The point was how the Holy Trinity of Niceae was introduced into Christianity. Up until Tertuliian, this was not prevalent. It was a subordination of Jesus and God, if that. You didn't mention the Didache, which mentions Jesus being a mere servant-son, a term used for David that's deducted from the Hebrew "Son of God", which in turn means "Servant of God", hence why they mentioned it. Nobody had equated him to God and made him divine except as a servant. Go and bring a Jew and try to explain the New Testament to him using Greek/Hebrew and you'll see why it doesn't make sense for Jesus to be God from this standpoint.
John 1 is attributed to John but is anonymous, so I take it with a grain of salt.
I didn't mention the New Testament specifically due to me having to go in great detail with the language. I'd be very specific with it and give grammar rules and cross references instead of my personal opinion. If you want me to deconstruct everything and do that, you'd have to wait a while.
None of the disciples worshipped Jesus. If you argue they asked of him as an intermediary, then there's no problem with this because they did this when he was alive. No person disagrees with this. However, after he died, they didn't worship him. They never claimed him as God nor did he ever claim himself as God. The Romans crucified him because they thought he was blaspheming - not because he claimed to be God, but because he claimed to be a prophet and it did not fit their political and religious aspect concerning his prophethood. Nowhere is Jesus stated to be God in the earliest sources. Only after Paul did this divine nonsense take place and slowly begin to grow.