Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

yam_110

Veteran Member
  • Content Count

    717
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About yam_110

  • Rank
    Level 2 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Islam

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,182 profile views
  1. The answer is in your post itself. The hadith you have quoted from the Holy Prophet pbuh is from the chapter dealing with virtues of knowledge. If one wants to learn about the inheritance then they should check the chapter dealing with inheritance. The narrations quoted above are about knowledge and not about materialistic wealth. So it would be wrong to take these narrations out of context.
  2. Tell that person to throw all the ingredients required to prepare bread like flour, water etc together into an oven without proper mixing and see if that results in bread. If not, then how can such a complex universe come into existence without any divine interference.
  3. Brother, We only follow what we have been advised by the Holy Prophet pbuh and his Ahlulbayt. So if it was 10th of Imam Ali (as) then the Imams would have told us. We cannot add or remove anything based on our preference.
  4. Fitra should be taken out on the eve of Eid and not before that. However if you want to give it to the needy before Eid prayers then you will have to give it to them as a loan and change the Niyah on the day of Eid to make it a fitra. Hope this helps.
  5. Ammar Nakshawani had recently given a lecture on this topic. Link to the same is as below:
  6. Usurping of Fadak was indeed an oppression towards the daughter of the holy Prophet (pbuh) as she was in control of that piece of land when her workers were chased away. So the onus should have been on the one making the claim to prove that it was a property belonging to the state. But unfortunately, the person making the claim not only took control of it, asked the owners of Fadak to present witnesses but also presided as a judge on this case. Logic defied from every angle. Regarding the wives, they escaped the oppression because the target was the daughter of the Prophet (pbuh). The fact that Prophet's wives continued living in their houses proves that the below narration quoted in defense of Abu Bakr is a concocted one: "Our property is not inherited, but whatever we leave is to be given in charity.' If everything left behind by Prophet was really for charity then the wives would have also been kicked out of their respective homes. The fact that they weren’t is a proof till the end of this world that the daughter of the Prophet had her property which rightfully belonged to her usurped from her. If only people use a little bit of common sense, the whole issue would be crystal clear. It is a very unfortunate truth that people in their blind love do not look at things logically.
  7. Brother, I know you are trying to play the Devli's advocate here but I am sure you can see the flaw in their logic. 1. Did the Prophet kill those people who refused to pay him the Zakat? 2. People like Malik Ibn Nuwayra (ra) were killed for not paying zakat yet he was a Sahabi, so how does this fit the adala of Sahabah? 3. Muwaiyah (la) did not have the right to ask for justice of Uthman's blood as Uthman's sons were alive, did they go to the Caliph of their time? 4. Even if we ignore point 3, how many killers of Uthman did Muwaiya (la) punish after he became the caliph? 5. What becomes of a Muslim who breaks a treaty/agreement? The list can go on but I don't want to derail the thread. Their replies doesn't absolve Muwaiya (la) of his guilt.
  8. Dare them to do the same to those who fought against their first caliph.
  9. Inna Lillahe wa inna ilaihi Rajeeoon. Sorry to hear about your loss brother. May Allah swt grant her a lofty place in the paradise and give your family the strength to deal with this loss.
  10. If they criticize one Sahaba, then they are opening up a floodgate to criticize many more. There lies the danger of their concocted fairy tales being shred to pieces and the very foundation of Adalat-e-Sahaba being punctured. So for them instead, it is better to alter history, distort facts, forget Quranic verses and praise everyone who fought against the Ahlulbayt. All because they can call those individuals stars and add (ra) at the end of their name. Remember, Muwaiyah (la) only used to write letters for the Prophet (pbuh) and they changed the historical facts to make him a scribe of the wahi. He also became Khalul Momineen while the brother of the alleged favourite wife of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) did not get to enjoy that title for obvious reasons. Anyone who fights the First caliph is labeled an apostate but anyone who fights their Fourth Caliph was doing it with good intentions and hence both the parties will get 1 reward. Muwaiya broke the peace treaty but still he is Amir Muwaiya to them. Oooh... their fictional history books are so much fun.
  11. Brother, the problem here is that in trying to prove that Shias are doing things wrong, you are cherry picking on the text which is presented to you. Please re-read what I had mentioned in one of my replies to you: I clearly said saying Ya Ali Madad is one of the ways of doing Tawassul. When did I say that it is the only way? So if you had read my reply completely, you would have gathered that there are different ways of doing Tawassul; instead of highlighting different ways of doing Tawassul and attributing each way to an individual, you should have tried to understand what Tawassul is. Brother Shiaman already presented the reply by Ayatullah Sistani (ra) on the acceptability of saying Ya Ali Madad. Is there any reason to debate further on this? When one of the highest living authority amongst Ulema says it is allowed, I was expecting you to accept this simple fact and move on. It is sad to see that you are constantly trying to prove that you are right and everyone is wrong in this regard. Anyways, Lakum deenukum waliya deen. Take care.
  12. The issue only exists for you. I am responding to your questions and not about the recent trend of the thread. Why is Dua Tawassul not certain? It is mentioned on duas.org : Shaykh Tusi says, in his book Misbah, that Imam Hassan bin Ali Al Askari (as) wrote this dua'a for Abu Muhammad who requested him to teach him the proper way of reciting salawat. Allama Majlisi has mentioned this dua'a on the authority of Ibn babawayh who confidently says that, there is no difficulty or problem that this dua'a does not solve. https://www.duas.org/tawasul.htm The dua does start by addressing Allah swt but after that it is all directly asking the 14 infallible's to intercede on our behalf. So that answers the original question you asked if we can directly ask anyone to intercede on our behalf. Ya Ali Madad is a sunnah of the Holy Prophet (pbuh). I am not a judge of what's in people's heart but I have already told you my opinion on Ya Ali Madad & how it is perceived. If you want to throw in a blanket statement saying all Shias are confused then I am sorry but it is you who is confused. Please don’t judge others based on your knowledge and understanding because in their knowledge and understanding you might be wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...