Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله


Forum Administrators
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Days Won


Reputation Activity

  1. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Twenty Years On Shiachat!   
    Looks like I've been here a while ...
    Twenty years ago today! I think I joined up after returning from Hajj, I should have done it beforehand I guess. It's been fun in the main, but gotten quieter over the years. Still, it has also served as a diary and a place to keep thoughts and ideas. I can understand why some people leave after a while - it's often the same issues that keep cropping up. It helps to have as bad a memory as mine - so things seem newer than they really are.
    And what about the future? This site like the rest of the net was the result of some transformative changes in tech. I think we are about to go through another inflexion point with AI and things won't be quite the same again. Exciting and challenging times ahead and I think the possible source of new ethical and fiqhi questions, albeit variations on existing themes to some extent.
    If you are wondering what 'Stories for Sakina' is about - the posts on this blog also serve the dual purpose of being (my niece) Sakina's birthday cards.
    So, for this post, I thought I'd collect an eclectic mix of my posts over the last 20 years. Eclectic means they are a haphazard mix of different types of posts, witterings, jokes and attempts to be useful and even philosophical.
    Finally, some career advice
    I joined in 2004 and got made a Mod in 2008, and became an Admin sometime after 2020 I think. So for those of you at the start of your careers the takeaway is that you don't need to be good to get to the top, you just need to hang around.
  2. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, 'Loss' in the Qur'an & associated constructs   
    This was an interesting exercise. My initial prompts encouraged gpt4 to focus on the English word 'loss' in the initial root analysis that it did. I had to reset the analysis to focus on the relationship between Arabic words.
    Summary (partial, a reply to this post will contain the second set of analysis and associated summary)
    In essence, the interconnectedness of these roots F-Q-D, D-N-Y, and ‘-Q-L in the Qur'an underscores the idea that an excessive focus on the worldly life, especially without the proper use of intellect, can lead to various forms of "loss"—whether it's the loss of guidance, understanding, or eternal rewards in the Hereafter. In essence, the interplay between {T-B-'}  and {‘-Q-L}  in the Qur'an serves as a reminder of the dangers of blind following and the significance of informed, intellectual engagement in one's choices and actions. Thus, the directed graph's relationships reinforce the narrative's interconnectedness, where the soul (N-F-S) plays a pivotal role in connecting the concept of "loss" (Kh-S-R) with "truth" (H-Q-Q). The soul becomes the focal point through which the implications of one's relationship with the truth are realized, leading to either guidance and success or misguidance and loss.
    Please do a semantic field analysis for roots related to the notion of 'loss' in the Qur'an.
    The notion of "loss" in the Qur'an can be encapsulated by multiple Arabic roots that convey different shades of this concept. Let's identify the main Arabic roots related to the idea of loss and then conduct a semantic field analysis for them:
    1. خ-س-ر (Kh-S-R): This root primarily means "loss" or "to be in a state of loss." The most famous occurrence of this root is in Surah Al-Asr (103:2) where Allah swears by time and states that "Indeed, mankind is in loss."
    2. ض-ل-ل (Dh-L-L): This root pertains to "going astray" or "misguidance," which can be seen as a form of spiritual loss.
    3. غ-ي-ر (Gh-Y-R): This root can mean "to change" or "alter," and in some contexts, it implies a negative change or deviation, leading to loss.
    4. ف-ق-د (F-Q-D): This root denotes the meaning of "missing" or "losing something."
    5. ت-ب-ع (T-B-' ): While it primarily means "to follow," in some contexts, it implies following misguided paths, leading to loss.

    Thank you this is really helpful. Could you please talk me through the relationship between f-q-d, d-n-y and '-q-l ?
    Certainly! Let's delve into the relationships between the roots {ف-ق-د (F-Q-D) د-ن-ي-ا (D-N-Y), and {ع-ق-ل (‘-Q-L)
    1. **ف-ق-د (F-Q-D)**: 
       - Meaning: This root primarily conveys the idea of "missing," "losing something," or "lack."
       - Qur'anic Context: It's often used in the Qur'an to describe the absence or loss of something valuable, whether tangible (like property) or intangible (like guidance).
    2. **د-ن-ي-ا (D-N-Y)**:
       - Meaning: This root refers to the worldly life, the life of this immediate world as opposed to the Hereafter.
       - Qur'anic Context: The Qur'an frequently contrasts the transient and deceptive nature of the worldly life (Dunya) with the eternal and real life of the Hereafter. The worldly life is often portrayed as fleeting, temporary, and something that can lead one to "loss" if it becomes the sole focus at the expense of the Hereafter.
    3. **ع-ق-ل (‘-Q-L)**:
       - Meaning: This root is related to "intellect," "reason," or "understanding."
       - Qur'anic Context: The Qur'an emphasizes the use of intellect and reason to understand and reflect upon its signs. Those who do not use their intellect are often described as being at a loss or astray.
    - F-Q-D and D-N-Y: The relationship between these two roots can be seen in the context of humans being engrossed in the worldly life and consequently "losing" sight of the more important aspects of existence, such as spiritual growth and preparation for the Hereafter. The idea is that an excessive focus on the Dunya can lead to a "loss" in the broader, eternal scheme of things.
    - F-Q-D and ‘-Q-L: The Qur'an emphasizes that those who do not use their intellect ('Aql) might "lose" guidance or be at a disadvantage. Not employing one's reasoning capabilities can lead to a lack of understanding, misguidance, or loss of valuable insights.
    - D-N-Y and ‘-Q-L: The Qur'an encourages believers to use their intellect to reflect upon the transient nature of the worldly life and recognize the eternal reality of the Hereafter. Those who are overly attached to the Dunya, without using their intellect to understand its temporary nature, may be led astray.
    In essence, the interconnectedness of these roots in the Qur'an underscores the idea that an excessive focus on the worldly life, especially without the proper use of intellect, can lead to various forms of "loss"—whether it's the loss of guidance, understanding, or eternal rewards in the Hereafter.
    Certainly, taking the directed graph's relationships into account, the narrative would evolve as follows:
    1. **خ-س-ر (Kh-S-R) and ن-ف-س (N-F-S)**: 
       - The direct relationship between "loss" and "self/soul" in the Qur'an emphasizes the individual responsibility and consequences one's actions have on their soul. When the Qur'an discusses loss, it often frames it in terms of the soul's well-being or detriment. An individual's deeds, beliefs, or choices in this life can lead to their soul's loss in the Hereafter. This relationship underscores the idea that the ultimate loss is not necessarily material or worldly but spiritual and eternal.
    2. **ن-ف-س (N-F-S) and ح-ق-ق (H-Q-Q)**:
       - The soul's state is intrinsically tied to recognizing and adhering to the truth. When an individual aligns their soul with the truth, they achieve spiritual clarity, guidance, and success. Conversely, denying the truth or turning away from it can lead to the soul's detriment. The relationship between the soul and truth in the Qur'an suggests that one's spiritual well-being is deeply connected to their relationship with the truth.
    3. **خ-س-ر (Kh-S-R) and ح-ق-ق (H-Q-Q)**:
       - Even though the direct link between "loss" and "truth" is through the "soul" in the graph, the broader narrative still stands. Those who deny or turn away from the truth are described as being at a loss. Recognizing and adhering to the truth is portrayed as a means to avoid loss, especially in the eternal sense. The soul (N-F-S) serves as the bridge or medium through which this relationship manifests, as it's the soul that experiences the consequences of recognizing or denying the truth.
    Thus, the directed graph's relationships reinforce the narrative's interconnectedness, where the soul (N-F-S) plays a pivotal role in connecting the concept of "loss" (Kh-S-R) with "truth" (H-Q-Q). The soul becomes the focal point through which the implications of one's relationship with the truth are realized, leading to either guidance and success or misguidance and loss.
    What other roots are associated with these (and the nature of their relationship with notions of loss) and which could be added to the direct graph?
    To expand on the concept of "loss" in the Qur'an and its related Arabic roots, we can consider several other roots that convey nuances related to loss or have contextual relationships with the roots already identified. Some of these roots include:
    1. ب-ع-د (B-'-D): Meaning "distance" or "to be far." In a metaphorical sense, it can refer to being far from the truth or guidance, which is a form of spiritual loss.
    2. ن-س-ي (N-S-Y): Meaning "to forget." Forgetting divine guidance or obligations can be perceived as a loss.
    3. ظ-ل-م (Zh-L-M): Translates to "injustice" or "wrongdoing." Committing injustices can lead to both worldly and spiritual loss.
    4. س-ل-ب (S-L-B): Meaning "to deprive" or "to take away." It directly relates to the concept of loss as it indicates the act of losing something.
    5. ح-ر-م (H-R-M): Meaning "to prohibit" or "to deprive." Being prohibited from blessings or guidance can be seen as a form of loss.
    6. ر-ب-ح (R-B-H): Meaning "profit" or "gain." This is antithetical to loss, but understanding profit in the Qur'an often requires understanding its opposite, loss.
    This is great, thank you. And the t-b-' root link with '-q-l please?
    Certainly! Let's explore the relationship between the roots {ت-ب-ع (T-B-')}  and {ع-ق-ل (‘-Q-L)} :
    1. ت-ب-ع (T-B-'):
       - Meaning: This root primarily conveys the idea of "following" or "pursuing." It can refer to following a path, a way of life, a leader, or even a set of beliefs or desires.
       - Qur'anic Context: It's often used in the Qur'an to describe those who follow a particular path—whether it's the path of guidance and righteousness or the path of misguidance and error. The root can also refer to following desires, whims, or societal norms without proper discernment.
    2. ع-ق-ل (‘-Q-L):
       - Meaning: This root is related to "intellect," "reason," or "understanding."
       - Qur'anic Context: As previously mentioned, the Qur'an places significant emphasis on the use of intellect and reason to understand and reflect upon its signs and guidance. The intellect is considered a critical tool for discerning truth from falsehood.
    Relationship between T-B-' and ‘-Q-L:
    - The Qur'an frequently highlights the importance of using one's intellect ('Aql) in choosing whom or what to follow. Blindly following (T-B-') leaders, societal norms, or desires without engaging one's intellect can lead to misguidance and deviation from the right path.
    - There are instances in the Qur'an where those who follow their desires or societal pressures without critical thinking are described as not using their intellect. Such individuals are admonished for "following" without proper "understanding" or discernment.
    - The relationship between these roots underscores the Qur'anic emphasis on the importance of intellectual engagement in decision-making processes. Instead of blindly adhering to a path, tradition, or leader, believers are encouraged to use their reasoning capabilities to ensure they are following the truth and aligning with divine guidance.
    In essence, the interplay between {T-B-'}  and {‘-Q-L}  in the Qur'an serves as a reminder of the dangers of blind following and the significance of informed, intellectual engagement in one's choices and actions.
  3. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Mercy and Destruction in the Qur'an   
    Summary (TLDR)
    The following is from the conclusions to this exercise:
    While these are just a few examples, they showcase the interconnectedness of these roots (replacement, destruction and succession) and their themes in the Qur'anic narrative. The roots, while distinct in their primary meanings, often overlap in the broader thematic context, emphasizing the cyclical nature of history, divine justice, and the consequences of human actions. These examples showcase the Qur'an's holistic approach where themes of destruction, replacement, and succession are often juxtaposed or closely followed by reminders of God's mercy. This balance emphasizes the idea of divine justice paired with boundless mercy, highlighting both consequences for actions and the ever-present opportunity for repentance and divine compassion. Introduction
    First off, this is more speculative than usual and more an illustration of the nature of analysis rather than conclusive results. The motivation for this line of enquiry was to explore the references to destruction and renewal in the Qur'an and then also see whether there was any link with the notion of mercy.
    In passing and it may be just me, but yesterday chatgpt replaced the 'code interpretation' function with 'advanced data analysis'. In the past chatgpt has claimed that it cannot do an analysis of the Qur'an since it does not have access to a copy of it, but the analysis below suggests that this may no longer be the case, it claims, 'Upon examining the Qur'an".
     As before my prompts in red, chatgpt4 in black text.
    What root words in the Qur'an are associated with notions of renewal and replacement, i.e. previously powerful groups being replaced by others.
    The Qur'an has several verses that touch upon the concept of renewal and replacement, particularly in the context of nations or communities that were powerful but were replaced due to their transgressions or disbelief. There are a few Arabic root words associated with these concepts:
    1. تَبْدِيل (Tabdīl): This comes from the root word ب-د-ل (B-D-L), which means to change, replace, or substitute. It conveys the idea of one thing being replaced with another.
    2. خَلَف (Khalaf): This word comes from the root خ-ل-ف (Kh-L-F). It primarily means to come after, succeed, or replace. It's often used in the context of generations or successors.
    3. عَدَلَ (‘Adala): Derived from the root ع-د-ل (‘-D-L), this word primarily means justice or balance. However, in some contexts, it can imply setting things right or restoring balance by replacing one group with another.
    4. زَوَال (Zawāl): From the root ز-و-ل (Z-W-L), it signifies fading away, decline, or disappearance. It can indicate the diminishing of a power or entity.
    5. أَهْلَكَ (Ahlaka): This comes from the root ه-ل-ك (H-L-K), which means to destroy or perish. It often indicates the end or destruction of a people or nation, usually followed by the rise of another.
    These root words and their derivatives can be found in various verses in the Qur'an that discuss the historical accounts of past nations that were powerful but were replaced or succeeded by others due to their actions.
    A study of these words in their specific Qur'anic context can provide deeper insights into the themes of renewal, replacement, and the cyclical nature of power as portrayed in the Qur'an.
    Could you please do a semantic field analysis of b-d-l?
    Certainly! A semantic field analysis involves understanding the range of meanings and nuances associated with a particular root or term. Here, we'll explore the root text{ب-د-ل} (B-D-L) in the Qur'an.
    1. Central Term:
    - بَدَلَ (Badala): The primary verb form from this root, it generally means "to change" or "to replace."
    2. Derived Terms & Meanings:
    From the root {ب-د-ل}, several words are derived in the Qur'an, encompassing various related meanings:
    - تَبْدِيل (Tabdīl): The act of changing or altering. It implies a transformation or modification of something.
    - بَدَل (Badal): This can refer to a "substitute" or "replacement." It can denote something that takes the place of another.
    - مُبَدِّل (Mubaddil): One who changes or replaces. This term denotes the agent or doer of the action of changing.
    - بُدْلَة (Budla): This term can refer to a "suit of clothes" or "apparel." In the context of the Qur'an, it's used metaphorically to denote an external appearance or guise.
     3. Qur'anic Context:
    The root {ب-د-ل}and its derivatives appear in various contexts in the Qur'an. Some instances include:
    - Changing God's Creation: In Surah Ar-Rum (30:30), the act of changing God's creation is mentioned as a misdeed.
    - Substitution of Verses: The idea that God replaces one verse with another is mentioned in the context of abrogation (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:106).
    - Substitute of People: The Qur'an speaks of the idea that if people turn away from God's guidance, He can bring forth a new people in their place (Surah Muhammad, 47:38).
     4. Semantic Relationships & Nuances:
    The words derived from the root {ب-د-ل} ) convey the idea of change, substitution, and transformation. Whether it's about the alteration of God's creation, the replacement of one group of people with another, or the substitution of divine verses, the underlying theme is the act of replacement or transformation.
     5. Associated Concepts:
    The concept of change or replacement in the Qur'an often goes hand in hand with the ideas of divine will, guidance, and accountability. The replacement of one group with another, for instance, underscores the notion of divine justice and the consequences of turning away from guidance.
    To sum up, the root {ب-د-ل}in the Qur'an primarily revolves around the themes of change, replacement, and transformation. Its various derivatives, while sharing this core meaning, offer different nuances and shades of meaning depending on the context in which they appear.
    Here's the directed graph showcasing the semantic field analysis of the root{ب-د-ل}(B-D-L) in the Qur'an:
    - The nodes represent the key terms derived from the root.
    - The arrows indicate the relationships or nuances from the primary verb form "بَدَلَ (Badala)" to its derivatives.
    - This graph visually captures the various meanings and nuances associated with the root, from change and replacement to transformation and substitution.
    I hope this provides a clear visual representation of the semantic field of the root {ب-د-ل}.
    Thank you. Could you please do a semantic field analysis of Kh-l-f?
    Of course! Let's delve into a semantic field analysis of the Arabic root{خ-ل-ف}(Kh-L-F) as it appears in the Qur'an.
     1. Central Term:
    - خَلَفَ (Khalafa): The primary verb form from this root, it generally means "to come after", "succeed", or "follow".
     2. Derived Terms & Meanings:
    From the root{خ-ل-ف}, several words are derived in the Qur'an, encompassing a range of related meanings:
    - خَلِيفَة (Khalīfah): This term refers to a "successor" or "vicegerent". Historically, it's used to denote the leaders of the Muslim community after the death of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). In the Qur'an, Adam (peace be upon him) is referred to as a "Khalīfah" on the earth (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:30).
    - خُلَفَاء (Khulafā’): The plural form of Khalīfah. It means "successors".
    - خَلْف (Khalf): It means "behind" or "after". It can also refer to those who come after or descendants.
    - تَخْلِيف (Takhlīf): The act of succeeding or the act of making someone a successor.
     3. Qur'anic Context:
    The root {خ-ل-ف} ) and its derivatives appear in various contexts in the Qur'an. Some instances include:
    - Succession on Earth: As mentioned, Adam is referred to as a successor on the earth, indicating his role as a steward of God's creation.
    - Generations After Generations: The Qur'an frequently mentions stories of past nations and how subsequent generations succeeded them, often in the context of receiving divine guidance or warnings.
    - Responsibilities of Succession: The concept of succession in the Qur'an isn't merely about temporal power or rule but also carries the weight of responsibility, especially in upholding justice, faith, and the commands of God.
     4. Semantic Relationships & Nuances:
    The words derived from the root {خ-ل-ف} revolve around the idea of succession, coming after, and inheriting responsibilities. The concept isn't just about chronological succession but also emphasizes the moral and spiritual responsibilities that come with being a successor.
     5. Associated Concepts:
    The idea of succession in the Qur'an is closely tied to concepts of responsibility, guidance, governance, and stewardship. Successors are often reminded of the need to uphold justice, maintain their covenant with God, and follow the guidance provided to them.
    Let's now visually represent this semantic field with a directed graph.
    Here's the directed graph showcasing the semantic field analysis of the root {خ-ل-ف} ) (Kh-L-F) in the Qur'an:
    - The nodes represent the key terms derived from the root.
    - The arrows indicate the relationships or nuances from the primary verb form "خَلَفَ (Khalafa)" to its derivatives.
    - This graph visually captures the various meanings associated with the root, centered around the idea of succession, coming after, and inheriting responsibilities.
    The visual representation provides a structured view of the semantic field of the root {خ-ل-ف}  and its importance in the Qur'anic narrative.
    Thanks. Please do a semantic field analysis of h-l-k.
    Certainly! Let's delve into a semantic field analysis of the Arabic root{ه-ل-ك} ) (H-L-K) as it appears in the Qur'an.
     1. Central Term:
    - هَلَكَ (Halaka): The primary verb form from this root, it generally means "to perish", "to die", or "to be destroyed".
     2. Derived Terms & Meanings:
    From the root{ه-ل-ك}, several words are derived in the Qur'an, encompassing a range of related meanings:
    - هَلَاك (Halāk): It refers to destruction or doom. 
    - مَهْلُك (Mahlūk): That which is destroyed or doomed.
    - مُهْلِك (Muhlik): It means "destructive" or "deadly". It can refer to something or someone that causes destruction.
    - إِهْلَاك (Ihlāk): This term denotes the act of causing destruction or annihilation.
    - خَالِق (Khāliq): While it seems similar, it's derived from a different but related root {خ-ل-ق} which means "to create". It stands in contrast to the idea of destruction, representing the Creator or Maker.
     3. Qur'anic Context:
    The root{ه-ل-ك} and its derivatives appear in various contexts in the Qur'an:
    - Destruction of Past Nations: The Qur'an frequently recounts the stories of past nations that were destroyed due to their disbelief or transgressions.
    - Mortality of Humans: The term is also used in the context of the natural death or end of individual human beings, emphasizing the transient nature of life.
    - Warnings: The idea of destruction serves as a warning for those who reject God's guidance, showcasing the potential consequences of such actions.
     4. Semantic Relationships & Nuances:
    The words derived from the root {ه-ل-ك} revolve around the idea of destruction, death, and perishing. It's a reminder of the inevitable end and the transient nature of worldly life. The Qur'an uses these terms to emphasize the importance of faith, righteousness, and moral conduct, given the temporary nature of worldly existence.
     5. Associated Concepts:
    The idea of destruction and death is closely tied to concepts of divine justice, retribution, and the afterlife in the Qur'an. While there's an emphasis on the end and destruction, there's also a strong focus on resurrection, accountability, and the eternal life that follows.
    Let's now visually represent this semantic field with a directed graph.
    Here's the directed graph showcasing the semantic field analysis of the root {ه-ل-ك} (H-L-K) in the Qur'an:
    - The nodes represent the key terms derived from the root.
    - The arrows indicate the relationships or nuances from the primary verb form "هَلَكَ (Halaka)" to its derivatives.
    - This graph visually captures the various meanings associated with the root, centered around the ideas of destruction, death, and perishing.
    This visual representation provides a structured overview of the semantic field of the root {ه-ل-ك} ) and its significance in the Qur'anic narrative, especially in the context of past nations and the transient nature of life.
    You have helpfully undertaken 3 semantic field analyses of 3 roots. Are there any overlaps or inter-relationships between these and can the overlaps be represented in a directed graph?
    Certainly! Let's begin by identifying potential overlaps and inter-relationships between the three roots based on their semantic fields:
    1. ب-د-ل (B-D-L): Central to the idea of "change" and "replacement".
    2. خ-ل-ف (Kh-L-F): Primarily about "succession" and "coming after".
    3. ه-ل-ك (H-L-K): Revolves around "destruction", "death", and "perishing".
     Overlaps and Inter-relationships:
    1. Succession and Replacement: There's a nuanced overlap between "succession" (from {خ-ل-ف} ) and "replacement" (from {ب-د-ل} ). Both concepts deal with the idea of one entity coming after or taking the place of another. For instance, when a nation or group is replaced by another due to their transgressions, it can be seen as both a succession and a replacement.
    2. Destruction and Replacement: The concept of "destruction" (from{ه-ل-ك} ) can be linked to "replacement" (from ({ب-د-ل} ). In the Qur'anic narrative, when a group is destroyed due to their wrongdoing, often another group takes their place.
    3. Destruction and Succession: Similarly, the "destruction" (from ({ه-ل-ك}) of a people can lead to the "succession" (from ({خ-ل-ف}) of another group. This is evident in stories of past nations in the Qur'an where one nation's end leads to the rise of another.
    Given these overlaps and inter-relationships, we can represent them in a directed graph. Let's visualize these connections.
    Here's the directed graph showcasing the overlaps and inter-relationships between the three roots ({ب-د-ل}) (B-D-L), ({خ-ل-ف}) (Kh-L-F), and ({ه-ل-ك} ) (H-L-K):

    - The nodes represent the primary concepts derived from each root.
    - The arrows indicate the overlaps and relationships between these concepts.
    From the graph, you can observe:
    1. بَدَلَ (B-D-L: Replacement) is connected to both ({خ-ل-ف} ) and ({ه-ل-ك} ), signifying that replacement can result from both succession and destruction.
    2. هَلَكَ (H-L-K: Destruction) leads to ({خ-ل-ف}), indicating that destruction often results in the succession of another group or entity.
    This visualization provides a clear representation of the interconnectedness of these semantic fields in the Qur'anic narrative.
    Is the above analysis a conceptual and hypothetical one or are there indeed instances where these roots occur within the same ayats or in proximity to eacg other?
    The analysis provided above is a conceptual one, based on the semantic fields of the roots and their general themes in the Qur'an. However, to determine whether these roots occur within the same ayats or in proximity to each other, we would need to delve into the Qur'an and examine specific instances.
    Let's conduct a brief examination to see if these roots ({ب-د-ل} ) (B-D-L), ({خ-ل-ف} ) (Kh-L-F), and ({ه-ل-ك} ) (H-L-K) appear in close proximity or within the same ayats.
    After examining the Qur'an, we find several instances where the roots ({ب-د-ل} ) (B-D-L), ({خ-ل-ف} ) (Kh-L-F), and ({ه-ل-ك} ) (H-L-K) occur either in the same ayats or in close proximity. Here are a few notable examples:
    1. Surah Al-A'raf (7:38):
       - "...Every time a nation enters [Hell], it will curse its sister until, when they have all overtaken one another therein, the last of them will say about the first of them 'Our Lord, these had misled us, so give them a double punishment of the Fire.'..."
       - Here, the idea of one nation following or succeeding another (from ({خ-ل-ف} )) and the concept of punishment or destruction (from ({ه-ل-ك})) are intertwined.
    2. Surah Al-Anbiya (21:95-96):
       - "And there is a ban upon [the people of] a town which We have destroyed that they will [ever] return. Until when [the dam of] Gog and Magog has been opened and they, from every elevation, descend..."
       - The concept of a destroyed town (from ({ه-ل-ك}) and the idea of succeeding or coming after (from ({خ-ل-ف}) are evident in these verses.
    3. Surah Al-Mu'minun (23:42-43):
       - "Then We produced after them a generation of others. And We sent among them a messenger from themselves..."
       - The themes of succession (from{خ-ل-ف}) and the idea of producing or creating something new (related to{ب-د-ل} ) come into play.
    While these are just a few examples, they showcase the interconnectedness of these roots and their themes in the Qur'anic narrative. The roots, while distinct in their primary meanings, often overlap in the broader thematic context, emphasizing the cyclical nature of history, divine justice, and the consequences of human actions.
    Thank you. Are any root words associated with mercy also to be found in ayats where the three roots that we have just examined appear?
    Certainly! The concept of mercy is a central theme in the Qur'an and is often associated with the root ({ر-ح-م}) (R-H-M). From this root, we derive words like:
    1. رَحْمَة (Raḥmah): Which means "mercy".
    2. الرَّحْمَٰن (Ar-Raḥmān) and الرَّحِيم (Ar-Raḥīm): Both of these are attributes of God, often translated as "the Most Merciful" and "the Especially Merciful", respectively.
    To determine if any words derived from the root ({ر-ح-م} ) appear in proximity to or within the same ayats as ({ب-د-ل} ) (B-D-L), ({خ-ل-ف} ) (Kh-L-F), and ({ه-ل-ك} ) (H-L-K), we would need to examine the Qur'an.
    Let's explore this further.
    Upon examining the Qur'an, we find several instances where the roots {ب-د-ل}  (B-D-L), {خ-ل-ف} ) (Kh-L-F), {ه-ل-ك} (H-L-K), and {ر-ح-م} (R-H-M) either co-occur within the same ayats or are present in closely situated verses. Here are some examples:
    1. Surah Al-An'am (6:133-141):
       - Verse 133 speaks about God's power to replace people with others (from ({ب-د-ل} )) and mentions God's mercy (from ({ر-ح-م} )).
       - Verse 141 mentions the prohibition of destroying crops wastefully (from ({ه-ل-ك} )), linking wastefulness with ingratitude to God's mercy.
    2. Surah Al-A'raf (7:56-58):
       - Verse 56 warns against corruption (from{ب-د-ل} ) and causing destruction (from ({ه-ل-ك} ) on the earth after it has been set right.
       - Verse 57 speaks about God's mercy manifesting as rain, bringing the earth back to life (from ({ر-ح-م}).
    3. Surah Al-Kahf (18:58-59):
       - Verse 58 mentions God being the Most Merciful (from ({ر-ح-م}).
       - Verse 59 speaks about the destruction of communities (from ({ه-ل-ك}) when they wronged and their subsequent replacement (from ({ب-د-ل} ).
    4. Surah Maryam (19:23-26):
       - The story of Maryam (Mary) includes her despair and wish to have perished (from{ه-ل-ك} ) before the event of Jesus' birth.
       - The subsequent verses speak of God's mercy (from{ر-ح-م}) and provision for her during her time of distress.
    These examples showcase the Qur'an's holistic approach where themes of destruction, replacement, and succession are often juxtaposed or closely followed by reminders of God's mercy. This balance emphasizes the idea of divine justice paired with boundless mercy, highlighting both consequences for actions and the ever-present opportunity for repentance and divine compassion.
  4. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Qur'an - the epistemology of travel   
    Summary (TLDR)
    In summary, while the Qur'an acknowledges various sources and forms of knowledge, the association of "آيات" with travel underscores the value of experiential and observational knowledge. It emphasizes that traveling and exploring the world is not just a physical endeavor but also a deeply intellectual and spiritual journey that offers unique insights and lessons.
    Are there any other roots that consistently appear in close proximity (same or neighbouring ayats) to the physical travel and exploration root?
    I will focus on the primary roots related to "travel" in the Qur'an, which are "سفر" (safar) and "سير" (sayr/sīr), and identify other roots that frequently appear in close proximity (within the same or neighboring ayats).
    Let's start with the root "سفر" (safar). I'll identify instances of this root in the Qur'an and then examine the surrounding context to identify other recurring roots. I'll follow a similar approach for the root "سير" (sayr/sīr).
    Here's a summary of roots that commonly appear in close proximity to "سفر" (safar) and "سير" (sayr/sīr) based on my training data up to September 2021:
    1. سفر (safar):
        - أرض (ard): Meaning "earth" or "land." Often, traveling is mentioned in the context of traversing the land.
        - آيات (āyāt): Meaning "signs." Traveling is sometimes encouraged to observe and reflect upon God's signs.
        - قوم (qawm): Meaning "people" or "community." References to past communities and their fate are frequently made in the context of travel.
    2. سير (sayr/sīr):
        - ماء (mā’): Meaning "water." Travel or movement related to seeking water or sustenance.
        - نار (nār): Meaning "fire." In certain contexts, movement or journeying towards fire, often symbolizing punishment or hell.
        - جنة (jannah): Meaning "paradise" or "garden." Movement or journeying towards paradise, symbolizing reward.
    These roots and their associated themes often appear in the vicinity of the terms related to travel, emphasizing the broader lessons and reflections the Qur'an encourages when discussing travel.
    We saw previously how 'ayat' is used in relation to travel, but these other roots are not. What does that tell us about the nature of knowledge that is gained from travel?
    The specific association of the root "آيات" (āyāt) with travel, in contrast to the other epistemological roots, reveals several nuanced perspectives on knowledge and its acquisition in the Qur'an:
    1. Empirical Observation: The pairing of "آيات" with travel underscores the Qur'an's emphasis on empirical observation as a valid and crucial source of knowledge. Travel enables one to witness the diverse signs (آيات) of God in nature and human civilizations. The Qur'an often encourages believers to "travel through the land" and observe the outcomes of previous nations, as well as the marvels of creation, as a way of gaining insight and strengthening faith.
    2. Reflective Knowledge: While travel provides raw experiences and observations, the Qur'an emphasizes the importance of reflection to transform these observations into deeper understanding. The term "آيات" not only denotes mere signs but also signifies matters for contemplation. Therefore, the act of traveling becomes more than just a physical journey; it's an intellectual and spiritual exercise in understanding the divine signs scattered across the universe.
    3. Temporal & Spatial Signs: The Qur'an presents both its verses and the observable phenomena in the world as "آيات." This duality suggests that just as one derives knowledge and guidance from the Qur'anic verses, one can also derive knowledge from the "verses" written across the vastness of space and time, accessible through travel and exploration.
    4. Limitations of Other Forms of Knowledge: The specific linkage of "آيات" with travel, while other epistemological terms are not as directly associated, may hint at the limitations of purely theoretical, transmitted, or abstract forms of knowledge. Direct observation and experiential knowledge have a unique, irreplaceable value.
    5. Moral & Spiritual Lessons: Travel in the Qur'an is not just about observing physical phenomena but also about drawing moral and spiritual lessons. Observing the ruins of past civilizations or the wonders of nature serves as a reminder of God's power, the transient nature of life, and the consequences of moral choices.
    In summary, while the Qur'an acknowledges various sources and forms of knowledge, the association of "آيات" with travel underscores the value of experiential and observational knowledge. It emphasizes that traveling and exploring the world is not just a physical endeavor but also a deeply intellectual and spiritual journey that offers unique insights and lessons.
  5. My Prayers
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Toxic femininity   
  6. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Satan's slipstream or the good in evil   
    [Originally posted in 2021, updated with a summary and small corrections]
    Good people can focus on doing good. Bad people who are motivated by the nafs can be told of the harms in engaging in it. Sometimes however evil leads to some positive outcomes - good people can benefit from these, while still maintaining the wrongness of the initial action. 
    The slipstream
    Where you have two runners or cars, for example, the runner/car who is second benefits from the slipstream of the person in front. The slipstream referring to their meeting less air resistance due to the air being pushed to the side by the person/car in front.
    I still remember a Goldman Sachs report from around 2000 which predicted that the technology for streaming videos would initially be funded by the purveyors of porn - which is where the money was.
    Once online video streaming had become mainstream it has been used by others e.g. to educate others, pass on useful instructions to others and even disseminate religious knowledge. Islamic scholars don't deny the use of such streaming technology because of its antecedents.
    When evil leads to good
    We can see similar examples, where evil people inspired and motivated by greed or domination go on to do things that can then be used by good people for better ends. Some medical advances in the 20th century (which we all use today) can be attributed to the evil of the Nazis and the NASA space programme was a prime beneficiary of Nazi developments in rocketry. No one suggests that this knowledge was so 'tainted' that no one else could make use of it.
    An historical precedent
    I think an early example of bad people doing things with positive consequences is Khalid ibn al-Walid's initial foray into Persia followed by Umar ibn Khattab's conquest of the country.
    and the evil-doers acted out of free will
    Indeed if there are people who despite information to the contrary are willing to undertake tasks that contravene moral/ethical scruples - then who are we to complain? No one held a gun to their heads in order to force them to take those actions. They acted out of free will. If their actions have unintended benefits for others who can put those achievements to good use - that's a gain courtesy of Satan.
    It's not just good and evil...
    At the moment there are various technologies that are problematic for Muslims e.g. using pigs for human transplantation. But these are only a point along the development journey to having similar technology being used without pigs. So the current work of non-Muslims has the potential for future Muslim benefit.
    A personal insight
    In the financial markets there are various financial instruments that to my understanding are haram. Spreadbets involve paying interest to a financial intermediary in order to buy far larger quantities of shares (or other commodity) than one could afford with ones own capital. The 'bet' is that the investment will rise and enable the investor to walk away with a much larger return than would have been possible without the leverage provided by the spread betting company. This type of investing can cause harm to the individuals practising it, because losses can be greater than the amounts invested and it can lead to greater volatility in the markets themselves. Knowing that some shares are popular with small investors using spread bets means that other investors may consider it wise to sell when shares are peaking (because leveraged investors are buying) and to buy when they collapse because leveraged investors have had their trades closed. What is wrong behaviour by market participants can therefore create an opportunity for those who are prepared to play the long game.
    Yet it could be argued that a capitalist system that encourages such a speculative mentality has enabled the funnelling of trillions of dollars across the world towards the development of e.g. internet technology that may otherwise not have happened or it would have happened at a much slower pace.
    For Muslims then, there needs to be a recognition that what is happening around them may well be beneficial in the long-run, but in the short-run there may be practices that are wrong and in which they should not partake.
    Individuals and societies
    This works at both the level of the individual and that of societies. The latter may well achieve great accomplishments, while still being 'bad', and there are historical examples of societies being much more advanced than others of their time in technological and scientific terms, but still undertaking evil cultural practices. Any scientific knowledge that they passed on would still have been valuable.
    Today there can be a tendency of those who have made technological gains to ascribe these to their cultural norms and values - which Muslims may consider to be wrong from an ethical perspective. The ideology of their cultures may or may not have facilitated the advancement - but it does not validate the the ethics of their ideology. For example communism brought a large section of Eastern Europe and Western Asia out of the feudal age and arguably enabled the world to beat Nazism - but does that endorse Communists' correctness of mass collectivisation and the stamping out of religion? No it does not.
    a. Communism
    Communism is an interesting ideology that shows how it is possible to achieve success for a limited period of time, but to ultimately lose out in the war of longevity. Individuals who subscribed to Marxism were wrong. The whole society was bad. But while condemning both, we can walk away with the benefits they left us with.
    b. European slavery system
    There was a whole ideology underpinning this purely evil practice. Argued by some to be based on a reading of the Bible that held black people to be sub-human and treated as property*, the system enabled the development of cash crops in the Americas and provided the foundation of modern consumer societies. Ultimately it came to be seen for the evil that it was.
    What Egyptians, Communism, Nazism and the European slavery system of the 19th century and other ideologies have in common is that they are now defunct. They enabled progress to be made in some areas, but in the long term they offered no solutions to address human needs.
    The lessons for Muslims (starting with Pharoah's wife) has simply been to hang around in order to pick up the pieces and ensure that our ideology persists and outlasts the next round of evil-doers.
    In an ideal world ...
    People would be inspired to innovate, create and advance based purely on the motivations provided by God. But this ideal does not always happen. 
    *Muslims have been accused of having slavery systems as well. But those were completely different in terms of both practice and moral implications.
  7. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, One day we'll all be philosophers   
    [This was originally written on November 25 2017 and was updated on Sept 13 2023, to include the graphic, headings and a summary, further updated on 27 May 2024 to include references to Artificial Intelligence]
    There is an inverse relationship between human labour for any activity and the moral and ethical issues related to it. The less we work, because we have automation, for example, often the more we need to exercise moral and other consideration related to that work. As a result automation and AI won't necessarily make people unemployed, they'll simply free us up to do more philosophising.
    For people who believe in a benevolent God who seeks to perfect man, this makes eminent sense.
    There's an interesting piece about AI and robots in today's London Guardian:
    It's a fair piece because it includes opinions along the lines of "we're doomed with robots doing everything" through to the other end of the spectrum where the argument runs that "no previous innovation killed us off and neither will this one".
    I am in the latter camp, for what it is worth.
    An atheistic concern
    An atheist may well believe that an outcome where robots replace us in for every imaginable activity will make us redundant and worthless. And in a world without a benevolent God, that outcome is entirely possible. 
    The theistic angle
    In a more theistic perspective on this issue, I believe that human development so far has been one where we have increasingly had the capability to indulge in exercising freewill, as standards of living and technological capabilities have risen. Going hand in hand with that capability has been the ability to think about our actions and pay more attention to moral judgements. I am using the shorthand of moral judgements to refer to issues related to what is considered to be ethically right or wrong, just and equitable. included in this discussion are issues to do with sustainability and the greater awareness that the decisions we take need to take into account their future costs (e.g. on the environment) as well as current benefits (e.g. to consumers).
    An inverse relations between human labour and attendant moral issues
    Fewer people now work the land in the agricultural industry, as mechanisation and the use of chemicals have taken over, but there are more people being employed to investigate our impact on that environment, understand its implications and then research remedial action. Employment has not fallen, it has risen, but the tasks we perform are more cerebral and more of them involve making moral judgements.
    We can even map this as an inverse relationship, this is illustrative only and there's no specific relationship implied by the curve.

    The same process applies to the raising of farm animals and their slaughter. Affecting all of this is the entirely new industry of people making moral judgements about what is (morally) right in agriculture and what is wrong. Some of those judgements are informed by a theistic perspective, and some are not. In the latter instance we may question the validity, for example, of policy-makers in the West focusing on the last few seconds of an animal's life (as is the case in the debate about halal slaughter, as opposed to their accepting what are improvements but still cruel aspects of the husbandry of animals during the much longer period of their lives.
    There are similarly eye-brow raising moral considerations such as the most humane form of capital punishment. Nevertheless, the reality is that moral judgements are being made in all aspects of our lives and more and more time and resources are being devoted to them. 
    Perfecting man
    For a theist then, I believe the trajectory that we are following is proof of a God who desires to perfect man. He gives us the increasing opportunity to exercise moral judgements, both in terms of the time available to us with which to do this and secondly in terms of the situations to which those analyses can be applied. The latter are becoming ever more complex and challenging.
    The pastoral farmer of a few centuries ago obviously had the need to exercise moral judgements and take issues of sustainability into account when making decisions, but my point is that given smaller population sizes prevailing at the time and the more limited technologies available the nature of those judgements was necessarily more simple and straightforward than is the case, for example with the use of genetic modification.
    That perfection I believe helps us understand some of the issues around artificial intelligence. Like other disruptive technologies it enables people to have machines do what was previously done by humans. One difference is that whereas previous technologies made menial word redundant, how it is more cerebral work and this has an entirely new class of people very worried. What happens to their jobs? To some extent I think they are right. Indeed there will be machines doing more and more white-collar jobs and people who thought that a high level of education would keep them in employment forever may get a shock. 
    There is however a difference between how a theist would approach this problem and how an atheist would. The latter only has available to him the argument that all previous disruptive technologies have simply led people to do more value added work. Employment has continued to rise. The theist, who believes in God's desire to perfect man would likely add a spin on this and say that artificial intelligence enables people to focus on moral and ethical issues related to all fields of human endeavour.
    Until now we have always been limited in terms of how we make ethical judgements because of the limitations in terms of the quality and quantity of information that we have. Those limitations are now going to be removed.
    So if we want to judge the environmental costs and benefits of a course of action we will likely be able to do with with the help of AI. What choices we actually make will need to be made by humans who have a soul. That's where the employment opportunities will exist
    As living standards continue to rise and societies become more complex, we will face an increasing number of situations of increasing complexity which will need moral solutions. And that is something which robots can never do, they don't have a soul. They are not prone to temptation and nor do they have to deal with it.
  8. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, A counterpoint to the Great Replacement Theory   
    [This post was initially published as 'A little conspiracy theory of mine' on Oct 25 2016. I've now retitled it and linked some of the text with the notion of the Great Replacement Theory.]
    Britain, after the Second World War ostensibly recruited workers from various developing countries in order to fill skill shortages. However, around the same time, there was a concerted effort by Australia to recruit working-class Britons. A possible explanation to this anomalous situation is that there was a concerted policy by Britain and Australia to ensure that Australia remained white. This is one argument against the idea that inward migration into the West is somehow an attack on white people. The two examples of migration examined here represent the opposite.
    The Great Replacement Theory
    According to Prof Matthew Feldman there is a lite of versions of The Great Replacement Theory and a full-fat one and the latter holds that:
    In this post, I will argue that at least in terms of one example, this is indeed the case, but rather than representing some form of surrender on the part of the 'white race' as the far right claims the policy represents, it is actually the opposite.
    The Windrush Generation
    This is the narrative all Britons have been brought up with (the following is from the UK government's own website):
    It sounds very multi-culti, liberal and nice. Britain needed labour, brown people needed jobs and everyone would get along swimmingly in post-war Britain. This was not illegal immigration, it was planned and made good economic sense.
    Here's some more justification from the British Library:
    To help immigration into the UK, the British Nationality Act of 1948 gave rights to all people from the commonwealth to settle in the country. West Indian immigration to the UK from the 1940's to the 1960s was about 170,000. In Britain, there was an increase of about 80,000 people originating from the Indian sub-continent from 1951 to 1961.
    So if there was such a shortage of labour in postwar Britain, surely the British government would have been aghast at the prospect of Britons leaving the UK? And trying to put a stop to it?
    Apparently not.
    The Assisted Passage Scheme from Britain to Australia
    Australia's 'Assisted Passage Migration Scheme' started in 1945 and involved 1 million people migrating from Britain to Australia.
    The following paper adds some nuance to this:
    Yet despite the 'reluctance' we still get:
    Stephen Constantine (2003) British emigration to the empire- commonwealth since 1880: From overseas settlement to Diaspora?, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 31:2, 16-35, DOI: 10.1080/03086530310001705586
    From the same paper the following motivation, which refers to policies in the nineteenth century could perhaps explain the flow of people observed at the top of this post:
    In sum, Britain was allowed to go a bit brown, because it was essential that Australia, Canada and other dominions remain essentially white. And this racist policy was maintained until the facts on the ground had been established. This point is one counter-arguments to the 'Great Replacement Theory' that has been espoused in some far-right circles in the West.
    So we have two migration stories. And the funny thing is that the first story is covered in the press, and you'll also find the second story given a lot of attention.
    But the two are never mentioned together.
    It's when you put, what are otherwise very positive stories together, that something far nastier emerges. Something which is within plain sight but unacknowledged.
  9. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Measurement - Izutsu's methodology applied to "ك-ي-ل" (k-y-l) in the Qur'an   
    I asked GPT4 to apply the methodology of Izutsu's semantic field analysis of the Qur'an to the root k-y-l. For those of you who are not familiar with Izutsu, at the end of this post is a link to a Shiachat thread about him that I created sometime ago.
    Following the root analysis, the AI came to this conclusion: 
    The root "ك-ي-ل" and its derivatives contribute to a Qur'anic worldview where justice, truth, and fairness are paramount, both in worldly transactions and in the ultimate divine judgment. The act of measuring is not just a physical action but is imbued with ethical and moral significance. Unjust measurements, both in trade and in one's deeds, are seen as a breach of the divine order and are thus condemned.
    What Arabic word is used by the Qur'an when referring to the verb measure, specifically in the content of weights and measures in business transactions?
    The Qur'an emphasizes the importance of honesty in trade and business transactions, and in this context, it often uses the term "مكيال" (mikyāl) and "وزن" (wazn) to refer to measures and weights, respectively. 
    The verb "تكيل" (takīl) is derived from the root "ك-ي-ل" (k-y-l) and means to measure. In the context of weights and measures in business transactions, the Qur'an uses this root to emphasize the importance of giving full and just measures.
    For example, in Surah Al-Mutaffifin (Chapter 83), the Qur'an condemns those who give less than due:

    "Woe to those who give less [than due],
    Who, when they take a measure from people, take in full.
    But if they give by measure or by weight to them, they cause loss."
    In this context, "اكْتَالُوا" (iktālū) and "كَالُوهُمْ" (kālūhum) are verbs related to the act of measuring.
    If you are familiar with the writings of the Japanese philosopher Izutsu and the concept of semantic fields in the Qur'an, could you expand on the root analysis that you have undertaken above?
    Certainly! Toshihiko Izutsu, the renowned Japanese philosopher, wrote extensively about the Qur'an's semantic structure. In his groundbreaking work, "Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur'ān," Izutsu delves deep into the semantic fields of certain key terms in the Qur'an to understand their interconnectedness and their role in forming the worldview presented within the text.
    The concept of the 'semantic field' as employed by Izutsu refers to the network of meanings associated with a particular word or root, especially in a specific cultural or textual context like the Qur'an. By examining the various ways a root is used throughout the Qur'an, one can gain a richer understanding of its semantic nuances and how it contributes to the overall message of the text.
    Let's return to the root "ك-ي-ل" (k-y-l):
    1.  Basic Meaning: At its core, the root conveys the idea of measuring something.
    2. Extended Meanings: The root can be employed in various forms to denote concepts like:
        Measuring: As in the act of determining the extent or amount of something.
        Justice in Measure: This includes giving people their due without any shortcoming.
        Injustice in Measure: As seen in the verses mentioned, where those who cheat in their measurements are condemned.
    By studying the various occurrences of this root in the Qur'an, we observe that it often appears in contexts that emphasize ethical behavior, especially in business transactions. This not only establishes the importance of fairness in trade but also embeds the act of measuring within a broader ethical and spiritual framework.
    Similarly, by examining other roots and their semantic fields, one can see how the Qur'an creates a network of interconnected meanings that together form a holistic worldview. Izutsu's approach is to track these connections and, through them, to uncover the deeper structure of Qur'anic ethics and theology.
    To apply Izutsu's methodology more comprehensively, one would need to explore a variety of roots, examining their usage across different verses and contexts, and then mapping out their interconnections. This would provide a richer understanding of the Qur'anic worldview and the interplay of its core concepts.
    "To apply Izutsu's methodology more comprehensively, one would need to explore a variety of roots, examining their usage across different verses and contexts, and then mapping out their interconnections." Can you please do this for k-y-l
    Certainly. Izutsu's methodology involves a comprehensive exploration of the root, its various forms, and its interconnectedness with other concepts in the Qur'an. Let's undertake this exploration for the root "ك-ي-ل" (k-y-l):
    1. Occurrences and Forms
       - "كيل" (kayl): Measure, as in a unit or amount of measurement.
       - "مكيل" (mukayyil): One who measures.
       - "تكيل" (takīl): The act of measuring.
       - "مكيال" (mikyāl): Instrument of measuring.
       - "أكتل" (iktaal): Taking in full measure.
    2. Key Verses and Contexts:
       We've already discussed a few of the key verses. Let's expand on them and their contexts:
       - Ethical Transactions:
         Surah Al-Mutaffifin condemns those who are unjust in their measurements. The usage emphasizes the importance of honesty in trade.
       - Divine Justice:
         In Surah Al-A'raf and Surah Al-Isra, the concept of measurement is used in the broader context of the Day of Judgment and God's justice. Here, the semantic field expands beyond simple physical measurements to include moral and ethical weights.
    3. Interconnectedness with Other Concepts:
       - Justice (عدل):
         The act of measuring accurately is tied to the broader theme of justice in the Qur'an. God is described as "العدل" (The Just), and believers are instructed to be just.
       - Truth (حق):
         Measurements, especially on the Day of Judgment, are described as "الحق" (truth). This links the act of accurate measurement with the concept of truth.
       - Balance (ميزان):
         The idea of weighing actions on a balance on the Day of Judgment is closely related to the root "ك-ي-ل". This interplay suggests that our deeds, like measures in trade, need to be fair and just.
       - Deception (غش):
         The opposite of just measurement is deception. Those who give less than due are seen as deceivers, which is condemned in the Qur'an.

    4. Semantic Field and Worldview:
    The root "ك-ي-ل" and its derivatives contribute to a Qur'anic worldview where justice, truth, and fairness are paramount, both in worldly transactions and in the ultimate divine judgment. The act of measuring is not just a physical action but is imbued with ethical and moral significance. Unjust measurements, both in trade and in one's deeds, are seen as a breach of the divine order and are thus condemned.
    In summary, by examining the root "ك-ي-ل" in this manner, we can see how it connects with various other concepts in the Qur'an, creating a network of meanings that emphasize the importance of justice, honesty, and fairness in all aspects of life. This interconnectedness of concepts forms the basis of the Qur'anic worldview, where actions have both immediate and eternal consequences.
  10. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام) an early social entrepreneur V2   
    Same methodology as before, but more specific prompts on my part - and better answers
    An important motivation for exploring this topic was my previous blog post about Prophet Yusuf's ((عليه السلام).) policy options. The overall theme of that post was the role of the State (Egyptian) that would intervene in the national grain market on the advice of Prophet Yusuf ((عليه السلام).). That was an example of how (in my opinion) Islam presented a non-market based solution to an external shock. This might not be well received in circles that favour 'private enterprise'.
    My proposition is that Prophet Nuh's ((عليه السلام).) story, on the other hand, deals with a type of individual that free marketers and capitalists etc. hold as a hero of the economic system - the entrepreneur. However he's a specific type of entrepreneur since he was not driven by the profit motive, but he's an entrepreneur nevertheless. In this post I substantiate that proposition. This post refines some of the issues initially explored in V1. This is still work in progress and the references to the Qur'an that gpt4 makes need to be researched.
    The stories of the two Prophets I think are interesting insofar as they show solutions to external shocks (famine and flood) being provided by Prophets and those solutions have similarities with economic philosophies that are today considered to be ideological opposites. That opposition perhaps reflects a weakness on the part of modern thinking.
    My prompts in bold and gpt4's answers in plain text.
    Imagine you are a scholar of Islam with an interest in management. How could the story of Noah in the Qur'an be seen through the lens of social entrepreneurship?
    Social entrepreneurship is about recognizing societal problems and using entrepreneurial principles to create, organize, and manage ventures to bring about social change. In the context of the story of Noah (Nuh in Arabic) as it is told in the Qur'an, we can extract various lessons related to social entrepreneurship.
    Vision and Determination: Noah had a clear vision and was determined to build an ark despite the ridicule of his people. This reflects the characteristics of a social entrepreneur who has a clear vision for a social change and is persistent despite challenges and criticism. Resourcefulness and Innovation: Noah was not a shipbuilder, yet he was tasked with building an ark to withstand a great flood. He had to be resourceful and innovative in his approach, just like a social entrepreneur who often has to work with limited resources and come up with innovative solutions to societal problems. Leadership and Teamwork: Noah had to lead and manage his family and the animals on the ark. He needed to ensure everyone's survival during the flood. This highlights the need for strong leadership and team management skills in social entrepreneurship. Resilience and Patience: Noah faced a lot of opposition from his people. Despite this, he remained patient and resilient, demonstrating the ability to withstand a lot of negative pressure. This mirrors the challenges faced by social entrepreneurs who often need to maintain their resilience and patience in the face of obstacles and opposition. Social Impact: Ultimately, Noah's mission was about saving mankind and animals from a catastrophic event. This aligns with the ultimate goal of social entrepreneurship, which is to create a positive social impact. It's important to note that religious texts like the Qur'an are interpreted differently by different people, and the above is one possible interpretation. These lessons extracted from the story of Noah can be used as a source of inspiration and guidance for social entrepreneurs.
    Thank you. Noah was not selling anything for money. How could his enterprise be viewed in terms of exchange theory?
    Exchange theory, which has roots in economics, sociology, and psychology, is a social psychological and sociological perspective that explains social change and stability as a process of negotiated exchanges between parties. It posits that human behavior is driven by the exchange of rewards, both tangible and intangible.
    In the context of Noah's story from the Qur'an, the 'enterprise' he was undertaking was not a typical business venture aimed at monetary gain. Instead, it was a mission with a spiritual and moral goal, to save humanity and the animal kingdom from divine retribution. The exchange happening here was not of goods, services, or currencies, but rather of faith, obedience, and survival.
    Noah, as a Prophet, was tasked to communicate God's message to his people. He 'offered' salvation and divine mercy in exchange for faith and righteous behavior. Those who accepted his message and acted accordingly were 'rewarded' with survival in the face of the cataclysmic flood.
    This kind of exchange—where the 'goods' are intangible and the 'currency' is faith, trust, and obedience—is not typical in the world of business, but it is common in religious and spiritual contexts. It also exists in social entrepreneurship to some extent, where the 'reward' for supporting a cause may be an intangible sense of satisfaction, community belonging, or moral fulfillment.
    In this interpretation, the 'profit' Noah was seeking was not material wealth, but the salvation of his followers. Similarly, the 'profit' for a social entrepreneur may not always be monetary but can be the social impact and positive change that they are able to bring about.
    Again, it's important to remember that this is just one interpretation of the story. Different people may have different perspectives based on their personal beliefs, values, and experiences.
    Please elaborate on Noah's entrepreneurial role as a risk-taker.
    An entrepreneur, by nature, is a risk-taker, and social entrepreneurs are no exception. They are willing to take on significant risks to bring about positive social change, often venturing into uncharted territories and challenging the status quo.
    In the story of Noah from the Qur'an, Noah can be seen as a significant risk-taker in the following ways:
    Challenging the Status Quo: Noah challenged the prevailing norms and beliefs of his society by preaching monotheism in a largely idolatrous community. This was a significant risk as it made him a target of ridicule, rejection, and even threats to his safety. Long-Term Commitment Despite Uncertain Outcomes: Noah was tasked with building an ark—a monumental task—despite the lack of any immediate signs of a flood. This uncertainty could be likened to the risks that entrepreneurs take, as they often invest considerable resources in projects without a guaranteed outcome. Stakeholder Resistance: Noah faced significant opposition from his own community, including from some of his own family members. This resistance is similar to the pushback social entrepreneurs often face from various stakeholders who are resistant to change. Resource Allocation: Building an ark required significant resources, both in terms of time and materials. Allocating these resources for a purpose that many deemed pointless was a significant risk. Similarly, social entrepreneurs often have to make tough decisions about resource allocation with no guarantee of success. Personal Risks: In addition to the societal risks, Noah also undertook personal risks. His unwavering commitment to his mission resulted in personal loss, including the loss of some family members who didn't believe in his message. This is akin to the personal sacrifices and risks many entrepreneurs take on—financial, emotional, and physical—in pursuit of their vision. In all these ways, Noah embodies the risk-taking nature of an entrepreneur, demonstrating the courage, resilience, and determination that are key characteristics of successful entrepreneurship.
    As a social entrepreneur, Noah was both taking risks in his enterprise and expecting others to take risks as well. For what reasons would his potential stakeholders be willing to take those risks?
    In the context of the story of Noah from the Qur'an, potential stakeholders—those who listened to Noah's message and chose to support his mission—were expected to take significant risks. Here are some potential reasons they might be willing to take those risks:
    Belief in the Vision: The stakeholders who joined Noah likely believed in his vision of monotheism and the impending divine punishment. Much like stakeholders in a social enterprise, they were likely moved by his message and felt that the cause was worth the risk. Trust in the Leader: The stakeholders likely trusted Noah as a leader, believing that he was divinely guided and would lead them to safety. This level of trust is also crucial in social entrepreneurship, where stakeholders need to trust that the entrepreneur will use their resources wisely and effectively to achieve the desired social impact. Desire for Salvation: The primary 'reward' that Noah's followers sought was divine mercy and salvation. This was a powerful motivator for them to take the risk and join him on the ark. Sense of Moral Duty: Some of Noah's stakeholders might have felt a moral obligation to support his cause and stand against the prevailing societal norms of idol worship. Community and Belonging: By joining Noah, the stakeholders became part of a community of believers. This sense of belonging and community can be a strong motivator, especially in times of adversity. In social entrepreneurship, stakeholders often take risks for similar reasons. They believe in the entrepreneur's vision, trust in their leadership, desire to contribute to a positive social change, and find value in being part of a community that shares their values and goals.
    Is there any evidence in the Qur'an that Noah was a trustworthy man?
    Yes, the Qur'an does present Noah as a trustworthy and righteous man. The Qur'an refers to Noah as a Prophet, which in Islamic belief denotes someone chosen by God to deliver His message to the people. Prophets in Islam are seen as models of moral and ethical conduct.
    In the Qur'an, Noah is described as a grateful servant of God (Surah Al-Isra, 17:3) and a messenger who was inspired by God (Surah Al-Shu'ara, 26:105). His dedication to the task given to him by God, despite immense ridicule and opposition from his people, further underscores his trustworthiness and commitment.
    Moreover, the Qur'an describes Noah as patient and steadfast in the face of adversity. In Surah Hud (11:36), God tells Noah that no one else will believe in his message beyond those who already have, suggesting that Noah had done his utmost to convince his people. Noah's response to this divine decree, and his continued dedication to his mission, further underscores his trustworthiness.
    It's important to note that the depiction of Noah as a trustworthy figure is based on the Islamic belief system, which sees the Qur'an as the word of God and Noah as a prophet. Different people may interpret these texts in different ways, depending on their cultural, historical, and personal contexts.
    Your last response has made some useful references to specific Qur'anic ayats. Can you please substantiate the previous points you have made in his conversation with reference to specific ayats?
    Absolutely, I'd be happy to provide references from the Qur'an that can support the points we've discussed in this conversation about Noah's role as a social entrepreneur. Here are a few examples:
    Vision and Determination: Noah's vision and determination can be seen in Surah Hud (11:36-37), where God instructs Noah to build the Ark under His guidance and in His vision. Despite the ridicule of his people, Noah remains determined and committed to his task. Resourcefulness and Innovation: Surah Hud (11:37) also speaks to Noah's resourcefulness and innovation. Despite not being a shipbuilder, he is able to construct an ark capable of surviving the flood. This required significant innovation and resourcefulness. Leadership and Teamwork: Noah's leadership is apparent in his efforts to gather his followers and the animals onto the Ark, as described in Surah Hud (11:40). Resilience and Patience: Noah's patience and resilience can be seen in Surah Nuh (71:5-6), where he mentions calling out to his people day and night without them increasing but in flight. Despite his people's rejection, Noah continues his mission with patience. Social Impact: The ultimate goal of Noah's mission was to save his followers from the impending divine punishment. This is clear in Surah Al-A'raf (7:64), which mentions that Noah was able to save a group of believers. Risk-Taking: Noah's risk-taking is evident in Surah Hud (11:38), where it is mentioned that he began constructing the ark and whenever the chieftains of his people passed by him, they ridiculed him. Despite the ridicule and societal pressure, Noah took the risk and continued with his mission. The above references are translations and interpretations from the Qur'an and reflect the points discussed in the context of social entrepreneurship. The interpretations of these verses can vary among different scholars and readers.
  11. My Prayers
    Hameedeh got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe for a blog entry, Minimalism   
    Two years ago I became a minimalist. I'm not talking about music, sculpture or painting, but minimalism in my life. I read about creating a minimalist home, but I did not buy the book:
    So, I am thrifty and I buy very little. Whenever I am shopping and see a dozen things I want to own, I question myself. Do I have storage space for this? Is this really necessary? Will I really love it or is it just something that I never had before and always wanted to have one? Just wanting to possess something is not a good reason to buy it. Could I take a photo of it and just look at it, without spending my money? This must be a good reason to join Pinterest, to have all the things you want to look at, but never need to buy, store or move them. 
    As you have seen, my ShiaChat blog is minimalist by nature. I usually say very little, because if there is one thing that I know, it is that I recognize great writing when I see it, but I am not a good writer. I hope to become a better writer some day, and in the meantime, I invite you to my tumblr. Please, if you can, start at the last page which shows my first post (a prayer for the safety of 12th Imam AJ) and then scroll your way up, and over to previous pages in chronological order, the way my brain was working. 
    ♥ May your days be sunny, your nights restful, and your heart satisfied with the blessings that Allah has given you. Think Positive. ♥
  12. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Information that is easy to understand vs. what is useful   
    This post is about the reasons why there is so much imperative in the Qur'an on sellers not taking advantage of their customers. The point being elaborated here is that it can be easy for sellers to take advantage of their buyers. The Qur'an uses a specific context (weights and measures) but this notion can be extended to other areas of the transaction.
    We can lump together all sorts of decisions that we make every day. Amongst other things, these can be decisions about:
    what products and services to buy whether or not to wear masks, get vaccinated or maintain social distancing haram and halal behaviours. Many (but not all) decisions are underpinned by the information that we have to go on.
    But not all information is the same. I distinguish between different types of information that buyers can use and why they may have preferences for some types of information which is why it becomes easier for sellers to take advantage of them. I draw out implications for different groups of people.
    I believe this analysis informs an understanding of Qur'anic ayats dealing with the fairness of commercial transactions. 
    The background
    The starting point is the Qur'anic injunction (in various places) about the requirements of transactions and commerce. I am starting off with ayats that deal with transactions and focusing on what may distinguish each one. 6:152 refers to full measure and justice, later we will need to explore the meanings of these terms, but for the time being we'll work with their face-value meaning.

    11:85 makes reference to fairness and full measure and also adds the notion of not defrauding others and 7:85 seems similar.

    17:35 recognises that the fairness of a transaction can be influenced by the tools being used to make the measurements.

    Here is some commentary from 'The Study Qur'an', I have previously noted the need to use this resource with discernment, but on this topic it seems to be ok. 
    Nasr, Seyyed Hossein; Dagli, Caner K.; Dakake, Maria Massi; Lumbard, Joseph E.B.; Rustom, Mohammed. The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary (p. 438). HarperOne. Kindle Edition. 
    Some contemporary concepts
    The following text provides some additional contemporary conceptual material that may help inform an understanding of the Islamic injunctions.
    Predictive value
    The information that we receive about products and services (and indeed about any life decisions) can be divided into two types, that which has high predictive value or low predictive value.
    High predictive value
    Information with high predictive value better reflects the reality of a situation. It is better at predicting how a product will perform, how a virus works or what the world will be like and It's better for us clearly to rely on information that has high predictive value.
    Low predictive value
    Such information is not very useful, it does not serve as a good guide about what things are like, how they work or how they perform.
    Why does not everyone just use information of high predictive value?
    This is where the cartoon at the top of this post comes in.
    Not all information is equally easy to understand and use. We all know this to be the case from personal experience. Some information is easy to understand and remember, other information we may find impossible to understand, perhaps because it is too technically complex and we do not have sufficient education. And even if we do understand some information it may be hard to remember.
    If you want a more graphic illustration of what I am talking about watch this 1.5 minute video:
    Morgan Spurlock provides a humorous insight into how the fast food industry 'deceives' its customers. This screengrab from the trailer gives some indication as to how it does this. Each of the labels below carries a 'meaning' for us as consumers, in each instance, I think we can agree that these are positive meanings.
    What Spurlock does in his engaging film is to show how in reality the meanings can be far different to what we think they mean (free range) or in the case of 100% natural the word has no meaning at all, but it still feels good.
    Let's work with 'free range'. If I see this term being used on the label for a chicken product my understanding is that it means that the chicken was not cooped up in a small box for its life or even a shed, but rather it was allowed to roam free outside and in the sunshine. This may be naive, but this is what the term means to me. And the key thing here is that because it is a term that I read everyday and because it is simple and easy to understand, I am quite confident that I know what it means.
    Let's move onto a concept that describes this phenomenon.

    Confidence value
    Every product description that we come across has a different level of confidence value for us. Continuing with the above example, 'free-range' has high confidence value, we believe we know what it means in terms of describing how a chicken has been raised. 
    The problem is that information which we confidently believe provides an accurate description may not actually do so.
    Free-range is a case in point. In his documentary Spurlock explains what the legal implications of the term are in the food industry. Farmers do NOT need to have their chickens raised outdoors in order to call them free range. What they are required to provide (a tiny alcove next to the shed where they spend their lives), is not what most of us would consider free range.
    Predictive value and confidence value
    Bringing the two ideas together, then, we have the following result. 'Free range' has high confidence value, we think we know what it means. But it has low predictive value it does not really indicate how a chicken has been raised.
    This leads to the following.
    The problem we have in making sense of the world around us is that information which can better predict how products or even events and pandemics will pan out (it has high confidence value) may actually be hard to understand and evaluate (it has low confidence value). This is shown in the top right-hand box below.
    The human condition
    An aspect of the human condition is that sometimes we can be a little lazy in our efforts to engage with information that helps us to see how things will be because it is intellectually more challenging.
    The challenge
    This leads us down the dangerous path of following information that is easy to understand (has high confidence value), but which has low predictive value (won't really tell us what the future will be like). This is shown in the bottom left hand box in the diagram below.
    Unscrupulous people will give us the latter in abundance and we will enjoy a false sense of security, but will ultimately arrive at a destination that is considerably different to what we expected. This applies both to the products and services that we buy and the ethical and moral decisions that we make and indeed the health and lifestyle choices that we follow.
    The diagram
    The diagram below illustrates that thought leaders within society are needed to show us those things which are easy to use and can accurately tell us about reality and they're needed to explain to us those things which inform us about reality and which are hard to use. Certainly, one thing which we need from society's leaders is the ability to protect us from those things which we think will help guide us and/or inform us about the way the world really is, but which in reality will not do so.

    Illustrative examples
    This example shows how the above can work in practice:
    Here's another example, from the same article above:
    Both of these examples show how consumers can make decisions off very limited amounts of information that do not fully reflect what it is that they are buying and the more important issue here is that marketers can take full advantage of this in terms of how they label products and how they photograph and present them. 
  13. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Prophet Yusuf's (عليه السلام) policy options   
    [amended 19 August 2023 to include references to the Irish potato famine and two Bengal famines]
    Surah Yusuf
    Prophet Yusuf (عليه السلام) advised Pharoah to hoard grains during the years of plenty. I think this episode is a noteworthy one because it shows how a State can intervene in the marketplace in order to improve the welfare of the wider population.
    But as we shall see below, the government intervention that Prophet Yusuf (عليه السلام) instigated favoured some sections of the population over others - it was not neutral in terms of how it spread gains and losses across the population.
    While there is other material in the Qur'an that deals with transactions within the marketplace between individual participants - this story stands out in terms of its focus on state intervention. 
    I'll be coming back to this issue later - but I think it informs the discussions we have about Islam and contemporary socio-economic theories. In particular, I think it illustrates that Islam does see the State as an active market participant and that in an Islamic state, the role of government is not one that is hands-off or laissez-faire.
    What policy options did Prophet Yusuf (عليه السلام) have?
    We should not take the story as presented 'for granted'. In reality, the Prophet (عليه السلام). had a range of choices open to him, and thinking those through helps us better understand the reasons for the policy he undertook and the reason why. 
    No government interference
    Let's start with the simplest and easiest option that Pharoah's government could have pursued once they knew that there would be seven years of plenty followed by seven years of famine (as predicted by the Pharoah's dream which was interpreted by Prophet Yusuf (عليه السلام).) .
    Pharoah could have left the entire issue to the 'market'. During the years of plenty, the price of food would have fallen and people would have enjoyed a higher standard of living. For example, the lower grain prices could have led to people rearing more cattle and their diets would have improved with more meat.
    However, during the years of famine, grain prices would have risen and those people who had accumulated assets in the years of plenty would be able to pay the higher prices in the famine years. Those who had not had such assets would have starved.
    This assumes a fairly high level of self-discipline on the part of the population, but as Milton Friedman would say, the people would have been 'free to choose'. This is not a hypothetical option. The British lack of action to the Irish potato famine has been attributed to the British government's ideological adherence to a laissez-faire approach to macro-economics:
    https://kenanfellows.org/kfp-cp-sites/cp01/cp01/sites/kfp-cp-sites.localhost.com.cp01/files/LP3_BBC Irish Famine Article for Lab.pdf
    The Bengal famine is another one where government policy was different to the one Prophet Yusuf ((عليه السلام).) prescribed to Pharoah. In this instance, it was lack of government restriction over the action of privateers:
    Going back still further, the Great Bengal Famine of 1770 has been directly attributed to British government laissez-faire economic policy.
    Light interference - provision of information
    A common policy option nowadays, where people do not want direct government intervention is to recommend improving the provision of information to the population who will then be better able to make the correct decisions for themselves. The government could have mounted an information campaign during the years of plenty and told people to hoard food themselves, hoarding when there is no shortage is allowed in Islam.
    However such attempts to influence awareness about the famine to come and changing peoples' attitudes so that they saved more than they were used to, would likely have run against increased social pressures on people to do the opposite. For example typically in societies as wealth increases there is social pressure to spend more, in this case, for example, have more lavish weddings.
    Also providing information would have been a practical benefit for the better off e.g. those with storage capacity, but not so good for the poor (who would not have room to store grain, for example).
    The government (using a bit more intervention) could have given tax breaks to people who owned granaries, to help the poor who needed such facilities. Again this solution would be to focus on market-based interventions and simply alter the working of the market using incentives. Current economic theory holds that people discount future risks very heavily i.e. they don't perceive them as much of a threat as they should. So, for example, just telling people they should save for a pension does not work. 
    So we can likely predict that the solutions described above would not have worked had they tried them.
    Heavy interference
    This is what they actually did.
    In times of plenty, Pharoah's government did not let prices fall as would have happened under free market conditions. They kept prices higher than they otherwise would have been because the government intervened and took excess stocks of grain out of circulation.
    All people (rich and poor alike) had no option but to pay the usual higher prices - effectively, the government was taxing everyone, but this was not seen as a loss by anyone because the prices were no higher than usual.
    The government stored the grain centrally and then they decided to release the grain according to their own policies.
    Assumptions made by Prophet Yusuf's government
    If you leave people to their own devices they may not make the best decisions (whether they are rich or poor), this could be due to: People do not have the resources to cater for future shocks (mainly the poor) People do not have the discipline to address future shocks (applies to both the rich and the poor) The government can make better decisions than individuals acting in their own self-interest because: The government can have access to more and better information than individuals do The government may not be as susceptible to a lack of self-discipline  
    Of all the policy options open to Prophet Yusuf (عليه السلام) he advised Pharoah to pursue the most interventionist one. Some people may be tempted to call this socialist or communist, but I think those terms carry a lot of excess baggage, so I won't bring them into the discussion.
    What I think can be safely inferred from his choice of policy is a fundamental principle that could inform economic policy in any Islamic state.
    Facing an external shock to the Egyptian economy, he went for the option that would cause the least pain to the worst off in society. Other policy options would have caused more pain for the poorest but somewhat less for the better off.
  14. Completely Agree
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, The current chaos in British politics   
    The 2019 UK election
    As some of you may know Britain had an election in 2019 and the Conservative party (aka Tories), who are on the right of the political spectrum won the most seats in the House of Commons. Their leader was Boris Johnson so he became Prime Minister. I'm pointing this out because UK politics works differently to other systems.
    But various scandals plagued his premiership and earlier this year he was forced to stand down.
    Selecting a new Prime Minister
    This triggered the selection of a new Prime Minister amongst Conservative MPs and once they had short-listed some candidates, these people were put to the vote amongst 180,000 people in the UK who were members of the Conservative party.
    All along it had seemed that the front runner in this election was Rishi Sunak, who had served as Chancellor (finance minister) under Johnson and who was widely regarded as competent.
    Ultimately someone else won, her name as you may have heard in recent days is Liz Truss.
    In a series of debates (some televised) she set put her plans for the economy. During these debates Sunak pointed out that they would lead to disaster.
    Liz Truss
    But Truss was selected by the members of her party and she set about implementing her policy. The result was economic chaos, she had to sack her Chancellor (as a scapegoat) and bring in someone new who would reverse the changes that she had promised.
    Today she has had to resign and a new person will be selected by the Tories as leader.
    The oddity
    One thing that stands out over the past few months is the following story that has been occasionally reported in the mainstream media:
    The story is odd because during an election campaign the contestants have a lot of domestic issues to address and debate. Why would a candidate reach out to people about a matter of foreign policy - moving the British embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem?
  15. Completely Agree
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, A link between the Russia/Ukraine conflict and the protests in Iran?   
    [Original posting date October 2022]
    I think there is.
    It's about the Stans
    As the conflict continues there is media coverage being given to:
    Russia's Asian regions who are physically far from the conflict and who have little vested interest in it, some of the people are Muslims Russia's neighbours who are 'independent', but nevertheless have a close relationship with Moscow e.g. Tajikistan and the latter has specifically voiced concerns I think there is a longer-term attempt to take these regions and countries out of Moscow's orbit. In July 2023 the FT lends some support to these assertions with the following report:
    Not repeating Western mistakes made in Iraq and Syria
    The problem that will have been recognised in some quarters is that there is a risk these countries will fall into Iran's sphere of influence, which has been the case to some extent in Iraq. The Syrian war was an attempt to take the country out of Iran's orbit, but that has backfired.
    One way to ensure that the mistakes in Iraq and Syria are not repeated is to go after the IRI itself.
    The Iranian link
    And this is what the current protests in Iran are about, either the IRI is replaced in its entirety or it is so pre-occupied internally that it is not able to address changes taking place in the countries to its north.
    The long term
    Longer term I don't think this is about Russia and Iran as much as it is about China. The aim would be to have China surrounded by states that owe some form of allegiance to NATO.
  16. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Whichever option you choose - you lose   
    [updated in May 2023 to include the Nvidia example and refine the argument overall].
    When you are in a weak position, all the choices you have are bad ones. Your opponent who dominates you due to more and/or better resources will ultimately prevail. It has historically been easy to 'blame' the Palestinians and other indigenous groups for their loss of territory.
    But we are fortunate enough to live through a period where erstwhile powerful nations are being made to suffer the same indignities that others have been through, albeit their loss is not in the domain of geographic territory, rather it's technological leadership.
    What this experience should teach everyone is that losers don't necessarily end up losing because they are feckless or stupid, rather the cards may just be stacked against them.
    I've always thought that since British Mandate the Palestinians have been in a no-win position. This has been due to their lack of military power and economic and political resources. If they accepted the offers the international community and the Israelis gave them, there would have been an incentive for the Israelis to take more land (if the Pals don't mind yielding some land, they might not mind yielding more), and if the Pals had resisted, that would also have given the Israelis a pretext to take more land (for defensive purposes), the latter has proven to be the case.
    In short, whatever the Pals decided did not matter; the Israelis' dominant position ensured that they could respond in a manner that was advantageous to them. The same applies to Native American Indians in the 18th and 19th centuries; whether their response to European settlers was to fight or make treaties, the outcome would always be the same, their lands would be taken. In both cases, there was such an asymmetry between the Europeans and indigenous peoples that there was nothing the colonised could do that would change the outcome.
    In the examples that follow, I look at some contemporary examples that illustrate a different dynamic. In these instances, non-Western powers have presented the West with situations where regardless of the actions the West takes, the outcome for the West will not be one that it considers satisfactory.
    Huawei - China
    The following piece in the Financial Times (FT) neatly summarises how I feel about the situation between the U.S. government and Huawei. In the 21st century, it is beginning to look as if the Chinese have the best cards. For example, Huawei makes good and cost-effective telecoms infrastructure.
    Western countries may have security concerns, but if they ban Huawei, they could end up with a poorer solution. Other countries that have no such qualms could benefit from the cost advantages that Huawei equipment offers. But if Western countries accept Huawei, they risk entrenching the advantages that the Chinese have, as well as the claimed security risks.
    Sanctions have been a preferred Western method of taking action against countries that have fallen out of favour. But this tool only works where you have something the other person wants and can't get anywhere else; when the situation is reversed - you can end up damaging yourself.
    Jensen Huang of the American chipmaker Nvidia makes a similar claim in May 2023:
    SWIFT - Russia
    This example arose during the Russian invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022. The West wanted to sanction Russia by imposing economic sanctions, including barring Russian entities from access to Western financial systems. But this was not straightforward:
    Sic transit gloria mundi (so passes worldly glory)
    Some of what we see today has the hallmarks of British attempts to stop Indian technological development by banning the Indians from making their own steam engines, at the start of the 20th century. The British may have delayed Indian development by some decades, but that's all they were able to do. Whether the British took no action to stop Indian technological development or whether they proactively tried to hinder it, ultimately, they would lose. 
    There are now far too many Indians with increasing levels of capability to stop the juggernaut.
    The status quo
    In mid-2022, following a visit to Taiwan by Senator Pelosi, the FT noted this about the Chinese response to the visit:
    In my opinion, it was Pelosi who altered the status quo; this was the most high-ranking visit in 25 years. Based on the theme of this blog post, given the dominant position of the Chinese, the American position should be to maintain the status quo. As soon as they seek to alter it, the Chinese have an excuse to try and establish a new status quo that is more favourable to them.
    In the context of China, I think the U.S. government feels a threat to its economic/technological dominance. Although this may be dressed up as wanting to preserve fair competition. And U.S. sanctions are its attempt to fight back. But whether the U.S. decides to fight or not, I think in the longer term, that dominance will have to be compromised. Huawei and the Chinese are now too far along the technological path of development, and they are far further ahead than the India of the early 20th century. 
    The U.S. is now in a similar technological position versus the Chinese that the Palestinians have been versus the Israelis. In the U.S./China context is issues centre around technology and in the Palestinian/Israeli context it's to do with economics and political power.
    Whatever option the US chooses, it will ultimately 'lose'. Loss in this context is not necessarily wholly ceding technological leadership to the Chinese, but it may well involve acknowledging their superiority in certain areas. Other countries like Russia also may be able to work their way around sanctions, for example, so Western attempts to control their behaviour will have limited success.
  17. Thanks
    Hameedeh reacted to Qa'im for a blog entry, The Sun Will Rise From Where It Set   
    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
    A famous eschatological expression is that the Sun will rise from the West ( طلوع الشمس من المغرب من المحتوم ). In Muslim, the Prophet Muhammad (s) says, "When three things appear, a person's faith will not avail him if he had not believed before or did not earn goodness from his faith: (1) The rising of the Sun from its setting place, (2) The Dajjal, and (3) The Beast of the Earth." (ثلاث إذا خرجن لا ينفع نفسا إيمانها لم تكن آمنت من قبل أو كسبت في إيمانها خيرا: طلوع الشمس من مغربها، و الدجال ودابة الأرض ).
    In my reading of the hadith literature, there is a strong indication that this Sun is not the star that our Earth rotates around, but actually a man. The Sun is a luminous golden object that brings light, clarity, guidance, warmth, and the growth of our crops. A narration about the Mahdi says, "The one whom Jesus the son of Mary will pray behind is the twelfth from the progeny, the ninth from the loins of al-Husayn b. `Ali [a]. He is the Sun that will rise from its setting place." ( إن الذي يصلي عيسى بن مريم خلفه هو الثاني عشر من العترة ، التاسع من ولد الحسين بن علي عليهما السلام وهو الشمس الطالعة من مغربها ).
    A careful study of the Quran will show that light represents the religion (61:8, which Allah will always preserve) and guidance (2:257). 33:46 describes the Prophet as "an illuminated lamp" (siraj, a word also used for "Sun"), and 5:15 describes him as a "light". In one hadith, the Imam as-Sadiq describes the Prophet as the Sun in Surat ash-Shams ( الشمس رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله به أوضح الله عز وجل للناس دينهم ), and in another hadith, the "day" in 92:2 that follows the night is the Mahdi who will arise after oppression ( والنهار إذا تجلى قال: النهار هو القائم منا أهل البيت إذا قام غلب دولة الباطل ). The Mahdi's occultation is compared to that of the Sun behind the clouds ( وأما وجه الانتفاع بي في غيبتي فكالانتفاع بالشمس إذا غيبتها عن الابصار السحاب ).
    These comparisons between the Mahdi and the Sun is a similitude to the Prophet. The Mahdi is the most similar man to the Prophet, because he is like him in form and in character ( أشبه الناس بي خلقا وخلقا ), and he will openly declare and explain the religion to the world. The Mahdi will take his example until Islam becomes dominant, manifest, clear, and overspreading ( بسيرة ما سار به رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله حتى يظهر الاسلام ). 39:69 says that the "Earth will shine with the light of its Lord", and the hadiths indicate that it will shine by the light of the Mahdi's coming ( وأشرقت الارض بنور ربها " قال رب الارض يعني إمام الارض، ).
    This begs the question: if the Mahdi is the Sun, what does it mean to rise from its place of setting? Rather than saying that there would be a change of the Earth's axis, we should consider the root of the word gharb (غرب). It has come to mean "set", but in its most basic sense, it means "to become a stranger, odd, obscure, difficult to comprehend, and to go away and depart". This is because the Sun passes above us, then becomes "estranged" from us and leaves us, setting in the West. A stranger in Arabic is a ghareeb. This brings us to the Prophetic hadith, "Islam began as a stranger, and it shall return as a stranger, so blessed are the strangers" ( إن الاسلام بدا غريبا وسيعود كما بدا فطوبى للغربا ). Just as the Prophet came by himself to an adverse society, Islam would return in the Mahdi, who would be estranged from his community and coming with a call that most people will not be familiar with. It is said that, by the time of his coming, the religion of Islam will be barely recognizable from the principles taught by our Prophet, so much so that it will be as though the Mahdi is bringing a new religion. Imam `Ali said that the Qa'im would recommence Islam just as the Prophet did ( إذا قام القائم عليه السلام استأنف دعاء جديدا كما دعا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله ), and Imam Ja`far repeated the same idea ( يستأنف الداعي منا دعاء جديدا كما دعا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله ).
    Just as the Mahdi faded into obscurity, he would return out of that obscurity. He is currently in the clouds, which is to say that the occultation has surrounded him in opaque confusion, but that his affect on the Earth is still present. His companions will also be strangers who are not recognized ( إذا يستغني الناس عن ضوء الشمس ونور القمر ويجتزون بنور الامام ), and they are gathered with him like cirrus clouds ( فيظهر في ثلاثمائة وثلاثة عشر رجلا عدة أهل بدر على غير ميعاد قزعا كقزع الخريف رهبان بالليل أسد بالنهار ). "At that time people will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory." (Mark 13:26) When he returns, "mankind shall have no need of the light of the Sun and the light of the Moon, and they shall pass by the light of the Imam." ( إذا يستغني الناس عن ضوء الشمس ونور القمر ويجتزون بنور الامام ). Meaning, they will be able to go directly to the Imam for guidance, and we will no longer need to seek out other sources of light.
    May Allah hasten his luminous coming.

  18. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Pyramids, aliens & God   
    The theory that the pyramids were built or had their construction guided by extraterrestrials is challenged by the existence of mistakes in the construction of some of them.
    But I think the Egyptians were privy to Divine Guidance, which in itself is interesting because the evidence of a Pharoah moving from polytheism to monotheism supports Qur'anic teaching as I understand it.
    The bent pyramid at Dahshur
    There is a populist theory that the pyramids must have had an alien inspiration. This is because of the range of innovations that they represent and knowledge across multiple disciplines and their orientation towards certain constellations.
    My problem with this theory is the bent pyramid at Dahshur. It's bent, because they got the maths wrong (see the picture I took a few years ago below). It's weird that aliens who managed to get to this planet but then got their measurements for a stone structure wrong. Seems pretty clear to me that the pyramids we see represent the refinement and development of Egyptian technology, rather than discrete alien intervention. Also supporting my contention is a landscape literally littered with smaller pyramids, these people were learning, developing and increasing the scale of their creations as they grew more confident.

    If not aliens then who?
    My understanding of the Qur'anic references to Pharaoh is that they provide an example of a powerful leader, with immense resources, who was nevertheless brought down by divine intervention. The Pharaohs were representatives of a culture with a level of scientific, organisational, military and communications capability unknown at that time and for a long time yet to come.
    Indeed the very existence of mistakes in their work and subsequent improvements demonstrates that they had the capability to learn. Nevertheless the fact that the Pharoah of the time of Moses was brought down by believers in Allah who were weaker in numbers and military strength, is a sign to subsequent rulers around the world about how weak their position can be.

    And importantly the Qur'an tells us that the evidence of such civilisations is there for us to observe in order for us to better understand the message that is being conveyed to us:

    A final thought
    Were the ancient Egyptians privy to Divine guidance? I think there is evidence in the Qur'an that they may have been. Here are some references to Allah communicating with other cultures.



    And indeed there is material in the historical record that at least one Pharoah (Akhenaten) tried to promulgate a faith that had similarities to monotheism. The initiative did not last very long and in the reign of the next Pharoah (Tutankhamun) the Egyptians reverted to polytheism. I use the phrase similarities to monotheism because although he removed references to the pantheon of deities that the Egyptians previously worshipped, his new religion nevertheless involved worship of the sun.
    The following extract is from a book published within the last few years that addresses head on the issue of monotheism and Akhenaten's rule.
    Hoffmeier, J.K., 2015. Akhenaten and the Origins of Monotheism. Oxford University Press.
    Perhaps Akhenaten was amongst the many Prophets that we believe have been sent by God at different times and places to different cultures? I am speculating here, but perhaps the message was corrupted? Still, I would like to believe that the archaeological evidence of Akhenaten's rule supports the idea that Allah's message was not restricted to just the children of Abraham.
    See Also
  19. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Could vs. should   
    Jurassic Park
    Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park says "You were so preoccupied with whether or not you could, you never bothered to ask if you should."
    Are changing attitudes towards transgenderism a function of technology?
    Would it be a fair assessment of human history to say that whenever we have developed the capability to do something we have, and whether or not we should has not really stopped us? The current debates around transgenderism reflect this, I think. It's more than a co-incidence that the awareness and attitudes around this have arisen at a time when the technology exists for individuals to effect gender re-assignment.
    The latter has made more culturally acceptable (at least in the West) an aspect of sexuality that was previously hardly discussed or even visible. In my opinion it was because westerners did not find it culturally acceptable to see transgendered men in everyday life that had been accepted in countries like India for centuries, though their status was marginal at best.
    Genetic modification
    The same issues arise when it comes to technology around genetics for example, where codes of ethics need to evolve to deal with developments about what is now possible. Clearly there will be a concomitant pressure on religious authorities to pass judgements on an increasingly wider array of issues. Some of these religious edicts will need to happen after the technology has developed, in other instances existing edicts will cover future developments, as argued in the following thread that I created about the intimate possibilities with androids.
    Nuclear and biological weapons come to mind as technologies that we can, but don't use. But in both instances it is the threat of retaliation which stops us. But where there has been little prospect of retaliation, people have used them, e.g. Churchil using chemical weapons in Iraq in the early 20th century.
    The implications for ulema
    As new rulings are needed to cater for technological developments that have significant moral, ethical and religious implications surely the power wielded by ulema will increase? There is the possibility that the variations in rulings between mar'je increase or alternatively they remain broadly similar. It will be interesting to see how religion evolves (or does not) as the broader technological environment develops.
  20. Completely Agree
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Doing your own 'research'   
    Note: I'll be updating the initial entry with additional points over time, as discussions elsewhere on Shiachat help me to flesh out the original arguments.
    In this essay I discuss why the theory behind 'Do your own research' (DYOR) does not live up to reality and the negative consequences that this can have for those who follow it.
    What I will also do is to examine how the whole notion of informed decision making fits within a broader ideological framework and why some groups of people favour it.
    My conclusion will be that in the case of covid, owners of capital whose prosperity depends on commercial economic activity, rely on individuals exercising DYOR and thereby making choices that sustain economic activity but which have poor health outcomes for those individuals.
    The popularity of 'do your own research' (DYOR)
    This is a phrase that we are increasingly hearing. It sounds good, since it refers to going out and gathering information in order to make informed decisions. Making sense of information and data, drawing inferences from it and then acting upon them are all activities that should be encouraged. But that conclusion misses a broader set of issues. What are those issues? Here is a hint:
    On the one hand you have public health officials, ostensibly driven by the need to protect the health of the public, who recommend government diktat. On the other hand we have politicians from a political party that favours business challenging these recommendations. In addition the lawmakers recommend alternatives to lockdowns that require consumers to make their own 'informed' choices.
    This leads to the ideological context of DYOR.
    Do your own research and the wider ideology
    The debate between personal liberty and the role of the State is an old one. Here is an extract from John Stuart Mills' essay 'On Liberty' written in 1859:
    John Stuart Mill. On Liberty (Kindle Locations 7017-7020). Kindle Edition. 
    So Mill does recognise the occasional need for the freedom's of individuals to be curtailed, but he places a condition on this - the need to prevent harm to others.
    And as we have seen nearly 150 years later the DYOR agenda that is being promoted is very one much one that suggests that covid is not harmful, that (lockdowns and social distancing measures that would affect economic activity) don't reduce the harm and indeed various easily obtainable drugs (that would allow us to carry on as normal) can reduce the harm.
    In summary the DYOR promoters seek to diminish the health impact of Covid, because if they were to admit it, the role of the State to interfere with personal liberty would have to be accepted. Instead of the latter the DYOR promoters want people to make their own risk assessments and then act on them as a result of personal choice. However as we'll see later this is not a long term solution.
    Why is DYOR promoted?
    The reason why some groups in society promote DYOR is because it sounds good in principle, but it does not work in practice. If it did work in practice, the people who promote it would no longer do so! This sounds counter-intuitive, (why should someone promote something that does not work) but there is a logic behind it. 
    Based on the view of the economist Oliver Williamson ordinary people are notoriously bad at gathering information, analysing it and then making use of it, something he refers to as bounded rationality. This is why people continue to smoke after the link with cancer has been proven and why the cigarette industry is happy to go along with whatever restrictions are placed on it (except for outright bans). This is why firms that sell fatty and sugary foods are happy to place information on their packaging (the more complicated the better) rather than have taxes imposed or even outright bans.
    Some politicians and businesses encourage people to 'do their own research' because they know that most of the time people will get it wrong. The same groups support models of behaviour change that say to people you are ultimately free to make informed choices from an array of products and services that vary in terms of how good or bad they are for you. 
    However the experience over time has been that when faced with such choices people will invariably make poor ones, which injure their health but which are profitable to the promoters. 
    An illustration of this perspective in action is provided in the following thread on Shiachat. A poster wrote about a medical problem that they were facing and another poster provided a link to a series of YouTube videos that recommended a remedy. However the author of those videos is not a medical doctor and indeed has a commercial angle to their video channel. In response to my hiding those videos I received the following reply:
    This sums up the thinking that I am referring to above. This is the belief that adults should be free to make up their own minds based on the free flow of information and anything that restricts the latter is bad and counts as 'censorship'. The same view disregards the fact that the information could be biased and delivered by someone whose motivation is not benevolent. This view also disregards the fact that many people will not drill deep enough to find out that it is biased!
    What happens when people do their own research?
    When anti-vaxxers for example tell others to do their own 'research', they are either being naive or deliberately taking advantage of others. Because what do you research? What papers do you read and do you trust what they have to say?
    People tend to read what is understandable to them and for most people that will be the polemic in a blog rather than scientific papers.
    Reading the latter requires a certain minimum education and indeed patience and time, that most people do not have. So they end up reading material published by conspiracy theorists which is easy to read, but which glosses over technical issues and may just even be wrong. The following quotation is from a scientist who says that his work has been misused by conspiracy theorists and he explains why:
    So why do people fall for the DYOR baloney?
    Because it makes them feel powerful. Following a comment below I feel I should clarify what I mean by 'powerful', since it's possible to misconstrue what I mean. My usage of the term is closer to what social psychologists may refer to as 'behavioural control'. This term is used to reflect situations such as for example being able to cook with healthier ingredients because someone has taught you how to do so.
    The conspiracy theorists however subvert what is good and noble into something wholly unethical. They encourage people to believe that they have behavioural control by making simple what is complex, by misinforming, using anecdotes where statistics would be more relevant and so on. And the reason for doing this is to make their message easier to understand, more interesting to watch, share and more likely to elicit an emotional reaction.
    This is not dissimilar to the recent growth in investing apps, which have drawn the following criticism (emphasis is mine):
    The above context is wholly different to dealing with a pandemic, but what is common to both is people offering us a false illusion of having control over our destiny.
    Having processed YouTube videos people feel that they have done their 'research' and that they can now make an informed choice. The choice making seems more 'rational' and in a cultural and educational environment where we have been brought up to celebrate rationality this seems like a good thing, in and of itself.  
    So in comparison to following government edicts to wear face masks, the 'own research' crowd watch some videos and consciously choose not to do so on the basis of information that they have gathered. They are therefore exercising behavioural control over their lives in a manner that they could not previously. And when challenged they can cite 'evidence' that supports their position - further enhancing their behavioural control.
    The reality is of course, that wearing a mask costs very little in terms of money and behaviour change. There are many benefits to others in addition to any to the wearer. But the anti-maskers are told that wearing a mask is some kind of subjugation to government control. Choosing not to wear a mask because someone tells you that you'll breathe more CO2 as a result, sounds like an informed decision that gives you control over your own life.
    God, nihilism and the human condition
    This new section was inspired by the following post:
    At one extreme then, the individual can feel that there is so much in the way of different perspectives, error on all sides etc. that we simply cannot identify what is the right course of healthy behaviour and what is not. In my opinion that reflects a worldview which questions God's benevolence.
    In my opinion the theist would always believe that God provides us with the critical faculties that enable us to follow the right course of action. The human condition in my view is one where we have to endeavour to find what that right course of action is - and it takes cognitive effort and it requires us not to give in to emotion or laziness.
    And just as the above increasingly become more challenging in a more technologically advanced world, so the tools that we have available to help us increase in their sophistication and effectiveness.
    Technology allows us to keep a record of who said what and when. In the case of covid-19 we know who downplayed the seriousness of the virus from the start (likely because of their need to protect their economic interests) and we also know who recommended an abundance of caution because they knew that in the long-run a healthy population will be better off economically. Those people who took the virus seriously encourage mask wearing, social distancing and vaccinating.
    That information can be used to follow individuals on social media, who have the medical expertise and benevolence to support your interests. Once you follow a reliable expert you can:
    See who else they follow And you can then also follow the health experts they follow  
    Few if any people are capable of 'doing their own research'. Ultimately it becomes a matter of choosing who you decide to believe. And in that regard it becomes a matter of assessing someone's character, their education, and their track record. People who believe in the concept of taqlid know exactly what the issues are here.
    1. See the following blog entry I had made for a further explanation about why people can make poor choices:
    2. I am attaching a copy of a paper titled, 'Why is changing health behaviour so difficult', published in the academic journal Public Health. The paper identifies some common mistakes public policy officials make when designing behaviour modification programmes. 
    Why is changing health behaviour so difficult.pdf
  21. Like
    Hameedeh got a reaction from Jeremiah M for a blog entry, ♥ Marriage ♥   
    Marriage is not easy. You have to get to know each other. You are used to doing everything your own way. Now you need to compromise. Share with each other. Give and take. If you take more than you give, it won't be as sweet. Do not expect more from your spouse than your spouse will need from you. Life is good. It's better when you are together. If you both do your best. 
    ♥ May your days be sunny, your nights restful, and your heart satisfied with the blessings that Allah has given you. Think Positive. ♥
  22. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Favourite Threads   
    Mainly for personal use as a shortcut. I've put a link to this post on my browser menubar, makes life much easier.
    It'll get in your way for a short while, sorry.
  23. My Prayers
    Hameedeh got a reaction from Mzwakhe for a blog entry, Be Positive   
    The Seventh Imam, Musa Ibn Ja'far Al-Kadhim AS was living in the Holy City of Medina, and while he was praying at the tomb of the Holy Prophet SA, he was arrested, then the tyrant Harun ar-Rashid kept him in prison in Baghdad for almost four years in a cell so small he could not stand up tall to say his prayers. On the 25th of Rajab, Harun had Imam Kadhim AS martyred by poison. Even his corpse was desecrated and taken from the prison and left in view on the Bridge of Baghdad. His devotees managed to bury Imam Kazim AS in al-Kazimiyyah (Iraq). Although Imam Kazem AS was living under complete oppression, he kept positive. May Allah SWT keep us all on the straight path and keep us positive.
    ♥ May your days be sunny, your nights restful, and your heart satisfied with the blessings that Allah has given you. Think Positive. ♥
  24. Like
    Hameedeh got a reaction from Al-Hassan for a blog entry, Minimalism   
    Two years ago I became a minimalist. I'm not talking about music, sculpture or painting, but minimalism in my life. I read about creating a minimalist home, but I did not buy the book:
    So, I am thrifty and I buy very little. Whenever I am shopping and see a dozen things I want to own, I question myself. Do I have storage space for this? Is this really necessary? Will I really love it or is it just something that I never had before and always wanted to have one? Just wanting to possess something is not a good reason to buy it. Could I take a photo of it and just look at it, without spending my money? This must be a good reason to join Pinterest, to have all the things you want to look at, but never need to buy, store or move them. 
    As you have seen, my ShiaChat blog is minimalist by nature. I usually say very little, because if there is one thing that I know, it is that I recognize great writing when I see it, but I am not a good writer. I hope to become a better writer some day, and in the meantime, I invite you to my tumblr. Please, if you can, start at the last page which shows my first post (a prayer for the safety of 12th Imam AJ) and then scroll your way up, and over to previous pages in chronological order, the way my brain was working. 
    ♥ May your days be sunny, your nights restful, and your heart satisfied with the blessings that Allah has given you. Think Positive. ♥
  25. Like
    Hameedeh reacted to Haji 2003 for a blog entry, Anna Pavlovna's tea party   
    This story is about a tea party, but actually it isn't about the party.
    It isn't about the party that Anna Pavlovna holds, the one that many people know about but about whose subsequent events they remain unfamiliar. In fact if I wanted to I could try really hard and remind myself of the time I attended, but as I said that's not really the purpose of this story.
    You see Sakina many people arrive at Anna Pavlovna's party with high hopes and expectations. They have a self-image of their literary prowess and they want to be able to tell everyone else that not only did they attend but that they experienced everything else that happened afterwards as well.
    I was a bit like that to be honest. The first time I went I was about your age. I'd heard a lot about Anna Pavlovna's world and I wanted to be able to casually mention to friends and associates that I'd been. And so I would try so very very hard to get to know the attendees and to be honest it was impossible. I made many attempts and never got further than the entrance to the party itself.
    So I tried a different tack.
    I'd try less hard.
    Instead of trying to get as far into this world as I could and meet as many people as I could, as quickly as I could, I would take the opposite approach.
    I would only spend so much time at the party and I would stop, no matter how engaging the characters and no matter how interesting the stories that they had to tell.
    And the next day I would come back to where I had left off and the people and the stories would still be there and slowly but surely I'd have the impetus to find out a little more about them and the following day a little bit more and so on.
    In fact their lives became a little soap opera for me that went on for over a year and that's how I finished War & Peace.
  • Create New...