Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Abdul-Rahman Brent

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    1,763
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Sad
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Feeling Sad Over The Death Of A Non-muslim   
    Salamu alaikum. I have a question; I recently learned that a dear friend of mine's mother was killed in a car accident by a drunk driver. I grew up and was best friends with this non-Muslim kid growing up (as I'm a recent revert); I still occassionally will chat with him and I've given him a little info on Islam the few times I've spoken to him in the last few years (as we now live in different states). I by chance saw my friend's father and he informed my family of the tragic news. The women was a very nice lady (she actually worked for a Christian church) and she did a lot for me when I was young, as far as I would eat dinner with their family often, she would give me and my friend car rides, I would sleep over at their house, etc. As I grew older I saw them less and less; until I hadn't seen them for years. Upon hearing the news I cried some. I believe there is nothing wrong with this as the family is Ahlul-Kitab Christians and have always been kind to me. For a second I was worried as I remembered old wahhabi teachings from before I found Shi'a Islam; these wahhabi terms say we should never mourn; even for a fellow Muslim, etc. I believe they derived this from sunni works where umar ibn al-khattab says the person in the grave is punished if someone cries for them! This is insanity and goes against our God given nature.
    So again crying for this person; and making Dua for Allah(SWT) to forgive them as they died as a Christian; is okay?
  2. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Sirius_Bright in Who killed Fatima?   
    Salamu alaikum I meant to say just that all Shi'a Muslim scholars agree on the existence of Sulaym ibn Qays (ra), you are correct in showing that there is a difference of opinion on the authenticity of "The Book of Sulaym ibn Qays"
    For example see this old thread: http://www.shiachat.com/forum/index.php?/topic/234947957-hadeeths-about-crimes-of-enemies-of-ahlul-bayt/page__st__25__p__1699531entry1699531
    Quote- Salam U Alaykum,
    I did not open it in the Shia-Sunni Dialouge, another moderator moved it there.
    Macissac I am aware that there are some scholars that state that it may have been a forgery. However as I stated earlier there are some older scholars who said it was correct. Such as al-numaani and al majlisi. The reason some scholars say it may be a forgery is because they can not find mention of it for many years from the hadeeths. Howeever there are many scholars such as (majlisi) who find this following narration to be correct:
    Imam sadiq said: Who ever doesnt have the book of Sulaim from among our shias and lovers, it is like he has nothing from us and has not learned from us any thing, and it is a secret of the house of muhammad .
    Majlisi states that this hadeeth is correct, and it is his basis for saying the book is sahih. Other than that there are some issues, with wether or not it is the original book, if things have been added to it or subtracted from it etc, it is for these reasons that Sayed khoie him self says teh contents are correct, but its difficult to atribute it to Sulaim him self.
    As far as I have seen there is nothing in the book that goes against any Shia principles or against any shia historical accounts.
    Is there a translated version available online? Only to purchse, from the al-khoie book store.
    end quote.
    Majlisi is a little late, but al-Numaani is an early scholar who argued for the reliability and authenticity of "The Book of Sulaym ibn Qays" and also from the same old thread proof is shown that the late Sayyid al-Khoei (ra) believed in the authenticity of "The Book of Sulaym ibn Qays" also:
    Quote- Al-Khoie site says this:
    Kitab-e- Sulaym Ibn Qays Al-Hilali
    The greatness and esteemed value of this book can be gauged by the hadith of Imam Ja’far Al-Sadiq a.s that whoever does not possess this book does not have anything from The Ahlul Bayt AS. This is a book that has received endorsement from five Infallible Imams.
  3. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Sirius_Bright in Consequences of tabarra   
    There is nothing but rewards for cursing those evildoers. Anyone who fights or rejects Imam Ali(as) is a kaafir.
  4. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from rajul in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Wow are you guys serious? Defending imperialist Crusader forces?! I don't support random acts of violence, but you most of you guys actually seem to be on the verge of tears for imperialist white devil crusader forces! Were there any tears from them when they murdered millions of Iraqis? NO they celebrated. Save your tears for the oppressed of the world not these terrorist imperialists at "Fort Hood" who are nothing but crusaders and imperialist neo-colonialist devils.
  5. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from TheHealer in Attempted Wahhabi Smear Of Imam Mahd(as)   
    Salamu alaikum, they actually did in there newly posted article on Imam al-Mahdi(as); here is the section: http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/mahdi/en/chap10.php
    Quote- The use of absurd conjecture by the Nasibi author
    Nawasib of www.allaahuakbar.net stated:
    ---the Prophet (saw) has stated : “The Dajjaal will be followed by 70,000 Jews of Isfahan, having on themselves persian shawls.” [sahih Muslim #5227]
    Question: What makes the Dajjaal to go to Isfahan as it is a Shiite land and why is the involvement of the Jews in a Shiite city? Is this a coincidence?
    Reply
    First of all the Sunni source is of no use for us and since we have made it clear that according to the Shia view, Dajjal will not be a person but be a symbol of evil the tradition further looses its importance and cannot be interpreted in the manner in which the Nasibi author has done. Despite this, allow us for the sake of discussion, the unveil the absurd logic the author has sought to use with this tradition.
    The largest Jewish community in the Middle East is in Iran, dating back to 600 BC. The present day Iranian Jews are the second largest Jewish community after Israel. In the past, Iran was a Sunni country, so if we apply the pathetic logic of the Nasibi author, does that means that had Dajjal appeared during the Sunni reign, most of his followers would have been Sunnies?
    It is logical that if the Dajjal appears his adherents shall come from those countries with a large concentration of Jew. We should also point out that Asfahan is a multi faith city wherein there are Shias, Sunnis, Ismailis, Sufis, Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians.
    The Nawasib shall be the actual followers of Dajjal - Sufiyani
    Having refuted all the absurd attempts by the Nawasib to malign the character of Imam Mahdi [as], let us now unveil the relationship that our opponents are going to have with the Dajjal and Sufiyani. Before we go any further, we would like to mention that if a Sunni or a Nasibi is asked whether he loves Uthman bin Affan, his answer is obviously going to be affirmative but if someone asks the same question to a Shia, the answer will be negative. This means the Ahle Sunnah are the proud followers and lovers of Uthman. Now who will be the follower of Dajjal be according to Sunnies themselves? Its answer is that:
    Åä ÎÑÌ ÇáÏÌÇá ÊÈÚå ãä ßÇä íÍÈ ÚËãÇä
    "When Dajjal appears, his followers will be the lovers of Uthman"
    Mizan al-Eitadal, Volume 2 page 107 Translation No. 3031
    Sunni scholar Yaqub Fasawi sought to cast doubts over the authenticity of the chain of narration in this tradition which incensed the grand Sunni Imam Dhahabi who stated:
    “That is what al-Fasawi rejected from the hadiths, no one did so before him, and if we follow such scruples we would be rejecting many correct Sunnah just because of wrong illusions”
    Not only Dajjal but Sufiyani will also be a staunch Uthmani/Nasibi as recorded by Imam Qurtubi:
    íÞæã Ýí Ãåá ÏãÔÞ ÝíÞæá íÇ Ãåá ÏãÔÞ : ÃäÇ ÑÌá ãäßã æ ÃäÊ ÎÇÕÊäÇ ÌÏí ãÚÇæíÉ Èä ÃÈí ÓÝíÇä
    “He shall address the people of Damishq: ‘O people of Damishq, I am from you and you people are special to us. My grandfather was Muawiyah bin Abi Sufiyan.”
    Tazkirah Qurtubi, page 693
    Sufiyani being from the filthy progeny of Muawiyah and Dajjal’s followers being the lovers of Uthman it is no surprise that these two entities shall come into conflict with the followers of the Ahlubayt [as] and this continue to be the case until their Imam Sufiyani appears and is defeated by the final Imam from Ahlulbayt [as].

  6. Disagree
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Irishman in Is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad really a Jew?   
    President Ahmadinejad has supported the right of scholars and individuals to freely discuss historical issues. A simple question President Ahmadinejad has raised, on western news sources like Larry King, etc. was simply where did the events of WWII happen. Obviously the answer is Europe, and those who were responsible for any war crimes or attacks against civilians were the government and military of Nazi Germany. The Palestinians should not have to pay for the crimes of Nazi Germany especially since there were around 150,000 Jewish German soldiers in the Nazi army (http://www.rense.com/general20/jewso.htm), the Zionist Jews themselves signed economic accords and alliances with the Nazi government see the 1933-1941 Haavara agreement (Transfer Agreement) between the Nazis and Zionists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement, and the Zionist "Lehi" aka The Stern Gang offered the Nazis a military alliance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_(group)#Contact_with_Nazi_authorities
    The 2nd in command (later the new leader when the old leader Mr. Stern was killed) of the Stern Gang (that offered an alliance to the Nazis in 1941) was a man named Yitzhak Yzternitzky (who "Hebraized" his last name, changing it to "Shamir"); this Yitzhak Shamir later became the 7th Prime Minister of Zionist "Israel".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzhak_Shamir
    Also there is a huge difference between questioning certain things; and allegedly "denying" the "Holocaust". For example one great scholarly work is the following that exposes many Zionist myths and Zionist attempts to silence honest debate (which threatens the Zionist sympathy/alleged guilt weapon):
    http://vho.org/Intro/GB/Flyer.html
    One example of a gross Zionist lie and myth that all real historians admit is false is the following; discussed in the above article.
    Quote- Eyewitness Testimony
    During medieval witch trials, many witnesses told similar accounts about broom-riding witches and the devil. Since most statements were made independently of each other and without pressure, this was taken as evidence that the stories must be true; material evidence was never produced. "Common knowledge," a word invented in those days, and social expectations formed the basis of these accounts, not the truth.
    Today, we face the same "common knowledge" produced by 60 years of one-sided mass media propaganda and massive social and sometimes even legal pressure to conform to certain views. To support their theories, anti-Revisionists depend almost exclusively on "eyewitness" testimony produced in this poisoned atmosphere.
    During the war crimes trials many "eyewitnesses" testified that Germans made soap out of human fat and lamp shades from human skin. Allied prosecutors even produced evidence to support these charges. For decades, highly respected scholars at the most prestigious universities in the world sanctioned these stories, leading us to believe that such stories were "irrefutable truths." But within time, many such stories have become untenable: In 1990, Yehuda Bauer, director of Holocaust studies at Hebrew University, Tel Aviv, admitted: "The Nazis never made soap from Jews…" (Jerusalem Post, Int. Ed., 5 May 1990, p. 6).
    end quote.
    And that was just that one silly myth, and look how it was taught in otherwise "respected" colleges and universities as alleged "history"!
    See: http://www.codoh.com/
    President Ahmadinejad has also exposed a huge contradiction in the West. The West claims it respects free speech, it even allows people the "right" to defame Prophets (as) and even God Almighty himself! Yet the Revisionist academics are not allowed to say a SINGLE word against the propaganda version of "history" that is propagated by the well oiled and funded (ex. U.S. "Holocaust Museum") Zionist groups; so this "Holocaust" religion (worship of the Zionist Jew "victim") is allowed to go on and nobody can speak against them publicly in the West (heck you can be arrested and put in jail in Europe for even asking scholarly questions!)
    Finally, the term "secular Jew" is self-contradicting and meaningless: since Judaism is a religion (and only Zionists and Nazis think Jews are allegedly a "race"). There is no such thinking as "Jewish" DNA! Some info from here: http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Maps/Story800.html
    Quote- While both the Palestinians and the world's distinct Jewish populations have mixed with invading and host populations respectively, Oppenheim's team found "that Jews have mixed more with other populations, which makes sense because they were more likely to leave the Levant.".[12]
    ...
    However, a follow-up study [Nebel et al. 2001] corrected that Jews were found to be more closely related to the peoples north of the Fertile Crescent (Kurds, Turkish "Turks" of Anatolia, and Armenians) than to the Arabic-speakers of Israel/Palestinian and other neighbouring now Arabic-speaking Levantines.[98][99]
    98) Nebel et al. 2001, The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East, Ann Hum Genet. 2001 Mar;70(2):195-206.
    99) Muir, Diana. "Genetics and the Jewish identity". Jpost
    end quote.
  7. Disagree
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Marbles in Dialogue with a supporter of moussavi   
    What a joke. Most of these secularist minority of Iran's population are not wearing anything even near proper hijab. :

    Your heroes:
    Underground Tehran

  8. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    So over 100+ Million Native Americans slaughtered by evil white people and all you can say is oh that's too bad, wow just wow. You truly can't recognize evil, that is the vast majority of white people (not being "racist", just read history about what sufferings the Africans and Native "Americans" endured from white people).
  9. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    The vast majority of whites are pure evil, again just ask the enslaved Africans or the Native "Americans" again if you can find any who weren't murdered in the largest Holocaust in human history (white evildoers killed over 100+ Million Natives throughout the Western hemisphere).
    http://www.2think.org/ah.shtml
    Quote- Who was Christopher Columbus? Every schoolboy knows, he discovered America. But in reality America had been discovered by Native Americans thousands of years before. What would Spaniards of the sixteenth century have said, had Native Americans landed at Spain's shores and proclaimed to have discovered Europe?
    Who knows that Columbus, prior to his career as a sailor, had been a slave trader by profession who would become a holy crusader and personally responsible for the killing of about half a million Natives and that it was already Columbus who introduced those measures generally attributed to later conquistadors, such as enslaving Indians and hunting them down with dogs?
    In "American Holocaust. Columbus and the Conquest of the New World" (Oxford University Press 1992), David E. Stannard not only dispels common myths, he tells the reader what was lost: the incredible variety of cultures and the impressive achievements Native Americans had developed throughout the millennia. How well known is the fact that most Native Americans were living in towns and villages as farmers, long before Columbus and that the majority of Native societies in Northern America was organized democratically, including women's right to vote, long before such an idea was conceivable to Europeans? How well known is it that - unlike European cities of the time - the magnificent capital of the Aztec society took its "drinking water ... from springs ... piped into the city by a huge aquaeduct system" that amazed the Spaniards (p. 5), just as they were amazed at the city's cleanliness and order: "at least 1000 public workers were employed to maintain the city's streets and keep them clean" (p. 5).
    When Columbus and a handful of Spanish sailors landed in the Caribbean, this was the beginning of "far and away, the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world" (p. x) and cost more than a hundred million lives in five centuries: "To put this in a contemporary context, the ratio of native survivorship in the Americas following European contact was less than half of what the human survivorship would be in the United States today if every single white person and every single black person died" (p. x).
    How well known is it that in the Spanish missions in California the Natives were forced to do slave labor and died in thousands and that the missions were "furnaces of death that sustained their Indian population levels for as long as they did only by driving more and more natives into their confines" (p. 137) ?
    Stannard's main goal, however, is to find an answer to the question of which European cultural and religious traditions and precepts lead to this carnage and why these proved so lethal to the Native American cultures. His finds of theological predecessors of racist ideas - such as the Spaniard Sepulveda's discussion about whether the Natives were humans at all, or the widespread idea that the New World had been given to the Christians just as Canaan had been given to the Jews - are very thought provoking and insightful and to some readers certainly provocative.
    Reading about hideous and appalling atrocities committed against Native Americans sometimes made me feel angry, sometimes very sad, yet Stannard writes always in a fair and calm manner, and - unlike many scholarly works - his book kept me fascinated from the first page to the last.
    end quote.

    Whites are mostly non-Muslims anyway, and they are evil and will burn in hell. They stole everything, to create their "culture" (be it Arabs who created Algebra, Persians, Indians, Timbuktu, etc.) and they will soon be overtaken by at least the Chinese, Insha Allah.
  10. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Not intended for all white people, only those who are evil and racist (which unfortunately is most white people) just as African-"Americans" and the the Native "Americans" (that is if you can find some that were not exterminated in the American Holocaust started in 1492). If you've become Muslim you've lift the evils of the vast bulk of white people, for example I recommend the website: http://racetraitor.org/
    The website's title: RACE TRAITOR - treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity
  11. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Go to hell you white devil. "America" is an evil fake nation stolen from the Native Americans, so all Europeans are illegal since the Genocide of 1492. The evil white people murdered over 100+ million Native "Americans" throughout the Western hemisphere in the largest and only true Holocaust in human history and then these evil white, usurpers built their evil empire by forced African slave labor.

    Note from mod: You have been warned for this post.
  12. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    I never said I supported what happened; but I certainly don't feel any sorrow for anyone in an American military that was, is, and continues to be involved in murdering, raping, and otherwise terrorizing the oppressed all over the world be it in Iraq, Afghanistan, supporting the Zionist terrorism in Palestine, etc. However, I completely agree with one thing you said and that is about the gunman. Why was he even serving in a neo-colonialist crusader force like this to begin with? I'm sure he was racked with guilt about supporting and being in theory a part of such crusaders and imperialists.
  13. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    It's funny you have these opinions for imperialist troops and then have a picture of Muhammad Ali in your profile. You do know that Muhammad Ali was brave and refused to go over in the draft to help the American military genocide in Vietnam right (which cased him to be stripped of his heavyweight title and to face jail time), unlike those at this military base who were and are willingly participating in the American imperialist/neo-colonialist genocides around the world. But I do agree with one thing you mentioned, may Allah(SWT) protect the Muslims from the grips of evil racist oppressors.
  14. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Truly crazy arguments on your part and alleged "hippie Islam" lets all gather around the fire and sing kumbaya. According to your logic we can't even hate Satan because our Imams (as) teach compassion (note compassion is only for the Muslims and those who are good people, not kaafir oppressors). You do know the Holy Qur'an commands Jihad and fighting in resistance against those who do evil; and if you don't see the American military (after murdering untold millions around the world) and the vast bulk of evil white criminals as evil you need to have your head examined. One personal question are you white? As this may be where your having a negative reaction, when I say white I don't mean all white people just those who are evil and racist (which sadly is the vast majority of white people).
  15. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Iran regularly speaks against the arrogant powers in the world and their forces. Do you have sympathy for the enemies of Islam and enemies of the oppressed throughout the world?
  16. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    If your a Shi'a Muslim I'm sure you have room your heart to allegedly feel sorry for Yazeed(la), Allah(SWT) forbid! The imperialist colonialists, especially those in the military (which as an institution has unapologetically murdered untold millions across the globe), deserve no sympathy. They are the same devils that enslaved Africans and exterminated 100+ million Native Americans throughout the Western hemisphere. Truly to have sorrow or sympathy for such people would be like having sympathy for Yazeed(la) or other soldiers of Satan.
  17. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Not defending him, but do are you feeling sorry for imperialist crusaders?! You actually care about them, after everything they done to oppress people throughout the world be it Iraq, Afghanistan, or any of the tons of other places American military terrorism has gone (Nicaragua, Cuba, American support of Zionist atrocities against Palestine, etc.).
    http://american-genocide.netfirms.com/html/americanstateterrorism/

    I have no tears for the imperialists chickens coming home to roost.
  18. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Researcher in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Wow are you guys serious? Defending imperialist Crusader forces?! I don't support random acts of violence, but you most of you guys actually seem to be on the verge of tears for imperialist white devil crusader forces! Were there any tears from them when they murdered millions of Iraqis? NO they celebrated. Save your tears for the oppressed of the world not these terrorist imperialists at "Fort Hood" who are nothing but crusaders and imperialist neo-colonialist devils.
  19. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Marbles in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Truly crazy arguments on your part and alleged "hippie Islam" lets all gather around the fire and sing kumbaya. According to your logic we can't even hate Satan because our Imams (as) teach compassion (note compassion is only for the Muslims and those who are good people, not kaafir oppressors). You do know the Holy Qur'an commands Jihad and fighting in resistance against those who do evil; and if you don't see the American military (after murdering untold millions around the world) and the vast bulk of evil white criminals as evil you need to have your head examined. One personal question are you white? As this may be where your having a negative reaction, when I say white I don't mean all white people just those who are evil and racist (which sadly is the vast majority of white people).
  20. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from Rashida in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Go to hell you white devil. "America" is an evil fake nation stolen from the Native Americans, so all Europeans are illegal since the Genocide of 1492. The evil white people murdered over 100+ million Native "Americans" throughout the Western hemisphere in the largest and only true Holocaust in human history and then these evil white, usurpers built their evil empire by forced African slave labor.

    Note from mod: You have been warned for this post.
  21. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from forte in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    Truly crazy arguments on your part and alleged "hippie Islam" lets all gather around the fire and sing kumbaya. According to your logic we can't even hate Satan because our Imams (as) teach compassion (note compassion is only for the Muslims and those who are good people, not kaafir oppressors). You do know the Holy Qur'an commands Jihad and fighting in resistance against those who do evil; and if you don't see the American military (after murdering untold millions around the world) and the vast bulk of evil white criminals as evil you need to have your head examined. One personal question are you white? As this may be where your having a negative reaction, when I say white I don't mean all white people just those who are evil and racist (which sadly is the vast majority of white people).
  22. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from wayfarer. in Tragic: Child bride, 12, dies in Yemen   
    Obama is made said speeches to try to appeal to the racist white majority. No one is saying you shouldn't try to better yourselves, but this is the typical white American excuse "I didn't personally do slavery thus I have no responsibility for it". WRONG! slavery allowed usurped wealth to accumulate in the hands of the white descendants of slaveholders and as stated before African slaves were forced to build America and even built the "white house".
    Accumulated wealth
    In 2008 the American Humanist Association published an article which argued that if emancipated slaves had been allowed to possess and retain the profits of their labor, their descendants might now control a much larger share of American social and monetary wealth.[9] Not only did the freedmen and -women not receive a share of these profits, but they were stripped of the small amounts of compensation paid to some of them during Reconstruction. The wealth of the United States, they say, was greatly enhanced by the exploitation of Black slave labor.[18] According to this view, reparations would be valuable primarily as a way of correcting modern economic imbalance. The US Department of Commerce has calculated that in modern US dollars calculated for inflation and interest, slavery generated trillions of dollars for the US economy. [19]

    Whites can't say "I didn't do it so don't blame me" blah blah and then at the same time freely reap the benefits of what the crimes their white racist ancestors did.
  23. Like
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from wayfarer. in Tragic: Child bride, 12, dies in Yemen   
    Regarding this issue it should be investigated. But if your trying to insult age of marriage laws in Islam, know that Islam is correct as it views marriage as being allowed when both man and woman have attained both mental and physical puberty/adulthood.
    Refuting some of the common lies about the marriage of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) to Aisha.
    http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Polemics/aishah.html
    and these great articles (also avaliable in videos on youtube.com)
    http://www.muhaddith.org/earlymarriage/EarlyMarriage-part1.html (Part 1)
    http://www.muhaddith.org/earlymarriage/EarlyMarriage-part2.html (Part 2)
    Also read about the historical case of a 5 year old Peruvian girl, Lina Medina, who gave birth to a son who grow up into adulthood and only died at age 40 from a bone marrow disease.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Medina
  24. Disagree
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from _jen_ in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    As for Holy Qur'an Surah 2:62, you are misinterpreting it so go ahead a read a real Tafseer.
    Quote- [Pooya/Ali Commentary 2:62]
    Sabeans belonged to Chaldean religion. Their religion was much modified at various times and places by Jewish, Gnostic and Zoroastrian influences, and so there are conflicting accounts of them in various Muslim authors. Star-worship was the distinctive feature of their religion, otherwise they were monotheists.
    Before saying that whoever believes in Allah and the last day, and does good, not becoming a Muslim even after Islam has been chosen as the religion of Allah, is entitled to be blessed by Allah, the following verse should be taken into consideration:
    And whoso seeks as religion other than Islam it will not be accepted from him, and he will be among the losers in the hereafter.
    (Ali Imran: 85)
    ]And to remove misunderstanding, it should be noted that this verse refers to those Sabeans, Jews and Christians who, as sincere faithful, followed the original teachings of their respective prophets, without ever corrupting the true message, and believing in the prophecy of the advent of Muhammad made known by Musa, Isa and other prophets (see Baqarah: 40), and also those of them who lived in the days of the Holy Prophet but died before the news of his proclamation of the promised prophethood could reach them, because surely they would have come into the fold of Islam if they had known about it. Belief in the unity of Allah and the day of judgement and doing good is the spirit of Islam. This was the religion all the messengers of Allah preached to their people.
    (see commentary for verse 4)
    end quote.
    So this verse you quote, is meaning "Christians" who were sincere in the true message preached by Prophet Jesus (as), that is Tawheed and Islam, before the advent of the final Prophet; Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) will be in Paradise. But after the advent of Islam, Islam is the only acceptable path to Paradise. So the terms "Christians" and "Jews", etc. are just figures of speech and means those who were sincere to the message of Islam preached by these Prophets (as) before the advent of the final Prophet (pbuh), Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), bringing the final complete message for all mankind (and not specific nations one at a time as was the method before).
  25. Disagree
    Abdul-Rahman Brent got a reaction from _jen_ in Solider Malik Hassan kills 12 marines in Texas   
    So over 100+ Million Native Americans slaughtered by evil white people and all you can say is oh that's too bad, wow just wow. You truly can't recognize evil, that is the vast majority of white people (not being "racist", just read history about what sufferings the Africans and Native "Americans" endured from white people).
×
×
  • Create New...