Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله

Muhammad A-H

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    697
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Hameedeh in Wudhu related questions   
    Wa Alaykum Al-Salam,
    The wudu' is valid as long as the elbow bump did not take too long that it interrupted the continuity of the wudu' according to the common view.
    Also, if new wetness got onto the elbow and went down to the hand, then you cannot wipe with that wetness.
  2. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Arian.5010 in Wudhu related questions   
    Wa Alaykum Al-Salam,
    The wudu' is valid as long as the elbow bump did not take too long that it interrupted the continuity of the wudu' according to the common view.
    Also, if new wetness got onto the elbow and went down to the hand, then you cannot wipe with that wetness.
  3. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Wudhu related questions   
    Wa Alaykum Al-Salam,
    The wudu' is valid as long as the elbow bump did not take too long that it interrupted the continuity of the wudu' according to the common view.
    Also, if new wetness got onto the elbow and went down to the hand, then you cannot wipe with that wetness.
  4. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Is my ghusl valid   
    Wa Alaykum Al-Salam,
    If blood clotted on the wound and become like skin, it is pure even if it is easy to remove although you should wash the blood clot to ensure that if there is any blood that is not like skin that it is removed, and then thereafter the wound should be washed to purify it.
    مسألة 85: ما ينجمد على الجرح عند البرء ويصير كالجلد لا يجب رفعه وإن حصل البرء، ويجزئ غسل ظاهره وإن كان رفعه سهلاً.
    https://www.sistani.org/arabic/book/23720/4782/
  5. Thanks
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Arian.5010 in Najasah question   
    It is necessary to know or be sure that the water reached all the impure areas so that all the shoe can become pure. I also have a top load washing machine and the water does not reach everything (always some float above the water) so I have to push them under the water while the water is running to purify them.
    Perhaps you should go to a tap and pour water over the dirt to purify it.
  6. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Najasah question   
    Did you actually see the shoe go under the water while the kurr water was being poured inside (not after)? It is possible that the shoe floats above the water.
    If you did see the shoe submerge and the shoe remained under the water until the water reached all the impure areas, then the dirt becomes pure according to Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani.
  7. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Najasah question   
    Wa Alaykum Al-Salam,
    If the intrinsic impurity was removed beforehand and the water reached all the impure areas of the dirt as well as the impure areas of the washing machine while the kurr water was still being poured in the washing machine, then according to Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani they become pure. If urine touched cloth or similar materials, then upon obligatory precaution it needs to be washed twice while the kurr water is still being poured into the washing machine.
    However, there are many scholars who say it is necessary or it is necessary upon obligatory precaution (such as Al-Sayyid Khamenei) to remove the used water that was absorbed by the dirt through pressing, soaking the water with a towel, etc. This is only necessary according to those scholars if the dirt absorbed water, otherwise, removing the used water is not necessary.
  8. Thanks
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from PureExistence1 in how do we know which is correct?   
    That part of the hadith is unauthentic according to Shia scholars.
  9. My Prayers
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Hameedeh in How do I change my name?   
    @Hameedeh
    Salam,
    Could you change my username to Muhammad A-H?
  10. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Men's Question - Ghusl Janabat Necessary for this?   
    Yes, it is necessary even if the semen came out involuntarily
  11. Thanks
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Diaz in Blood under nail   
    According to Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani, if the blood clots over the cut and becomes "similar to skin", then it is pure and a person can wash over it while performing ghusl, even if it is easy to remove it.
    However, you should wash it to ensure that if there were parts of the blood that were not "like skin" they would be removed. However, do not over wash.
    مسألة 85: ما ينجمد على الجرح عند البرء ويصير كالجلد لا يجب رفعه وإن حصل البرء، ويجزئ غسل ظاهره وإن كان رفعه سهلاً.
    https://www.sistani.org/arabic/book/23720/4782/
  12. Disagree
    Muhammad A-H reacted to AmirAlmuminin Lover in Who’s the most knowledgeable marja?   
    AmirAlmuminin Lover
    Just kidding. You can follow any Marji that you want if he is certified by Qum religious school. I presonally follow Ayatollah Sistani, and I know Ayatollah Sistani and Khamenei are pretty common among Shias. Choose a Marji that has enough English resources, and Ayatollah Sistani has enough English sources to learn from.
  13. Disagree
    Muhammad A-H reacted to Ashvazdanghe in I don’t get the emphasis on hatred   
    Salam It's not first time people likewise you who have been affected by Wahabi & Nasibi propaganda ,have accused Imam Khomeini (رضي الله عنه) then coseuently Shias through this losing battle procedure of mistranslation & wrong half baked conclusion by repeating such nonsense likewise a broken record for justifying enemies of Imam Ali (عليه السلام) especially Ayesha & Abubakr & Umar which everyone knows that you won't accept truth in such debates which in multiple threads people likewise you have started such time wasting debates which at the end they have repeated your mentality without accepting truth even after bringing multiple valid refute against their falshood however your nonsense  have been refuted many times which you can see some examples here which everyone   knows that lady Fatim (sa) never has made allegiance  with Abubakr   & until she has martyred , she has been angry from both of Abubakr  & Umar also enmity of Ayesha with Amir al Muminin  Imam  Ali(عليه السلام) & uprising of Ayesha & Talha & Zubair then cursed Muawiah against  him  has been crystaly clear unrefutable so there your argument  is completly refuted .
    In contrast to your baseless  claim about YH , there is no reliable  evidence is available  about his study in presence  of any grand Ayatollah  before his migration to Britain which only reliable history about him which is available about him is that he suddenly  from thin air appeared in a local mosque in Kuwait which he has started cursing sunni revered figures which caused jailing him by government  of Kuwait  then he released from prison by direct intervention  of British embassy  in Kuwait then by support of Shirazi grouplet he moved to Qom then London by help of office of Shirazi grouplet  which after entering to Britain & marrying with daughter of Ayatollah  Shirazi then he has  resumed his insults toward both of sunni revered figures & all grand Ayatollahs which until now his sudy in any Shia Hawza whether in Iraq or Iran or even in Kuwait  has not been verified by any Hawza ,neither by  any  grand Ayatollah  in these countries nor by any member Shirazi  grouplet in Britain .
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Superiority of Fatima to Aisha in Aloosi's view
     
     
     
  14. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from The Straight Path in Disbelievers Are Impure - inquiry   
    After reading more on this topic, I found that you were actually correct. I didn't read this part from his ruling in Minhaj Al-Saliheen:
    الكافر نجس بجميع أقسامه على الأحوط لزوماً غير الكافر الكتابيّ فإنّه لا يبعد الحكم بطهارته، وإن كان الاحتياط حسناً، وأما المرتدّ فيلحقه حكم الطائفة التي لحق بها.
    https://www.sistani.org/arabic/book/23720/4787/
     
    I also found these:
    السؤال: هل الكافر اذا نطق بالشهادتين يطهر من كفره؟
    الجواب: الكافر ما عدا الكتابي نجس على الاحوط وجوباً مالم ينطق بالشهادتين ، فاذا نطق بهما صار مسلماً وطهر تمام بدنه من النجاسة الناشئة من كفره ، وأما النجاسة العرضية كما اذا لاقى بدنه البول مثلاً ، فهي لا تزول بالإسلام ، بل لابد من ازالتها بغسل البدن. والشهادتان هما : أشهد ان لا اله الا الله ، وأشهد ان محمداً رسول الله (ص). https://www.sistani.org/arabic/qa/search/949885/   Question: What is the difference between Ahl-e Kitab (the People of the Book) and the rest of the unbelievers with respect to Shari'ah law?
    Answer: Ahl-e Kitab (Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians) are ritually pure and it is permissible to eat their foods even if we know that they have touched the food with wet hands. Yes, if their food contains meat, it is necessary that the meat should be ritually slaughtered Halal. As for those of non-Muslims who are not from the People of the Book, they are ritually impure (obligatory precaution) and their food is Najis, if it has been touched with a wet hand by them. https://www.sistani.org/english/qa/search/4129975/
  15. Thanks
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Arian.5010 in Washing the urinary organ.   
    According to Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani, one wash is sufficient even with qalil water.
    Ruling 62. The urinary outlet does not become pure with anything other than water and washing it once is sufficient, although the recommended precaution is that it should be washed twice, and it is even better to wash it three times.
    https://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2123/
    Also:
    Ruling 26. Qalīl water with which the urinary outlet or the anus are washed does not make anything it comes into contact with impure, provided that five conditions are met:

    1. it does not acquire the smell, colour, or taste of the impurity;
    2. another impurity has not come into contact with it;
    3. another impurity, such as blood, has not come out with the urine or faeces;
    4. particles of faeces do not appear in the water;
    5. a more than usual amount of impurity has not spread around the urinary outlet or the anus.
    https://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2118/
  16. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Disbelievers Are Impure - inquiry   
    After reading more on this topic, I found that you were actually correct. I didn't read this part from his ruling in Minhaj Al-Saliheen:
    الكافر نجس بجميع أقسامه على الأحوط لزوماً غير الكافر الكتابيّ فإنّه لا يبعد الحكم بطهارته، وإن كان الاحتياط حسناً، وأما المرتدّ فيلحقه حكم الطائفة التي لحق بها.
    https://www.sistani.org/arabic/book/23720/4787/
     
    I also found these:
    السؤال: هل الكافر اذا نطق بالشهادتين يطهر من كفره؟
    الجواب: الكافر ما عدا الكتابي نجس على الاحوط وجوباً مالم ينطق بالشهادتين ، فاذا نطق بهما صار مسلماً وطهر تمام بدنه من النجاسة الناشئة من كفره ، وأما النجاسة العرضية كما اذا لاقى بدنه البول مثلاً ، فهي لا تزول بالإسلام ، بل لابد من ازالتها بغسل البدن. والشهادتان هما : أشهد ان لا اله الا الله ، وأشهد ان محمداً رسول الله (ص). https://www.sistani.org/arabic/qa/search/949885/   Question: What is the difference between Ahl-e Kitab (the People of the Book) and the rest of the unbelievers with respect to Shari'ah law?
    Answer: Ahl-e Kitab (Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians) are ritually pure and it is permissible to eat their foods even if we know that they have touched the food with wet hands. Yes, if their food contains meat, it is necessary that the meat should be ritually slaughtered Halal. As for those of non-Muslims who are not from the People of the Book, they are ritually impure (obligatory precaution) and their food is Najis, if it has been touched with a wet hand by them. https://www.sistani.org/english/qa/search/4129975/
  17. Thanks
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from HusseinAbbas in Progressive musim claim shia maraji allow "thighing" of 9 year old girls   
    Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani does not permit child trafficking:
    1. We have recorded footage that two religious clerics in Iraq, who describe themselves as followers of the Grand Ayatollah Al-Sayyed Ali Al-Sistani, are in contravention to Iraqi law, through providing or offering to provide women for temporary marriage. They charge money for this “service”, which is considered sex trade.
    Does the office of his eminence condemn these practices that we have demonstrated?
    1. Such practices, if they exist as you have mentioned, are surely condemned and denounced. Those who are truly followers of the Marjiya (Religious Authority) would not commit such acts. In fact temporary marriage, which is allowed in the Shia Imamiya school of thought, and similarly the permanent marriage, which can be based on relinquishing all rights but the right of copulation, cannot be used as a means for sex trade as stated, as that would disgrace the dignity of a woman and her humanity. Hence, those who follow such practices are corrupted individuals, and they are abusing religion to fulfil their illicit objectives.
    The pure Islamic religion and in particular the belief of the followers of Ahlul-Bayt (peace be upon them) upholds the virtues of decency, chastity and respect of dignity for both men and women equally, and it cares about the conservation and protection of family as an integral unit for a healthy society without overlooking the natural needs of the human. And it is not permissible to distort and pervert any religious edicts in a way which would violate these lofty aims and principal values.
    Hence, it is incumbent upon the relevant official authorities to take deterrent legal action against such disgraceful behaviour, wherever that may be. However, what is noticeable unfortunately is the weakness of the rule of law in this country, which has allowed some to carry out a range of illegitimate practices, until it reached the point of running brothels and promoting them.
    https://www.sistani.org/english/archive/26348/
  18. Disagree
    Muhammad A-H reacted to shia8 in Obligatory Precaution?   
    Seems like it is not necessary to follow the next most learned Mujtahid according to Sayyid Sistani,since he Says "another Mujtahid".Am I right?
     
  19. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Progressive musim claim shia maraji allow "thighing" of 9 year old girls   
    Sunnis also believe in this, not just Shia.
  20. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Ashvazdanghe in Progressive musim claim shia maraji allow "thighing" of 9 year old girls   
    Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani does not permit child trafficking:
    1. We have recorded footage that two religious clerics in Iraq, who describe themselves as followers of the Grand Ayatollah Al-Sayyed Ali Al-Sistani, are in contravention to Iraqi law, through providing or offering to provide women for temporary marriage. They charge money for this “service”, which is considered sex trade.
    Does the office of his eminence condemn these practices that we have demonstrated?
    1. Such practices, if they exist as you have mentioned, are surely condemned and denounced. Those who are truly followers of the Marjiya (Religious Authority) would not commit such acts. In fact temporary marriage, which is allowed in the Shia Imamiya school of thought, and similarly the permanent marriage, which can be based on relinquishing all rights but the right of copulation, cannot be used as a means for sex trade as stated, as that would disgrace the dignity of a woman and her humanity. Hence, those who follow such practices are corrupted individuals, and they are abusing religion to fulfil their illicit objectives.
    The pure Islamic religion and in particular the belief of the followers of Ahlul-Bayt (peace be upon them) upholds the virtues of decency, chastity and respect of dignity for both men and women equally, and it cares about the conservation and protection of family as an integral unit for a healthy society without overlooking the natural needs of the human. And it is not permissible to distort and pervert any religious edicts in a way which would violate these lofty aims and principal values.
    Hence, it is incumbent upon the relevant official authorities to take deterrent legal action against such disgraceful behaviour, wherever that may be. However, what is noticeable unfortunately is the weakness of the rule of law in this country, which has allowed some to carry out a range of illegitimate practices, until it reached the point of running brothels and promoting them.
    https://www.sistani.org/english/archive/26348/
  21. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Eddie Mecca in Progressive musim claim shia maraji allow "thighing" of 9 year old girls   
    Sunnis also believe in this, not just Shia.
  22. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Eddie Mecca in Progressive musim claim shia maraji allow "thighing" of 9 year old girls   
    Salam,
    If the girl is married and willingly consents, then it is permissible. 
  23. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Diaz in Is Music (performing or listening) permissable in Islam?   
    Salam,
    Yes, I am fully aware of the fatwa of Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani and Al-Sayyid Khamenei and other scholars.
    All I am saying is that some scholars say that all music is haram, so it is more safe to avoid all music.
    A person who follows a marja' who says listening to non-lahwi music is permissible can choose to listen to non-lahwi music.
    Also, Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani has said that it is a recommended precaution (ihtiyat mustahab) to also avoid non-lahwi music, so it is better for a follower of Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani to avoid music in general:
    وأمّا الموسيقى فما كان منها مناسباً لمجالس اللهو واللعب - كما هو الحال فيما يعزف بآلات الطرب كالعود والطنبور والقانون والقيثارة ونحوها - فهي محرّمة كالغناء، وأمّا غيرها كالموسيقى العسكريّة والجنائزيّة فلا بأس بها وإن كان الأحوط الأولى الاجتناب عنها أيضاً.
    https://www.sistani.org/arabic/book/15/770/
    According to Al-Sayyid Al-Sistani and Al-Sayyid Khamenei it would be permissible.
    According to Sheikh Wahid Khurasani and Sheikh Gulpaygani, playing any musical instrument even if it is not lahwi is not permissible. 
    I will re-paste the answer I received from wahidkhorasani.com:
    هل يجوز الاستماع إلى الموسيقى الكلاسيكية أو الجنائزية؟ :
     
    استعمال الآلات الموسیقیة مطلقا حرام و من الکبائر (لهویّاً کان أم غیرَ لهوی کان من الآلاتِ الجدیدة کالبیانو أم القدیمة کالمزمار و البربط )والحضور فی مجلس الاستعمال مطلقا حرام (لهویّاً کان أم غیرَ لهوی کان من الآلاتِ الجدیدة کالبیانو أم القدیمة کالمزمار و البربط ) والاستماع خالیا عن الاستعمال والحضور اذا لم یکن الصوت لهویا او مطربا فلاباس به واذاکان لهویا او مطربا یحرم
     
  24. Thanks
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Diaz in Is Music (performing or listening) permissable in Islam?   
    This is the opinion of Sheikh Wahid Khurasani, which is a response to a question I had sent:
    هل يجوز الاستماع إلى الموسيقى الكلاسيكية أو الجنائزية؟ :
     
    استعمال الآلات الموسیقیة مطلقا حرام و من الکبائر (لهویّاً کان أم غیرَ لهوی کان من الآلاتِ الجدیدة کالبیانو أم القدیمة کالمزمار و البربط )والحضور فی مجلس الاستعمال مطلقا حرام (لهویّاً کان أم غیرَ لهوی کان من الآلاتِ الجدیدة کالبیانو أم القدیمة کالمزمار و البربط ) والاستماع خالیا عن الاستعمال والحضور اذا لم یکن الصوت لهویا او مطربا فلاباس به واذاکان لهویا او مطربا یحرم
  25. Like
    Muhammad A-H got a reaction from Diaz in Is Music (performing or listening) permissable in Islam?   
    @Ashvazdanghe 
    Salam,
    Why have you repeated the same post? If you intentionally repeated the same post that just proves that you do not have any proper argument or evidence to add on.
    You also disagreed to my post despite that it is very clear that Sheikh Gulpaygani believes all music is haram just with this one quote:
     
    The response to the previously mentioned question also clearly states that all music is haram even if it is used for halal purposes and for not lahwi purposes, like commemorating the death of Imam Husain (AS):
    الموسيقى بأنواعها حرام فعلها واستماعها وبيع آلاتها مطلقاً، سواء في عزاء الحسين عليه السلام أو في غيره
    https://saafi.com/ar/Istifta?page=1
    If you continue to disagree without providing any evidence then you are just being stubborn, and if that is the case then I will stop debating with you further.
    I do not understand why you are not accepting that there are differences of opinions between scholars regarding this topic.
    Whether you believe it or not, the opinion of Sheikh Gulpaygani is that all music is haram.
     
×
×
  • Create New...