Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About hoskot

  • Rank
    Level 1 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

1,246 profile views
  1. salam bro i found this in fadhail ush-shia page 2/83, Chapter 1: My father (d) related to us from Abdullah bin al-Hussein al-Mueddib from Ahmed bin Ali al-Isfahani from Mohammed bin Aslam at-Tusi from Abu Rajaa from Hemmad bin Zaid from Abdirrahman as-Sarraj from Nafii that Ibn Omar said: When we asked him about Ali bin Abi Talib, the Prophet (s) was angry and said: [note: i did not quote the earlier portion, only the later part of the narration] Whoever loves the family of Mohammed will be saved from the Judgment, the Balance, and the Path. Whoever dies on the l
  2. don't be fooled by a ploy to make iran keep her mouth shut up so that oppression will continue unabated.
  3. come on. be reasonable bro. only nasibis will get offended if you curse abu sufyan and hind. no sunni brothers/sisters hold them in high esteem.
  4. very true - it's not even like comparing an orange to an apple. most even don't know except for imam hassan (as) and imam hussin (as), let alone acknowledging the existence of the purified and goodly progeny. so, i say, someone has cool it down.
  5. let's be pragmatic. for the last 90 years or so, rallying behind "quran and sunnah", has failed the ummah miserably. One very sore point is the ummah failed to appoint a caliph, though the saying is "People disliked to be left even part of the day without being organized into a community (jama’ah)." [ed: without a caliph/leader] moving forward, let's give "quran and ahlul bayt" a chance to prove itself. the bonus point is we don't have worry about quranic verse 2:167. [Shakir 2:167] And those who followed shall say: Had there been for us a return, then we would renounce the
  6. salam bro i'm quite lost here. if i said something wrong, do correct me pls.
  7. salam bro i know what the preceding verse is all about. so you are saying, in peace time, muslims can quarrel among themselves and not be weak in heart and not lose power, like what's happening today? i believe, quarrelling is the first step towards disobeying the verse [Shakir 3:103] And hold fast by the covenant of Allah all together and be not disunited ..... totally agree with you if the verse ends like this, "then if you quarrel about anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger."....... (1) for my comprehension skill will then conclude it's permissible to qua
  8. in the other thread about theory of evolution, i made a reference to quranists. this is what i mean: [Shakir 4:1] O people! be careful of (your duty to) your Lord, Who created you from a single being and created its mate of the same (kind) and spread from these two, many men and women; and be careful of (your duty to) Allah, by Whom you demand one of another (your rights), and (to) the ties of relationship; surely Allah ever watches over you. and this is from one dr shabbir ahmed (qxp_dr_shabbirAhmed.pdf) 4:1 [The development of human personality can be easier achiev
  9. salam i'm just trying to understand your question - no offence intended. does it means, you are brought up to believe in macro evolution? do you mean, macro evolution is a certainty? i believe, the theory of evolution (macro inclusive) applies to all with no exception. here's a quranic verse, it's apparent meaning is beneficial to me in my quest to find the truth. [Shakir 39:18] Those who listen to the word, then follow the best of it; those are they whom Allah has guided, and those it is who are the men of understanding. although i'm not one
  10. 4 monumental events have taken place so far:- 1. balfour declaration http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/10/100-years-balfour-declaration-explained-171028055805843.html 2. creation of israel 3. liberation (conquest for some) of jerusalem 4. trump announced jerusalem as capital city of israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-likens-trumps-jerusalem-speech-to-israels-founding/ https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/889076/Benjamin-Netanyahu-Donald-Trump-Jerusalem-Israel-speech what's next?
  11. your view about those opposing man descends from an LCA is bit faulty. I (maybe quranists are the exception) believe Prophet Adam (as) had no father nor mother. but i surely believe how i evolved from a single cell (zygote is my biology knowledge still holds true) to a fully developed man as i am right now. even if science is able to show to the world what is believed to be an LCA for the present human beings, it's still doesn't contradict my belief since "that LCA" could well be from one of thousands of Adams before the last Prophet Adam (as). maybe, just maybe, if scien
  12. salam bro i found what is below on a forum. base on that, i would say yes to (1) and (2). Second dialogue between Umar and Abdullah Ibn Abass (ra). Umar:"How did you leave your cousin?" Ibn `Abbas said he thought `Umar meant `Abdullah ibn Ja`far; so, he answered: "I left him in the company of his friends." Umar said: "I did not mean him; I meant the greatest among you, Ahl al-Bayt(i.e. Imam Ali)." Ibn `Abbas said: "I left him exiled, irrigating while reciting the Qur'an." `Umar said: "O `Abdullah! I implore you not to be shy but tell me if he is still concerned
  13. if you can't disagree with the Prophet, the construct of the verse means you can't disagree with Ulil Amri also. you see bro, verse [Shakir 8:46] And obey Allah and His Messenger and do not quarrel for then you will be weak in hearts and your power will depart, and be patient; surely Allah is with the patient. cleary says "...do not quarrel...". while some people are interpreting the second part of verse [4:59] [Shakir 4:59] O you who believe! obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority from among you; then if you quarrel about anything, refer it to Allah
  14. actually, i did google a little bit before my previous posting Currently there are two major obstacles to the reconstruction of The Third Temple. One pertains to its location. The next temple can only be built where the two previous temples stood because the Holy of Holies must be on the exact same spot. But no one knows for sure where the previous temples were located on the Temple Mount. Most scholars believe that they stood where the Dome of the Rock currently stands. That conclusion may be wrong, but there is no way to prove the exact location without conducting archeological e
  • Create New...