Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Zurarah

Banned
  • Content Count

    194
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Zurarah

  • Rank
    Level 1 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Islam

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. salam brother abu dujana well i'm not sunni (not now) but i was most of my life and sunnis were brought up to love all sahabah even though they prefer some to some and it shocks the system of any sunni to see someone criticizing sahabah let alone cursing them or insulting them. we cannot expect a sunni to just switch and accept our logic or behavior( in case of people who curse ). yes sahabah are important because they conveyed the religion to us and Allah praised the good sahabah and prepared paradise for them if the carry on sticking to the truth and die upon it. so there's no guarantee un
  2. ok inshallah i edited it so edit that part in your post brother. it was a joke but if you didn't like it then it's deleted wassalam
  3. Edited by the way and before a go watching the match i want to add this surprise to botta : the hadith he's trying to weaken was declared sahih by : surprise surprise : AL-ALBANI see silsilah sahiha by sheikh Al-albani but of course botta knows better than al-albani because information botta has about amru ibn maymoon and irsal etc was not available to sheikh al-albani!
  4. i wonder if brother Nader has anything to add or any comment to submit as he's unusually silent!
  5. Lord botta is nowhere to be found !
  6. if someone says that he saw him during ghaibah kobrah then we are ordered not to believe him. he cannot be seen during major ghaibah(atf) if someone says he saw him then he's a either a liar or got deluded so he's mistaken. ws
  7. jazakom Allah khairan you and brother aladdin, and may Allah keep us on the middle path of ahlbait(as) and be saved in this life and the hereafter ameen ya rabb. now back to botta : looks like botta is conferring with his friends : efendi and others but he didn't present proof as yet from where ahmed ibn hanbal said that amru ibn maymoon didn't hear from ibn abbas : i want to see where ahmed said ; amru ibn maymoon al-awdi didn't hear from ibn habbas. if imam ahmed said he doesn't know then not knowing is not like saying: no he didn't hear !! so where did he get that ahmed ibn hanbal view tha
  8. oh there's many brother ! first of all all sahabah are reliable then comes people like sufyan thawri and sufyan ibn uyaynah and sho3bah and nafi3 and al-amash , so many !
  9. i won't ignore him now brother , unless i get bored of him which will happen eventually. first of all i want to humiliate him and expose him in front of everyone that he's dishonest and only plays games. look at his avatar : he's saying indirectly: you are all retards and i'm here to take the mick out of you ! believe me he is showing great disdain and hatred for shia but using indirect signs.
  10. i think we should start calling him nutter (nutta ) ;)
  11. at least mr botta don't misquote me while i'm here , u are lying to my face which is strange. i didn't say ahmed is wrong as i didn't see what did ahmed say to judge it and i don't believe a word you say without seeing proof for it so show us what did ahmed say(this is the second time i ask for this) secondly you are playing games as usual: -one time the hadith is mursal which is not backed by any proof so far . -then you quoted dhahabi saying it's munkar or more accurately from manakeer abu balaj(rah) -then you claim the narrator is not amru ibn maymoon but maymoon abu abdilleh based on som
  12. show us the paragraph please because i don't have access to mizan or many other books now as yasoob.com is not working. i wanna see what dhahabi said : is it about this particular hadith he called sahih in mustadrak or is it about different cahin or did he reject the whole thing as munkar? back to the topic : even if dhahabi said munkar then this is still proof for us not against us because dhahabi (if he said so) used the nakarah card and if the sanad was mursal then he would use the irsal instead or both but to overlook the irsal if it was proven then it's out of the question. second point
  13. salam it's not my intention to expose anyone , i look at my defects first before even thinking of finding defects in others , but i have serious doubts about your aqeedah bro. maybe you are shia tafdhili or something like this but i doubt you are a twelver very much but it's not up to me to decide who you are . i always win arguments not because i am more intelligent or better than others astaghfirollah but because i stick to true tashay and stick to the middle path and ghulu never attracted me and also taqseer is not one of my problems alhamdulilleh. ws
  14. It looks like botta disappeared ! anyway untill he comes back i let his imam dhahabi destroy his claim: 4652 - ÃÎÈÑäÇ ÃÈæ ÈßÑ ÃÍãÏ Èä ÌÚÝÑ Èä ÍãÏÇä ÇáÞØíÚí ÈÈÛÏÇÏ ãä ÃÕá ßÊÇÈå ËäÇ ÚÈÏ Çááå Èä ÃÍãÏ Èä ÍäÈá ÍÏËäí ÃÈí ËäÇ íÍíì Èä ÍãÇÏ ) ËäÇ ÃÈæ ÚæÇäÉ ) ËäÇ ÃÈæ ÈáÌ ËäÇ ÚãÑæ Èä ãíãæä ÞÇá : Åäí áÌÇáÓ ÚäÏ ÇÈä ÚÈÇÓ ÅÐ ÃÊÇå ÊÓÚÉ ÑåØ ÝÞÇáæÇ : íÇ ÇÈä ÚÈÇÓ : ÅãÇ Ãä ÊÞæã ãÚäÇ æ ÅãÇ Ãä ÊÎáæ ÈäÇ ãä Èíä åÄáÇÁ ÞÇá : ÝÞÇá ÇÈä ÚÈÇÓ Èá ÃäÇ ÃÞæã ãÚßã ÞÇá æ åæ íæãÆÐ ÕÍíÍ ÞÈá Ãä íÚãì ÞÇá : ÝÇÈÊÏÄæÇ ÝÊÍÏËæÇ ÝáÇ äÏÑí ãÇ ÞÇáæÇ ÞÇá ÝÌÇÁ íäÝÖ ËæÈå æ íÞæá ÃÝ æ ÊÝ æÞÚæÇ Ýí ÑÌá áå ÈÖÚ ÚÔÑÉ ÝÖÇÆá áíÓÊ áÃÍÏ ÛíÑå æÞÚæÇ Ýí ÑÌ
×
×
  • Create New...