145_turbo_16V

Did you check with your marja? I think it’s discouraged but the definitive fiqhi answer should come from them not from this forum.

Even the eyes that with the beings in Jannah are still a form of creation and limited to some degree. Even THAT eye will not be able to see Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى

Why did Bilal Philips quote this: "As for previously mentioned verse, "Eyes cannot catch Him, but He catches all eyes", https://quran.com/6/103 It's absar no 'uyun That's just weird for someone who knows arabic to suddenly translate it wrongly. And we can see, but not with our eyes. Again look وَفِي أَنفُسِكُمْ أَفَلَا تُبْصِرُونَ , it it's not seeing with the eyes, it's basara not nadhara

He doesn't deny imamah, but his opinion on imamah is flawed. I can no longer use his lectures.

What was the point about Nahjul Balagha which MH brought forth which would "destroy" our arguments? He didn't state which khutba of Amir Al-Mu'minin it was. I would like to look it up. I mean the question which they keep on asking is pretty dumb. "Show me where in the Quran there are mention of 12 imams". "Why does Allah make it difficult for us, couldn't he just show it in the Quran about the 12 imams". Show me where in the Quran there are mention of 5 prayers. Seriously, why do these people to themselves. Isn;t there a hadith which states: صـلـّوا كـمـا رأيـتـمـونـي أصـلـّي Then it's the same for Imamah.

Salaam I'm not Sunni, I was Sunni (following Imam Shafie (Rahmatullah Alaih)). Imam Shafie as you all know was a lover of Ahlul-Bayt. I came to Shiachat in 1997 when Bro Asad from Canada was the admin.

Intercession or intermediary is not a new thing Jimmy. Even the Quran is an intermediary between us and AllahSWT. Haven't you asked yourself why you can't pray your own way? Why must you follow an intermediary like the Quran? I was born Sunni and I have no problems with the concept at all. Only problem I have with are those shias who think "mola" Ali will save us regardless of what our actions are, sort of like a Christian belief.

Sayyid Abidi does not allow people do taqleed of him. All your questions are answered based on fatawas of your marja of choice.

Salamun Alaikum, I don't understand why Sheikh Ariff is saying that mistakes are possible. See at timestamp 12:20. "But that DOES NOT MEAN if evidence is placed in front of them and that they are judging, there cannot be there a flaw in their judgement" I agree that it's possible that there could be other outcomes given a situation, all of which can still be acceptable in the context of the syariah, but what does he mean that it's still could be flawed?! That doesn't make sense at all. Our Imams have taqwa, knowledge, etc , to me, is a means to prevent them from making those flaws! If not, their sunnah cannot be used because it could be flawed! I like Sheikh Ariff but I don't agree with this conclusions. What are your thoughts? Please don't insult him. I'm already seeing youtube videos made by other Shias calling him names, which I think is unacceptable. Remember that his contributions probably far outweigh what your or I might be able to do in a few life times.

Sheikh Ariff along with other Shia and Sunni ulama have discussed this issue in a cordial environment. This debate with Asrar Rashid seems pointless because it's probably going to be similar to the ones with Dimasqiyah. Just lots of back and forth and both side loses. But just the title Adalat of the sahabah is a non-starter. Those 2 words don't go together.

Sorry to bring this topic back to life again, but about the sermon 216, "......Therefore, do not abstain from saying a truth or pointing out a matter of justice because I do not regard myself above erring." The khutbah then proceeds with "....I do not escape erring in my actions but that Allah helps me (in avoiding errors) in matters in which He is more powerful than I." Seems clear to me that Imam Ali (AS) was indeed infallible with guidance from Allah (SWT), he was never independently infallible.

His views are not the same as Sayyid Kamal Haydari and many other great ulama. I don't feel like getting into the Shirazi debate again. I got fed up with that since 1997.

SA, Saya tengok video ustadh Kamil dan Prof. Azmi debat di Bagan Serai kut, hujung tahun 2011. Pejabat Agama tu cuba nak perangkap diorang. Diorang nak Ustadh Kamil kata kalau tak percaya Imamat maka jatuh hukm kafir. Pasai apa la setengah2 ustadh sunnah kat Malaysia ni suka membuat fitnah. Hang tak suka Shiah to tak apa, tapi biaq la depa nak hidup. La ni hari2 saya dok tengok videp Sayyid Kamal Haydari. Selama ni saya tengok videp dia, fuuuh dahsyat sungguh dia ni. Di ni kalau debat dengan ustadh2 Malaysia, habih, hancur.

Salamun Alaikum, Video tu private. Macam mana nak tengok?

SA, Do you have the link to the denial by Sheikh Al-Attas? That would be good to read. I couldn't find it through google. The time discrepancy is really something disturbing, too much false news. I'm really very doubtful about the loudspeakers being so loud. I know Sheikh Zuhairi has had an understanding with JAIS, Bro Faisal, Were you there during the raid?