Jump to content

Jay

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    1,190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jay

  • Rank
    Sayyid Yousif al-Hussaini
  • Birthday 02/24/1994

Profile Information

  • Location
    West
  • Religion
    Ahlulbayt School of Thought

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,755 profile views
  1. You're assuming God needs to interfere; why? God has no obligation to interfere within the affairs of men, even in vices. If he does, he denies free will to that person committing the crime. Thus, on judgment day, Hitler would be questioned as to why he did this and that, and Hitler can argue that he didn't have complete free will. Without free will, there is no test. And to those comparing the holocaust to the Pharaoh: remember, the Pharaoh DID persecute the children of Israel. God didn't stop him from starting the persecution, but he let Moses free them from the persecution. In the same way that the holocaust did happen, and a finite force (the allied forces) stopped it. Not to say that the allied forces are prophets in any way. Any man, be it Moses or Dr. Who has the capability to stop evil. Moses isn't God, he doesn't have infinite power, he had to struggle to stop the Pharaoh.
  2. Jay

    How Times Changed

    Well the woman is dressed more modestly, so it's not all bad.
  3. Religion is not represented by its followers. To help you understand, here's an example: Lets say a man named Yahya the Bartender, for whatever reason, killed another man in your name. However, you didn't want him to kill that man. By your argument, you were responsible for the death because the person claimed he followed you. The reality is, you are not responsible because that person does not represent you. The only person that represents you is you. Likewise, the only person, thing, or idea that represents a religion is the religion itself, i.e. the actual scriptures, laws, and sources of that religion. To challenge the morality of a religion like Islam, you must challenge the Quran, accepted Sharia Law, and the primary sources of the religion, i.e the Prophet and Imams (as). You cannot challenge Islam through the moral behavior of Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Ladin, or Yahya the Bartender, because they don't represent Islam. You say not to kill, Yahya the Bartender kills, therefore Yahya the Bartender is not following you. No matter what Yahya the Bartender says or does to justify the murder, his actions will never represent you. Islam says to not kill, Saddam killed, therefore Saddam is not following Islam. No matter what Saddam says or does to justify the murder, his actions will never represent Islam. Its not difficult to understand.
  4. http://rt.com/usa/ne...tivenin-us-184/
  5. Jay

    Topic Poll | Bashar Al Assad

    The question is flawed. I'm with him on certain issues and against him on others. You can't be 100% with or against someone.
  6. I believe that morality through concepts alone is flawed. There's no binding that can chain you to a concept. Religion chains you to morality out of fear of Hell. Likewise, state laws chain you to morality through the fear of legal consequences. To organize and follow a concept of morality, there must be fear of punishment in its transgression. Otherwise it would be too unstable. Even if someone without any religious faith creates a perfect moral system for himself and forces himself to follow it, it still is unstable. To violate your moral beliefs believing that no one will judge you for it is too easy. Belief in religion is a much more powerful chain, since there are no loopholes. You do an immoral action, you will be punished. In the material world, a person who commits a crime must undergo a fallible process and still has a chance to escape from punishment, or be punished for a crime he did not commit. In a divine court, such things are impossible. Every action you commit is questioned and every sin you commit, no matter how small, will be accounted for. If one truly believes in a religion, he assumes a powerful chain on himself that no law or system can create. The only question is the moral system itself and not the effectiveness of it.
  7. http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/aalimnetwork/msg00349.html QUESTION: Is it haram to join the police or armed forces of a non Shia' government - can someone join the police or military of their respective country? ANSWER: It is not haram to join the police. As for the armed forces, it will be haram especially when it is mobilised against Muslims or an Islamic state.
  8. That is the most disgusting thing I've ever seen. These monsters never fail to surprise me at how low they can sink. I don't even think Shaytan (la) would've anticipated how dreadful such humans can be.
  9. Does anyone else ever think that the conflict in Syria is the same conflict that will bring out the Sufyani (according to narration)? Just something I've been pondering.
  10. That's somewhat the root of the question. My professor, who has taught many Muslim students this book, has gotten the impression that Islam views the character negatively (i.e. what she did was haram). I'm currently studying in college :)
  11. My English class has been analysing Fyodor Dostoyevsky's translated novel Crime and Punishment. My professor has asked of me and a few fellow Muslim classmates to form an opinion of the character Sonya in the book. He was very specific, questioning the moral stance of Islam on the occupation of Sonya (a prostitute). He feels that Muslims in his experience teaching the novel have felt she is not the sympathetic character Dostoyevsky presents her as. I would like to seek the opinion of my Muslim brothers and sisters about Sonya. For those of you who haven't read the novel, a quick summary of Sonya and events that led her to do what she did:
  12. I think the point of the article was to bring about the point that white collar workers can't represent the blue collar majority simply because they lack the knowledge and experience of said white collar workers. Basically, majority should not be represented by minority. As for the other comments; they're somewhat irrelevant to the topic. I don't disagree, but it doesn't exactly try to analyse/refute the article. The video was funny though.
  13. Doesn't this just give the prisoner a prolonged life? There's no possible way to memorize the entire quran in his condition at his age.
  14. I'm supposed to read and analyse this article for my Political Science class. I just wanted to see the opinion of SC on it. (Keep in mind, the target audience for the article is voting americans)
  15. Is it a coincidence that the problems that Prophets of the past had to face are somehow slowly coming to be a reality of the modern world? Why is it that such modern "civilized" social issues were deemed uncivilized in the most uncivilized times in history? If you think about it, many of the problems that the Prophets had dealt with are coming back from the dead. It might be just me, but history seems to be circular and the problems of the past are recycling themselves in the modern and coming era.
×