Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

tek91

Banned
  • Posts

    652
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tek91

  1. The blood on the Altar was not washed. Did you read the verse the blood was sprinkled on the sides and the blood was DRAINED in the foundation of the ALTAR. The flour was placed UPON that Altar. Meaning the flour was mixed with the blood on the ALTAR. It's not difficult to understand.
  2. So you are saying he was telling them not to believe in him ? The verse is clear he tells them to forgive others and to confess and ask God to forgive them. The method in which forgiveness is made is through the blood of Yeshua.
  3. Read what the verses say They asked Yeshua for a sign to us (the Jews) and Yeshua said destroy this temple and in three days I WILL RAISE IT UP. Yeshua was saying that the sign they would all know is that his body would be killed and in three days he would raise it up. That sign came to pass. His body was destroyed and three days later he rose from the dead.
  4. God did not murder his Son he gave his son as a blood sacrifice for Remission of sins. To pay the penalty that we deserve God did that out of love to save you and me and make a way for us to have a relationship with him. And you are spitting at what he did. Muhammad is dead in the grave and could not offer you eternal life or guarantee you heaven. He claimed to be a man of God and yet he did not even know if he was good enough to make it to heaven in Judgement Day. Yeshua conquered death and promises us eternal life and bled and died for our sin and reconciliation. The choice is simple.
  5. The type of animal didn't matter Read Leviticus Lambs were offered for sin Also what did Abraham prophecy to his son? When his son asked where is the lamb for the burnt offering. And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.
  6. You have yet to show a clear verse outlining another way. You have also yet to show that sins and good deeds are put in some balance o decide who goes to heaven and hell. I am still waiting for one clear verse
  7. He does not deal harshly because he made blood atonement for us. What I try to tell you is that it's impossible to be sinless to be acceptable to God without our sins being atoned through blood which is taught throughout the OT and NT. No person in history can live out a sinless life (Except Yeshua) God always gave a substitude in the torah by blood sacrifices and in the gospel by the Lamb of God blood for blood life for life
  8. No Yeshua did his Fathers business he knew his purpose and what would happen to him. Think of it like a book God already has the book written and knows everything that will happen yet the story still happens. Likewise Yeshua just did his purpose and knew that it was going to lead to his death as he knew that was his cross to bear and that he had to drink of the cup. (He expressed what was going to happen to him many times) It was his destiny the reason he came down from heaven.
  9. Yes if the blameless people in the Torah and NT did not give animal sacrifices or have faith in Yeshua and his blood. They will go to hell. Those blameless people like Job participated in the Leviticus blood sacrifices daily under the law and in the NT by the final sacrifice of Yeshua. God's Lamb
  10. Yeshua never commited any evil he lived a sinless life he was tempted by satan and never sinned. All the HB says is that good and evil are creations and they are put there for a choice. We can choose to do good or evil to obey or to sin and there are consequences for our actions. This shows that God is in full control it doesn't mean that God is evil or that God does evil thing. God hates evil and hates murder and rape and sin and wants us to do what is right and reject evil. You say people create evil that is illogical because people have no power to create good or evil. Those two things are a choice given to us.
  11. I said the same thing about records in the bible and you said it's fable because historians never recorded it. now you show your hypocrisy. The difference is the Earthquake only happened in Israel, meanwhile Mohammad breaking the moon in half would have been felt and seen by EVERYONE and would have been reported by NASA. Where is the report by NASA that 1500 years ago the moon split in half. Where are outside quran sources ? Like you said no where it was just a made up myth the moon splitting never happened. In 2010, NASA Lunar Science Institute (NLSI) staff scientist Brad Bailey said, "No current scientific evidence reports that the Moon was split into two (or more) parts and then reassembled at any point in the past." The narrative was used by some later Muslims to convince others of the prophethood of Muhammad.
  12. You watch too many Walking Dead show. There was no Zombies. The bible says that the bodies of the SAINTS started walking the streets of Jerusalem this is because of what Yeshua did when he became atonement for sin. The saints can go to heaven and so can we by faith in Yeshua and his blood, the blood shed for Remission of sins. If you don't receive God's gift and keep the lie that he never died, you will find yourself burning forever. Mohammad nor your quran will save you and you will not be able to say no one ever WARNED YOU.
  13. He's a Roman historian and a governor his job is not to mock but report. Paul is saying that the crucifixion that they preach is hard to understand to many Jews and sounds like foolishness to gentiles. He is not saying that this dude in the future named Tacticus would make jokes about a crucifixion. Read it it was not a joke but a statement about the Christians who Nero blamed for the fire. Tacticus was telling their history and showing how their leader (Yeshua) was KILLED by Pontius Pilate. There is no hint of a joke or sarcasm. inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, You really need to stop with denials and your silly way of debating It's obvious Tacticus reported that Yeshua was killed by Pontius Pilate. All Romans knew that no one can survive a full CRUCIFIXION it's impossible. And NO ONE EVER believed he did some houdini act and pushed someone else to the cross and ran LOL that is just so silly.
  14. Yea that's what some Judaism believe. They believe if we are worthy Messiah will come in the clouds, but if unworthy, he will come riding in a donkey. Messianic Jews believe the prophecies have been fulfilled and the rest will be fulfilled, he first came in a donkey and will come in the clouds. I showed you how Yeshua himself said that you shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and COMING IN THE CLOUDS OF HEAVEN. Referencing the vision Daniel saw in the night of the Son of Man in the clouds.
  15. No Jew believes two messiahs will come in the end of days There are Judaism and Messianic Jews Judaism believe 1 messiah will fulfill ALL prophecies by himself Messianic Jews believe Messiah fulfilled the suffering servant for sin prophecies and will fulfill the rest when he comes back.
  16. No where in the torah or tanach says that messiah would come in one turn. It talks that he would first come to make an end to sins, make reconciliation for iniquity and bring in everlasting righteousness ALL BEFORE THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SECOND TEMPLE. You all missed it. In the End of days Yeshua the LORD will come as a LION and rule over the Earth for 1000 years but first he had to come and be God's Lamb. Why are you even referring Paul I hardly even used Paul in any of my debates lol
  17. It's a lengthy subject basically Isaiah 53 and Daniel mentions that the anointed one Messiah would be cut off for sin of others before the destruction of the 2nd temple. Daniel speaks of the anointed one would put an end to sin, atone iniquity, bring in everlasting righteousness and then it says Messiah will be CUT OFF, but not for HIMSELF, then it says that the people of the prince which is to come shall destroy the city and the temple. This was prophesied in the 70 weeks of years meaning that ALL THIS HAD TO HAPPEN BEFORE THE SECOND TEMPLE is destroyed which happened in 70 AD This is only Daniel don't let me get started in Isaiah 53 my friend
  18. The Blasphemy was the reason the JEWS found Yeshua worthy of DEATH Rebellion was the reason they used to manipulate Pontius Pilate to order the EXECUTION since the JEWS had no power to EXECUTE get it
  19. The trial of Yeshua in the Sanhedrin is to find a REASON for THE JEWS to put Yeshua to death and they did BLASPHEMY. SInce they CANNOT HAVE AN EXECUTION they went to the Romans to manipulate THEM to have Yeshua killed. This is not difficult to understand!! I am shocked how you still cannot understand this
  20. Please understand what is taught in the NT Rebellion wasn't the accusations against Yeshua in the Sanhedrin trial it was Blasphemy which is a religious offence. Yeshua claimed to be God's Son and also showed that he is the same "Son of Man" in the clouds from the book of Daniel. The Sanhedrin then accused him of BLASPHEMY and sentenced him to death. Since they could not act on a death sentence they took him to Pontius Pilate and the Romans and accused him of breaking their Jewish Law(malefactor) (Pilate did not care about this much) later the Jews accused him before Pilate of claiming to be Christ a King and being a threat of starting a Rebellion against Rome. Pontius Pilate then gave the Jews a decision let go of Barabbas (a murderer) or Yeshua the jews cried out to release Barabbas and have Yeshua crucified. What is so difficult about this that you can not understand?
  21. Show me where I can find these sorcerers and healers in the Talmud named Yeshu as well?
  22. Why do you keep changing the conversation and adding things? why don't you deal with the subject first? Here this answers your question https://www.gotquestions.org/circle-of-the-earth.html The reference to the “circle of the earth” in Isaiah 40:22 is the source of much speculation. Some see this phrase as evidence that God revealed to ancient Israel something of the physical layout of the universe long before anyone had discovered that the earth was round. Later, as scientific discoveries were made, the Bible was shown to be incredibly correct, recording truth that only God could have known. According to this view, the Scripture is demonstrated to have a divine origin by revealing “scientific secrets” before they were commonly known.The Bible speaks of the rising and setting of the sun (as do we), but it is simply the language of appearance and not intended to communicate scientific accuracy (see Psalm 113:3.) The Bible also speaks of the “four corners of the earth,” yet no one thinks that the Bible is teaching that the earth is square (see Isaiah 11:12). Proverbs 30:4 speaks of the “ends of the earth,” an expression we still use today to refer to the remotest extremes. The problem with the “scientific secrets” approach is that it reads scientific precision into certain passages that seem to fit our modern scientific concepts while ascribing phenomenological language (language of appearance) or metaphor to those passages that do not. To be consistent, it would seem that all such passages should either be interpreted literally or metaphorically. If they are all interpreted literally, then there would be far more scientific inaccuracies than accuracies or “scientific secrets.” If they are all interpreted metaphorically or phenomenologically, then each of the passages would still make sense in its original context. Isaiah 40:22, with its reference to the “circle of the earth,” is just one example. “And Allah has made the earth for you as a carpet (spread out).”71:19 “He Who has made for you the earth like a carpet spread out; has enabled you to go about therein by roads (and channels)....”Al-Qur’an 20:53
  23. I showed you the account of Thallus, which report a darkness and an Earthquake. I also showed that Luke and Mark collaborate Matthew by showing the temple veil was thorn in half and that there was a darkness on the Earth. You admitted that there was NO outside the quran evidence of Mohammad splitting the moon in half. The Earthquake in the NT was witnessed and felt around the area of Judea and Jerusalem meanwhile the Moon being split would have been something everyone would have witnessed and felt World wide, yet there are NO records of it outside of the quran.
  24. Don't try to hide. Is your quran a fable or truth? If truth why would it say that Mohammad split the moon and there is NO HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OR VERIFICATION. I wont let you hide from the subject I know it's a tough subject but this moon splitting must be verified. You claimed that if an event is not historically verified it's a fable. SO show me historical verification of the famous moon splitting fable of the quran.
  25. Curtains tear in 2 due to earthquakes? Read the account the veil was not just some curtain. The Veil was in the temple and seperated the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place. Matthew says that when the Earthquake occured that same veil was rent in two from top to bottom and Luke validates Matthews account by saying the sun was darkened and the veil of the temple was torn in two and so does mark which says the veil was rent in two from top to bottom. Now who verifies the claims of Muhammad about the moon being split in half to prove to some point to some meccans. He didn't even made the point because afterwards he converted them through the sword meaning it was probably a false miracle and he had to force them to change to Islam.
×
×
  • Create New...