Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله


Advanced Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Mohammed-Mehdi last won the day on February 2

Mohammed-Mehdi had the most liked content!

About Mohammed-Mehdi

  • Rank
    Level 4 Member

Profile Information

  • Religion

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

5,359 profile views
  1. @Hameedeh , @Hassan- , if you know someone who (might) know about this, feel free to tag them, thanks in advance all.
  2. Perhaps this has already been answered in another topic; feel free to post it down below. If you have to pray while traveling on the train, how should one approach this issue? There is (most of the time) not a place where you can stand and pray without forming an obstacle for other passengers. Does this mean you have to pray while in a seat? If yes, what rules for this kind of prayer? What about the Qibla? If one can find a place where he can stand and pray, he can choose the right Qibla at the start of the prayer and just finish his prayers like even if the train starts turning? In this case, it is about Morning prayer. Note: it is not possible to pray before entering the train due to not the correct time for salat, and after arriving will be too late (Qadha/ and lessons begin) I am a follower of Sayyed Al Sistani (MAPHL) Please provide information or tag people who might know (some of) this Please provide sources of Sayyed Al Sistani or tell me where I should look Any other important point for your brother on this is very welcome. May Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) Grant you Success
  3. @hasanhh Interesting, will look into it INsha'Allah The Bad The good The Ugly, contains some problems if I remember correctly, but it was very good to watch as well. What do you think?
  4. With translation

    please write done the lyrics in orginal language if you can

  5. @hasanhh What do you think about Clint Eastwood movies? Like 'm? Other movies you are now reminded of (classics/...) ?
  6. Iran in words and pictures at Vienna intl. book fair http://www.hamidkasiri.com/
  7.  Anyone who can translate this feel free to do so for us

  8. @hasanhh I had my own valid criticism of at least one small statement/idea of the speech, indeed. (Yours sounds familiar point, but haven't watched it yet) But still, I do I appreciate it very much and consider it great work of the brother.
  9. ( Personalities: What Non-Muslims Say About Muhammad, The Prophet of Islam )
  10. The Queen neglects her duty to defend Britain's 'unity'
  11. https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/11/05/610450/United Kingdom-House-of-Commons-Corruption House of Commons or House of Corruption Tue Nov 5, 2019 02:24PM [Updated: Tue Nov 5, 2019 02:29PM ] Home United Kingdom Politics British parliamentarians have been repeatedly exposed to be vulnerable to financial corruption The House of Commons is often touted by the British establishment as a bastion of democracy and the oldest Parliament in the world. The House of Commons’ official website (www.parliament.United Kingdom) describes the modern British Parliament as “one of the oldest continuous representative assemblies in the world”. The British establishment also has a habit of depicting the House of Commons as squeaky clean, a House that is inhabited by loyal servants of the people. But to what extent is this portrayal an accurate description of the state of affairs in the British Parliament? Most people will remember the parliamentary expenses scandal of 2009 in which hundreds of MPs were proven to be improperly claiming expenses. Once the investigation into the full scope of the scandal was completed, it was revealed that more than half the House – 389 MPs in total – had improperly claimed expenses. The Daily Mail reported on February 05, 2010, that MPs had claimed a record £95.6 million in expenses in 2008-09, an increase on £92.9 million the year before. But astonishingly, a full year after the scandal came to light, hundreds of MPs were still enjoying the “gravy train” (to quote from The Daily Mail). The irony of the scandal was that in the end MPs were ordered to repay a total of £1.1 million (a fraction of the expenses that had been improperly claimed) whilst the enquiry into the scandal, led by Sir Thomas Legg, cost £1.16 million. Despite the gravity of the scandal, only a handful of MPs were prosecuted for what amounted to the theft of public funds. And amongst the prosecutions only six Parliamentarians – four members of the House of Commons and two members of the House of Lords – were sent to prison. The longest sentence – a mere 18 months – was imposed on David Chaytor, former Labour MP for Bury North. He was given an 18 months custodial sentence in January 2011 but was released in May 2011 after serving only a third of his sentence. But the expenses scandal was preceded by the Life Peerages scandal (also known as the Cash for Honours scandal) of 2006-2007, which centred on the connection between political donations and the award of life peerages. The scandal reached epic proportions in December 2006 when Tony Blair became the first ever serving British Prime Minister to be questioned by police officers investigating allegations of corruption. Blair was questioned by police for a second time in late January 2007 over cash-for-honours allegations. The investigation into the scandal led to a series of arrests of powerful individuals at the heart of the British establishment, including former government advisor, Desmond Smith, former director of Government Relations at 10 Downing Street, Ruth Turner and former chief fundraiser for the Labour party, Lord Michael Levy. Another unprecedented feature of the case was the police’s questioning of serving government ministers, including Patricia Hewitt (former Secretary of State for Health) and Jack McConnell (the former First Minister of Scotland). In a damning review of the scandal, The Telegraph wrote in April 12, 2008, that the scandal had “rocked Whitehall to its core” as “stunned officials watched as a series of Number 10’s most powerful figures were arrested or questioned by officers on the investigating team”. Yet another parliamentary-related scandal broke out in March 2010 after four former Labour cabinet ministers were accused of offering to use their political influence in return for substantial payments. The then MPs Stephen Byers, Patricia Hewitt, Geoff Hoon and Margaret Moran, were secretly recorded discussing payment with an undercover reporter posing as a company executive seeking to hire MPs for lobbying work. A similar scandal, dubbed “cash for access”, engulfed former foreign secretaries Jack Straw and Malcolm Rifkind in February 2015. The two establishment giants were initially accused of breaching the parliamentary code of conduct. Straw and Rifkind were secretly filmed by an undercover reporter, whilst offering to use their positions on behalf of a fictitious Chinese company, in return for substantial financial remuneration. Two years later, a different form of scandal, one centred on sexual corruption, engulfed Westminster. The scandal, which broke out in October 2017, implicated leading MPs, including Tory MP, Chris Pincher, who was forced to step down as a government whip after accusations of improper behaviour towards women. But the biggest victim of the “Westminster sexual scandal” was former defence secretary, Sir Michael Fallon, who was forced to resign after complaints about his conduct by a Conservative party activist. The scandal prompted former Prime Minister, Theresa May, to call for a “new culture of respect”, but critics doubt if there is sufficient will to change Westminster’s toxic attitude to sexuality. In addition, a series of other scandals has ensnared individual parliamentarians from both Houses. In July 2015, Lord Sewel was forced to resign from the House of Lords after being filmed taking drugs with prostitutes. And these are only the scandals that have come to the public’s attention at the right time. There have been cases where the truth about the corrupt conduct of British parliamentarians has only come to light following their death. The most notorious case involved the late Cyril Smith, a former Liberal party MP, who was revealed to have engaged in serial child sexual abuse after his death in 2010. In a further twist, it was later revealed that the British security service, MI5, knew the truth about Cyril Smith but had (for unknown reasons) influenced prosecutors to take no action against the paedophile MP. How many more Cyril Smiths are out there? Rupert Cansell, Investigative Journalist
  • Create New...