Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Ibn-Ahmed Aliyy Herz

Banned
  • Content Count

    805
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Ibn-Ahmed Aliyy Herz last won the day on March 14 2014

Ibn-Ahmed Aliyy Herz had the most liked content!

About Ibn-Ahmed Aliyy Herz

  • Rank
    يا حسين

Profile Information

  • Location
    usa
  • Religion
    اسلام

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,574 profile views
  1. The name of the book is العتب الجميل على اهل جرح و تعديل They would use their usul to reject it, but they cannot do so without looking foolish.
  2. The sad part is they know for a fact the companions did it, including Ibn umar, and they know for a fact that Imam zayn al abideen (as) claimed it was the original adhan but they deny him. The question comes to us dear brother, we have Ibn arabi the aalim and top gun of the "traditional sunni/sufis" like hamza yusuf,ghumari brothers, habib family, gf haddad, deos/bralavis. Then we have the "top gun" shaykh of the salafi type sunnis like Ibn taymiyya himself, including the son of Umar al khattab and a mujtahid mutlaq Imam from Ahlul bayt (as) all saying that haya ala khayr l amol is from the su
  3. Lion does not concern himself with the opinion of the sheep B)
  4. "Investigators later found out it was a jelly bean gun".
  5. I came across two authentic Hadith from the books of ahlus sunnah that show that the phrase "haya 'ala khayr l 'amol", was actually the original and proper adhan. When looking at the sunni replies from both the English and Arabic forums I saw that they said two things... 1- Ibn umar was reviving a sunnah or he was doing it optionally, and it is not a bidah and the shia are not blamed in this and are actually correct. (For example Imam shafii agreed with the shia on wearing aqeeq and raising the hands in qunut, and as An-nawawi mentions the shia did not innovate in this particular area). 2-
  6. Abul Hassan's links just strengthens the shia heart and Iman, walhamdulilah. Sunni rijal is the rijal of the governments and their court scholars. الناس على دين ملوكهم
  7. Farid said : Habibi even if Abu Al Salt's real name was Abu Ishaaq ibn barmitsva al yahoodi and was a jew and not a twelver it wouldn't change the fact that your salaf did not narrate or consider narrations from the shia who said anything negative against the companions, me and you farid don't have to debate this point since we both know this is true. Farid said: So if Thahabi is saying this, it negates the fact that your salaf acted in the way we are saying? So if Thahabi says all of this, it erases all the entries we posted from your books from the salaf? There is something calle
  8. It becomes a sad sign when we get "happy" from this, as if we need their approval. The question mark should be on the sunnis not on the shia.
  9. Farid, it took you months to post that? Literally nothing that you said actually refuted anything from darul Islam. Your entire post was just you citing sunnis giving tawtheeq to bakris,politically inclined proto-sunnis from kufa, and undeniable giants among the shia that even ahmad ibn hanbal was reluctant to accept but was forced to due to status, somehow that makes your science "objective"? Take any average thiqa imami his narrations will be thrown in the sea, your own shaykh bukhari said not to even pray behind us and considers us kuffar, are you saying that he will objectively analyze
  10. Muslim720 is a sincere person who only made a mistake in reading since he read fast. Muslim720 continue studying on this subject, I recommend writing down lists of subjects debated upon between sunni and shia, such as fadak, nazar Allah, 3dl Allah, mutah, etc and see which side has stronger proofs.
  11. Ighatha Ahfaaz, Ibn qayyim jawzjiyya, page 122, And if you were to see one of them you'd see that they would not pray except on the carpet, and he (Rasulallah S.) would never pray on the carpet, nor a carpet furnished in front of him, however he would pray on the ground, and maybe upon dates, and he used to pray on the reed mat, and what was available to him from these, and if he did not find any of these then he'd pray on the earth.. Minhaj As sunnah, page 151, "And also what Imam malik said, praying on something other than nature is hated, and the muminun (shia, the other says rafidhi
  12. Why would Imam Malik base his ruling upon the hadith if he thought it was weak? Also he did indeed say it was haram, ولو جاز السجود على ثوب متصل به Meaning "if it was permissible" I.E. it's not, basic reading comprehension skills need on your part before you accuse someone of lying.
  13. Again you don't understand these narrations, the scholars of your school have already explained them in saying that they did this out of necessity if they could not find gravel they cool down in their hands and make prostration upon it as was demonstrated in the above hadith, and as explained by Imam Malik.
  14. عن جابر بن عبد الله رضي الله عنهما قال كنت اصلى مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم صلاة الظهر فآخذ قبضة من الحصى في كفي حتى تبرد واضعها بجبهتي إذا سجدت من شدة الحر*.ثم قال البيهقي( قال الشيخ رحمه الله ولو جاز السجود على ثوب متصل به لكان ذلك أسهل من تبريد الحصا في الكف ووضعها للسجود عليها وبالله التوفيق ) From Jabir Ibn Abdullah(ra) " I was praying with Rasulallah (ص) salaatu dhur, he then took a handful of gravel in his palm until it cooled down and he would place it on his forehead (place of prostration) if he made prostration from the intensity of the heat". (COMMENTARY from bayhaqi) "The Sh
×
×
  • Create New...