Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Shahrukh

Basic Members
  • Content Count

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Shahrukh

  • Birthday 04/23/1982

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Location
    NJ

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male
  1. salam, salawat bar

    Mohammad wa Aalay Mohammad

    may Allah bless you on your birthday

  2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqiKDIjO8i4 I dont speak Arabic, sorry if this is a repost. But this video is very powerful, even though I dont understand Arabic. Just thought I would share. Long Live Palestine! Death to the Zionists!
  3. Dont get the concept of the Messiah in Judaism and Christianity mixed. "In Judaism, the Messiah (מָשִׁיחַ Standard Hebrew Mašíaḥ, Tiberian Hebrew Māšîªḥ, Aramaic משיחא) initially meant any person who was anointed by a prophet of God." Cyrus the Great of Persia was called The Messiah in the Bible. So your whole argument if flawed. You are confusing the concept of the Messiah confused across three major religions. You keep asking to PROVE a NEGATIVE. Are you serious? Is there anything in the Bible that says that says "The Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) was not going to be the last Prophet of Allah (SWT) ?
  4. Shame on Shias and Sunnis. 006.159 As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: their affair is with God: He will in the end tell them the truth of all that they did. 042.014 And they became divided only after Knowledge reached them,- through selfish envy as between themselves. Had it not been for a Word that went forth before from thy Lord, (tending) to a Term appointed, the matter would have been settled between them: But truly those who have inherited the Book after them are in suspicious (disquieting) doubt concerning it.
  5. Well I never said this text is true. I am just trying to prove a point. Christians like to say that what happened to Jesus (pbuh) was "fact". They say Islam's claim is totally false and impossible. But as we see from this text, wheather Gnostic or not. It was talked about during the earliest days of Christianity. Religion isnt really "logically" to the average joe. 4:156-159 "That they rejected Faith; That they uttered against Mary A grave false charge; That they said (in boast): 'We killed Christ Jesus The son of Mary, The Messenger of Allah.' But they killed him not, Nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjunction to follow, for of a surety they killed him not. Nay, Allah raised him up Unto Himself; and Allah Is Exalted in Power, Wise. And there is none of the people of the book (Jews and Christians) But must believe in him (Jesus) Before his death; And on the Day of Judgment He (Jesus) will be a witness Against them." Actually I am not confusing the two. The "gnostic" Apocalyse of Peter is also part of the New Testament apocrypha. Actually my source the "gnostic" Gospel of Peter, which was part of the Hamadi Library which dates to - A 1st or 2nd century date of composition for the lost Greek originals has been proposed, though this is disputed. Which is around the same age of the accepted 4 Gospels.
  6. Exactly. These topics just cause bickering, and fighting among muslims, due to nationalism.
  7. Are any of the accepted Gospel's "authoritative"? How are you so sure that its not written by Peter? Are you sure about the authorship of these gospels? John, Luke, Mark, Matthew? Definetly not. So you pick and choose, based on the Church's teachings, to pick and choose what you want to believe. A Paganlike Jewish sect called Christianity. Its all guesses that credited these 4 disciples with writing those 4 gospels. It is decieving to say its a "Coptic Apocalyspse of Peter", it was not. It was a book that was used by early christianity, all sects, not just the gnostics.
  8. (bismillah) Remember none of Jesus's (pbuh) disciples witnessed the crucification. Except for Saint Peter, because he denied knowing Jesus (pbuh), the rest of the disciples fled for their lifes, you will know this, if you read the Bible. Now according to the writings of Saint Peter, which is "banned" from the Bible for some reason. It also says Jesus (pbuh) was not crucified. http://wesley.nnu.edu/biblical_studies/non...poc/fgapcpt.htm So the only disciple that witnessed the "crucification", agrees with the Quran, and Islam. About the The Apocalypse of Peter, in early Christianity, Christians believed it was spritually inspired. Christians had more doubts about the Apocalypse of John which is the Book of Revelations in the NT, than they had about the Apocalypse of Peter. And it was a very popular book in early Christianity. Yet the Apocalypse of John was included in the NT, but the Apocalypse of Peter was not. Maybe because the Apocalypse of Peter says that Jesus (pbuh) was not crucified, but someone that looked like him was crucified?
×
×
  • Create New...