Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Glow

Banned
  • Content Count

    387
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Glow

  • Rank
    Level 2 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Islam

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,460 profile views
  1. Israel progressively steals more and more Palestinian land every yea, despite them already having the overwhelming amount of land. This despite the whole world, including the UN and even there greatest allies have told them to stop (at least publicly) but they refuse to. Everyone with even half a brain and is not bias knows Israel does not want peace.
  2. Iran continues to do well for itself and advance despite all these pressures. MashAllah
  3. (I am just generally speaking here, not trying to address anything specific here) Well, Scientifically the world was once flat! Science is and has never a standard, scientific 'facts' change from one generation to the next. You are talking as if even the most fundamental principals once held as the most paradigm (accepted view) of science have not changed throughout history, and even modern history at that. Furthermore, to compound this you are assuming God has to work within the bounds of this constantly 'changing' (as we know it) subject, therefor putting God on the same level as the creation by subjecting him to the same rules. And if God is the same as the creation, via subject to the same rules, then there really is no need for him to be worshiped.
  4. Sorry, My bad. I should have made it more clear. They considered you the worst Mubtadi's/Munafiqs. Just on the verge of being non Muslim.. This is pretty much unanimous from all the major scholars and rulers. I am not saying the rulers were the epitome of righteousness I am just stating the facts. Anyways, you will have a great difficulty of finding a major Scholar who did not heavily rebuke or out right call them Kaffirs. You will find alll the major scholars from past to present characterize them as one of 3 parties. Either Ignorant Muslims, Wicked Muslims or Non Muslims. As for them accepting Shia in the Sahih, yes we accept the shi'a back then. According to Authentic narrations from those same Sahih's, these people shared the same exact Aqeedah as the rest of the Sahabah. Furthermore, they loved all the Sahabah especially the 4 (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman Ali) but they just believed that Ali had more merit to be Caliph then Uthman. Furthermore they had nothing of this Imams = Infallibility concept, furthermore they shared the same ideology with the rest of the Sahabah on Shrine building, furthermore they shared their concept of Tawheed, furthermore, furthermore, furthermore and we can go on forever. I am not saying there was a prefect relationship or they were prefect but the overall atmosphere was not one of enmity between them. This is very different from some of the Shia of today, who hate Most of the Sahabah and curse the first 3, do not share the same Aqeedah, continue to build shrines, do not share the same concept of Tawheed and the list goes on. This is all from the Sahihs. What you are doing is combining narrations from our Sahih's and your books. Basically picking and choosing whatever narrations fit your desires about them from both books, mixing them and then disregarding all the other narrations about them in the Sahih's. Then you present your argument as conclusive. That my friend is not how it works.
  5. And, what makes you think they considered you Muslims in the first place.... I mean, all evidences from the majority of people/scholars/rulers of the time say otherwise... To them, saying that is equivalent to saying "And the Romans tasted the poison of Khalid ibn Waleed in the battle of Yarmock" It's a fallcy On a side note: Most of them commented by saying the end result of these people is: Treachery against the Ummah, dislike of the transmitters of knowledge, fabrications, innovations and concealing what they believe until they have authority over you, only then will they reveal their true intentions and it will be far what they have proclaimed when you had authority over them. But by then it will be to late. And many would say that the course of history proved them right to a great extent.
  6. You need to stop saying what you think the Ayah means and who you think it refers to and go and read an authentic tafseer. Thats all I am going to say on that issue. It's a plague on these forums. Furthermore, it shows you know very little to nothing about authentic Islam due to the fact you bring up this silly point of the companions running away. Allah FORGAVE the Sahabah for running away. If Allah forgave them, aren't you ready to forgive them? As for the errors, well, I have made corrections to your mistakes so you can see the discrepancy between my quote and your original post.
  7. ^ I just corrected your post with some Minor Corrections Furthermore, you did not respond to my post, you did not give me Qur'an or Sunnah all you did was give me rhetoric and the rhetoric which you gave me was also plagued with error. May Allah Rectify your condition. InshAllah.
  8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqHZTrTyf44&feature=related Very Wise words. May Allah rectify there condition.
  9. You'd be surprised how prevelent this is espcially from unexpected sources like some people who weep in your face for justice in specific countries and how the actions that are happening there are unjust, but secerly this is what they conceal. They will reveal it only when they have authority over others and not while others have authority over them. The cake may look good from the outside, but in many cases it's made out of poison.
  10. Hey Mr. Nasib of Ahlulbayt, heard u got banned from chat. I wonder how that happened???

  11. Hey Mr. Nasib of Ahlulbayt, heard u got banned from chat. I wonder how that happened???

  12. Before we can proceed, we need to know exactly what this Arabization is and entails, and so then it will become clear to the people weather some individuals here are using the spread of "Arabziation' as a cover against the spread of Sunni Islam or Islam in general. As for what we are supposed to call God- there are many terms used in the Qur'an, Allah, Ar-Rhman, Ar-Raheem etc etc etc. It is acceptable to use the common language if people are not familiar with the term Allah or if there is extreme pressure against Muslims to use the local language for God. However for some important words, it is best to use the words given in the Qur'an rather then the local languages word for it. Furthermore, the local languages exact meaning, connotation and history of the word is usually not the same as with the words given in the Qur'an to denote generally the same thing. So with important words, if you can and your environment allows you to without any stigmatization it is much more desired to use the terms given in the Qur'an (NOT Arabic street language either because alot of people get Qur'anic Arabic and street Arabic confused when they are TOTALLY different). This is highlighted by the fact that some important rituals like saying prayers can only be done in Qur'anic Arabic. As for reading the Qur'an, yes if you want the Barraka of reciting the whole Qur'an exactly the way Prophet did then you can read it in Arabic but make sure you, after reading the sur'ah or ayah re-read it it in a language that YOU understand so that you may be able to derive some guidance and knowledge from it.
  13. You still are not getting the point. And before I spoon feed the concept to you....again, read the post before making any satirical attacks on me. You are either clearly not reading the posts or are clearly not able to understand the concept. If you love God, you obey what he has sent forth and you worship him according to how he has told you to worship him. Not according to how you FEEL god should be worshiped. This act of worship was INNOVATED within the Christian religion. This is not how they were instructed to show gratitude to God even within there own holy texts. Their highly regarded predecessors or those they hold in high esteem did not show gratitude, love or worshiped like this and their Prophet DEFINITELY did not show gratitude or love or worship like this. This means this act of worship is INNOVATED. And what is the nature of the any innovation? To bring something new. Meaning, this act of worship was INVENTED by people. It was not what/how God asked them to show love, worship or gratitude even within their own revered texts. Therefor, they are telling God how he needs to be worshiped, how to show love to him and how to show gratitude to him instead of following what God, there prophet and there revered predecessors did. (AKA those who new the faith BEST) did. I can just as easily tell someone to run 12 laps around the field, do 20 push ups do 5 jumping jacks and hold your breathe for 10 seconds and that God loves this and this is how to show love to God.
  14. Who mentioned anything about laughing? I never said I make fun of them nor do I make fun of them nor did i allude to making fun of them. I did not even address the details of what goes on in the video nor did I watch it because I am well aware of what happens. My whole post was about leaving innovated forms of worship. Whatever form them may take. Furthermore, as a side note: This form of worship is innovated even within there own theology. Next time, before taking satirical shots at me or anyone else, make sure you have read there post carefully.
×
×
  • Create New...