophet's assassination. That interpreter is Ali Ibn Ibrahim Al-Qommi, a great scholar who lived in the days of Imam Al-Hassan Al-Askry (Peace be upon him). He was known among Shias for his veracity and honesty in the way he related Hadith from Imams. The Hadith reported by Ali Ibn Ibrahim says: "The Prophet said to Hafsa: I will tell you a secret. If you divulge it, Allah, His Angels and people will curse you. So, what is it? wondered Hafsa. The Prophet said: Abu Bakr will be able to seize the Caliphate and power after me, and will be succeeded by your father, Omar. Hafsa wondered: Who informed you of this? Allah, the Omnipresent, the Omniscient informed me. On the same day, Hafsa divulged the secret to her friend, Ayesha. In turn, Ayesha divulged the secret to her father, Abu Bakr. So, Abu Bakr came to Omar and said: My daughter Ayesha told me a secret reported by Hafsa, but I cannot always trust what Ayesha says. So, you ask your daughter Hafsa, make sure and tell me. Omar went over to Hafsa, and asked her. In the beginning, she was startled and denied it. But, Omar said to her: If you have indeed heard this secret, then, tell us so we can immediately seize power and get rid of Muhammad”. So, Hafsa said, yes, he told me that. At this point, those four got together and conspired to poison the Prophet" (Refer: Tafseer al-Qommi, Vol II, Page 367, Bihar-ul-Anwar by Allama al-Majlisi, Vol XXII, Page 239). There is another great ancient scholar of the Quran, Muhammad Ibn Massoud al-Ayashi who also belonged to the Bakri sect, but was later divinely guided to the true faith and converted to Shia faith and believed in the Imams. That scholar lived till the end of Third Century Hegira. Scholars have ever since relied on his book that he wrote to interpret the Holy Quran (Tafseer). When this great scholar reaches the point where he interpreted the verse I have referred to earlier, he relates a Hadith reported by al-Imam al-Sadiq (Peace be upon him) in which he confirms that Abu Bakr, Omar, Ayesha and Hafsa had committed the crime. Imam al-Sadiq (Peace be upon him) was sitting with a group of his followers, and asked them: "Do you know whether the Prophet died a natural death or was murdered? Allah the Almighty says: "if then he died or is killed". The truth is that the Prophet was poisoned in his last days before he died. Ayesha and Hafsa administered poison in his food. Upon hearing this, the Imam Sadiq's followers said that they and their fathers were among the worst villains ever created by Allah." (Refer: Tafseer al-Ayashi, Vol I, Page 200; Bihar-ul-Anwar, by Allama Al-Majlisi, Vol XXII, Page 516) Al-Ayshi relates another Hadith attributed to Imam Al-Sadiq (Peace be upon him) in which he says: "al-Hussein Ibn Munther asked Imam Al-Sadiq about Allah's words "if then he dies or is killed will you turn back upon your heels". Does it mean that the Prophet died a natural death or was murdered? Imam Al-Sadiq said: In this verse, Allah refers to the Prophet's companions who committed the misdeed". (Refer: Tafseer Al Ayash, Vol I, Page 200; Bihar-ul-Anwar, By Allama Al-Majlisi, Vol XX, Page 91) These Hadiths confirm beyond doubt that the Supreme Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) was killed by poison administered in his last days and not which was allegedly given four years prior to his death. They also confirm that the crime was an act of treachery by his two wives and their fathers. Jews had nothing to do with this. If we take a closer look at the Quranic verse that speaks of the Prophet's death, we notice its consistency with these Hadiths. The verse says: "And Muhammad is no more than an apostle; the apostles have already passed away before him; if then he dies or is killed will you turn back upon your heels? And whoever turns back upon his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah and Allah will reward the grateful." (3:144). In that verse, Allah addresses the Prophet's companions and not the Jews. The verse associates the (Prophet's death) and the (turning back), which means apostasy. We hereby understand that the assassination of the Prophet was to be followed by turning back and apostasy. This actually happened, and turned in favour of the rebels who seized power, i.e. Abu Bakr and Omar. Thus, it was addressed to the accused in the first place and not to the Jews who were no longer a threat in Medina . It is true that the verse was quoted in relation to the Uhud battle, to reprimand the Prophet's companions who had let him down, by fleeing and leaving him alone with Imam Ali amidst the non-Muslim warriors. But, the verse also speaks of the future. It says that a group of people would turn back and become apostates. They would bring no harm to Allah, because they would actually be harming themselves as they would go to hell. On the other hand, another group of people would keep their faith and would be well rewarded by Allah and enter the Heaven. This is because they were grateful to Allah for His blessings by keeping their allegiance to His Prophet and his rightful successor. It is now evident that the crime was described by these Hadiths and this is in consistence with the Quran. Therefore, it is obvious that the Shiite version of the Prophet's assassination is trustworthy. But is there any evidence in the resources of Bakri sect, that supports the Shiite version and shows involvement of the Prophet's two wives in the crime? In fact, most of the Hadiths that reach us through the pious Imams from among the Prophet's descendants (peace be upon all of them) are supported by Hadiths in Bakri resources, even if implicitly. It is here that the power of Shiism, as it does not rely only on Shiite resources. Rather, it brings forth supporting evidence from the sources of other sects for the facts put forth by the Imams. There is a Hadith related by the famous scholars of Bakri sect like Bukhari, Muslim, Ahmed Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Kathier. In that Hadith, Ayesha confesses that when the Prophet was sleep during his illness she put a strange substance into his mouth with the help of the other wives. Ayesha did it intentionally despite Prophet's prohibition. When the Prophet woke up, he saw the residuals of the substance that they had put into his mouth. He angrily asked what it was and who had disobeyed his orders. Ayesha and her collaborators justified their action saying that it was just a medication. Following that, they accused the Prophet's uncle, Al-Abbas Ibn Abdul Muttalib. However, the Prophet acquitted his uncle and ordered that those who were with him in the room should be punished by having the same substance put into their mouths. Ayesha relates: "When Allah's Prophet contracted the terminal disease, he told us: Don't put the medicine in my mouth. But we disobeyed him on the ground that every patient dislikes medication! So, we put the substance in his mouth. When he regained his senses, he wondered: Who did that? Have I not admonished you not to do that? So, we said: It is your uncle Al-Abbas who thought that you might have contracted a lateral tumour! The Prophet said: This disease is caused by the Devil. I cannot contract it. The Prophet ordered that everyone in the house must put the same substance into their mouths, except Al-Abbas, as the Prophet said: He was not with you". (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol VIII, Page 42; Sahih Muslim, Vol VII, Page 42; Masnad Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Vol VI, Page 53; Prophet's Biography by Ibn Kathier, Vol. IV, Page 446). It seems that people were confused about what had happened to the Prophet. This was the matter that forced Ayesha to relate this Hadith in an attempt to falsify and conceal the truth. She wanted to hide the truth of the substance that she put into the mouth of the Prophet, claiming that it was a medication. She explained that what she made was "lad", which means administering medication to a side of the mouth. What exactly was that strange substance? Why did Ayesha and her collaborators intend to put it into the Prophet's mouth during his sleep? Why did Ayesha and her collaborators falsely accuse Al-Abbas of the crime? Why did the Prophet order to have them punished by putting the substance into their mouth? Basically... how could Ayesha and her collaborators disobey the word of the Prophet? These controversies prove that a serious crime was perpetrated against the Prophet. If there had been no crime, the Prophet would not have ordered to punish the perpetrators. If that substance had been indeed a medicine, the Prophet would not have forbidden it to be put into his mouth. This would not have stirred his anger. Therefore, that substance must have been the poison that the Prophet's children spoke of later. Those who helped Ayesha prepare it must have been Hafsa, Abu Bakr and Omar whose names were not revealed by Ayesha in her Hadith on that strange substance. Their interest was associated with the Prophet's homicide, as they were going to seize power and oust his family from there. There remains a question unanswered: Can the two wives of the Prophet dare to kill him? Is it possible that Abu Bakr and Omar, who were among the Prophet's companions, dared to commit such a crime? The answer is: It is not unlikely at all, because the Quran mentioned that the two wives of the prophets, Noah and Lut betrayed them and would go to hell. These verses in the Chapter Al Tahreem were revealed in the first place to address Ayesha and Hafsa by citing this example. In the same chapter, Allah testified the infidelity and wrongdoing of Ayesha and Hafsa. He threatened them strongly should they fail to repent, as I explained earlier. Quran predicted that the Prophet's companions would turn against him as I have said earlier. The Prophet had also predicted in his several Hadiths that most of his companions would go to hell. History reveals that most betrayals and acts of treacheries that occurred after the Prophets were committed by their wives and companions. Al-Bukhari related that the Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) said: "On doomsday, when I will be at the water pond delivering water to those who will be thirsty among my followers, a group of my followers will come to drink but the angels will drive them away and take them to Hell! And I'll say: Oh, God! They are my companions! But God will tell me: You do not know what they did after your death. They degraded themselves to apostasy. Following that, another group of my companions will come to drink but the angels will drive them away and take them to Hell. And I'll say: Oh, God! They are my companions! But God will tell me: You do not know what they did after your death. They degraded themselves to apostasy. Thus, only small number of my companions will escape like deserted camels in the desert." (Refer: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol VII, Page 206). No one can claim that Abu Bakr cannot be among those people who will be driven to Hell, since the Prophet himself did not exempt him from that. Imam of the Malki school of thought, Malik Ibn Anas, relates that the Prophet prophesied to the Muslim martyrs of Uhud that they would go to Heaven. So, Abu Bakr wondered: "Aren't we their brothers who have submitted to Islam just as they did, and fought in jihad just as they did; so, why don't you give us the good news that we will go to heaven? The Prophet said: "It is absolutely true that you are their brothers, but I do not know what you will do after my death". (Refer: Al Muatta of Malik Ibn Anas, Vol II, Page 642). Therefore, we should not exempt Abu Bakr and Omar from the crime of having taken the life of the Prophet, especially when they had tried that once before when the Prophet was on his way back from the city of Tabuk. He had to go past a rough road up a mountain. That road is called Al-Aqaba by Arabs. Those who have to go down it, on a camel for example; must choose a camel with a very quiet disposition. Should it panic, it will trip and its rider will fall and die. Abu Bakr and Omar conspired with a group of the Prophet's hypocrite companions. They would lie in wait for the Prophet at the time of his crossing this Aqaba to frighten his camel so that she falls and he dies. This fact was reported also by the Bakri resources in clear terms, but the Bakri people try to hide and deny this fact. Ibn Hazm Al-Alndulsi, a famous scholar of Bakri Sect, lashed at Al-Waleed Ibn Jamia, dismissing him as a liar. But why? Ibn Hazm says: "Because he related Hadiths that state that Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Talha and Sa'ad Ibn Abi Waqqas wanted to kill the Prophet and made sure that he met with the accident in Tabuk". (Refer: Al Mohalla of Ibn Hazm, Vol. IX, Page 224). Al-Walid Ibn Jamia was not a Shiite. He belonged to the Bakri sect. Contrary to what Ibn Hazm said about him, he is so widely known for veracity and credibility that Ibn Habban would say "May Allah be pleased with him", whenever his name was mentioned. The famous scholar of Bakri Sect in this field, "Al-Thahabi" also testified the truthfulness and credibility of this man. If he had not been honest, he would not have his Hadiths related by the famous compilers of Hadith like Muslim, Al-Baihiqi, Ahmed Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Shabba. So, Al-Walid Ibn Jamia is not a liar. This proves that Abu Bakr, Omar and their group indeed tried to murder the Prophet as he was passing through Al-Aqaba on his way back from Tabuk. This is a famous incident in which Allah saved the life of His Prophet by a miracle. The Prophet forgave the perpetrators and refrained from punishing them. Thereby, we can be sure that Abu Bakr and Omar indeed wanted to kill the Prophet. Though, their plan in Aqaba failed, their next plan succeeded by collusion with their daughters Ayesha and Hafsa who administered poison to the Prophet during his sleep. Just as the Prophet forgave those who tried to kill him in Al-Aqaba, Imam Ali did the same after the martyrdom of the Prophet, fulfilling the will of the Prophet so that Allah's test continues for them and for the humanity as a whole. In fact, the Prophet was just a normal patient. During his sleep, Ayesha and Hafsa administered this poison in the Prophet's mouth, in order to hasten the seizure of power by their fathers, while ousting the rightful successor, Ali Ibn Abi Talib. It was in this way the greatest and the noblest Prophet (Peace be upon him and his pure family) fell prey to the treachery of his two wives and companions. This is a fact that most Muslims are not aware of.
  9. We believe its Aisha بحار الأنوار - العلامة المجلسي ج 82 ص 20 : عن أبى عبد الله ( عليه السلام ) قال : تدرون مات النبي ( صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم ) أو قتل ؟ إن الله يقول : " أفان مات أو قتل انقلبتم على أعقابكم " فسم قبل الموت ، إنهما سمتاه ! فقلنا إنهما وأبويهما شر من خلق الله .................................................. .......... - بحار الأنوار - العلامة المجلسي ج 13 ص 641 : عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام ، قال : تدرون مات النبي صلى الله عليه وآله أو قتل ؟ ، إن الله يقول : [ أفإن مات أو قتل انقلبتم على أعقابكم ] فسم قبل الموت ، إنهما سمتاه ! فقلنا : إنهما وأبويهما شر من خلق الله . [ بحار الانوار : 28 / 20 حديث 28 ، و 8 / 6 ، عن تفسير العياشي : 1 / 200 - حديث 152 ، وتفسير البرهان : 1 / 320 ، وتفسير الصافي : 1 / 305 ] . .................................................. .......... - تفسير العياشي - محمد بن مسعود العياشي ج 1 ص 200 : عن عبد الصمد بن بشير عن أبى عبد الله عليه السلام قال : تدرون مات النبي صلى الله عليه واله أو قتل ان الله يقول : " أفان مات أو قتل انقلبتم على أعقابكم " فسم قبل الموت انهما سقتاه [ قبل الموت ] فقلنا انهما وأبوهما شر من خلق الله .................................................. .......... - تفسير نور الثقلين - الشيخ الحويزي ج 1 ص 401 : في تفسير العياشي عن عبد الصمد بن بشير عن ابى عبد الله عليه السلام قال : تدرون مات النبي صلى الله عليه وآله أو قتل ؟ ان الله يقول : ( أفان مات أو قتل انقلبتم على اعقابكم ) فبسم قبل الموت انهما سقتاه فقلنا : انهما وابوهما شر من خلق الله
  10. Don't waste your time researching a religion which you don't need to know about if it was an important religion we would've heard of it
  11. Is that what your dad told you on your eighteenth birthday?
  12. 1) Haydar answered 2) We believe that the only person who can lead us in prayer has to be a pious person with right beliefs. 3) Some are but majority aren't and oppose this deviation 4) No. We say the best of Prophets is Muhammad (P), after him there are many sayings some say Imam Ali is better than the rest of the Imams and others say Fatima a.s is better than the Imams and Imam Ali a.s. We believe Imam Hassan is better than Hussain and the rest of the Imams there is no specific opinion. 5) I would say it depends on the person himself. Salam
  • Create New...