Ibrahim Rasheed

The United States has crossed into open barbarism — torture, kidnapping, and high sea piracy as state policy.

This is not law enforcement. This is a poisonous cocktail of imperial violence that threatens humanity itself. From Vietnam to Venezuela and into Iran. 
Maduro’s wife was dragged before a U.S. court bruised, battered, with a blackened eye — the physical marks of abuse carried into a courtroom as if they were normal. Maduro himself appeared limping, visibly injured, showing clear signs of coercion and mistreatment.
This is what “justice” looks like when empire abandons law. A sovereign leader abducted. A spouse brutalized. Bodies used as evidence of power.  The US Jew Power. 
There is no legal cover for this. No moral excuse. No ethical defense. Kidnapping a head of state to impose control and plunder resources is not democracy — it is state-sanctioned criminality.  War on Humanity.  
When the U.S. boasts about such acts, it is no longer pretending to uphold international law. It is openly mocking it. The world is no longer safe from this monster. This is not strength. It is fear wrapped in violence.
History will remember it not as leadership — but as imperial thuggery laid bare over barbarism, human misery. 

Western media continues to recycle the same manufactured script: labeling foreign-backed destabilization as “protests” while deliberately omitting the root cause of Iran’s economic suffering — U.S. and European sanctions designed to cripple the economy and provoke unrest.
This is not journalism. It is narrative management.
Iran’s hardship did not emerge in a vacuum. It is the predictable result of economic warfare: sanctions targeting oil exports, banking access, shipping, insurance, and trade — measures imposed and enforced by the United States, with Europe acting as a compliant partner. These policies were never about human rights; they were about coercion and regime change.
Western outlets now attempt to revive this playbook by amplifying dissident networks and presenting them as spontaneous popular movements, while ignoring documented histories of U.S. and Israeli covert operations, assassinations, sabotage, and intelligence penetration inside Iran. This selective framing is deliberate.
Iran has once again neutralized foreign-linked covert cells operating within its borders, exposing networks tied to Mossad and the CIA that were tasked with destabilization and targeted violence. Iranian authorities have stated their intent to pursue full legal accountability against those apprehended, in accordance with national law.
Yet Western media remains silent on this — because acknowledging it would shatter the illusion that Iran’s crisis is self-inflicted rather than externally engineered.
The world has seen this model before:
Sanctions first
Economic collapse next
Media-driven delegitimization
Calls for “transition” and “intervention”
It is the same model used against Venezuela, where Iran’s oil and resources were openly targeted, seized, and looted under the guise of legality.
Iran’s wealth and natural resources belong to the Iranian people — not to Washington, not to Tel Aviv, and not to foreign interests. Regime change through sanctions, covert violence, and information warfare is a violation of sovereignty and international law, regardless of how elegantly it is packaged.
Western media must be challenged to answer a simple question it consistently avoids:
If sanctions are the cause of economic collapse, why are they never treated as the crime scene?
Until that question is confronted honestly, claims of concern for the Iranian people ring hollow.

Western media continues to recycle the same manufactured script: labeling foreign-backed destabilization as “protests” while deliberately omitting the root cause of Iran’s economic suffering — U.S. and European sanctions designed to cripple the economy and provoke unrest.
This is not journalism. It is narrative management.
Iran’s hardship did not emerge in a vacuum. It is the predictable result of economic warfare: sanctions targeting oil exports, banking access, shipping, insurance, and trade — measures imposed and enforced by the United States, with Europe acting as a compliant partner. These policies were never about human rights; they were about coercion and regime change.
Western outlets now attempt to revive this playbook by amplifying dissident networks and presenting them as spontaneous popular movements, while ignoring documented histories of U.S. and Israeli covert operations, assassinations, sabotage, and intelligence penetration inside Iran. This selective framing is deliberate.
Iran has once again neutralized foreign-linked covert cells operating within its borders, exposing networks tied to Mossad and the CIA that were tasked with destabilization and targeted violence. Iranian authorities have stated their intent to pursue full legal accountability against those apprehended, in accordance with national law.
Yet Western media remains silent on this — because acknowledging it would shatter the illusion that Iran’s crisis is self-inflicted rather than externally engineered.
The world has seen this model before:
Sanctions first
Economic collapse next
Media-driven delegitimization
Calls for “transition” and “intervention”
It is the same model used against Venezuela, where Iran’s oil and resources were openly targeted, seized, and looted under the guise of legality.
Iran’s wealth and natural resources belong to the Iranian people — not to Washington, not to Tel Aviv, and not to foreign interests. Regime change through sanctions, covert violence, and information warfare is a violation of sovereignty and international law, regardless of how elegantly it is packaged.
Western media must be challenged to answer a simple question it consistently avoids:
If sanctions are the cause of economic collapse, why are they never treated as the crime scene?
Until that question is confronted honestly, claims of concern for the Iranian people ring hollow.

Western media continues to recycle the same manufactured script: labeling foreign-backed destabilization as “protests” while deliberately omitting the root cause of Iran’s economic suffering — U.S. and European sanctions designed to cripple the economy and provoke unrest.
This is not journalism. It is narrative management.
Iran’s hardship did not emerge in a vacuum. It is the predictable result of economic warfare: sanctions targeting oil exports, banking access, shipping, insurance, and trade — measures imposed and enforced by the United States, with Europe acting as a compliant partner. These policies were never about human rights; they were about coercion and regime change.
Western outlets now attempt to revive this playbook by amplifying dissident networks and presenting them as spontaneous popular movements, while ignoring documented histories of U.S. and Israeli covert operations, assassinations, sabotage, and intelligence penetration inside Iran. This selective framing is deliberate.
Iran has once again neutralized foreign-linked covert cells operating within its borders, exposing networks tied to Mossad and the CIA that were tasked with destabilization and targeted violence. Iranian authorities have stated their intent to pursue full legal accountability against those apprehended, in accordance with national law.
Yet Western media remains silent on this — because acknowledging it would shatter the illusion that Iran’s crisis is self-inflicted rather than externally engineered.
The world has seen this model before:
Sanctions first
Economic collapse next
Media-driven delegitimization
Calls for “transition” and “intervention”
It is the same model used against Venezuela, where Iran’s oil and resources were openly targeted, seized, and looted under the guise of legality.
Iran’s wealth and natural resources belong to the Iranian people — not to Washington, not to Tel Aviv, and not to foreign interests. Regime change through sanctions, covert violence, and information warfare is a violation of sovereignty and international law, regardless of how elegantly it is packaged.
Western media must be challenged to answer a simple question it consistently avoids:
If sanctions are the cause of economic collapse, why are they never treated as the crime scene?
Until that question is confronted honestly, claims of concern for the Iranian people ring hollow.

This was not an arrest. This was a kidnapping of a sitting head of state.
A president is not a private citizen you seize off the street. The capture of a head of state cannot happen without internal betrayal. History is very clear on this.

It took NATO, the United States, and multiple armed militias eight months of bombing, siege, and ground operations to corner Muammar Gaddafi—and that ended in chaos and lynching, not “law enforcement.” Even then, Libya’s army had already fractured.

What allegedly happened in Venezuela is entirely different.
You do not “snatch” a president while: the army remains passive, the Presidential Guard does nothing, command-and-control systems remain intact, and the capital does not erupt.

That scenario does not exist in reality.
If Maduro was taken, it was by arrangement, not by force. Either:
senior cabinet members, the vice president, intelligence chiefs, or top military commanders sold him out.

There is no other explanation. Zero.
A functioning state does not lose its president unless the state itself collapses or conspires. Venezuela did not collapse overnight. Therefore, this was an inside job, facilitated or approved at the highest levels.
Calling this an “operation” or “law enforcement action” is dishonest.
Calling it “extradition” without due process is propaganda.
This is kidnapping under international law.
It violates:
state sovereignty,
diplomatic norms,
and the most basic principles of international order.
If powerful states normalize abducting presidents they dislike, then no head of state is safe, anywhere. That is not justice. That is rule by brute force.
This is not strength.
It is lawlessness dressed up as authority.

here is another photo.  

You can see her forehead.  The lump is still visible heavily.

The United States has crossed into open barbarism — torture, kidnapping, and high sea piracy as state policy.

This is not law enforcement. This is a poisonous cocktail of imperial violence that threatens humanity itself. From Vietnam to Venezuela and into Iran. 
Maduro’s wife was dragged before a U.S. court bruised, battered, with a blackened eye — the physical marks of abuse carried into a courtroom as if they were normal. Maduro himself appeared limping, visibly injured, showing clear signs of coercion and mistreatment.
This is what “justice” looks like when empire abandons law. A sovereign leader abducted. A spouse brutalized. Bodies used as evidence of power.  The US Jew Power. 
There is no legal cover for this. No moral excuse. No ethical defense. Kidnapping a head of state to impose control and plunder resources is not democracy — it is state-sanctioned criminality.  War on Humanity.  
When the U.S. boasts about such acts, it is no longer pretending to uphold international law. It is openly mocking it. The world is no longer safe from this monster. This is not strength. It is fear wrapped in violence.
History will remember it not as leadership — but as imperial thuggery laid bare over barbarism, human misery. 

here is another photo.  

You can see her forehead.  The lump is still visible heavily.

here is another photo.  

You can see her forehead.  The lump is still visible heavily.

Ofcourse we  know that some will try to distort the reality into zionist style hasbara reverse psychology antics.  It is not even worthwhile to appease Zionists.  I do not mean you are one.   

Here is your "god revealed fox news" so that you may believe at least she was beaten up.  The main issue here is kidnapping and beating up Maduro and his wife. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/maduros-wife-suffered-significant-injuries-dramatic-capture-attorney-alleges?

The United States has crossed into open barbarism — torture, kidnapping, and high sea piracy as state policy.

This is not law enforcement. This is a poisonous cocktail of imperial violence that threatens humanity itself. From Vietnam to Venezuela and into Iran. 
Maduro’s wife was dragged before a U.S. court bruised, battered, with a blackened eye — the physical marks of abuse carried into a courtroom as if they were normal. Maduro himself appeared limping, visibly injured, showing clear signs of coercion and mistreatment.
This is what “justice” looks like when empire abandons law. A sovereign leader abducted. A spouse brutalized. Bodies used as evidence of power.  The US Jew Power. 
There is no legal cover for this. No moral excuse. No ethical defense. Kidnapping a head of state to impose control and plunder resources is not democracy — it is state-sanctioned criminality.  War on Humanity.  
When the U.S. boasts about such acts, it is no longer pretending to uphold international law. It is openly mocking it. The world is no longer safe from this monster. This is not strength. It is fear wrapped in violence.
History will remember it not as leadership — but as imperial thuggery laid bare over barbarism, human misery. 

Some people just go beyond rationality to fabricate lies. Try to distort so the layman gets fooled. 

 
“The Qur’an criticizes Ezra for esoteric reasons.”
❌ Fabrication
The Qur’an does not criticize Ezra.
It criticizes a Jewish faction that said:
Even Jewish historians admit:
Some mystical sects exalted Ezra
Ezra wasn’t universally accepted as prophet or priest
His scripture editing caused major disputes
Nothing “esoteric” here.
It is a known historical controversy.

4. “No evidence connects lost Israelites to Arab tribes.”
❌ Strawman + historically false
Never claimed that.
The Qur’an does not claim Ishmaelites = Lost Tribes.
But, historically:
Many Israelites fled south into Arabia (documented by Assyrian records)
Jewish–Arab communities existed long before Christianity
Israelite tribes mixed with Arab clans around Hijaz and Najran
This does not make Arabs “Israelites,” but it proves:
✔ Israelite presence
✔ Cultural and genealogical mixing
So the reply’s claim is meaningless.

2. “Only Judah remained faithful so only Judah was fit to continue the covenant.”
❌ Not in the Tanakh at all
The Tanakh states:
The covenant was with ALL 12 tribes — forever.
Even when they sinned, God calls them back.
Nowhere does Tanakh say:
❌ “Judah inherits the covenant alone.”
❌ “Other tribes forfeited ancestry or identity.”
❌ “Judah now represents all Israel.”
This is a post-exilic ideological claim, not scripture.

1. “Judah acquired prominence because other tribes became idolaters.”
❌ Distortion
This is a self-serving narrative from Judah’s scribes, not an objective historical fact.
Tanakh was written, edited and canonized by Judahite priests long after the Northern Kingdom fell. They portrayed:
Judah = faithful
Israel (10 tribes) = idolaters
But archaeology shows:
✔ Both kingdoms practiced similar religion
✔ Both worshipped Yahweh + regional deities
✔ Even Judah worshipped idols inside the Temple (2 Kings 23)
So the idea that Judah was “more righteous” is a literary reconstruction — not history.

Here is the historical breakdown
1. The Covenant was with Abraham → Isaac → Jacob → the 12 tribes
The covenant is about BLOODLINE, not a later religion.
Abraham was NOT a “Jew” — the word did not exist
Isaac was not a Jew
Jacob (Israel) was not a Jew
The 12 tribes were not Jews; they were Israelites
Only ONE tribe later became known as “Yehudim / Jews”:
the Tribe of Judah
So the covenant belongs to the entire House of Israel — not to a single tribe and certainly not to Rabbinic Judaism.
2. Judaism as a religion did not exist until ~500 BCE
After the Babylonian Exile (6th century BCE):
▪️ The priestly elite (Ezra, Nehemiah) rewrote/edited scriptures
▪️ New laws, new interpretations, new identity
▪️ The “House of Judah” became known as “Yehudim” → Jews
▪️ Later all Israelites began to be retroactively called “Jews”
This is how a regional tribal identity became:
a national identity →
then a religious identity →
then a global identity
But it is not the same as the ancient Israelites.
3. 10 tribes disappeared — only Judah survived
The Assyrians destroyed the Northern Kingdom (10 tribes).
Only Judah + Benjamin + some Levites remained.
These survivors became:
“Jews” — people of Judah (Yehudah)
The rest of Israel was gone or absorbed into other nations.
So the word “Jew” NEVER meant all the descendants of Israel.
4. Rabbinic Judaism arose EVEN LATER (~200 CE)
Modern Judaism is based on:
Mishnah (200 CE)
Talmud (400–500 CE)
Rabbi interpretations
New laws, new theology
This is 1000+ years after Moses.
So Rabbinic Judaism ≠ Mosaic religion
And Rabbinic Jews ≠ ancient Israelites
5. How did the Covenant get “claimed”?
By redefining the word “Israelite” to mean “Jew”
After the exile, the elites of Judah began calling themselves:
“We are the whole nation of Israel”
(even though Israel had 12 tribes)
This linguistic shift allowed:
 the Tribe of Judah
to claim
 the Covenant meant for the entire House of Israel
6. The Real Reason for the Confusion
Language manipulation
“Israelite” (all 12 tribes) becomes
→ “Jew” (1 tribal group)
Scriptural editing
Post-exile scribes rewrote history to center Judah.
Religious evolution
Rabbinic Judaism replaced ancient Israelite religion.
Modern politics
Today’s claims rely on the rewritten identity, not on original scripture or history.
Final Answer (simple):
The Covenant was not given to “the Jews” or “Rabbinic Judaism”.
It was given to Abraham → Isaac → Jacob → all 12 tribes of Israel.
The word “Jew” originally referred only to people from Judah — not to all Israelites.
Modern Judaism inherited the covenant claim through historical rebranding, not through original scripture.  IT WAS PLAIN STEALING.  THEFT.  JUST LIKE ANYTHING RELATED TO JEWS.  

The United States has crossed into open barbarism — torture, kidnapping, and high sea piracy as state policy.

This is not law enforcement. This is a poisonous cocktail of imperial violence that threatens humanity itself. From Vietnam to Venezuela and into Iran. 
Maduro’s wife was dragged before a U.S. court bruised, battered, with a blackened eye — the physical marks of abuse carried into a courtroom as if they were normal. Maduro himself appeared limping, visibly injured, showing clear signs of coercion and mistreatment.
This is what “justice” looks like when empire abandons law. A sovereign leader abducted. A spouse brutalized. Bodies used as evidence of power.  The US Jew Power. 
There is no legal cover for this. No moral excuse. No ethical defense. Kidnapping a head of state to impose control and plunder resources is not democracy — it is state-sanctioned criminality.  War on Humanity.  
When the U.S. boasts about such acts, it is no longer pretending to uphold international law. It is openly mocking it. The world is no longer safe from this monster. This is not strength. It is fear wrapped in violence.
History will remember it not as leadership — but as imperial thuggery laid bare over barbarism, human misery. 

The United States has crossed into open barbarism — torture, kidnapping, and high sea piracy as state policy.

This is not law enforcement. This is a poisonous cocktail of imperial violence that threatens humanity itself. From Vietnam to Venezuela and into Iran. 
Maduro’s wife was dragged before a U.S. court bruised, battered, with a blackened eye — the physical marks of abuse carried into a courtroom as if they were normal. Maduro himself appeared limping, visibly injured, showing clear signs of coercion and mistreatment.
This is what “justice” looks like when empire abandons law. A sovereign leader abducted. A spouse brutalized. Bodies used as evidence of power.  The US Jew Power. 
There is no legal cover for this. No moral excuse. No ethical defense. Kidnapping a head of state to impose control and plunder resources is not democracy — it is state-sanctioned criminality.  War on Humanity.  
When the U.S. boasts about such acts, it is no longer pretending to uphold international law. It is openly mocking it. The world is no longer safe from this monster. This is not strength. It is fear wrapped in violence.
History will remember it not as leadership — but as imperial thuggery laid bare over barbarism, human misery. 

Narcissistic sociopaths who don't care about law or people. 
What, even, is the benefit of power, if you're not using it to help people? 

Yes, this. 
They're also threatening Greenland.  
Someone, somewhere, needs to fight back. They are way less powerful than they pretend to be. Even their most ardent MAGA supporters are starting to see their evil. (Which does not excuse the choice those racist MAGA idiots made!)

NEW:
The United States is not installing the Venezuelan opposition in power at present, not out of respect for democracy, but because doing so would require a large-scale, long-term U.S. military occupation, according to ABC journalist David Alandete.
What the U.S. has instead resorted to is kidnapping — not the arrest of a fugitive, not the capture of a criminal, but the abduction of a sitting head of state, an act that has no standing in international law. Heads of state are not “captured.” They are kidnapped when seized extraterritorially by force.

This follows a long and documented criminal pattern:
Iraq — invasion based on fabricated weapons claims, resulting in mass civilian deaths
Libya — regime change by force, leaving a destroyed state and open slave markets
Afghanistan — two decades of occupation ending in collapse
Syria, Yemen, Somalia — proxy wars, sanctions, and covert operations
Seven Muslim-majority countries destabilized under the banner of “security”
Now Venezuela and Iran are already scheduled for destruction.

Unable or unwilling to openly deploy troops, Washington is playing with domestic traitors, offering money and protection to collaborators willing to sell out their country — a textbook imperial tactic repeated across decades.
Wrong is wrong.
Kidnapping is kidnapping.
Looting is looting.
Calling it anything else is propaganda, not analysis.

NEW:
The United States is not installing the Venezuelan opposition in power at present, not out of respect for democracy, but because doing so would require a large-scale, long-term U.S. military occupation, according to ABC journalist David Alandete.
What the U.S. has instead resorted to is kidnapping — not the arrest of a fugitive, not the capture of a criminal, but the abduction of a sitting head of state, an act that has no standing in international law. Heads of state are not “captured.” They are kidnapped when seized extraterritorially by force.

This follows a long and documented criminal pattern:
Iraq — invasion based on fabricated weapons claims, resulting in mass civilian deaths
Libya — regime change by force, leaving a destroyed state and open slave markets
Afghanistan — two decades of occupation ending in collapse
Syria, Yemen, Somalia — proxy wars, sanctions, and covert operations
Seven Muslim-majority countries destabilized under the banner of “security”
Now Venezuela and Iran are already scheduled for destruction.

Unable or unwilling to openly deploy troops, Washington is playing with domestic traitors, offering money and protection to collaborators willing to sell out their country — a textbook imperial tactic repeated across decades.
Wrong is wrong.
Kidnapping is kidnapping.
Looting is looting.
Calling it anything else is propaganda, not analysis.

Torah does NOT mandate Jerusalem
Torah never names Jerusalem as God’s chosen sanctuary.
It repeatedly says only “the place YHWH will choose” (Deut 12).
Mount Gerizim, however, is explicitly named in the Torah (Deut 11:29; 27:12).
So from a Torah-only standpoint, Samaritan worship is not un-Torahic.
Jerusalem is later Judahite theology, not Mosaic law
Jerusalem becomes central only in Kings/Chronicles, centuries after Moses.
Temple exclusivity is Davidic-Solomonic, NOT ORIGINAL TORAH.
Tanakh itself weakens Judah’s monopoly
Jacob elevates Ephraim over Manasseh (Gen 48)
Psalm 78 admits God rejected Joseph/Ephraim before choosing Judah
Multiple Israelite centers existed before Jerusalem.
Judah’s dominance is historical, not eternal.
Prophets repeatedly undermine Temple absolutism
Jeremiah 7: Temple condemned
Amos 5: sacrifices rejected
Isaiah 1: ritual obedience meaningless without justice
Critique of the Temple is orthodox prophecy, not heresy.
Jesus never endorses Temple permanence
Mark 11: Temple cleansing
Matthew 24: “Not one stone will be left”
John 2: Temple replaced by his body
This is prophetic judgment, not cultic support.
John’s Gospel is NOT anti-Samaritan
John 4 (longest dialogue):
Jesus relativizes both Gerizim and Jerusalem. John is the least Temple-centric Gospel.
Matthew 23:2–3 is misused in the answer.  Why?
“Do what they say, not what they do” acknowledges teaching authority, not Temple legitimacy.
The same chapter ends with judgment on Jerusalem (23:37–38).
‘Hellenists wanted Jesus pro-Temple’ makes no sense
John replaces Temple with Logos/Spirit
Acts 7 (Stephen, a Hellenist) explicitly condemns the Temple
If Hellenists wanted Temple orthodoxy, John is the worst text to invent it.

NEW:
The United States is not installing the Venezuelan opposition in power at present, not out of respect for democracy, but because doing so would require a large-scale, long-term U.S. military occupation, according to ABC journalist David Alandete.
What the U.S. has instead resorted to is kidnapping — not the arrest of a fugitive, not the capture of a criminal, but the abduction of a sitting head of state, an act that has no standing in international law. Heads of state are not “captured.” They are kidnapped when seized extraterritorially by force.

This follows a long and documented criminal pattern:
Iraq — invasion based on fabricated weapons claims, resulting in mass civilian deaths
Libya — regime change by force, leaving a destroyed state and open slave markets
Afghanistan — two decades of occupation ending in collapse
Syria, Yemen, Somalia — proxy wars, sanctions, and covert operations
Seven Muslim-majority countries destabilized under the banner of “security”
Now Venezuela and Iran are already scheduled for destruction.

Unable or unwilling to openly deploy troops, Washington is playing with domestic traitors, offering money and protection to collaborators willing to sell out their country — a textbook imperial tactic repeated across decades.
Wrong is wrong.
Kidnapping is kidnapping.
Looting is looting.
Calling it anything else is propaganda, not analysis.