Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Abdul-Rahman Brent

Advanced Members
  • Content Count

    1,763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Abdul-Rahman Brent

  1. As for Holy Qur'an Surah 2:62, you are misinterpreting it so go ahead a read a real Tafseer. Quote- [Pooya/Ali Commentary 2:62] Sabeans belonged to Chaldean religion. Their religion was much modified at various times and places by Jewish, Gnostic and Zoroastrian influences, and so there are conflicting accounts of them in various Muslim authors. Star-worship was the distinctive feature of their religion, otherwise they were monotheists. Before saying that whoever believes in Allah and the last day, and does good, not becoming a Muslim even after Islam has been chosen as the religion of Allah, is entitled to be blessed by Allah, the following verse should be taken into consideration: And whoso seeks as religion other than Islam it will not be accepted from him, and he will be among the losers in the hereafter. (Ali Imran: 85) ]And to remove misunderstanding, it should be noted that this verse refers to those Sabeans, Jews and Christians who, as sincere faithful, followed the original teachings of their respective prophets, without ever corrupting the true message, and believing in the prophecy of the advent of Muhammad made known by Musa, Isa and other prophets (see Baqarah: 40), and also those of them who lived in the days of the Holy Prophet but died before the news of his proclamation of the promised prophethood could reach them, because surely they would have come into the fold of Islam if they had known about it. Belief in the unity of Allah and the day of judgement and doing good is the spirit of Islam. This was the religion all the messengers of Allah preached to their people. (see commentary for verse 4) end quote. So this verse you quote, is meaning "Christians" who were sincere in the true message preached by Prophet Jesus (as), that is Tawheed and Islam, before the advent of the final Prophet; Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) will be in Paradise. But after the advent of Islam, Islam is the only acceptable path to Paradise. So the terms "Christians" and "Jews", etc. are just figures of speech and means those who were sincere to the message of Islam preached by these Prophets (as) before the advent of the final Prophet (pbuh), Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), bringing the final complete message for all mankind (and not specific nations one at a time as was the method before).
  2. So over 100+ Million Native Americans slaughtered by evil white people and all you can say is oh that's too bad, wow just wow. You truly can't recognize evil, that is the vast majority of white people (not being "racist", just read history about what sufferings the Africans and Native "Americans" endured from white people).
  3. The vast majority of whites are pure evil, again just ask the enslaved Africans or the Native "Americans" again if you can find any who weren't murdered in the largest Holocaust in human history (white evildoers killed over 100+ Million Natives throughout the Western hemisphere). http://www.2think.org/ah.shtml Quote- Who was Christopher Columbus? Every schoolboy knows, he discovered America. But in reality America had been discovered by Native Americans thousands of years before. What would Spaniards of the sixteenth century have said, had Native Americans landed at Spain's shores and proclaimed to have discovered Europe? Who knows that Columbus, prior to his career as a sailor, had been a slave trader by profession who would become a holy crusader and personally responsible for the killing of about half a million Natives and that it was already Columbus who introduced those measures generally attributed to later conquistadors, such as enslaving Indians and hunting them down with dogs? In "American Holocaust. Columbus and the Conquest of the New World" (Oxford University Press 1992), David E. Stannard not only dispels common myths, he tells the reader what was lost: the incredible variety of cultures and the impressive achievements Native Americans had developed throughout the millennia. How well known is the fact that most Native Americans were living in towns and villages as farmers, long before Columbus and that the majority of Native societies in Northern America was organized democratically, including women's right to vote, long before such an idea was conceivable to Europeans? How well known is it that - unlike European cities of the time - the magnificent capital of the Aztec society took its "drinking water ... from springs ... piped into the city by a huge aquaeduct system" that amazed the Spaniards (p. 5), just as they were amazed at the city's cleanliness and order: "at least 1000 public workers were employed to maintain the city's streets and keep them clean" (p. 5). When Columbus and a handful of Spanish sailors landed in the Caribbean, this was the beginning of "far and away, the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world" (p. x) and cost more than a hundred million lives in five centuries: "To put this in a contemporary context, the ratio of native survivorship in the Americas following European contact was less than half of what the human survivorship would be in the United States today if every single white person and every single black person died" (p. x). How well known is it that in the Spanish missions in California the Natives were forced to do slave labor and died in thousands and that the missions were "furnaces of death that sustained their Indian population levels for as long as they did only by driving more and more natives into their confines" (p. 137) ? Stannard's main goal, however, is to find an answer to the question of which European cultural and religious traditions and precepts lead to this carnage and why these proved so lethal to the Native American cultures. His finds of theological predecessors of racist ideas - such as the Spaniard Sepulveda's discussion about whether the Natives were humans at all, or the widespread idea that the New World had been given to the Christians just as Canaan had been given to the Jews - are very thought provoking and insightful and to some readers certainly provocative. Reading about hideous and appalling atrocities committed against Native Americans sometimes made me feel angry, sometimes very sad, yet Stannard writes always in a fair and calm manner, and - unlike many scholarly works - his book kept me fascinated from the first page to the last. end quote. Whites are mostly non-Muslims anyway, and they are evil and will burn in hell. They stole everything, to create their "culture" (be it Arabs who created Algebra, Persians, Indians, Timbuktu, etc.) and they will soon be overtaken by at least the Chinese, Insha Allah.
  4. Not intended for all white people, only those who are evil and racist (which unfortunately is most white people) just as African-"Americans" and the the Native "Americans" (that is if you can find some that were not exterminated in the American Holocaust started in 1492). If you've become Muslim you've lift the evils of the vast bulk of white people, for example I recommend the website: http://racetraitor.org/ The website's title: RACE TRAITOR - treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity
  5. The ringleaders of these current CIA/Zionist orchestrated coup attempts (see the examples from the past like 1953's "Operation Ajax" against Iran by American CIA and British MI6 in support of the evil puppet Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi(la)) are using things like Twitter and their personal easy access to Western (Zionist run) media (speaking on the phone or via Twitter with CNN, etc.). Although Western media is nothing but a propaganda arm for the West and the Zionists (Zionist Jews own most of the main networks, be it Rupert Murdoch(la) and fox "news" (noise) or on and on, these stations are the most powerful and best funded in the world and can send their propaganda anywhere on earth. Then these Zionist run networks make stuff up and take stuff out of context, like not telling everyone how the Iranian security forces were just responding after violent "protesters" attacked them with molotov cocktails and the like. Iranian security forces building under attack by MKO(la) backed saboteurs with molotov cocktails. http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8805101431 These "protesting" people are a small minority who are played up by the Western media (for their personal imperialist aims), see North Tehran Syndrome. Also you hear nothing about how the U.S. supports dictators like "house of Saud"(la) or dictator Hosni Mubarak(la) in Egypt, or on and on. Also nothing about the plight of the those fighting the coup against Manuel Zelaya the elected president of Honduras. Also see this about American media hypocrisy on breaking up of violent "protests": http://pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.com/2009/06/contrasting-protest-coverage-iran-vs-g.html Quote- Thursday, June 18, 2009 Contrasting protest coverage Iran vs G-20 and Georgia Iran, Iran, Iran. You would think this was the only news in the world. Odd isn't it? What is so unique about unrest in Iran? Isn't there unrest everywhere? Sure there is! Aren't there protests everywhere? Yup, there are! Look at the G-20 protests. The coverage that was given served to portray the protestors in a negative light and law enforcement as doing their job to keep the peace. Even when the death of an innocent bystander resulted, Ian Tomlinson at the hands of head bashing police officers, the main stream media stayed quite quiet. Apologies I stand corrected, quiet, except for the smear campaign that was launched against the victim after the police brutality was exposed! Apparently, Ian Tomlinson liked to drink. As if that justified his murder at the hands of law enforcement. The main stream media was clearly making excuses, clearly justifying the actions of law enforcement. In Iran, it is a different story. The police trying to control some extremely unruly crowds are portrayed as ruthless and "videos of police beating demonstrators hit hard at the emotions" Unusual for western media to be sympathetic to unruly protestors. At the G-20 where the police were bashing peaceful protestors, those on line videos sure didn't "hit hard at the emotions". But, the protests in Iran? Resulting in heart strings being tugged? Does this coverage make one suspect the western audience is being played? Makes me suspicious. If protesting is legitimate in Iran for an election, it surely should be at the G-20 protests, when issues affecting the world populace are being discussed and decided upon by elites behind locked gates. Gates that ensure the masses are left out in the cold. But if the G-20 protests aren't relevant in your mind. Let us look at another country. Georgia. There have been many protests there. Did you know that? Most people don't. Why is that? Well there hasn't been much western mainstream media coverage of it. Certainly not the wall to wall, 24/7, coverage Iran has garnered. Yet, in Georgia on June 15th/09, guess what was going on? Protests! Along with police beatings! ... Where is the western media coverage on this situation. Where are the hard hits at the western emotions for these disgruntled citizens? Why there aren't any at all! None. It is just like, it doesn't exist. Why is that? Look at these two countries, Georgia and Iran. One already has a pro-western puppet installed. That would be Georgia. As for Iran, well there are hopes to install a pro- western puppet, or to at least demonize sufficiently to "bomb, bomb, bomb,-bomb, bomb Iran" to quote John McCain. The agenda is political. There are western aspirations (regime change and more) behind this wall to wall media coverage. end quote.
  6. You clown, Jundallah has admitted they support and work in coordination with MKO(la) which was and is backed by America (who protected their "Camp Ashraf" set up by Saddam al-Baathi(la) back in the 1980s).
  7. Go to hell you white devil. "America" is an evil fake nation stolen from the Native Americans, so all Europeans are illegal since the Genocide of 1492. The evil white people murdered over 100+ million Native "Americans" throughout the Western hemisphere in the largest and only true Holocaust in human history and then these evil white, usurpers built their evil empire by forced African slave labor. Note from mod: You have been warned for this post.
  8. I never said I supported what happened; but I certainly don't feel any sorrow for anyone in an American military that was, is, and continues to be involved in murdering, raping, and otherwise terrorizing the oppressed all over the world be it in Iraq, Afghanistan, supporting the Zionist terrorism in Palestine, etc. However, I completely agree with one thing you said and that is about the gunman. Why was he even serving in a neo-colonialist crusader force like this to begin with? I'm sure he was racked with guilt about supporting and being in theory a part of such crusaders and imperialists.
  9. It's funny you have these opinions for imperialist troops and then have a picture of Muhammad Ali in your profile. You do know that Muhammad Ali was brave and refused to go over in the draft to help the American military genocide in Vietnam right (which cased him to be stripped of his heavyweight title and to face jail time), unlike those at this military base who were and are willingly participating in the American imperialist/neo-colonialist genocides around the world. But I do agree with one thing you mentioned, may Allah(SWT) protect the Muslims from the grips of evil racist oppressors.
  10. I'd guess most of the people, in this minority of anti-government protesting people, are simply being used because they are angry the candidate they supported (Mousavi) lost in the free election. Then you have the people leading these individuals, these ringleaders are likely in contact with the Zionists and American CIA and groups like the MKO(la) and Jundallah(la).
  11. Truly crazy arguments on your part and alleged "hippie Islam" lets all gather around the fire and sing kumbaya. According to your logic we can't even hate Satan because our Imams (as) teach compassion (note compassion is only for the Muslims and those who are good people, not kaafir oppressors). You do know the Holy Qur'an commands Jihad and fighting in resistance against those who do evil; and if you don't see the American military (after murdering untold millions around the world) and the vast bulk of evil white criminals as evil you need to have your head examined. One personal question are you white? As this may be where your having a negative reaction, when I say white I don't mean all white people just those who are evil and racist (which sadly is the vast majority of white people).
  12. Iran regularly speaks against the arrogant powers in the world and their forces. Do you have sympathy for the enemies of Islam and enemies of the oppressed throughout the world?
  13. If your a Shi'a Muslim I'm sure you have room your heart to allegedly feel sorry for Yazeed(la), Allah(SWT) forbid! The imperialist colonialists, especially those in the military (which as an institution has unapologetically murdered untold millions across the globe), deserve no sympathy. They are the same devils that enslaved Africans and exterminated 100+ million Native Americans throughout the Western hemisphere. Truly to have sorrow or sympathy for such people would be like having sympathy for Yazeed(la) or other soldiers of Satan.
  14. Not defending him, but do are you feeling sorry for imperialist crusaders?! You actually care about them, after everything they done to oppress people throughout the world be it Iraq, Afghanistan, or any of the tons of other places American military terrorism has gone (Nicaragua, Cuba, American support of Zionist atrocities against Palestine, etc.). http://american-genocide.netfirms.com/html/americanstateterrorism/ I have no tears for the imperialists chickens coming home to roost.
  15. Wow are you guys serious? Defending imperialist Crusader forces?! I don't support random acts of violence, but you most of you guys actually seem to be on the verge of tears for imperialist white devil crusader forces! Were there any tears from them when they murdered millions of Iraqis? NO they celebrated. Save your tears for the oppressed of the world not these terrorist imperialists at "Fort Hood" who are nothing but crusaders and imperialist neo-colonialist devils.
  16. You are very misguided for a whole refutation of the myth of "Abdullah ibn Saba" see this link: http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/who_really_killed_uthman/en/chap2.php Chapter Two: Refuting the defence card of Abdullah Ibn Saba Regarding the claims from the "Jewish Encyclopedia" see the following refutation of this: Quote- There is Jewish Encyclopedia on the internet, which contain the very story of Abdullah Ibn Saba fabricated by Sayf Ibn Umar and the foolish authors amongst Nawasib such as Ibn al-Hashimi rejoiced over the presence of Abdullah Ibn Saba’s name in Jewish encyclopedia and sought to make his readers believe that ‘even Jews accept the presence of a Jewish character Abdullah Ibn Saba’ . To enable this endeavor, the stupid author used the the tag line “Abdullah ibn Saba, Founder of Shi’ism”. The reason we call such Nasibi authors stupid and foolish is that in their hatred for the Shi’a of Ahlulbayt [as], they didn’t even bother to check the original source on which the Jews relied, which is al-Milal, the book written by a famed Sunni scholar Abdul Kareem Shatrastani who himself relied on the fabrication of Sayf Ibn Umar. ... (From the Jewish Encyclopedia entry) Bibliography: Shatrastani al-Milal, pp. 132 et seq. (in Haarbrücken's translation, i. 200-201); Weil, Gesch. der Chalifen, i. 173-174, 209, 259 end quote. So this "Jewish Encyclopedia" just copied a Sunni source (which took the lies of the liar Sayf ibn Umar al-Tamimi; who the classical Sunni Ulama like Abu Dawud, al-Nasa'i, Hakim al-Nishaburi, al-Suyuti, etc. confirmed as a liar and fraud). Note if your look in the same "Jewish Encyclopedia" for Jesus (as); that entry in the "Jewish Encyclopedia" says Jesus (as) was allegedly the "founder of Christianity": we don't believe this as Muslims, we know Prophet Jesus (as) was just a great Prophet of Allah(SWT). ... As for the quote about what law Imam al-Mahdi (as) will rule by see this refutation of the Wahhabi/Nasibi accusation; From: http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/mahdi/en/chap10.php Quote- Nasibi accusation that Imam Mahdi [as] will rule according to the Sharia of David [as] ... Nawasib of www.allaahuakbar.net stated: 1)Mahdi of the Rawafidees will rule according to the Laws of David and the family of David: Al-Kulyani reports in his work al-Kafi, volume no.1, p.397-398: a)Narrated Ali ibn Ibraheem -from his father-from ibn Abi Umair-from Mansour-from Fadhl al Aour-from Abi Ubaidah who reported: “During the times of Imam Jaffar[as] we used to go around like herds without a caretaker. We met with Salim ibn Abi Hafs who asked me: ”Oh Abu Ubaidullah, who is your Imam?” I replied:” My Imams are from the household of the prophet”. He then stated: “You have perished and so have I for both of us have heared Abu Jafar[as] saying: “One who dies without recognizing his Imam, he dies a death of Jahiliyyah.” Then I affirmed what he said. It was before that three or somewhat close to it(time span) when I entered upon Abu Abdullah[as] and God granted me knowledge. Then I said to Abu Abdullah[as]: “Salim said such and such.” He replied: “Oh Abu Obaidah nobody here will die until he is succeeded by some one who does the same thing as his, and adopts the similar manners of his predecessor, and calls to the same thing as his predecessor did. Oh Abu Ubaidah, it was permitted that whatever was given to David was also provided for Sulaiman.” Then he added: “Oh Abu Ubaidah when the Qaem of the household of the prophet appears, he will rule according to rule of David and Solomon.” B) Muhammad ibn Yahya-Ahmad ibn Muhammad-Muhammad ibn Sinaan-Abaan who reported: “I heard Abu Abdullah[as] saying: “The world will not fade away unless a person from us appears who will rule according to the rule of the family of David and he will not ask his house. He will give every one his right. c) Ahmad--Ahmad ibn Muhammad--Ibn Mahboob--Hisham ibn Salim--Ammar as Saabati who reported: “I asked Abu Abdullah [as] : “On what will you rule if you are made the rulers.” He replied: “By the rule of Allah and the rule of David. And if we are confronted by a situation which we cannot solve, Gabriel (Ruh al Quds) will reveal it to us.” d) Muhammad ibn Ahmad--Muhammad ibn Khalid--Nazr ibn Suwaid--Yahya al Halabi--Imran ibn Oueiyn--Jaeed al Hamdani--Ali ibn al-Hussein[as] said: “I asked him by which law will you rule?” He said: “By the rule of David, and if there is something which we are unaware of, Gabriel(Ruh al Quds) will reveal it to us.” e) Ahmad ibn Mahran[ra]--Muhammad ibn Ali--Ibn Mahboob--Hishaam bin Salim--Ammar as Saabati reported: I asked Imam Abu Abdullah[as] :“What is the status of the Aimmah.” He replied : “It is similar to the status of Dhul Qarnain, Ushegh, and Asef the companion of prophet Sulaiman.” Then I asked: “By what will you rule?” He replied: “By the rule of God, by the rule of David, and by the rule of the Prophet Muhammad[saw] and by the revealation of Gabriel. Reply Since the filthy Nawasib are fully aware that they shall be the followers of the Sufiyani, an adherent of Muawiyah, they have sought to adopt the inherited traits of deceit in order to pollute the Shia view of Ahlulbayt [as]. They cite the above traditions before their naive and some ignorant masses to prove that according to the Shia, Imam Mahdi [as] will not rule according to Sharia of Prophet Muhammad but according to the Sharia of David [as] and hence the Mahdi [as] will be the Dajjal (naudobillah). Unfortunately these children of Muawiyah: * fail to reveal to their followers the chapter name from which they quote the above cited traditions * intentionally present the traditions in a contaminated form Had these Nasibis adopted honesty, they would have never been able to achieve their nefarious objective of maligning Imam Mahdi [as], who shall uproot the filth of the would-be Nasibi Imam Dajjal. The chapter from which the above cited traditions have been quoted from Al-Kafi is: ÈóÇÈñ Ýöí ÇáÇÆöãøóÉö (Úóáóíúåö ÇáÓøóáÇã) Ãóäøóåõãú ÅöÐóÇ ÙóåóÑó ÃóãúÑõåõãú ÍóßóãõæÇ ÈöÍõßúãö ÏóÇæõÏó æóÂáö ÏóÇæõÏó æóáÇ íóÓúÃóáõæäó ÇáúÈóíøöäóÉó Úóáóíúåã ÇáÓøóáÇã æóÇáÑøóÍúãóÉõ æóÇáÑøöÖúæóÇäõ When the Imams will Rise with Divine Authority They will Judge Among People as David and his People had Done that They will not Ask any Witness to Testify (May the peace and blessings of Allah be up on them). Al-Kafi, Volume 1 Part 4 chapter 99 The chapter name shall suffice to show the dishonesty of the Nawasib since we believe that Imam Mahdi [as] being the true successor of Prophetic knowledge will not need witnesses to determine the truth but the knowledge granted to him by Allah [swt] shall suffice for Him [as] to decide matters and spread justice amongst the people, this replicated the method that was previously utilised by David [as] who would not use witnesses to rule upon matters, but would access the divine knowledge granted to him by Allah [swt]. Imam Mahdi [as] who is the final authority of Allah [swt] on this earth has a special era of rule in contrast to all of the other representatives of Allah [swt] that have set foot on the earth because being as this is the last era of earth, Allah [swt] will make Islam prevail across the globe through Him [as] and a major tool to enable this process shall be the availability of justice to each and every individual as we read in Prophetic traditions: "Even if the entire duration of the world's existence has already been exhausted and only one day is left (before the day of judgment), Allah will expand that day to such a length of time, as to accommodate the kingdom of a person from my Ahlul-Bayt who will be called by my name. He will fill out the earth with peace and justice as it will have been full of injustice and tyranny (by then) ." Since one of the key tasks linked to Imam Mahdi’s [as] special era shall be the provision of justice a special method will be used, namely the precedent set by David’s [as] relating to the method of providing justice. Imam Mahdi [as] the final representative of Allah [swt] shall therefore rule according to: 1. Allah’s [swt] Sharia brought by Muhammad 2. the method of David i.e. not to depend on witnesses when ruling upon issues. We know from the stories of Prophet Solomon [as] that He would pass judgments in cases without seeking reliance upon witnesses due to the knowledge given to him by Allah (SWT). We shall now cite the hadith in question and another from the same chapter that shall prove that Imam [as] shall pass judgments according to the laws of Allah [swt] brought by Prophet Muhammad . Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from Muhammad ibn Sinan from Aban from abu ‘Abdallah (a.s.) who has said the following. "The world will not end before the rise of a man from us who would judge among people the way the family of David had been judging them. He will not ask any witness to testify. He will make every soul’s rights available to it." al-Kafi, Volume 1, Part 4, Chapter 99, hadith 2 In another hadith it says: "....when Al-Qaim (the one who will rise) will rise he will judge among people the way David and Solomon had been judging among people. He will not call any witness to testify in a case." al-Kafi, Volume 1, Part 4, Chapter 99, hadith 1 Note that in both above hadith it says "the way" and not that "they will rule in accordance with the ruling of the prophet David" as the Nawasib have suggested, and this exposes their deception. In another hadith it states clearly that this will be for special cases. He said, "We judge by the laws of Allah and in the manner of David. If a case would come before us to which there is no lead with us,........" al-Kafi, Volume 1, Part 4, Chapter 99, hadith 3 All of the hadiths clearly state that the Imam [as] will judge amongst people in the way that David [as] and Solomon [as] did namely by deciding matters via the knowledge given by Allah [swt] that made the concept of witness testimony redundant. The Hadith does not say that His judgments shall be according to the Sharia of David or Solomon. We have the story of Prophet Solomon [as] that had to decide who amongst two women was the mother of a baby. Solomon [as] stated that the matter be resolved by slicing the child in two, with each claimant getting half the child. When one woman said she would rather give up her claim than have the child killed, it was determined that she was the real mother. There were no witnesses in this case but through knowledge and logic bestowed on him, Prophet Solomon [as] was able to judge between them rightly. Apart from David [as] and Solomon [as], Khidr [as] was also granted knowledge by Allah [swt] which he would decide matters, what clear example can be than that cited in the Quran when Khidr [as] killed a child on the basis of the knowledge granted to him by Allah [swt]. end quote.
  17. Most of these so-called "non-democratic" states are puppet states put in place, armed, funded, supported, and propped up by imperialist/neo-colonialist America, Europe, and Zionist "Israel". Such Western puppet states include the "Kingdom of Saudi" Arabia under the puppet Saudi royal family(la) (aka "House of Saud"(la)), the Western puppet dictator Hosni Mubarak(la) in Egypt, formerly Saddam(la) in 1980s Iraq, Kuwait, monarchy in Jordan, etc. All these Western puppet regimes (aka puppet dictatorships) engage in torture and all manners of evil actions to serve their Zio-American masters.
  18. Again Hezbollah often works in union with and helps the official Lebanese army: in missions of joint interest. The reports say the first two Zionist spy devices self-destructed when they were discovered (meaning the Zionist "Israelis" destroyed them after they knew the Lebanese had detected them). As for finances and such, Hezbollah is now largely independent and raises funds inside Lebanon itself. The Islamic Republic of Iran did much to originally help setup and arm their brothers in the Hezbollah Mujahideen to fight the Zionist "Israeli" occupation (after 1982 Zionist invasion of Lebanon). When one is occupied they need all the help they can get. However, since then Hezbollah has become much more self-sufficient and all their leadership and such is purely Lebanese in nature. The official Lebanese army doesn't have good weapons largely because they have relied on purchases from America and Europe. America especially would never allow the Lebanese army to have any good military equipment that could potentially be utilized in fighting with Zionist "Israel" (America's #1 puppet and ally in the region). The Lebanese army was smart in actually trying to diversify and get other sources of weapons in the recent past, Lebanon purchased some Russian weapons and was suppose to receive a gift of 10 Russian MiG-29 fighter jets in an attempt to boost Lebanon-Russia defence cooperation. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article5360865.ece Russia provides 10 MiG fighter jets to Lebanon for free
  19. Marjas are not infallible, the rank of infallibility (being Masoom) is only for the Holy Prophets (as) and Holy Imams (as). Today during the Ghaybat (Occultation) of Imam al-Mahdi (atf), the Marjas guide our community as we await Allah(SWT) to initiate the reappearance of our blessed Imam (atf): when we as a community have earned it through our piety, belief, and good deeds. The Marjas have this current rank of leadership (during the Ghaybat of the Imam (atf)) because they are the most religiously studied and knowledgeable; and should also be the most pious of regular human beings around.
  20. A good article refuting the claims of the Wahhabis and Nasbisi about the alleged character "Abdullah ibn Saba" is this link from Answering-Ansar.org; http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/who_really_killed_uthman/en/chap2.php I will give an excerpt quote from this article which is discussing the Wahhabi myth of "Abdullah ibn Saba" versus a possible reality. The myth is the fraud "narration" from a proven liar called Sayf ibn Umar al-Tamimi: Quote- Distinguishing between the stories narrated by Sayf Ibn Umar and the reports free of Sayf Even for the sake of discussion we consider the traditions recorded by Ibn Asakir and Al-Kashi (that don't exceed to fourteen) they do not prove what the Nawasib would want us to believe and have clear dissimilarities such as: 1. In all fourteen traditions free of Sayf Ibn Umar, Abdullah Ibn Saba played no role during the Caliphate of Uthman, rather he appeared long after the killing of Uthman, during the reign of Ali bin Abi Talib [as] that conflicts with the stories of Sayf Ibn Umar according to which Abdullah Ibn Saba appeared during the reign of Uthman, conspired against him, built up a huge army of agitators that stormed Madina and killed him. 2. According to the fairy tale of Sayf bin Umar, Abdullah Ibn Saba claimed that Ali ibn Abi Talib [as] was a “successor" of the Holy Prophet where as the traditions free of Sayf Ibn Umar tell us that Ibn Saba didn't campaign for the "successorship" of Ali bin Abiu Talib [as] rather he claimed that Ali bin Abi Talib [as] was "god"(naudobillah). 3. The traditions free from Sayf Ibn Umar tell us that Ali bin Abi Talib [as] burnt Abdullah Ibn Saba alive along with other Sabaies whilst Sayf Ibn Umar didn’t mention any such thing. 4. According to the fourteen traditions free from Sayf bin Umar, there was no role of Sabaies or Shias in the wars of Jamal and Siffeen, whilst according to Sayf Ibn Umar Kadhab, both the parties were about to enter into a peace treaty but suddenly the Sabaies / Shias attacked both sides in the darkness that resulted in the beginning of the war. 5. According to the fourteen traditions free from Sayf bin Umar, pious companions such as Ammar Yasir [r] and Abu Dhar Ghafari [ra] were not misguided by Ibn Saba, they didn't become his followers and they didn't assist the Sabaies in the murder of Uthman. It is only Sayf Ibn Umar and hence the Nawasib of today who make such accusations against these great Sahaba. end quote.
  21. The Islamic Republic of Iran needs to be self-sufficient and should never rely on outside powers (who do not have Iran's interests in mind). This is the way of the world is with the arrogant imperialist Western powers, they claim to love development and growth in the "Third World"; but the second a power like Iran begins to really become strong they want to stop them. This is because the imperialist powers in the West don't actually want any challenge to their global hegemony. As for France, the Islamic Republic of Iran should make no deals with that nation currently being run by the Zionist Sarkozy(la). France has also in the past not followed through on deals they made with Iran for delivering things like hexaflouride. Iran needs to stay strong and not bow to the arrogant imperialist West; it is this Iranian self-sufficiency in the face of Western threats, sabotage, and economic sanctions that has made Iran a self-sufficient power with its' own indigenously produced military equipment, scientific equipment, and even space program and satellites.
  22. Yes, if you doubt this one simple technical question: which of these organizations is stronger in every facet military, technology, etc. the official Lebanese army or the armed military/resistance wing of Hezbollah?! The answer should be clear. Also you seem to be knocking Hezbollah for only finding the devices now, keep in mind Hezbollah has been at the lead of uncovering all the Zionist "Israeli" spying inside Lebanon over this last year (see all those Zionist spies and suspected spies arrested over this year or so in Lebanon). Also Zionist "Israel", with its' American government/military backer, likely has some of the most sophisticated spying equipment in the world: so for a resistance militia like Hezbollah to be able to defeat the Zionists high-tech spying equipment actually shows how great Hezbollah is, Insha Allah.
  23. How? I explained it to you clearly, Hezbollah coordinates with and helps the Lebanese army on joint interests. Hezbollah, as a military/resistance organization is much stronger and better then the actual Lebanese army. It is absurd to think the Lebanese army alone could detect Zionist "Israeli" spy devices. If Hezbollah wanted they could defeat the official Lebanese army in a few hours. Also the Lebanese army would not take any initiative to root out these Zionist spying problems; as the army is officially loyal to the official Lebanese government which has supporters of the Americans/Zionists in it: like Saad Hariri, Phalangists, etc. and other forces put in place when Lebanon was created (carved out of Syria) via the French Mandate of Lebanon by European colonialism after WWI. The Lebanese army would only act, if Hezbollah forced them too, because in these circumstances the official Lebanese government and security forces wouldn't want the whole world to see the nation of Lebanon was being spied on by Zionist "Israel" and they (the official Lebanese government and security forces) did nothing! This would make it clear to the world this alleged official Lebanese government and army were full of Zio-American puppets. If it wasn't for Hezbollah and its' successful resistance against Zio-American plots; Lebanon would be nothing but an occupied Zionist colony (just like the occupied Palestinian West Bank is still today: with the Zio-American puppet and traitor Mahmoud Abbas(la) in power with American-Zionist support).
  24. The Nobel is a worthless Zionist "award"; Sayyed Sistani (ha) is too great to even be mentioned next to this Zionist group and their silly "award". Also this NY Times garbage from a Zionist Jew like Thomas Friedman(la) is full of so many imperialist lies it is not even worth reading.
  25. There is no contradiction, Hezbollah is the most important group in South Lebanon and Lebanon as a whole; so Hezbollah often helps and coordinates with the Lebanese army. For example Hezbollah has in the past secured protection of UN personnel in Lebanon (along with the Lebanese army), as these UN people were under threat from al-Qaeda affiliated Wahhabi gangs in Lebanon (like Fatah al-Islam, etc.).
×
×
  • Create New...