145_turbo_16V

Listen to this Sunni Karbala majlis by Sheikh Ninowy

Muawiya was khalifah and then passed it down to Yazid. Is this khilafah restricted to Syam? Non-Salafi Sunnis also have similar narrations to the Shia. This salafi man is obviously a liar.

Probably some differences in the understanding of the level of infallibility. But I doubt it’s major. but differences in opinion on the level of infallibility exists even for prophets. From my research and attending lectures, infallibility is due to knowledge. We are all “infallible” to some degree because of our knowledge. We wouldn‘t do X or Y because we have knowledge of somethings, be it from experience or second hand knowledge. Our level of “infallibility” is very low. Sometimes we have knowledge but lack taqwa. Even when we know something is bad, we may still do it. We can still commit sins, but there is a very high probability we won’t commit some sins, like murder or grand theft because we know the consequences here and the hereafter. Also, we have hijab which prevents us on seeing what awaits us, be it good or bad, The Imams’ infallibility is based on knowledge and wisdom that Allah has bestowed upon them, it’s not as if they are prevented from sinning. They have clearer vision and can see what’s ahead.

Watch this video Mufti Farouk sahib (sunni) Urdu around: 4:44 Translation by Sheikh Ariff 13:35 Mufti Farouk disputing Abu Bakr's (translated by Sheikh Ariff) 19:39 You can also see how Mufti Farouk sahib dismantles the typical Sunni argument that the inheritance is only spiritual with the example of Nabi Zakaria (عليه السلام)

I’ve been searching different narrators. People say there are many Hadith, but it’s a duplicate, so from my limited reasearch it looks like Khabar wahid. Can any of our Sunni brothers here post a different Hadith narrated from a different sahabi? one Sunni mufti during a Al Mahdis institute panel discussion said He did not accept Abu Bakrs hadith or something to that extent. I need to find the video of that

I like him, open minded, but I just hate the fact he admires muawiyah because he thinks muawiyah is charismatic and is a little “naughty, naughty”

deleted

Some Sunnis oppose mutaah but they have other variations which they are ok with. This is proof that Sahih Hadith abrogates the Quran https://sunnah.com/muslim:1406b they sometimes use the example of the prohibition of alcohol, but Alcohol was prohibited in the Quran explicitly in 2:219

Salam, Almost every sect uses that Hadith and they claim their sect is the saved one. If you are "considering" switching, then what is it that you are considering? Which factor is causing you to consider?

Search for: Ahlulbayt: Reborn Ahlulbayt: Documentaries

don't use it and cause mischief

Yes, I understand. But according to the Quran, even if news comes a evildoer, it doesn’t mean you just throw it away, you can use it but you need to verify it, use it and cause mischief with it. So why is it by Qur’anic standards, did Allah say it’s ok to use the info brought by an evildoer after the info is verified but we want to toss something good brought by Sheikh Saduq (رضي الله عنه). The problem is when ignorant people claim it’s 200% Sahih and is a part of our aqeedah. Quran 49:6: O believers, if an evildoer brings you any news, verify ˹it˺ so you do not harm people unknowingly, becoming regretful for what you have done. I mean I don’t have an opinion on this, I’m just a lay person, I rely on our scholars too. But from what many scholars have said it’s ok and thus type of day is found in Sunni Sahih Hadith. So this is not a Sunni Shia issue at all as far as the wording or concept of tawassul goes. Of course on matters of halal and haram our scholars are more strict.

wa alaikumussalam It's NOT authentic from the point of view of sanad. It has a broken chain, nothing connects it from Sheikh Saduq (رضي الله عنه) to any of the Imams. But the content, according to most scholars, based on "qaedah at tassamuh fi adilat assunnan" it's permissible to recite it and some say even recommended. The other objection I've heard is this part: إِنِّي تَوَجَّهْتُ بِكُمْ https://www.duas.org/tawassul.htm I can't say too much about this, but most scholars I've talk to don't find this objectionable. Some do, and you can watch the objections by the group at Al-Mahdi institute. You can email the offices of the various maraje to clarify this with them. But as a side note, this type of wording is also found in sunni hadith (Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, Naisaburi) (sahih, and according to Hakeem Al naisaburi sahih with the conditions of the sheikhain ) https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:3578 إِنِّي تَوَجَّهْتُ بِكَ إِلَى رَبِّي فِي حَاجَتِ So it's not something ground breaking or shocking. Tawassul is found on both sides of the divide. The dua itself cannot be established as sahih from the point of view of the chain of narrators. But it doesn't mean that is' bad or a sin to recite. Here's what Samahat Sayyid Kamal Al-Haydari has to say about the sand-centric approach but not paying enough attention to content.

My point was simple, if you use QURAN ONLY, can you point where it says "I need to pray 5 times a day"? Does it? Go re-read my statement again in case you don't understand. Let's look at your points 11:114 Sahih International: And establish prayer at the two ends of the day and at the approach of the night. Indeed, good deeds do away with misdeeds. That is a reminder for those who remember. You claim 3 salats, fajr (at one end) and maghrib and isya (the other end). But tell me, where does it explicitly say "1 at one and and 2 at the other end" ?? Where? If you DID NOT HAVE HADITH, how would you conclude that? You can claim that because you can map the solutions you already have to the verses in the Quran. Suppose you didn't know what the salats were, now can you still tell me that there are 2 salats at one end of the day and 1 salat at the beginning of the day? 50:39 Sahih International: So be patient, [O Muhammad], over what they say and exalt [Allah] with praise of your Lord before the rising of the sun and before its setting, You claim "This seems to refer to Salat al-fajr, Salat al-asr and Salat al-'isha." Again it says salat before the rising sun and before the setting sun, 2 salats, no 3. Again, WITHOUT HADITH, how would you know which salat is which is? My point was simple, salat is in the Quran, Imamah is also in the Quran. Period. End of. But when it comes to Imamah they say "no no no Quran only show me 12, show me 12 explicitly". I didn't say which one was more detailed and which one is less detailed. Go read my statement again, where did I claim, as you seem to infer "Salat and Imamah both have very detailed evidences in the Quran, both equally presented" Where did I say that?

My problem when I was sunni, nobody could answer this verse وإذ ابتلى إبراهيم ربه بكلمات فأتمهن قال إني جاعلك للناس إماما قال ومن ذريتي قال لا ينال عهدي الظالمين People are always asking "show me a verse of the 12 imams". I don't get it, show me a verse that says I need to pray 5 times a day. Then they bring out Hadith. صـلـّوا كـمـا رأيـتـمـونـي أصـلـّي، I said "No brazar, no no no, you naughty naughty, only Quran, only Quran" Then we can debate if aqidah ONLY comes fro the Quran or not.