Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Bhooka_Bhairiya

Unregistered
  • Posts

    1,077
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Disagree
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from adi_a in What In The World Is A Malang?   
    True. It's just another(there's only one approach to Islam, that recommended by ahlulbayt) approach to Islam. To make it worse it's just a rip off of sufis, ghalis, ismailis, shiakhis etc. Since malangs don't have a standard set of beliefs, some are more deviated than others.
    What's common among them is their practicing of idiotic azadari rituals(zanjeer/qama zani, tazia etc) which involves aping the innovations started by safavids(ex sufis) and further propagated by the eunuch led qajar regime. As far as the indo-pak is concerned, all the filthy azadari rituals have been created by the famous sufis of the land and it's no wonder the biggest azadari comical performances are held in Multan(Punjab), the stronghold of deviant heretic sufis, pir, mureed, sajada nasheens etc. Ironically these malangs are also from punjab. For further details, check this thread:

    Unfortunately they've borrowed heavily from ismailis as well as other deviants. The parroting of the idiotic phrase "ya Ali Madad", especially as a greeting, comes from the deviant ismailis. Their famous Nad e Ali junk is also found in deviant books such as the deviant heretic Mulla Jami's Shawahidun nubuwwah, instead of being present in any classical shi'ite authoritative text. Same for their Khutbatul bayan and other such non sense which has been imported from the deviant sufi Hafidh Rajab al Bursi's mashariq anwar ul yaqin. Deviant malang zakirs also propagate heretic shaikhi beliefs from the pulpit. See post# 20, here:

    Their idiotic belief of syeda can't marry non syed is also imported from deviant sunnis. See post# 13, here:

    and post# 103, here:

    The less said about these deviants, the better.
  2. Disagree
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from adi_a in What In The World Is A Malang?   
    Just in case anyone forgot, I'll repeat my post again. :)
  3. Haha
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from A_A in Is Sugar Haram?   
    Everything is haram.
  4. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from MohammadAli1993 in How Can Shias Say That Ali (ra) Is Ilaah?   
    (wasalam)
    Ma'am, shouldn't you as admin ban this user or at least delete these frivolous threads where someone plucks statements from thin air and DOESN'T provide proofs to back them up. I can guarantee you this thread will also go upto 6-7 pages as usual even though the starting assumption(s) is/are not backed by authoritative proofs.
  5. Completely Agree
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from Ali Sharifli in Taqleed Wajib?   
    (wasalam)
    ÝÃãÇ ãä ßÇä ãä ÇáÝÞåÇÁ ÕÇÆäÇ áäÝÓå ¡ ÍÇÝÙÇ áÏíäå ¡ ãÎÇáÝÇ Úáì åæÇå ¡ ãØíÚÇ áÇãÑ ãæáÇå ¡ÝááÚæÇã Ãä íÞáÏæå
    So then whoever among the fuqaha is an upkeeper of his nafs, protector of his religion, opponent of his desires, submitter to the command of his maula, then the common men should emulate him.
    Although the hadith doesn't make any mention of marja (putting the title of fuqaha on marjas has no basis) but anyhow, this hadith is from Tafsir al Askari which is considered fabricated by modern usoolis so it's hypocrisy for usoolis to use this hadith.

    Life of Imam Hasan al Askari by Allama Baqir Sharif al Qarashi

    [b]Anyhow, it is certain that this tafsir was not Imam Abu Muhammad’s but it was fabricated and ascribed to him.[/b] In addition to the defects it has, it is not eloquent in many of its chapters, and of course, this does not fit the imam who had been endowed with wisdom and eloquence, and he was the most eloquent man in his time. So how could this tafsir, which had no any feature of eloquence, ascribed to this great imam? Besides that, it has some traditions that have excessiveness as I think, and this was too far from the imam (a.s.).
    http://www.maaref-foundation.com/english/index.htm (page 86)
  6. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from MohammadAli1993 in How Imam Ali Look Like?   
    (wasalam)
    Your Qur'an is probably different from ours.
  7. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from Al-Hassan in Female Mods/admins, Acceptable?   
    Produce such a hadith from our primary sources to prove your point. Thank you.
  8. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from Al-Hassan in Female Mods/admins, Acceptable?   
    Al Sahih Min Kitab Basaer ad darajaat
    ÍÏËäÇ ãÍãÏ Èä ÇáÍÓíä (ËÞÉ) Úä ãÍãÏ Èä ÅÓãÇÚíá (ËÞÉ) Úä ÍãÒÉ Èä ÈÒíÛ (ËÞÉ) Úä Úáí [Èä ÓæíÏ] ÇáÓÇÆí (ËÞÉ) Úä ÃÈí ÇáÍÓä Úáíå ÇáÓáÇã :
    (Ãäå ßÊÈ Åáíå Ýí ÑÓÇáÉ æáÇ ÊÞá áãÇ ÈáÛß ÚäøÇ Ãæ äÓÈ ÅáíäÇ åÐÇ ÈÇØá¡ æÅä ßäÊ ÊÚÑÝ ÎáÇÝå ÝÅäß áÇ ÊÏÑí áã ÞáäÇ æÚáì Ãí æÌå æÕÝÉ )
    * ÇáÍßã : ÕÍíÍÉ
    Told us Muhammad b. al Hussain (trustworthy), from Muhammad b. Ismail (trustworthy) from Hamza b. Bazigh (trustworthy), from Ali [b. Suwaid] al Saai (trustworthy) from Abi al Hasan (as): That he (as) wrote to him in a message, "And don't say of what comes to you from us or is attributed to us "this is false", and (even) if you had known (up till now) its opposite for verily you do not know why we (as) said it and upon which/any of its point/aspect and attribute."
    Ruling: Sahih (authentic)
    http://realtashayyu.blogspot.com/2011/03/rejecting-odd-ahadith-allowed.html
    Kafi

    Úäå¡ Úä ÃÍãÏ Èä ãÍãÏ¡ Úä ÇÈä ãÍÈæÈ¡ Úä Ìãíá Èä ÕÇáÍ¡ Úä ÃÈí ÚÈíÏÉ ÇáÍÐÇÁ ÞÇá: ÓãÚÊ ÃÈÇ ÌÚÝÑ (Úáíå ÇáÓáÇã) íÞæá: æÇááå Åä ÃÍÈ ÃÕÍÇÈí Åáí ÃæÑÚåã æÃÝÞååã æÃßÊãåã áÍÏíËäÇ æÅä ÃÓæÃåã ÚäÏí ÍÇáÇ æÃãÞÊåã ááÐí ÅÐÇ ÓãÚ ÇáÍÏíË íäÓÈ ÅáíäÇ æíÑæì ÚäÇ Ýáã íÞÈáå ÅÔãÇÒ ãäå æÌÍÏå æßÝÑ ãä ÏÇä Èå æåæ áÇíÏÑí áÚá ÇáÍÏíË ãä ÚäÏäÇ ÎÑÌ æÅáíäÇ ÇÓäÏ¡ Ýíßæä ÈÐáß ÎÇÑÌÇ Úä æáÇíÊäÇ
    From him, from Ahmad b. Ahmad, from ibn Mahboob, from Jameel b. Saleh, from Abi Ubaidah al Hadha' who said: I heard Aba Ja'far(as) saying: "By Allah(swt) I love my companion to be pious ones and ones with understanding and hiding of our(as) ahadith and verily worst of them with me (Imam(as)) currently and those with enmity is of who when hears the hadith attributes to us and narrates from us then he doesn't accept (and) detests it(the hadith) and he rejects and declares kufr on one who professes it and he doesn't know perhaps the hadith is from us (Imams(as)) and to us (Imams(as)) is the sanad (chain of narration of the hadith), so would thus be expelled from our (Imams(as))'s wilayah.
    Source
    Al-Kafi (Shaikh Kulaini), Vol 2, Page 223, Hadith number 7
    Grading
    Majlisi (Miratul uqul, Vol 1, page 191)
    ÕÍíÍ Sahih

    http://realtashayyu.blogspot.com/2011/03/what-act-expels-one-from-wilayah-of.html
    Miraat ul uqool

    æ Ñæì ÇáÕÏæÞ Ýí ÇáÚáá ÈÅÓäÇÏå ÇáÕÍíÍ Úä ÃÈí ÈÕíÑ Úä ÃÍÏåãÇ ÚáíåãÇ ÇáÓáÇã ÞÇá:
    áÇ ÊßÐÈæÇ ÈÍÏíË ÃÊÇßã Èå ãÑÌìþÁ æ áÇ ÞÏÑí æ áÇ ÎÇÑÌí äÓÈå ÅáíäÇ¡ ÝÅäßã áÇ ÊÏÑæä áÚáå ÔíþÁ ãä ÇáÍÞ ÝÊßÐÈæÇ Çááå ÚÒ æ Ìá ÝæÞ ÚÑÔå
    And narrated al Sadooq(ra) in al Illal (Illul ul sharai) with sahih (authentic) sanad (chain of narration) from Abi Baseer from one of the 2 Imams(as) said: Don't reject hadith which has come to you people through murj'i, qadari and kharji attributed to us, for verily you people don't know for it is something from the truth so you rejected Allah(swt).
    http://realtashayyu.blogspot.com/2011/03/stop-rejecting-ahadith.html
  9. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from robbenmessi1010 in Don't Teach Your Women?   
    A trillion articles from al-islam.org and a few thousand lectures of Ammar Nakshwani/rajabali etc :!!!:
  10. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from irakiya_shi3iya in God As A Female   
    These type of discussions should be strongly avoided.
    Kafi:
    ãÍãÏ Èä íÍíì¡ Úä ÃÍãÏ Èä ãÍãÏ¡ Úä ÇáÍÓíä Èä ÓÚíÏ¡ Úä ÇáäÖÑ Èä ÓæíÏ Úä ÚÇÕã Èä ÍãíÏ ÞÇá: ÞÇá: ÓÆá Úáí Èä ÇáÍÓíä (Úáíå ÇáÓáÇã) Úä ÇáÊæÍíÏ ÝÞÇá: Åä Çááå ÚÒæÌá Úáã Ãäå íßæä Ýí ÂÎÑ ÇáÒãÇä ÃÞæÇã ãÊÚãÞæä ÝÃäÒá Çááå ÊÚÇáì Þá åæ Çááå ÃÍÏ æÇáÂíÇÊ ãä ÓæÑÉ ÇáÍÏíÏ Åáì Þæáå: " æåæ Úáíã ÈÐÇÊ ÇáÕÏæÑ " Ýãä ÑÇã æÑÇÁ Ðáß ÝÞÏ åáß.
    Imam Zain ul Abideen(as) was asked about tawhid(oneness of Allah). He replied: "Indeed Allah(SWT) knew that in the end times there would be intellectual people so Allah(SWT) sent down, Surah al Ikhlas* (chapter in al-Qur'an) and the verses of Surat al-Hadid*(chapter of al-Qur'an) until His words, ". . . and He knows well that which is in the breasts." Therefore someone who seeks to go beyond that will perish.'"
    *Surah al Ikhlas(Yusuf Ali translation):
    Al-Ikhlas
    In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful
    Say: He is Allah the One and Only; (1) Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; (2) He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; (3) And there is none like unto Him. (4)
    *Surah Al Hadid(first 6 verses, Yusuf Ali translation):
    Al-Hadid
    In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful
    Whatever is in the heavens and on earth let it declare the Praises and Glory of Allah: for He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. (1) To Him belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth; it is He Who gives life and Death; and He has Power over all things. (2) He is the First and the Last, the Evident and the Hidden and He has full knowledge of all things. (3) He it is Who created the heavens and the earth in six Days, and is moreover firmly established on the Throne (of authority), He knows what enters within the earth and what comes forth out of it, what comes down from heaven and what mounts up to it. And He is with you wheresoever ye may be. And Allah sees well all that ye do. (4) To Him belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth: and all affairs go back to Allah. (5) He merges Night into Day, and He merges Day into Night; and He has full knowledge of the secrets of (all) hearts.
  11. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from Ali-Reza in How Haram Is Music?   
    Wrong, the Imam of our time is Imam al Mahdi(as). If a self proclaimed "Imam" makes something permissible, it's irrelevant for the shias.
  12. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from gogiison2 in I Am Always Crushing On People...   
    Man la yahdhuruhul faqih
    æäåì Çä ÊÊßáã ÇáãÑÃÉ ÚäÏ ÛíÑ ÒæÌåÇ Çæ ÛíÑ Ðì ãÍÑã ãäåÇ ÇßËÑ ãä ÎãÓ ßáãÇÊ ããÇ áÇÈÏ áåÇ ãäå
    Prophet(PBUH) said "............woman should not speak to any man other than her husband or mahram more than 5 sentences if she must speak to him.............."
  13. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from gogiison2 in I Am Always Crushing On People...   
    It's totally normal. I myself keep getting crushes on different girls all the time. But I don't get worried because I'm always aware that it's just a crush and nothing serious. So basically I'd be longing for a girl for a few months, then after some time the focus will shift to another girl and I'll totally forget about the first one. So no need to worry.
    As we say in Urdu: Tu na sahi to koi aur sahi, koi aur na sahi to koi aur sahi
    Rough translation (flavor would be lost though): If not you then someone else, if not someone else then someone else.
  14. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from sunrise_786 in Forced Khula   
    Never a good idea to marry a woman with too many brothers.
  15. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from wayfarer. in Karbala: Fact Or Fiction?   
    Shimr was a khariji. Khawarij had fought with Ali(AS) in siffeen until they broke off. As for the sunni parroting of "shias did this, they betrayed etc", anyone with an ounce of intelligence will know that the "shia" being referred to are not imamis/ithna ashari shias. It's just referring to ones who consider Ali(AS) the fourth caliph and politically favor him against muawiya. Heck, even people like abu hanifa, shafii, tabari, hakim nishapuri etc have been sometimes labeled as shias. I believe a non retard would know why that is. Let me give you a clue, Muhammad Abu Zahra(al azhar scholar) in his work on the 4 imams of fiqh has written that abu hanifa preferred Ali(AS) over uthman. Of course, the typical "salafi" response would be "al azhar was founded by shias". So I guess Muhammad Abu Zahra was also "shia".
    Secondly, it's pretty idiotic of you(and more so of the mods of this forum, with due respect, I had to say this) that you are posting junk from sunni source to discuss karbala. As for the usual game of salafi internet warriors "so and so narrator was considered da'eef by so and so muhadith" takes the cake. It's not rocket science that historical events are not authenticated(in terms of sanad) as ahadith. If this was so then you guys would have had to dump the "umar the great" and other such "conquerors of the world" myths in the garbage bin where they belong. Show me some undisputed fatawaa from any classical sunni ulema advising sunnis(for me wahabis and sunnis are the same, they're our mukhalifeen) to do "takhreej" of historical events in this manner and bring some historical books written by your scholars which fulfill this criteria to the tee. And no, al bidaya wal nihaya or tarikh dhahabi don't fulfill them.
    Lastly, although your(sunni/salafi whatever) rijal is simply personal opinions of your "scholars" which themselves contradict heavily among themselves enabling e-jihadi sunnis to cherry pick stuff to suit their agenda, nonetheless from dhahabi to suyuti it's agreed that tashayyu and rifdh are different and a narrator's having tashayyu is not suitable ground to reject his narrations. If this was the case then you guys wouldn't have a history, since you guys have labeled every historian from waqidi to tabari as shia.
    Anyhow, it's time this stupidity of posting sunni junk on a shia forum came to an end. I'll report you to mods so as to have this 4 page junk thread binned.
  16. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from muslimah1 in Hijabi women   
    Because shia women think they know better than the Ma'soomeen(as). What else can I say.
  17. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from Çåá ÇáÈíÊ in Haraam Relationship - Regret It Everyday   
  18. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from Mumin in Ijtihad And Occultation   
    ßíÝ ÃäÊã ÅÐÇ ÈÞíÊã ÏåÑÇ ãä ÚãÑßã áÇÊÚÑÝæä ÅãÇãßã¿
    How will you people be when little from your age would be left nor know your Imam(as)?
    ÅÐÇ=When (future)
    áÇ= Negation (no, not, neither, nor etc)
    In farsi (the language which marjas speak and is taught in hawzas) it maybe different.
    Link to the real post:
    How to deal with modern issues, in terms of their religious ruling?
  19. Like
    Bhooka_Bhairiya got a reaction from Waiting for HIM in Is it really right for her to die unmarried?   
    The notions of "syeda can only marry a syed" and "syeda's marriage with non syed is zina" have no basis in Imami shiaism and are only propagated by deviant heretic malangs/matamis/molayis etc. In fact, these concepts have been borrowed from the sunni notions of "ajlaf, ahraf" as seen in Beheshti Zewar of Molana Ashraf Ali Thanvi(deviant heretic sunni deobandi scholar) and Ahmad Reza Khan Barelwi(deviant heretic scholar, founder of barelwism)'s fatawa.
    This hadith should clear up the issues.
    Man la yahdhuruhul faqih:
    æÞÇá ÑÓæá Çááå Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÂáå: (ÅäãÇ ÃäÇ ÈÔÑ ãËáßã ÃÊÒæÌ Ýíßã æÃÒæÌßã ÅáÇ ÝÇØãÉ ÝÅä ÊÒæíÌåÇ äÒá ãä ÇáÓãÇÁ
    Prphet(PBUH) said "I'm not but example of a human, I'll marry within you and give(my daughters) for marriage(to you) except for Fatima(as) for her marriage orders came from sky."
×
×
  • Create New...