repenter-gone4awhile

They hate Rouhani now more than they ever did Ahmadinejad. And no, he didn't strengthen anything other than his ego. Iran lost so much because of him. 

So how the heck can we know if it has undergone istihala or not? Friggin confusing. I think should teach chemistry and biology in hawzah so we get more accurate answers for our diets.

lulz

I personally hate you all........sooooo

hopefully not, but we have had cases were everything is bidah....apparently. 

Celebrating first day of spring is jahiliyah? You might argue that the way its celebrated is jahil, but the actual occasion is jahil to celebrate? That's odd.....

Ofc, Soviet was bad. Who has denied that? But you judge someone by their history AND their present. Not just by their history. Iranian empire also tried to suppress islam from its land by banning hijab. Afghanistan has been run by taliban, you judge a free and good afghanistan by its taliban past if it comes to it?

I don't know how much economy and war history you have read, but saying "what do wars and sanctions do, they weaken economy, then concluding something about labor from weaken economy" is quite weak. You have to look at why the economy is weakened first, not that it's weakened. 
 
If it is weakened by sanctions and war then the solution is not cheap labor. War and sanctions means, in simple terms, that the native population itself is struggling to find jobs, selling/buying merchandise, getting a spot in universities etc, then cheap labor is fruitless and will only stress the economy even more. 
 
Anyways, again, we are getting nowhere, which is a shame. I believe both sides have been spoken for, but fair is fair, you may have the last word. 

I mean the guy has excellent charisma and has a very nice voice for lectures. I just wish he spoke about something else rather than speaking about anus, sodomy and who is a prostitute and who isn't all the time. 

This is a special collection specifically for the haters:
 

 

 

 

That was awesome, thanks bro. 
Al-Abbas, by Karimi:

This part....i believe you need to investigate more. I can't be bothered to list the examples because there are sooo many. But a lot of western science as we like to call it, are actually eastern science stolen.
Another issue was the militarization of the western world. Rest of the world didn't focus on military power at that time, but the western world did. AKA, colonization. 
 
Western world has had a lot of progress no doubt, but it's not exactly based on moral values and efforts. I'm speaking on a general level of course, because some sciences were actually honest, but it dwarfs compared to the developments funded by slavery, riches, minerals, scientists stolen from colonies, not to mention making sure others don't progress.

@emceemo40
You lost me at: Sayed Ammar Nakhshawani deserves to get arrested, think again.

When did i say that??? I was saying Sayyed Sadiq deserves to get arrested because he repeatedly breaks the law. Just like i believe anyone that breaks any law of any land deserves to be arrested. 

1. Being an enemy to something does not mean disagreeing with it. IF i disagree with you, I'm not your enemy. But if i plot against you, sabotage you, etc etc then I'm your enemy.
2. Why do you doubt i watched the video? Based on what fact do you say that? The video clearly is meant to give people a distaste of the government, which not only is causing fitnah, but also is actually illegal. They should arrest him, but haven't so he is lucky. And don't even start with cursing, you need to understand the context of cursing before commenting on it, which you clearly don't. 
3. Why is Mojtaba cursing people irrelevant? If you are a marja, and your brother goes of on a tangent, shouldn't you stop him? Isn't your silence the same as approving his actions?
4. Trash can be said hidden in polite construction of sentences or straight out. If you can't see it, then that is your problem. I already gave you an example of them doing that, and breaking the law, constantly. What does Islam say about breaking the law of the country you live in?
5. No, i don't have any videos in English. The problem here is that most his followers aren't Iranian so they don't know a lot of the stuff we do and see. They are regarded as a cult more than a family in Iran, and there are pleeeenty of speeches and written articles that provide sufficient evidence and arguments against the entire structure they have created. Unfortunately, you need to learn Farsi or get someone to bother translating it for you. The problem you will meet then is that no one really cares, as they aren't really a big threat or a big problem for WF and it's supporters, it's mostly academics and some ulama/scholars speaking about them, and that is mostly during academic sessions. 
 
Here, get someone to translate these for you:
IS this not insulting?
 
Here explaining difference between disagreeing and insulting/being an enemy:
 
This one is also a debunking:
 

Shirazis are generally against WF and rahbari, so no proof needed there. Montazeri went sideways when Imam Khomeini removed him from his position, after that he has many videos were he trashes Ayatollah Khamenei, if you speak farsi i can give you videos. Good akhlaq? The shirazis trash other marjas all the time, where have you been? Sayyid Sadiq himself has a video where he literally trashes Imam khomeini and his revolution. His brother calls everyone a kafir, worse than saddam etc etc and the sayyid says nothing. Montazeri basically disrespected his teacher Imam Khomeini, protected munafeqeen and wasted his entire life to save a murderer just because he was family. Not to mention his house was a haven for BBC and spies/traitors. 
In regards to enemy of WF and cursing them. What do you want them to say? May god bless our enemies? Disagreeing with WF is one thing, being it's enemy is another. Of course we are going to curse our enemies. 
I'm sorry, but you need to do a little research, then use common sense. 

People like me? Well considering i am iranian and live in the society it's not hard to tell. And i never said Ayatollah Shirazi spread lies, but his surroundings sure do. Just like the letter from Ayatollah khoei clearly saying he is not qualified to be a marja. Yet, their website says that he didn't say it, without providing any proof. 

Yeah the problem with this list is that they all have grudges against him. 

According to his website he has to say that. It's not the first time they twisted something. Problem is that the letter exists and has Ayatollah Khoeis signature on it, and its well known in the circle of scholars. So.....it's going to be a tough thing to deny.

What kind of proof would satisfy you? You agree that Ayatollah Sistani is qualified right? What qualifies him? And then ask Ayatollah sistani if Ayatollah Khamenei is qualified. See what he says.
His promotion was controversial simply because the constitution required the leader to be a marja. And since Ayatollah Khamenei wasn't a marja they changed it. It was normal that no student declared their marjaiiyah as long as their teacher was alive, as with Ayatollah Sistani and Ayatollah Khoei. Imam khomeini died the day before Ayatollah Khamenei was elected leader.
Can you name these 'many scholars'? Because 80+ scolars/marjas/mujtahids did elect him as well as many marjas such as bahjat, lankarani, amoli, meshkini etc endorsed him. So im curious who these many are.

Well according to Ayatollah khoei(Ayat.Sistanis teacher) sayyed shirazi isnt qualified to be a marja. Ayat.Haeri says the same thing.

The general idea was that they didn't want Beyt Shirazi to become another Beyt Montazeri. Beyt Montazeri caused so much problems and extra headache for everyone, including sercurity issues, spies, BBC den of joyful journalism, green movement etc etc. And the Shirazis are more prone to this than Montazeri ever was. As i said before, the wish of a scholar is not as important as the security and comfort of the people. He got burried in Hazrat masoomeh, which is respectful in itself. IF he was buried in his home, a lot of resources must have been taken out of beyt ul maal for the reasons i mentioned above. Some basirah goes a long way. 

It's been answered like 1000 times..........

You keep pushing this theme huh?

Ok time for some lesson in logic, history and common sense again it seems.
First:
Where is your wikileaks proving he was martyred? Everytime i begin to think you are decent and actually after the truth, you prove me wrong. You pretend to go research stuff, but you never do, your glass is already full. 
Second:
Ayatollah shariatmadari was caught knowing and linked to about plot to kill Ayatollah Khomeini and he didn't say anything. What did you want them to do? Give him a cookie? Marjas are not exempt from law. 
Ayatollah Rouhani, I met him at least 4 times. He is all fine and dandy, also speaks openly about tatbir and noone bothers him. Try again. Same goes for ayatollah Khorasani, whom ive both met and seen him in mashad many times. 

The late Ayatollah Shirazi, whom back then when imam told him to chill his activity a little, was no ayatollah and stuck his business where it didn't belong. Due to this, and his family name, pride got to him and he started speaking more than he should have. What his father did is irrelevant. And what exactly qualifies his younger brother to be a marja? If you actually live in iran, you realize its more of a cult than a family. Marjaiyah going down in inheritance instead of being earned. The younger brother btw, speaks his mind all the time, no one bothers him nor his hawzah, in the country he so much hates, his brother calls other marjas for dogs, sons of yazeed and worse than saddam, and he remains quiet, yet he gives lectures on Akhlaq. So much for being a marja. 
http://media.farsnews.com/media/Uploaded/Files/Images/1394/07/13/13940713000939_PhotoL.jpg
Third:
Some Ulama..............name 2. 
Then:
The Shirazi family are not in line with anyone. Who are most shias that are not inline with WF? You are uneducated and come here and regurgitate what others have told you. Most Ulama are for WF, they just have difference of opinion on the limitation. Tell me, how come they dont kill his brother, who talk a heck of a lot more than his older brother ever did?
Finally:
His body was taken because the Iranian intelligence services are smarter than you are, and knew what would happen if they didn't. You can call him a "top ranking marja taqleed" but first of all, he didn't have that many muqalids. Secondly, even if he did, if a security of a country, town, even a street is at risk, that is more important than a marjas wish to be burried somewhere. If you can't understand this simple fact, then no wonder you make these ridiculous threads from time to time. 
What exactly did you do in Iran when you visited? Wouldn't it be a good idea to actually find people to answer you questions like this? But then again, you are the same person that believes that there is a secret whistle that baseej have that makes them get ready for war..................Jesus Christ. 

Depends what you mean by strict.
Ayatollah Khamenei for example says woman must cover their feet infront of non mahrams...Ayatollah Sistani i think allows you to show feet. So if that is criteria of strict???