Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله

mahmood8726

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    934
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Everything posted by mahmood8726

  1. It's a war: Videos in links below: https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/18255?single —BREAKING: Indian airstrikes against Nur Khan Airbase in Rawalpindi, just south of the Pakistani capital Islamabad Videos show clear impacts. @Middle_East_Spectator https://t.me/tabzlive/35058?single — Air defenses are targeting unidentified objects in Peshawar, northwestern Pakistan near the border. Locals reported hearing 5 blasts. @TabzLIVE Image of pakistans NOTAM, showing this war is at a point of no return now: https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/18267 — BREAKING: Pakistan has issued a NOTAM, closing its entire national airspace to all traffic @Middle_East_Spectator India here bombed a commercial plaza in pakistan: https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/18274 — NEW: At least one person has been injured following the Indian drone attack on commercial plaza in Gulberg Greens in the Pakistani capital Islamabad @Middle_East_Spectator Unrelated video, but still relevant: https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/18272 — NEW: India's most senior national defense advisor, Major Gaurav Arya, calls Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi a 'pig' on live TV – while Araqchi is in New Delhi. He accuses Iran of being pro-Pakistan, as Araqchi was meeting with Pakistani officials some days ago – and he called Iran a 'terror-supporting state' for funding Hamas. @Middle_East_Spectator
  2. No, most shias dislike the fascist government of india. An example that I was just going to post now is this: https://t.me/NEWWORLDORDYR/33921 Once they used to call them terrorists and insult their religion as a whole, today they refer to them as "martyrs" Yesterday, when they themselves stormed their mosques, harassed Muslims, beat them, attacked them, violate the hijab of Muslim women, it was all seen as countering terrorists in a Hindu land Today, the very same people they have been oppressing for a long time, are suddenly labelled as "our civilians" and they are given the title "martyrs" An example of hypocrites from India who never cared about the Muslims in their country, nor moved an emotion for them and were seen as secondary, now suddenly use different tone when referring to them, why? Because these Indians were killed by Pakistan Pakistan does not care about the Shias nor India care about Muslims altogether, what you are seeing from both sides, how they act like they care so much about the very groups they have been oppressing for years, to suddenly be referred to positively, is not out of humanity and realization, not for genuine and authentic unity, not because they truly value their lives, but to polish and brighten their image in media, they are just weaponizing the blood of the people they have been oppressing for years and have it as a card to unite people under their banner, it is nothing but a nationalist propaganda, in benefit of the regime and not the people @NEWWORLDORDYR
  3. India and pakistan lateley have been hitting eachothers millitary targets, with the latest being india that claims to have destroyed some of pakistans air defences. Medman who has been quoting pakistans MOD a lot latley, claimed that india exaggerated their claims on the AD destruction: https://t.me/medmannews/21535 No. An HQ-9 has not been damaged by those dollar store Indian-Israeli drones. @medmannews They also seem to have both hit eachothers urban centers, india doing the latest strikes. Whats intresting is the drones india used are israeli made: Pictures of the drones: https://t.me/medmannews/21534?single
  4. I don't think it makes it an error, you certainly don't bomb mosques just like this with the flimsy justification that it's "terrorist infrastructure" without good undeniable evidence, it's a barbaric thing to do, it's just as barbaric and savage as bombing a hospital and in the case that some terrorist happened to be in one of the few mosques they bombed, that doesn't justify it either, you bomb these places when theyre being used to store ammunition and it's impossible to kill the people using that ammunition in another way, otherwise india is violating basic international law here and basic morality. Instead supporters of the bjp resort to stupid excuses like "it was 1 am, it looked suspicious, who goes to a mosque in 1am?". The fact is, india, like pakistan is obsessed with their PR image, is going to bomb some random terrorist and bomb recklessly civilian targets and act like they were the one with restraint by saying "we informed iran to tell pakistan that our strike was going to be symbolic and only against terrorist targets." And thats what they did and iran told them to not be idiots and that they would not tell pakistan because this is such a stupid thing to do and told them to go tell pakistan themselves about their reckless plan. Instead of taking irans advice, india decided to bomb pakistan and given pakistans reaction, I assume they were not informed by india. A third party doing it is something I suspected too, this could be either india that got convinced to behave in an unhinged manner that is uncharacteristic of them or its a false flag and its meant to prepare the stage to get iran bombed or make iran beg for a deal with america once they are in a weaker position, but this needs more evidence and the world doesn't revolve around iran either. That I doubt it.
  5. Now during this war, something caught my eye but I'm not sure what to make of it, Indias behaviour has been very uncharacteristic and weird, Ill show some telegram thread that I found intresting and wanted to see peoples thoughts on it: https://t.me/NEWWORLDORDYR/33843 | Why War Now? - India's strikes on 9 locations in Pakistan that killed 26 civilians and wounded 50 are in response to an alleged attack in Pehelgam, Indian-Occupied Kashmir, that killed tourists, many of whom were international. - Worse 'terrorist' attacks have taken place in India, with no apparent hostile action taken against Pakistan in the past. The Mumbai attacks of 26/11 killed a total of 175, with India alleging that it was also carried out by Pakistani-backed militants. - Ajmal Kasab, one of the attackers, was famously interviewed by an Indian police officer. During the interview, speaking Urdu in an accent obviously foreign to Pakistan, he misgenders simple terms such as baraf para instead of baraf pari, which is to say, "It was snowing" while referring to snow in the masculine form, whereas it is feminine in Urdu. He misgenders more than once during the interview. - Expressing remorse over his actions, he can also be heard saying "Bhagwan (the Hindu God) will never forgive me", which is an objectively unfathomable phrase for any Muslim to utter, whether Indian or Pakistani. - These statements cast serious doubt on the origin of the attackers in the Mumbai 26/11 incident. They also provide a strong reason to doubt the credibility of Indian claims of Pakistani involvement in subsequent 'terror' incidents in India, such as Pehelgam. Let's now turn back to the current situation. - A militant operation killing innocent tourists was carried out in Pehelgam, Indian-Occupied Kashmir, while JD Vance was visiting the country. - Some interesting facts to contemplate when analysing this inident: - Local Kashmiri militants (or those alleged to be backed by Pakistan) have never targeted tourists in the 77 years of conflict. - The deaths of international tourists in Pehelgam, a Muslim majority area of Kashmir, poses a problem for the local Kashmiris the most, as they rely on tourism as their primary source of income in the region. Why alleged Kashmiri locals would carry out an operation that hurts their own livelihoods is an interesting thought to ponder. - The Indus Water Treaty has never before been suspended, even during the 3 full-scale wars of 1948, 1961, and 1971. - The suspension of this treaty before a day passed since the Pehelgam incident and without an investigation having taken place, suggests Indian premeditation and intent to incite war. - India and Pakistan both are developing countries that cannot afford to go to war. - India has never initiated war with Pakistan in the past. All 3 previous wars were triggered by Pakistan. - Despite having existed for over 5000 years as one of the oldest civilizations in the world, India has historically never conquered any significant territory. It is not a warring nation. It is uncharacteristic of India to initiate war. - India's attacks on Pakistan today, the deepest since the War of 1971, are evidently an open call to war instead of a limited operation. There is no rationale for India to attempt to initiate a war as that in no way benefits India. - The incitement of this war only seems reasonable if an attack on Iran is confirmed. This would explain the premeditation and the uncharacteristically disproportionate reaction of India to the Pehelgam incident. - It would make sense if India was ushered behind closed doors, much like Ukraine, to carry out this attack against Pakistan to prepare the operation theatre for a later attack on Iran. - This would wound the only ally with a conventional military that could have offered meaningful support to Iran from the Eastern front whether militarily or non-militarily. - If this is plausible, it would follow that the attack on Iran will be fitting of a scale that would compel it to require aid from its neighbours, (likely non-military, as Pakistan is unlikely to assist Iran militarily). The Indo-Pakistani war may just be the preface to a full-scale Iran/Israel/US war.
  6. Obviously, this war is stupid and will cause millions to die, pakistan and india should do what iran and pakistan did in 2023 and deescalate this fast, but both brainless countries seem hinged on wanting to destroy eachother. Whats worse is both pakistan and india are full of misinformation, theyre so focused on their stupud PR image. These 2 countries should be used as an example on why blind nationalism is a cancer.
  7. The shia mosque that india bombed and mercelesly killed shia civilians had takfiri terrorists? This is not collateral damage, pakistan being a hub of terrorism and takfirism doesn't excuse indias fascist government when they kill innocent people and use flimsy justifications as their "proof". So far both sides have been disgusting, shame on both countries, shame on india for starting this senless war by blaming pakistan imediatley without doing a proper investigation, shame on india for bombing mosques and killing innocents. Shame on pakistan for slaugthering innocents in india, I just saw a disgusting video of a child with its head open because of the pakistani shelling.
  8. https://t.me/Middle_East_Spectator/18123?single — NEW: One of the Pakistani mosques struck yesterday by Indian missiles was a Shia mosque Pakistan's President, Prime Minister and Army Chief all attended the funeral ceremony amid the local Shia community, behind a Shia imam. @Middle_East_Spectator Pakistans government when warcrimes are being commited against shias in paranchinar: Pakistans government when india commits warcrimes against shias in it's country: "we love shias, lets do namaz together" This is still a good gesture, it needs to be praised, but they need to show consistency when it's their own nation where these crimes against shias also take place repeatedly, instead of only when india does it.
  9. What she did instead was write a letter to al quaeda in syria and they said they were talking to old evil politicians like her.
  10. https://thecradle.co/articles/syrian-forces-arrest-palestinian-leader-as-anti-resistance-crackdown-continues "Syrian forces arrest Palestinian leader as anti-resistance crackdown continues" PLFP-GC sg leader got arrested a few hours ago and just got released a few moments ago: https://www.almayadeen.net/news/politics/مصدر-فلسطيني-للميادين--نقل-طلال-ناجي-إلى-منزله-بعد-ساعات-على This comes after turkey closed its airspace to israeli planes and hezbollah condemned israels bombing in syria and ofcourse after the whole druze mess. Its unknown if the terrorist government has finally got the common sense to stop being a sectarian moron and to focus on israel instead who seems to want to dispose of him and seem to have no use for him anymore, which could explain him releasing the palestinian PLFP-GC SG and turkey closing its airspace to israel. Or this could be much more sinister and he could be complying faster, after israel bombed near his palace and is now intimidating palestinian factions by having them arrested and released on the same day. I say this because there is potential another got arrested, this is comming from an unconfirmed report where apparently al mayadeen said " Syria’s HTS regime arrested the guy who raises money for Gaza, Sheikh Al-Zubair Al-Ghazi.", but I couldnt find the article to confirm it. Edit: sheikh Al-Zubair Al-Ghazi being arrested was mentionned in al mayadeens twitter account.
  11. Anyone beleiving iran, north korea, south korea, america, china, venezuella, canada, brittan, cuba, france, russia, mongolia, vietnam, etc... are all in some conspiracy together to claim the earth is round, is out of their minds. The earth is round, use common sense.
  12. There is a big diffirence between stealing some innocent persons land because of some ridicilous criteria that it belong to you 3000 years ago which can't be proved anyways versus imposing a usually small tax on non muslim fully healthy/mentally sound males so they can live in an islamic country without having to be forcefully conscripted into the army or lose protection from the state if they decide to refuse mandatory millitary conscription given they decided not to pay that tax. Beleiving in holy rights is dangerous if they contradict your fundemental beleifs or if they are too extreeme as most societies would not tolerate them and it could endanger your religion. Luckly islam is not extreeme with its holy rights, islam isn't demanding settler colonialism and genocide, or child sacrifices like the mayans or bu[Edited Out]o like the japanese in ww2. Unlike zionists who not only violate their own "thou shall not steal" principle and have a very extreeme holy right that most of the world agrees is uncivilised and barbaric behaviour, which is though settler colonialism and genocide. If most of the world has a problem with islamic states imposing a reasonable tax on people (muslim or non muslim) so their state can function, then may our creator help us, because humanity is doomed at this point. Luckly most of the world wouldn't find islamic holy rights extreem, yet.
  13. Most knowledgable salafis will even refuse to call shias kuffar and same with shias towards salafis as salafi =×= nasibi. But don't worry, many of us aren't taking your question as an attack.
  14. Just so we are clear, the prayers aren't combined, you're still praying duhr then asr as seperate prayers, same with maghrib and isha, they're just done in the same period of time, so we are praying 5 times a day. Meaning there is no 8 rakat prayer for duhr and asr or 7 rakat prayer for maghrib isha.
  15. Are you sure? I know in shia islam and maliki sunni islam, all polythiests can pay jizya, but in hanafi sunni islam only non arab pagans can pay jizya and in hanbali and shafii sunni islam no pagan can pay jizya and they're all given the choice to convert or death. In shia islam we have to have the 12 infallible immams to rule to be able to impose jizya, if I remeber. I might make a topic on this soon to clear our what each sect beleives what on jizyah. So there can be an indepth discussion people can benefit from.
  16. >Be Joulani >Go on a secret trip to the UAE, where an israeli official also went the same day >Meet with the traitor collaborator mahmood abbas, leader of Palestinian Authority >Arrest leader of Palestinian islamic jihad the same week >bootlickers still think you'll do anything against israel >Syria most probably normalised with israel now, but hey, congradulations, syria is free from bashars tyranny
  17. Ive been curious about this, what about polythiests? I heard they didn't pay it, what would happen to them?
  18. New york time claimed this. Then trump on video responded to this saying, that he never ruled out any attack on iran and that hes just "not in a rush to do it"
  19. Salafi extreemism, maybe, but anti white racism, as I said, not really. Unless youre talking about some arabs in the west who grew up as leftists and might have a small tendency to be "anti white", but other than that not really. Unless youre conflicting anti american with anti white? But thats hardly anti white as americans could be non white and many terror attacks didn't really discriminate. Many of these terrorist groups like isis had 0 issues indoctrinating and recruiting white europeans too, you remeber these white europeans with long hair joining isis back in 2014-15? Some of them even went high in their ranks. I honestly dont see the similarity to be fair.
  20. Still wont change that muslims will follow a muslim power if it was technologically advanced. If anything, their racism towards the spanish will be less than that towards the turks, because turks originated from central asia, whilst the people of the levant and north africa regularly interracted with europeans and saw them as the same people as them. This concept of "white people" would have been foreign to them and it still is in much of the arab world.
  21. Then there is 0 points saying iran should get them. If iran was vulnerable without them, they would have been gone a long time ago considering they were the most sanctionned country on earth until 2022 and they have been threatened consistently for the last 50 years. The reality is even america admits a war with iran will be unlikley to achieve anything. Their bombs couldnt even penetrate places in yemen. Plus iran has enough missiles to cause ad much damage as nukes but whilst being precise. But when it comes to your opinion on nukes, are you sure you want iran to do a nagasaki like option? Where they wipe out entire cities just so israel "understands" to stop doing what its doing? Or so iran can get some security they already enjoy without the nukes? Even the most anti zionist amongst us wont see this as a moral thing. Are you sure you understand the implications of what youre saying? I feel like you need to take a step back and please think about the implications of this, i reflected a bit on it this week and in no way does iran flattening cities bring any good, thankfully iran never made one 50 years ago and this discussion is useless other than to make people reflect on their morals.
  22. guess that wasnt "fake news" and his advisors did tell him to stop being an idiot.
  23. No its not and don't let people guilt trip you into voting in child killers who lie like they breath. If they want the "bigger evil" of not getting elected, they should hold their own party accountable instead of guilt tripping people with a conscience who had a red line on genocide and the mass slaugther of children and the causing of unecessairy bloody wars that claim the lives of thousands of millions.
×
×
  • Create New...