mahmood8726

Its run by America zionists and Turks, so for now yes.

No.

He's still posting on Twitter. He never allowed anyone to criticize Bashar? Never followed people on Instagram so I don't know, guess he realized he was wrong about bashar and did the decent thing of deleting it all.

I forgot to mention one crucial thing here: Noitice how all the journalists who were accused of being "assadists" or "being paid by assadist money", all still have their opinions, proving these accusations wrong? As a matter of fact, most of them are even calling Bashar a traitor. It's like they always genuenly beleived in this stuff and were not being disingenious paid shills . These people/news outlets include: Max Blumenthal, Aaron mate, Syrian partisan girl, Richard medhurst, kevork amassian, eva Bartlett,Vanessa beeley, the cradle, etc... Ironically these accusations come from either actual paid shills from western media or liberals/takfiris who love cognitive dissonance.

There is that aspect yes, but the population would have overthrown him way too easily had they supported majoritarly the opposition. You'd be suprised, Syria held out against the "rebels" from 2012-2015 rather pretty decently before any Russian intervention. But you're right, most people did not think he was a good guy, as a matter of fact, most pro Bashar guys didn't think he was 100% a good guy either and almost all beleived his father was a ruthless tyrant (which he was, hafez was brutal).

Syria is special because most of the population was either neutral or pro assad, only a minority, I would say 20% supported these extreemist al quaeda types. I talked to many Syrians on this, they were all scared and panicking when these terrorists launched their mongol horde invasion of Syria from idlib and turkey and then terrorist sympathisers started a revolt in daraa near the Israeli and Jordanian border. This wasn't a popular uprising, despite people fallaciously showing showing crowds cheering as if it's proof HTS terrorists are popular. In this instance it was an invasion of Syria, not a popular revolt and the reason why Syria was difficult to topple for a decade and half was because most Syrians hate these extreemist types wether they're neutral or pro Bashar, most Syrians wanted to see change in Syria and a more free syria with less abuse, but most did not support these forgein sponsored thugs who hijacked the movement to replace Syria with a new dictator that is a puppet of America. Unfortunatley because Bashar was a fool who didn't listen to Iran or allies, because he brown nosed gulf state dictatorships, because he replaced all his battle hardened soldiers with smugglers, mercs and drug dealers, because he did not control the oil feilds, because of covid, earthquake and the Cesar sanctions, his country crumbled at the first sign of this foreign invasion and Bashar betrayed his own country by giving it up willingly to al quaeda 2.0. That's why they allied with such a system, because the opposite is litterally al quaeda 2.0 which were witnessing now or lybia 2.0 which is a possibility or Israel occupying large swaths of Syria which is also ongoing, all of these alternatives are nightmarish compared to Bashar. This should be a lesson to never trust America, turkey, Israel or the West in general when it comes to these regime change operations, there is always a catch when they come as this helper. Revolutions should be done organic with an actual goal, otherwise you get whatever the hell this is that were witnessing unfolding in Syria.

even kevork who isn't even a Muslim, but some armenian from aleppo can see thd writing on the walls, you might be onto something.

Hafez assad was a tyrant, litterally, he was 1000x worse than bashar al assad. Hafez was israel but less brutal in the killings and inappropriate touching of women, etc... Israel and christian fascists were the few who were worse than hafez, so it says a lot. Despite all this, in 1982, he crushed it because the muslim Brotherhood attacked before.

Israeli terrorists have been reported by local sources to be in Al-dimas not far from damascus city outskirts. Either they want to invade Damascus city, or they want to invade Lebanon from the north with a flanking maneuver.

Who's going to bet this will be syrias fate? Israeli tanks are now 10km from damascus city.

SNA-affiliated Azaz News Network: 'There is no truth to the claims spread by 'anti-revolutionary media' that Israel has advanced in western Damascus countryside' @Middle_East_Spectator The "anti revolutionary media" is al mayadeen. They're doing the same kind of coping that SAA did to not sow panic.

Israel is about to capture Qanata and potentially Damascus city.

Israeli tanks are 2km from qatana, theyre closing in near damascus city. -Al mayadeen

NO, we need to invade Afghanistan again for the 10th time and hope we don't join the grave of empires and waste our resources away in a war of attrition against an army that refuses to die

I can't blame him, in Lebanon were also panicking over what just happened in Syria and were worried terrorist cells will activate in tripoli city now like last time, im assuming he's iraqi or lebanese, iraqis also don't have the best experience with isis.