Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

al-`Ajal Ya Imaam

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    1,069
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

al-`Ajal Ya Imaam last won the day on March 4 2013

al-`Ajal Ya Imaam had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About al-`Ajal Ya Imaam

  • Rank
    al-Kanadee
  • Birthday 11/10/1996

Profile Information

  • Location
    Rafidistan
  • Religion
    Shi`ah Ithna `Ashari Usooli Muslim

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

17,537 profile views
  1. @al-`Ajal Ya Imaam #ShiaChat now on Twitter! @ShiaChatForum

  2. It was a blast being here, try not to kill yourselves

  3. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيمالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته Same thread, post 19, literally all it takes is just some scrolling. Majlisi's gradings beyond Mir'at al-`Uqul, and Miladh al-Akhyar aren't too reliable. He was lenient which make them unreliable to depend on. والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  4. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيمالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركتهThat's nice, what about now `Abd Allah b. Muhammad b. Abi Shaybah in his Musannaf where he has a book called "Kitab Rad `Ala Abi Haneefah" (click away!), the name means "Book of Refutation upon Abu Haneefah", guess what it does. What the style that Ibn Abi Shaybah used here; he takes a fiqh ruling of Abu Haneefah لعنة الله عليه and then presents the Ahadeeth of the Prophet, happy reading.والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  5. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيمالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركتهNot only the Sunni Imams Ahmad b. Hanbal and Malik b. Anas have cursed him, but our Imam al-Kazhim has also, on the basis of his Qiyas علي بن إبراهيم، عن أبيه، عن ابن أبي عمير، عن محمد بن حكيم قال: قلت لأبي الحسن موسى عليه السلام: جعلت فداك فقهنا في الدين وأغنانا الله بكم عن الناس حتى أن الجماعة منا لتكون في المجلس ما يسأل رجل صاحبه تحضره المسألة و يحضره جوابها فيما من الله علينا بكم فربما ورد علينا الشئ لم يأتنا فيه عنك ولا عن آبائك شئ فنظرنا إلى أحسن ما يحضرنا وأوفق الأشياء لما جاء نا عنكم فنأخذ به؟ فقال هيهات هيهات، في ذلك والله هلك من هلك يا ابن حكيم، قال: ثم قال: لعن الله أبا حنيفة كان يقول: قال علي، وقلت. قال محمد بن حكيم لهشام بن الحكم: والله ما أردت إلا أن يرخص لي في القياس al-Kulayni (d. 329), al-Kafi, ed. `A. A. al-Ghiffari, 3rd (Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, 1388), Vol. 1, Pp. 56, H. 9 الحديث التاسع 3: حسن al-Majlisi (d. 1111), Mir'at al-`Uqul, ed. S. J. al-Hussaini (Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, 1410), Vol. 1, Pp. 193 One only needs to see what is amongst the fiqh rulings of Abu Haneefah لعنة الله عليه to understand the state of his fiqh. Books have inspectors, who amongst other things grade the Ahadeeth in the books. The Muhaqqiq (inspector) of this copy of Ta'reekh Baghdad is named Dr. Bishar (or Bashar?) `Awad Ma`ruf. والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  6. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيمالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركتهStories of the Prophets عليهم السلام: al-Saduq قدس سره; from His Father (`Ali b. Babawayh al-Qummi) قدس سره; from Sa`ad; from Ibraheem b. Mahziyar; from His Brother, `Ali b. Mahziyar; from al-Nadr; from Musa b. Bakr, he said: Some of our companions said to Abi `AbdAllah عليه السلام: "Did the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله know the names of the hypocrites?" So he said: "No, however, when the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله was in the campaign of Tabbuk, he was riding on a camel, with a group leading in front of him. So when he reached al-`Aqabah and sat there, 14 men, 6 from Quraysh, and 8 from other people - or vis versa - So Jibra'eel عليه السلام came to Him صلى الله عليه وآله and said: 'Verily so-and-so, and so-and-so, and so-and-so have laid in wait for you in al-`Aqabah to frighten your she-camel.' So the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله called to them saying: 'Oh so-and-so! Oh so-and-so! Oh so-and-so! Have you laid in wait to frighten my she-camel?' Hudhayfah, was behind Him صلى الله عليه وآله, he caught up to them. So he said: 'Oh Hudhayfah, did you hear?' He said: 'Yes.' He said: 'Keep this secret.'" Small note if you were confused like me when read the she-camel being scared part, scaring the she-camel in this mountain pass would've caused it to go mad, and the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله to be thrown off and fall to his death. Mind any translation errors. والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  7. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيمالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركتهSign me up for Juz' 28والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  8. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته I can't say for all of them, but just eyeballing, I know al Rasa'il al-`Ashar has a translation to English, it's a decent book outlining aspects of Usul, followed by the Daleel that Shaykh al Taa'ifah رضوان الله تعالى عليه found for it. I own an old edition of it printed in the 90s, that was printed in Pakistan, so I'm not sure if it's had recent printing. Though these books aren't from the site, I know that Sayyid Mujtaba Lari رضوان الله تعالى عليه had books on `Aqa'id as well, here his books "God and His Attributes" can be read. If online reading isn't your thing, his books are fairly easy to obtain, the masjid I bought my copies from said that he also gives these books for free if you contact his website. There's also the book by Yasin T. al-Jabouri entitled "Allah" which is, it includes a biography of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله, I don't know if this one can be read online though. What might be useful could be Hadeeth books on Tawheed like Tawheed al Saduq رضوان الله تعالى عليه, or parts of books of Hadeeth which deal with `Aqeedah on Tawheed, such as parts of Usul al-Kafi, or the Ahadeeth on Tawheed from `Uyun Akhbar al Ridaa عليه السلام (can be read here in English). Perhaps try checking out sites like al-islam.org, they're bound to have books on theology and `Aqeedah. And sorry for the ramblings in this post. والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  9. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته If you can speak Arabic, perhaps these books of `Aqeedah might be interesting to you. Building up your Usool always leads to a strong faith, enjoy: http://alfeker.net/library.php?catid=22 والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  10. Perhaps Allaah does not will you to have a picture for your signature? just spitballing ideas here
  11. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيمالسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركتهDid you read what I wrote? Shaykh Yassir al-Habeeb is not a terrorist, he doesn't fit the definition of one, being offensive does not make one a terrorist. And you say he's used violence, when? Was this violence of his when he was kidnapped and tortured in a Kuwaiti prison while he had asthma, for almost half a year, before having to escape the country? If not, please do tell when. Oh, and now Shaykh Habeeb is bad for writing books against companions and insulting them? So what, how does that make him bad? It might not be the most diplomatic thing to do, but it won't make him any less of a scholar. And Masha'Allaah, Shaykh Yassir is condemned for speaking the truth! Condemned by who, you? Offending Sunnis does not earn condemnation, stop thinking so naive. Huh, what did I say that makes me sound like a "non-Muslims who say that Islam is a devilish religion"? Please, do tell. Sunnis have hated our guts since day one, here's even a Fatwa from Bukhari's "Khalq Af`al al-`Ibad: قال أبو عبد الله: ما أبالي صليت خلف الجهمي والرافض أم صليت خلف اليهود والنصارى، ولا يسلم عليهم ولا يعادون ولا يناكحون ولا يشهدون ولا تؤكل ذبائحهم. Abu `Abdullaah said: I don't care (or I don't differentiate) whether I pray behind a Jahmi and Rafidi, or behind a Jew and a Christian. And don't say peace unto them, nor visit them, nor wed them, nor accept their witness, nor eat their sacrifices. al-Bukhari, Muhammad b. Isma`il, Abu `Abdullah (d. 256), Khalq Af`al al-`Ibad, 1 vol. (Beirut: Mu'asasat al Risalah, 1st ed., 1404-1984), Pp. 13 I chose to provide the above as an example because this is from a time period when Shi`ahs couldn't be open about religion, due to constant fear, and we're still called Kuffar Or do you need reminding about the riots that the Sunnis did in Baghdad, led by the Seljuks, where they burnt the library of al Tusi? And Brained is spot on about the Sunni and Shi`ah relations. Facts are facts, Sunnis have hated us from day one, and their hate for us is not based of our "cursing the Sahabah" alone, if that made any difference in those days. And what on earth are you going on about in your fourth paragraph. You prayed on 4 people who are going to hell, so you can put a smile on some Sunni's face, that's where you compromised your own beliefs. I have Sunni friends too, I don't do Taraddi after their names if I ever say them, but I don't abuse them either, you and Yassir al-Habeeb are both on opposite extremes, where he's taking some extreme Rafd, you're now sacrificing parts of your religion to please them. I think you're mixing up Indo-Pak Malangs with Akhbaris. Akhbaris in the classical sense didn't do things like "Beat themselves on `Eid", or whatever Pseudo/Neo-Akhbaris do. However, they didn't do Taqleed, and accept the Ahadeeth from the books of the Quddamah `Ulema' without Rijalically evaluting them. However, that doesn't make them non-Shi`ah, if they abrogated the Usool and/or Furu`, then you can argue for them not being Shi`ah, however, until then they're Shi`ah. But if you actually think that Akhbaris are not Shi`ah, then how about you go take Wasaa'il al Shi`ah (a 30 volume long book of hadeeth covering almost all aspects of Shari`ah, Fiqh, and daily Ahkam, from things like executing apostates to colouring your hair and what colours to use, it's one of the most important books and relied upon heavily by `Ulema') and throw it into the garbage, because the author of it-ie. Shaykh Hurr al-`Amili رضوان الله تعالى عليه- was an Akhbari :-) I think as for tahreef and calling for takfeer of someone who believes in it, brother Dar'ul_Islam best sums it up: والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  12. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته That's all fine and dandy, but you still haven't answered my question. Now you keep explaining to me why I shouldn't take Shaykh Yassir al-Habeeb's approach to Tabarra, where I go cuss out the Shaykhayn on TV, now that's semi-reasonable and I can understand that. However, what I don't understand is the following, and just the following: You have done Taraddi on the Shaykhayn, `Uthmaan, and `Aa'ishah (ie. you prayed for Allaah to be pleased with them), now why did you do that is what I am asking. Because, there's a world of difference between having manners in public, and becoming a Batri (as Yassir al-Habeeb likes to put it). Now please just answer why you did that. Putting aside the other things you got wrong, Ayatullaah Khumayni was a saint? Boy that's new, but in case you were unaware, there are many people, on this site as well, who have opposed Khumayni's regime and Iran (Such as in this thread here which was entertaining when it was going) so Iran is not exactly a state as what you describe. And the first one to ban abusing the companions of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله was not Khamanaei, even Nader Shah of Iran, who came about 200 years before Khamanaei. And I just need to ask, do you sincerely think that Akhbaris are not Shi`ah? والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  13. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته Putting aside your confused conceptions of unity and religion. Please explain to me how now abusing the Shaykhayn, their daughters, and `Uthmaan or cursing them in public is equal to doing Taraddi on them, that's my question. Do these people honestly deserve taraddi in your eyes? The ones who robbed Imaam `Ali's عليه السلام right, attacked his house, and assaulted his wife which led to her death, then stole his right for about 2 decades. These are the people in your eye who deserve Taraddi..nice. Also in post 13 you asked for the grading of the Hadeeth which PT posted, the one from Kafi: حنان عن أبيه، عن أبي جعفر عليه السلام قال: قلت له: ما كان ولد يعقوب أنبياء؟ قال: لا ولكنهم كانوا أسباط أولاد الانبياء ولم يكن يفارقوا الدنيا إلا سعداء تابوا وتذكروا ما صنعوا وإن الشيخين فارقا الدنيا ولم يتوبا ولم يتذكرا ما صنعا بأمير المؤمنين عليه السلام فعليهما لعنة الله والملائكة والناس أجمعين Hanan, from his Father, from Abi Ja`far عليه السلام, he said: I said to him عليه السلام: "Were the children of Ya`qub عليه السلام prophets?" He said: "No, but they were grandchildren of offspring of the prophets, and they did not depart from the world except happily for they repented and remembered what they had done whereas the Shaykhayn departed the world and did not repent and did not remember on what they did to commander of the faithfulعليه السلام, So on them the curse of Allaah, and the angles, and all of mankind." al-Kulayni al Razi, Muhammad b. Ya`qub b. Ishaq, Abu Ja`far (d. 329 ah), al-Kafi fi al-Hadeeth, ed. `Ali Akbar al-Ghiffari, 8 vols. (Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, Second ed., 1389 ah), Vol. 8, Pp. 246, Hadeeth 343 Grading which you wanted: حسن أو موثق Hasan or Muwatthiq Majlisi al-Isfahani, Muhammad Baqir b. Muhammad Taqi (d. 1111 ah), Mir'at al-`Uqul fi Sharh Akhbar Al al Rasul, ed. al Sayyid Ja`far al-Hussainy, 26 vols. (Tehran, Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, 1410 ah), Vol. 26, Pp. 215. والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
  14. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته Oh dear..please explain how this works? Tasleem on Muhammad صلى الله عليه وآله and Aal Muhammad عليهم السلام and Taraddi on their oppressors? Especially when the A'immah have condemned these individuals: وسألت عن رجلين اغتصبا رجلا مالا كان ينفقه على الفقراء والمساكين وأبناء السبيل وفي سبيل الله فلما اغتصباه ذلك لم يرضيا حيث غصباه حتى حملاه إياه كرها فوق رقبته إلى منازلهما فلما أحرزاه توليا إنفاقه أيبلغان بذلك كفرا؟ فلعمري لقد نافقا قبل ذلك وردا على الله عز وجل كلامه وهزئا برسوله (صلى الله عليه وآله) وهما الكافران عليهما لعنة الله والملائكة والناس أجمعين `Ali b. Suwayd: I wrote a letter to Abi al-Hasan al-Musa عليه السلام (Imaam Kazhim) when he was in prison in which I asked about his state and a large number of questions and he wrote to be this answer: "...And you ask about the two men who usurped the right of a man (Imaam `Ali عليه السلام), which he spent for the poor and the destitute and those who deplete their supplies on a journey and in the of Allaah. When they usurped his asset, they did not stop for that much until they made him carry that asset to their homes. When they secured it, then they made themselves as the person in charge of its spending and they reach the level of disbelief in doing so. By my life, they had played hypocrisy before as rejection against Allaah, and His words, by considering His Messenger as deriding and they are kaafirs, may the curse of Allaah, His angels and all people be upon them..." al-Kulayni al Razi, Muhammad b. Ya`qub b. Ishaq, Abu Ja`far (d. 329 ah), al-Kafi fi al-Hadeeth, ed. `Ali Akbar al-Ghiffari, 8 vols. (Tehran, Iran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah), Vol. 8, Pp. 124-126, Hadeeth 95 al-Majlisi's grading: الحديث الخامس و التسعون حديث أبي الحسن موسى عليه السلام‏ رواه بثلاثة أسانيد في الأول ضعف، و الثاني حسن كالصحيح، و في الثالث ضعف أو جهالة، لكن مجموع الأسانيد لتقوي بعضها ببعض في قوة الصحيح، و رواه الصدوق بسند صحيح. Hadeeth Ninety-Five, the narration of Abi al-Hasan Musa عليه السلام‏: It is narrated by three chains, the first is weak, the second is Hasan like Saheeh, and the third is third is weak or Majhool, but, the combination of the chains of narration due to the strengthening of some of them by some is Saheeh in strength, and it is narrated by al Saduq رضي الله عنه by a Saheeh Sanad. al-Majlisi al-Isfahani, Muhammad Baqir b. Muhammad Taqi (d. 1111 ah), Mir'at al-`Uqul fi Sharh Akhbar Aal al Rasul, ed. al Sayyid Ja`far al-Hussainy, 26 vols. (Tehran, Iran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, 1410 ah), Vol. 25, Pp. 295 Incase it was also unclear who the "two men" are, Majlisi wrote on page 298 of volume 25 of Mir'at: قوله عليه السلام:" و سألت عن رجلين" يعني أبا بكر و عمر عليهما اللعنة He عليه السلام said: And you asked about the two men, meaning Aba Bakr and `Umar, upon them the curse (of Allaah). And the chains of the Hadeeth: عدة من أصحابنا، عن سهل بن زياد، عن إسماعيل بن مهران، عن محمد بن منصور الخزاعي، عن علي بن سويد From a group of our companions, from Sahl . Ziyad, from Isma`il b. Mihran, from Muhammad b. Mansur al-Khaza`i, from `Ali b. Suwayd ومحمد بن يحيى، عن محمد بن الحسين عن محمد بن إسماعيل بن بزيع، عن عمه حمزة بن بزيع، عن علي بن سويد and Muhammad b. Yahya, from Muhammad b. al-Hussain, from Muhammad b. Isma`il b. Bazi`, from his uncle Hamzah b. Bazi`, from `Ali b. Suwayd والحسن بن محمد، عن محمد بن أحمد النهدي، عن إسماعيل بن مهران، عن محمد بن منصور، عن علي بن سويد and al-Hasan b. Muhammad, from Muhammad b. Ahmad al Nahdi, from Isma`il b. Mihran, from Muhammad b. Mansur, from `Ali b. Suwayd I can understand the request to not curse them in public, but honestly, doing Taraddi on those two when the Imaam عليه السلام cursed them..why? والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركته
×
×
  • Create New...