Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

truth177

Basic Members
  • Content Count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Religion
    shiite Muslim

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male
  1. Alhamdulillah we are both indicating to the same thing, when I said u, it was a figurative speech and not u as u. The title sayyid is against all aspects of human rights. It Is against all equality and as u said against the basic teachings of Islam. The clerigy use it and the public do the same and that is all wrong( I'm not talking about a surname). I hope the ones who are using it based on lenage stop doing so.
  2. Ur totally missing my point, pls read what I'm saying carefully thank u, I'm from Lebanon as well from jabal amel a village called ain qana near jubaa3 First ur surname can be sayyid, mitchelle or smith that is not the point My point is asking the ones who put the title before their name, the title Sayyid , I don't care if they ate Arabs or non Arabs, and spare me the discussion even Arabs even in Lebanon the ones who uses that title believe they are superior, the simple point is u are a sayyid or a 3amma, that means master or from the general public, and don't say sayyid only means sir, as sir in a certain context means sayyid, but the sayyid that used as a title indicates to madtership, or how would u translate master into Arabic? So who gives u the right to be sayyid let the tanslation be (master or sir) based on ur lenage? That is ridiculous Take the title away and be normal like all Calling urself a sayyid as a title is wrong for Arab or non Arab if ur 1400years ago grandad was prophet Mohammad, still doesn't give u the right to be called a sayyid, so stop using the title
  3. Tell me about it, master/ sir whatever it is, it is not justified.
  4. Good historical events there. But my question is actually why should u be called sir / just because ur grandfather was this or that, the title is wrong as it separates people based on heritage and not achievements, this is against the basis of human right and equality, and against the teaching of the prophet and his progeny Ima ali as said " people are of two types, ur brothers in religion or equal in humanity" so what the hell titles are being applied in the name of ahlul bayt? And the funny thing if u say the so called title sayyid is for the prophet then imam ali is not a sayyid or if he is then abu Lahab his uncle is a sayyid? U must be kidding me
  5. Perfectly said brother,( if u want the shaykh's number I can pass it to u, his young and doing his phd maybe we should support instead on knocking our academics down) next the shaykh has to say to these guys on here pls pls forgive me and beg on tv... For him he said no one dares to accuse my love to imam ali and following. And if people are not happy it is their problem, but their right on me to explain what I said. he said i know after i post the video still they will not accept it as they dont care about the truth, they only like to puck on eacother. U know this shows hypocrisy, first they accused him of not following the ahlul bayt and accused the entire institution of attacking Shiites, the guy records a video in both languages refuting the main claim and explaining what he said on mustakilah, and saying he never said he doesn't follow imam ali, and his progeny after him, all he questioned that the evidence that is used need to be re-examined. But no he should apologies for talking in ustakillah the place where many Shia scholars come on and debate with their sunni counterparts, the guy told me that he should have not gone on there but still that is not acceptable? Wawo now that is ridiculous. Correctly put by brother in every detail.
  6. Salaams all The word sayyid translates as a master, can I humbily ask who gave that title? As the prophet and his progeny stoped the cast system or titles that comes from family status, and the Quran mentions that the best among u are the ones with taqwa not who ur family are? So when did the title start to be given? As ahlul al bayt did not use it? Salaams all The word sayyid translates as a master, can I humbily ask who gave that title? As the prophet and his progeny stoped the cast system or titles that comes from family status, and the Quran mentions that the best among u are the ones with taqwa not who ur family are? So when did the title start to be given? As ahlul al bayt did not use it?
  7. Thanks u for the lovely words, but I see here are individuals want to say harsh words to someone even so the person whom the words are directed to, clarifies his position in public on video, but still not enough, and read the title for this room, it is against a whole institution, which has the banner of imam Mahdi, and they are saying if anyone have any doubt in regards to our position pls visit us or call and speak to Shk ali himself, but no we are bigger than that we need to accuse and promote hatred in the name of ahlul bayt. How pity. Shaykh ali response video in Arabic and English http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=trbS1LY8Y5w http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=trbS1LY8Y5w Pls watch the link and stop abusing the guy there are much more important things in life then trying to acuse someone wrongly, maybe an apology should be given to him for the way he was talked about or an apology for the institute for the title of this room, at least we should remove the title http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=trbS1LY8Y5w
  8. Shk ali video , yaqul anahu yahub ahlul al bayit wa yuwalihum pls regard
    />http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=trbS1LY8Y5w

  9. bismillah. salam. the youtube link you typed on my profile did not work. please give the correct link and i will look at it, inshaAllah.

  10. Salam dear brother

    Salam pls look at the latest debate regarding Almahdi institute even after shaykh ali recorded a video in english refuting claims and anything that say's that he doesn't follow and love ahlul bayt, in which he clearly a Shiite and love ahlul bayt but still on here they won't accept it? Rediculous . The YouTube video is on the following link http://m.youtube...

  11. Salam pls look at the latest debate regarding Almahdi institute even after shaykh ali recorded a video in english refuting claims and anything that say's that he doesn't follow and love ahlul bayt, in which he clearly a Shiite and love ahlul bayt but still on here they won't accept it? Rediculous . The YouTube video is on the following link http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=trbS1LY8Y5w

  12. Salam pls look at the latest debate regarding Almahdi institute even after shaykh ali recorded a video in english refuting claims and anything that say's that he doesn't follow and love ahlul bayt, in which he clearly a Shiite and love ahlul bayt but still on here they won't accept it? Rediculous . The YouTube video is on the following link http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?xl=xl_blazer&v=trbS1LY8Y5w

  13. How pity, u quote what Im saying, and u reply without even taking into consideration what I said. So why u quoting it then? How did u derive it is out of my depth? Can't u apply what ur quoting? I said let us finish the matter at hand then go into other discussion, but u understood that as it is out of my depth that is why Im telling u we should be constructive and discuss one issue at a time? So no answers to what I said in the above quote? This only shows that u r here to promote hatred and debates. First we say the institute is attacking shiisim thought? Then when the guy clarifies it so clearly who his imams are, we still don't wAnt to accept it? Another thing is that the principel is the imama and wilaya and not the way it is derived, so a person can derive the wilaya of ali as in anyway but if he reaches the truth of following the imam then, u can't tell him ur not a follower because u believe in another evidence? The evidence is only the way the finality of reaching the objective in this case the wilaya is what should be questioned. What ur saying in regards to him speaking to the Iranian nassibi ur right and I agree with u on that, and even the shaykh accepted that, so who are we to not forgive and keep judging, if god himself forgives a sinner after he repences? Or ur authority is above god now?
  14. First The accusation to Shk ali was based on that him attacking shiitism in which the guy clarified so clearly that he is follower of ahlul beit. This means if ur sincere now it is clear then we should thank Allah that the followers of ahlulbayt never change, and we should be happy for him as his one of us, unless ur agenda is to continue saying no he doesn't follow ahlulbayt for the sake of the argument. Thirdly, I do not like to go into debates of what is ijtihad and the level that it can be applied to - we can do that after we reach a conclusion on this issue inchallah-my point Here is that as soon as i read the coments I asked the Shk to meet me and asked him clearly, in which we can all do instead of debating And how come none of u is commenting about the issue of gold, that his talking about. For u who's asking why call that channel, I spoke to the Shk and asked him that, he was very clear, that it was a debate between Shias and sunni's and even Shk qurani was calling , but Shk mallah did regret for saying things that are debated and said within every howza Walls but he came out with it outside. Now if the Shk saying he follow ali as and his progeny, and his wilaya is unquestionable, as well as that his saying he can prove the wilaya of ali as in a new system, so the current debates can be changed between the Muslim sects, why don't we encourage him. For me the guy loves and follow ahlulbayt as his leaders and imams maybe it is Allah who judges now on his love.
×
×
  • Create New...