Jump to content
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!) ×
ShiaChat.com
Guests can now reply in ALL forum topics (No registration required!)
In the Name of God بسم الله

Jondab_Azdi

Advanced Member
  • Content Count

    3,310
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Reputation Activity

  1. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from gogiison2 in Fadlallah and Shaving   
    A/c to him its mustahab to keep beard and not haram to shave. . .



    أعلم أن السيد فضل الله يسمح بحلاقة الذقن، ولكنني أريد أن أدع لحيتي قليلاً، فهذه من السنة. . ماذا يجب أن أفعل ؟
    ج: الأحوط إستحباباً عدم حلق اللحية، فالأفضل للمؤمن عدم حلقها لأنها أصبحت شعاراً وإن كان حلقها جائز بحسب رأينا الفقهي




    س: ما هو الدليل على جواز حلق اللحية؟
    ج: المطلوب هو الدليل على الحرمة، وبعد عدم تماميّة أيّ من الأدلّة الواردة في هذا المجال، لدينا القاعدة التي تقول: ((كل شيء حلال حتى تعلم أنه حرام))، ولذلك فإن السيد الخوئي ـ رحمه الله ـ لم ير هناك دليلاً على حرمة حلق اللحية، وإنما كان رأيه الاحتياط، فقط الاحتياط الوجوبي نتيجة شهرة هذا الموضوع بين الفقهاء، ولكننا لم نر هناك أي دليل على الحرمة، وإن كنا ننصح بعدم الحلق، باعتبار أن اللحية من شعائر الإيمان، ولكننا لا نفتي بحرمتها.



    w/s
  2. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Rohani in Fadlallah and Shaving   
    ^The prohibition is based on ihtiyat wajib.
    http://www.al-khoei.us/books/index.php?id=4948
    http://www.*******.org/hadiths/dress-and-appearance/beard
    w/s
  3. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Rohani in Fadlallah and Shaving   
    A/c to him its mustahab to keep beard and not haram to shave. . .



    أعلم أن السيد فضل الله يسمح بحلاقة الذقن، ولكنني أريد أن أدع لحيتي قليلاً، فهذه من السنة. . ماذا يجب أن أفعل ؟
    ج: الأحوط إستحباباً عدم حلق اللحية، فالأفضل للمؤمن عدم حلقها لأنها أصبحت شعاراً وإن كان حلقها جائز بحسب رأينا الفقهي




    س: ما هو الدليل على جواز حلق اللحية؟
    ج: المطلوب هو الدليل على الحرمة، وبعد عدم تماميّة أيّ من الأدلّة الواردة في هذا المجال، لدينا القاعدة التي تقول: ((كل شيء حلال حتى تعلم أنه حرام))، ولذلك فإن السيد الخوئي ـ رحمه الله ـ لم ير هناك دليلاً على حرمة حلق اللحية، وإنما كان رأيه الاحتياط، فقط الاحتياط الوجوبي نتيجة شهرة هذا الموضوع بين الفقهاء، ولكننا لم نر هناك أي دليل على الحرمة، وإن كنا ننصح بعدم الحلق، باعتبار أن اللحية من شعائر الإيمان، ولكننا لا نفتي بحرمتها.



    w/s
  4. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Rohani in Jumma Prayer of Women   
    ^It is permissible.



    åá ÊÌæÒ ÕáÇÉ ÇáÌãÚÉ ááäÓÇÁ ¿
    ÇáÝÊæì:
    íÌæÒ .



    http://www.alseraj.net/ar/fikh/2/?ek99io1zCJ1075094090&1&30&1
    w/s
  5. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from hadez803 in 23 days left to Ghadir   
    ^All these narrations are weak in sanad.
    w/s
  6. Like
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to abbas110 in Who are the clerics, and scholars   
    I can not comprehend all the slander that is shown here against Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah. The moderators should delete all these empty accusations that are thrown at our respectable marajas.
  7. Like
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to Shia & Proud in Who are the clerics, and scholars   
    Then you clearly know nothing about Fadhlallah and Hezbollah.
  8. Like
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to Rohani in Who are the clerics, and scholars   
    (salam)
    Fadlallah is not a sunni scholar i would watch slandering men whom spend their days and nights seeking what is right from Allah. and not just saying something is correct because all the other scholars agree to it. and what sunni do you know that accepts imam ali (as) as the successor of the prophet? as for whom Hezbollah follows i can consider that at least some among them consider what fadlallah says but perhaps not the majority.
    and hassan nasrallah don't seem to have a problem with fadlallah
    http://english.bayyn...ing17042007.htm
    http://english.bayynat.org.lb/se_002/news/31012007.htm
    http://english.bayynat.org.lb/se_002/news/31012008.htm
    and
    Thank you everyone for your reply's
    (wasalam)
  9. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to Aabiss_Shakari in Who are the clerics, and scholars   
    Ayatullah Fadlullah is more a Sunni scholar than a Shia scholar. I do not think that Hezbullah Soldiers would be following him. He would prefer doing taqleed of Ayatullah Sistani (a.r) or Ayatullah Ali Akbar Khaminai (a.r).
  10. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to aliunwalliulla wajib in am i allowed 2 marry a syed   
    RuQaYaH~ sent you a new conversation
    Subject: Warning
    Replies: 0
    Sent: Yesterday, 08:31 PM
    Salam, Insulting scholars and cursing the 3 caliphs are against the site rules and you have thereby recieved a warning. wasalaam
    may be you should name the forurm
    umar(la)loverschat.com
  11. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to aliunwalliulla wajib in am i allowed 2 marry a syed   
    [Edited out] i don't know i am not a follower,anyway i don't get much time to be online as you can see from my history if any one require more information on the OLD authentic Islam there is a great website at www.hubeali.com you will find more in depth answers to,can a sayidzadi marry a non sayid plus many other answers to questions caused by the many NEW prophets who seems to have appeared like the black plague and have made people clinically ill,
    i was going to log but let me give you an example this is from authentic shia books i dont remember the name but her go's,this narration is set at the time of the bani abbasid la dynisty when a sayyidzada a son of an holy imam settled in land away from madina and raised a family amongst which the sayyid had a
    daughter who was the eldest and their neighbor was a wealthy lord of the area and had a son similar age to this sayyid's daughter and when this wealthy lords son achieved the age of maturity his parents began to look for a suitable partner to marry and after some time when they failed to find suitable bride the husband and wife talking between them realised that their neighbor had a daughter and the family although poor was in fact honest trustworthy and reliable thus meets all the criteria for marriage proposal.
    the wealthy lord ask his wife to go and ask their neighbor's daughter's hand in marriage and after this took place they wife of the sayyid replied that her husband was away and upon his return would convey this proposal happy,when this sayyid did return the informed him of the proposal and the sayyid immediately got up without saying a word in response and did woozo and prayed two rakat namaz and at the end of which he prayed that Allah swat should remove his daughter from this world and no sooner did his hands came down that his daughter passed from this world hearing this the sayyid started to cry when the wife noticed him crying she rebuked him saying that she saw hih praying for her death with her own eyes and now crying why? the sayyid grabbed his wife by the hand and lead her in their room saying let him explain.
    the sayid explained that he was a sayyid aulad e Aimmas a.s and hid his identity(taqqya)because of the fear of persecution from the zalam ruling ragime and he was sorry that he did not teach his daughter was in fact daughter of sayidah Faima tu zahra s.a(Allah huma sall e ala Mohammadan wa ale Mohammadan) and marriage out side the sadath was haram,as i said before make what you like of this and many many other proof of evidence which you of course will deny and this is what Set's haram annd halal apart there were people like me and will alway be who will say it is haram for a sayidzadi to marry a non sayid and to follow one who set'a abad example
  12. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to aliunwalliulla wajib in am i allowed 2 marry a syed   
    ya Ali a.s madad
    when talking about marriage one should look at their religion because marriage is an religious obligation,like you i am an ummati and it is deemed haram for an non sayid to marry an sayidzadi looking closer to home non of the aulia Allah's permitted it.
    maula waris
  13. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from lotfilms in Sanad of Ziarat e Ashura   
    You wouldn't have said this if you knew the standard principles of rijal as used by Ayatullah al-Khui in his fiqh work and by Shaykh al-Radhy here in his ananlysis of chains of Ziyarah Ashura.
    One can authenticate any narration by ignoring these principles and that's what Ayat. Jafar Subhani has done in his analysis.
    1) In the first chain Ayat. Jafar Subhani is ignoring the standard principle that for a chain to be sahih/hasan, there needs to be explicit tawthiq or madh(praise) of narrator. No criticism/no praise makes the narrator majhool and thats why Uqba b. Qais is majhool as mentioned by Ayatullah al-Khui in Mujam ar-Rijal.

    ÚÞÈÉ Èä ÞíÓ:
    ãÌåæá¡ ãä ÃÕÍÇÈ ÇáÈÇÞÑ Úáíå ÇáÓáÇã¡ ÑÌÇá ÇáÔíÎ (74).
    æÚÏøå ÇáÈÑÞí ÃíÖÇð Ýí ÃÕÍÇÈ ÇáÈÇÞÑ Úáíå ÇáÓáÇã
    2) In the second chain, Jafar Subhani is relying on a weak narration from the book of al-Kashi to authenticate the narrator Alqama. Here's the chain of that narration he used:
    æÞÇá ÇáßÔí ( 290 ) : " ÍÏËäí Úáí Èä ãÍãÏ Èä ÞÊíÈÉ ÇáÞÊíÈí ¡ ÞÇá : ÍÏËäÇ ÇáÝÖá Èä ÔÇÐÇä ¡ ÞÇá : ÍÏËäí ÃÈì ¡ Úä ãÍãÏ Èä ÌãåæÑ ¡ Úä ÈßÇÑ Èä ÃÈì ÈßÑ ÇáÍÖÑãí ¡ ÞÇá
    Muhammad b. Jamhur is daif in hadeeth and Bakr b. Abi Bakr is majhool

    ÞÇá ÇáÓíÏ ÇáÎæÆí ÃÞæá : ãÍãÏ Èä ÌãåæÑ ÖÚíÝ ¡ æÈßÇÑ ãÌåæá ¡ ÝáÇ ÇÚÊãÇÏ Úáì ÇáÑæÇíÉ
    There is no tawthiq or praise for Alqama in reliable books of shia rijal and he was considered majhool by early scholars such as Majlisi.
    3) In the third chain he is ignoring that there is no tawthiq for Muhammad b. Khalid al-Taylasi in the reliable books of rijal.
    a ) Majlisi considered him majhool.
    æÐßÑå ÇáÚáÇãÉ ÇáãÌáÓí Ýí ÑÌÇáå Õ 301 ÈÑÞã 1643 ææÖÚ Úáíå ÑãÒ ãÌåæá ÇáÍÇá
    b ) Ayatullah Sadiq Rohani grading a narration weak b/c of Muhammad b. Khalid al-Taylasi in the chain:

    ÞÇá ãÍãÏ ÕÇÏÞ ÇáÑæÍÇäí Ýí ÝÞå ÇáÕÇÏÞ Ì 14 Õ 33 Ýí ÈÇÈ ( ÇáãÚÇæÖÉ Úáì ÃÈæÇá ãÇ áÇ íÄßá áÍãå ) ÞÇá :
    ( ÖÚÝ ÓäÏå áÃä Ýí ØÑíÞå ãÍãÏ Èä ÎÇáÏ ÇáØíÇáÓí ÇáÐí áã íäÞá Ýíå ÊæËíÞ
    c ) A/c to Ayatullah Khui too, there is no tawthiq on him and in Mufeed Mujam ar-Rijal he is graded as Majhool.

    æ ÌÇÁ Ýí ÇáãÝíÏ ãä ãÚÌã ÑÌÇá ÇáÎæÆí :
    ãÍãÏ Èä ÎÇáÏ Èä ÚãÑ ÇáØíÇáÓí ÇáÊãíãí ÃÈæ ÚÈÏÇááå – ãÌåæá – ãä ÃÕÍÇÈ ÇáßÇÙã .... Ñæì Ýí ßÇãá ÇáÒíÇÑÇÊ – ØÑíÞ ÇáÔíÎ Åáíå ÖÚíÝ
    For correct analysis of chains of Ziyarah Ashura, see: http://www.alradhy.com/moadeea/ashora.htm
    w/s
  14. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from lotfilms in Help regarding ziyarat-e-ashura   
    w/s
  15. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to alial1234 in Nasrollah:Send Your Whole Army, We’ll Destroy Them   
    (bismillah) (salam)
    Why is hezbollah looking to pick a fight? This is not Hassan Nasrallah talking, it's someone else. ( metaphorically)
  16. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from lotfilms in How do shias view Abdullah ibn Abbas ra?   
    AFAIK, a tafsir book is attributed to Ibn Abbas (ra) and shi'as don't have a sahih chain for this tafsir.
    w/s
  17. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Rohani in Vegetarians...   
    ^Roughly, its saying that there is no prohibition in shariah to be a vegetarian and eating meat is not wajib shar'an, but, if the lack of eating meat is causing harm to his health then it would be haram for him to not eat meat.
    w/s
  18. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Laraib in Sects of Islam   
    Not sahih a/c to Syed Fadhlallah. . .



    س: قال الرسول الأعظم(ص): "ستفترق أمتي على ثلاث وسبعين فرقةً، كلّها في النار إلا واحدة". ما مدى صحّة هذا الحديث؟
    ج: لقد بحث بعض المحقّقين عن سند هذا الحديث، فوصل إلى نتيجة أنه حديث غير صحيح، لأنّ الأمّة افترقت إلى أكثر من ثلاث وسبعين فرقة، ولو فرضنا أننا أردنا أن نحصي الشيعة، وهكذا السنة وغيرهم، فإنّ فرقهم ربما تكون أكثر من ذلك.

    http://arabic.bayynat.org.lb/books/nadwas/fikrQ2_591.htm
    For shia versions see: http://www.al-shia.org/html/ara/books/lib-hadis/behar28/a1.html
    w/s
  19. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Rohani in Sects of Islam   
    Sahih hadith in al-Kafi says that Muhammad b. Hanafiya (ra) acknowledged the imamah of Ali b. Hussain (as). . .
    Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from ibn Mahbub from Ali ibn Ri’ab from abu ‘Ubayda and Zurara all from abu Ja'far (as) who has said the following: “When al-Husayn (as) was martyred, Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiya asked Ali ibn al-Husayn (as), for a private meeting. In the meeting he said, ‘O son of my brother, you know that the Messenger of Allah (as), delivered the task of al-Wasiyya, to Amir al- Mu’minin Ali, (as). Thereafter it was delivered to al-Hassan (as) and then to al-Husayn (as). Your father, May Allah be pleased with him, has been murdered, may Allah grant blessing up on his soul, and he did not make any will. I am your uncle and equal in status to your father and I am a son of Ali Because of being older in age I am more deserving of the position of Imamat considering that you are younger than me. Therefore, you should not dispute me about al-Wasiyya (the will) and Imamat, and should not argue with me about it.’ Ali ibn al-Husayn said, ‘O uncle, be pious before Allah and do not claim in what you have no right. I advise you not to be one of the ignorant people. In fact, my father, O my uncle, appointed me as the executor of his will before his leaving for Iraq. He made such covenant with me just an hour before his becoming a martyr. This is the Armament of the Messenger of Allah with me. You then should not dislocate them. I am afraid for you of a shorter life and difficult conditions. Allah, the Most Majestic, the Most Gracious, has placed al-Wasiyya, and Imamat, in the descendents of al- Husayn. If you want to know it we can go near the Black-stone and ask it for judgment about the issue.’ “Abu Ja’far (as), has said that the issue came up between them in Makka and they went near the Black-stone. Ali ibn al-Husayn, said to Muhammad al-Hanafiya, ‘You begin first and pray to Allah, the Most Majestic, the Most Gracious, and ask Him to make the Black-stone speak to you and then ask your question.’ Muhammad then pleaded in his prayer and asked Allah and then asked the Black-stone about the disputed issue, but there was no answer. Ali ibn al-Husayn said, ‘O uncle, had you been the executor of the will and the Imam it would have answered your question.’ Muhammad then said, ‘Now you pray to Allah, O son of my brother, and ask your question. Ali ibn al-Husayn prayed to Allah for what he wanted. He then addressed the Black-stone and said, ‘I ask you for the sake of the One Who placed the covenant of the prophets in you, as well as the covenant of the executors of the will and the covenant of all the people. You must tell us who the Wasiyy and Imam after al-Husayn ibn Ali is.’ “The narrator has said that the Black-stone began to shake so much that it almost came out of its place. Allah, the Most Majestic, the Most Gracious, then made it to speak in clear Arabic language and said, ‘O Lord, al-Wasiyya and Imamat after al-Husayn ibn Ali is for Ali ibn al-Husayn ibn Ali ibn abu Talib and ibn Fatimah, daughter of the Messenger of Allah.’ “The narrator has said that Muhammad ibn Ali returned and he acknowledged Ali ibn al-Husayn to be his Wali.”
    w/s
  20. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to mansab.jafri in Questions for the Sunnis   
    First of all... you copy/pasted these without owning these books or reading them.
    Secondly... are you blind? These ahadith are not acceptable because they have weak asaaneed. Do you know what this means? Do you want someone to explain this concept to you?
    Learn how to read and buy some books. Perhaps this will help you in the future.
    - Mansab
  21. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from lotfilms in Questions for the Sunnis   
    Majlisi's books are full of weak narrations. There is no sahih sanad for the narration you mentioned.

    ابى رحمه الله قال: حدثنا سعد بن عبد الله قال: حدثنا الحسن بن عرفة (بسرمن رأى) قال: حدثنا وكيع قال: حدثنا محمد بن إسرائيل قال: حدثنا أبو صالح عن ابى ذر رحمه الله عليه قال: كنت أنا وجعفر بن ابى طالب مهاجرين إلى بلاد الحبشة فاهديت لجعفر جارية قيمتها أربعة آلاف درهم فلما قدمنا المدينة اهداها لعلي " ع " تخدمه فجعلها علي " ع " في منزل فاطمة فدخلت فاطمة عليها السلام يوما فنظرت إلى رأس علي عليه السلام في حجر الجارية فقالت يا ابا الحسن فعلتها فقال لا والله يا بنت محمد ما فعلت شيئا فما الذي تريدين؟
    . . .
    The narration is weak b/c of majhool narrators in the sanad.

    الحسن بن عرفة : من وجوه العامة ، لقيه ، وسمع منه سعد بن عبد الله الأشعري .
    قاله النجاشي - مجهول

    محمد بن إسرائيل : مولى بني هلال الكوفي - من أصحاب الصادق ( ع ) -
    مجهول - .

    ^This is the same narration which is weak in sanad. See
    Those who believes Fatima (sa) is God is a Kafir and ghulat (LA) and worst than Jews, Christians, Fire-worshipers, Kharijites or any of the Ahlul Bidah.
    w/s
  22. Disagree
    Jondab_Azdi reacted to alial1234 in To improve ShiaChat.com... [OFFICIAL THREAD]   
    To improve shiachat i would remove the cursing rule. Both marjas and caliphs.
  23. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from lotfilms in Questions for the Sunnis   
    ^This narration is weak. There are majhool narrators in the sanad.

    ÍÏËäÇ Úáí Èä ÇÍãÏ ÞÇá: ÍÏËäÇ ÃÈæ ÇáÚÈÇÓ ÇÍãÏ Èä ãÍãÏ Èä íÍíì Úä ÚãÑæ ÇÈä ÃÈì ÇáãÞÏÇã æÒíÇÏ Èä ÚÈÏ Çááå ÞÇáÇ: ÃÊì ÑÌá ÃÈÇ ÚÈÏ Çááå " Ú " ÝÞÇá áå: íÑÍãß Çááå åá ÊÔíÚ ÇáÌäÇÒÉ ÈäÇÑ æíãÔí ãÚåÇ ÈãÌãÑÉ Ãæ ÞäÏíá ÃæÛíÑ Ðáß ããÇ íÖÇÁ Èå¿ ÞÇá ÝÊÛíÑ áæä ÃÈì ÚÈÏ Çááå " Ú " ãä Ðáß æÇÓÊæì ÌÇáÓÇ Ëã ÞÇá: Çäå ÌÇÁ ÔÞí ãä ÇáÇÔÞíÇÁ Åáì ÝÇØãÉ ÈäÊ ÑÓæá Çááå (Õ) ÝÞÇá áåÇ: ÃãÇ ÚáãÊ Çä ÚáíÇ ÞÏ ÎØÈ ÈäÊ ÃÈì Ìåá
    . . .
    Úáí Èä ÃÍãÏ Èä ãÍãÏ : ãä ãÔÇíÎ ÇáÕÏæÞ ¡ ÇáÚáá - ãÌåæá
    ÃÈæ ÇáÚÈÇÓ ÇÍãÏ Èä ãÍãÏ Èä íÍíì - ãÌåæá

    w/s
  24. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Rohani in Authenticity of this Sunni hadith(quite beautiful)   
    See chap. (Çä ÇáÇíãÇä íÔÑß ÇáÇÓáÇã æÇáÇÓáÇã áÇ íÔÑß ÇáÇíãÇä) and (ÂÎÑ ãäå æÝíå Ãä ÇáÇÓáÇã ÞÈá ÇáÇíãÇä) in al-Kafi Vol. 2
    http://www.yasoob.com/books/htm1/m012/09/no0980.html
    w/s
  25. Like
    Jondab_Azdi got a reaction from Rohani in Imams Hassan and Hussain (a) teaching wudhu   
    I think it's originally from Manaqib Al Abi Talib of Ibn Shahr Ashub who has quoted it from Uyun al-Majalis from al-Ru'yani.
    See: http://www.yasoob.com/books/htm1/m013/12/no1203.html
    w/s
×
×
  • Create New...