Jump to content
In the Name of God بسم الله

Dutchzahra

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Islam (shia)

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

1,875 profile views

Dutchzahra's Achievements

  1. Assalamu aleykum wa Rahmatullahi wa barakatuh, I think you are right too, but how to respond to a ex muslim that says this? How do you not understand that we aren't judging the past. We are judging the man who claims to be an example for mankind for all times.
  2. Assalamu aleykum wa Rahmatullahi wa barakatuh brothers and sisters I have a question about salaat al-ayaat. I wonder myself if thunder and lightning count as 1 or 2 events and what to do if it thunders and lightning spread throughout the day. I could not find it on al.islam.org. Thank you. May Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) bless you.
  3. Salam aleykum sister, I read some of your posts that I want to respond to. 1: Islamic Republic: Many of us live in western countries, but wish to live in an Islamic republic, because the west oppresses Muslims in some way. Double standards are used. Now look, for example, at the rights that one group of people have and the other does not. The holy Quran may be burned or torn up in Western countries that is supposedly expression of opinion, but the Muslims are not allowed to destroy a Zionist or LGBT flag. Women are oppressed in the west. just look at the legal porn industry, modeling world, Hollywood etc. Muslim women are not allowed to wear a headscarf everywhere. They are sometimes even required to take it off. Certain European political parties would like to ban the headscarf or that we should pay taxes for wearing a headscarf. It's going in the worse direction. Racists therefore often shout that we Muslims do not belong here and that we should move to an Islamic country. Which country is ideal for many Muslims? An Islamic republic like Iran, but the dominant west even wants to take that away from the Muslims. The world talks about "Woman Life Freedom" for the women who cannot live in an Islamic republic, but where is the "Woman Life Freedom" for the Muslim women who want to live there? The west feels like a prison and an Islamic republic that feels like freedom. In my opinion it is better that there should be a "Woman Life Freedom" for both groups. The women who cannot live in an Islamic republic must move to Western countries where they can be themselves and practicing Muslims can live in an Islamic republic. Freedom for both. We have lived in Iran for years, but unfortunately we do not have the financial means to live there now. We had to return to the Netherlands. we have 5 children and an Islamic upbringing is really better than in the west. Preserve the Islamic Republic for the Muslims who want it. Although it is not perfect, but it is still better than the western countries. 2: Everywhere in the world there are laws that everyone must abide by. The government's approach is different everywhere. In addition, every police is not the same. we cannot lump them together. We cannot then say that the system in Iran is wrong. I agree that mistreating and torturing people is not always okay, but you need to know the other story as to why it happened. For example, if we look at the protesters. They are not peaceful protesters, but violent rioters. Many people have already been killed by them. women also play a role. they yell for the rioters to kill. In almost all countries there are laws that we are not allowed to walk naked on the street. We are required to wear clothes. Why then should there not be a law in an Islamic country to also have to wear a headscarf. It is 1 item extra.
  4. yes you are right. I have seen that many times. I mostly can't find the hadiths they posted.
  5. Assalamu aleykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh dear brothers and sisters. I've read some topics about this here and read other websites. I'm a little confused about it. There are several hadiths about it, but which ones are Sahih? In some Hadiths it says it is in Jerusalem and others in heaven. These scholars say that it is in Jerusalem. https://www.al-islam.org/ask/topics/13063/questions-about-Masjid-al-Aqsa and https://en.wikishia.net/view/Masjid_al-Aqsa They use sources too. A sunni told me in a discussion it's shirk to believe it's in heaven. If it means in heaven. Can you please explain it to me, because I don't understand it anymore. thank you so much. May Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) bless you
  6. Thank you for the information. I know that Umar was upset and I have Sunni sources to show him that, but I couldn't find not many Shia Hadiths about it. I told him many times that we Shia don't consider the Hadith books as reliable, but I wasn't sure about these Hadiths that he posted. That's why I asked you all. So the Hadiths aren't Sahih?
  7. Is it true that some scholars said that Malik ibn Nuwayra was not a sahaba and became an apostate, a murtad? Or are these Hadiths not Sahih? Can you also give Shia sources where it is clear that he was a sahaba and Muslim. A Sunni sended me these 2 Shia Hadith. Bihar Al Anwar أقول: قال السيد ابن طاوس - ره -: ذكر العباس بن عبد الرحيم المروزي في تاريخه: لم يلبث الاسلام بعد فوت النبي (صلى الله عليه وسلم) في طوايف العرب إلا في أهل المدينة وأهل مكة وأهل الطايف، وارتد سائر الناس ثم قال: ارتدت بنوتميم والرباب واجتمعوا على مالك بن نويرة اليربوعي وارتدت ربيعة كلها وكانت لهم ثلاثة عساكر: عسكر باليمامة مع مسيلمة الكذاب وعسكر مع معرور الشيباني وفيه بنوشيبان وعامة بكر بن وايل وعسكر مع الحطيم العبدي وارتد أهل اليمن ارتد الأشعث بن قيس في كندة وارتد أهل مأرب مع الأسود العنسي وارتدت بنوعامر إلا علقمة ابن علاثه بحار الأنوار جزء28 صفحة11 باب 1: افتراق الامة بعد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم Google Translation: Bihar Al Anwar I say: Sayyid Ibn Tawus - may God have mercy on him - said: Al-Abbas bin Abd al-Rahim al-Marwazi mentioned in his history: Islam did not abide after the Prophet (peace and blessings of God be upon him) passed away in the Arab groups except in the people of Medina, the people of Mecca and the people of Taif. Banu Tamim and al-Rabbab gathered against Malik bin Nuwayra al-Yarbu’i, and all of Rabi’a apostatised, and they had three soldiers: the camp of al-Yamamah with Musaylimah the Liar, the camp with Maarour al-Shaibani and in it Banu Nushiban and Aamah Bakr bin Wail and Askar with al-Hatim al-Abdi, and the people of Yemen apostate. She wore Banaamer except for Alqamah Ibn Alathah Bihar al-Anwar Part 28 p.11 Chapter 1: The nation split after the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace And "Ibn Tawus" in his book "Kashf Al Mahadja" كشف المحجة لثمرة المهجة للسيد ابن طاووس: صفحة69 الفصل الثاني والتسعون: واعلم يا ولدي محمد سلك الله جل جلاله بك سبيل الصواب وشرفك بسعادة ذوي الألباب أن الذي جرى يوم السقيفة من تركهم للنبي صلى الله عليه وآله على فراش الممات واشتغالهم بالولايات وما جرى من ترك المشاورة لذوي البصائر وانفرادهم بتلك الفضائح في الموارد والمصادر كاد أن يزيل حكم النبوة ويوجب ذهاب الاسلام بالكلية لان العرب لما سمعوا عن أهل السقيفة اشتغالهم بالأمور الدنيوية واستخفافهم بالحرمة النبوية لم يستبعدوا أنهم خرجوا من اعتقاد نبوته وعن وصيته بمن أوصى إليه بإمامته وأن قد صار الامر مغالبة لمن غلب عليه فارتد قبائل العرب واختار كل قوم منهم رأيا اعتمدوا عليه فحكى جماعة من أصحاب التواريخ منهم العباس (بن عبد الرحيم المروزي) فقال ما هذا لفظه: ولم يلبث الاسلام بعد موت النبي صلى الله عليه من طوائف العرب إلا في أهل المدينة وأهل مكة وأهل الطائف ارتد سائر الناس ثم شرح (المروزي) كيفية ارتداد الخلائق بعد النبي (صلى الله عليه وسلم) فقال ارتدت بنوتميم وغيرهم واجتمعوا على مالك ابن نويرة اليربوعي وارتدت ربيعة كلها وكانت لهم ثلاثة عساكر عسكر باليمامة مع مسيلمة الكذاب وعسكر مع مغرور الشيباني وفيه بنوشيبان وعامة بكر بن وائل وعسكر مع الحطم العبدي Google translation: in the book Kashf Al Mahadja" Revealing the argument for the fruit of Al-Mahja by Sayyid Ibn Tawus: page 69 Chapter Ninety-Second: And I know, my son Muhammad, may God Almighty guide you in the right path and honor you with the happiness of people of understanding that what happened on the day of the shed was their leaving the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him and his family on his deathbed, and their preoccupation with states, and what happened from not consulting with people of insight and being alone with these scandals in resources and sources. To remove the rule of prophecy and necessitate the disappearance of Islam altogether, because when the Arabs heard about the people of the shed being preoccupied with worldly matters and their disregard for the sanctity of the Prophet, they did not rule out that they departed from believing in his prophethood and from his will to whom he recommended to lead him. They relied on him, so a group of historians, including al-Abbas (bin Abd al-Rahim al-Marwazi), said: What is his wording: Islam did not remain after the death of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, among the Arab sects except in the people of Medina, the people of Mecca and the people of Taif. The creatures after the Prophet (may God’s prayers and peace be upon him) said, “Banoutimam and others apostatized, and they gathered against Malik Ibn Nuwayra al-Yarbu’i, and all of Rabi’ah apostatised, and they had three soldiers: al-Yamamah with Musaylimah the liar, and a military with Maghrur al-Shaibani.” And in it Banu Nushiban and Aamah Bakr bin Wael and Askar with Al-Hatam Al-Abdi
  8. thanks for your reply. May Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) reward you for it. does this mean that she is not allowed to join another Marja on the first and last day? This is the only way?
  9. Salam aleykum brothers and sisters. First of all, Shahr Ramadan Mubarak. I have a question. Someone follows Ayatollah Sistani and her husband follows Ayatollah Fadlallah. Her husband started the fast yesterday and she today. She asks if she can join her husband for the first and last days during the month of Ramadan. I often read that it is not allowed for that reason. I have not come across any sources. Do you know that? Can you post sources?
  10. thank you all for replying. May Allah (سُبْحَانَهُ وَ تَعَالَى) bless you
  11. How can I respond to the below? That's more my question. Hussein رضي الله عنه made Du'a (supplications) to the Shi'a (Shiites) saying: “O Allah, if You give them (Shia) a temporary pleasure (in this worldly life) divide them into sects. And tear them apart into different currents. And never let the rulers be pleased with them. They (the Shiites) called us to help us, Then they attacked us and killed us.” {Al-Irshad by Al-Mufid 241, Al-Tabarsi's I'laam Al Wara 949, Kashf Al-Ghamma 2:18, 38}. دعا الحسين على شيعته قائلاً : " اللهم إن متعتهم إلى حين ففرقهم فرقاً ( أي شيعاً وأحزاباً ) واجعلهم طرائق قددا ، و لا ترض الولاة عنهم أبدا ، فإنهم دعونا لينصرونا ، ثم عدوا علينا فقتلونا " { الإرشاد للمفيد 241 ، إعلام الورى للطبرسي 949، كشف الغمة 18:2و38 SHEIKH Mohsen Al-Amin said: "twenty thousand of the people of Iraq pledged allegiance to Al Hussein. They betrayed him and rebelled against him, while their pledge of allegiance to him was around their necks, and they killed him.” {A'an As Shi'a 34:1}.
  12. also true, of course they were nasibi, but I see Sunnis claim that they love the Ahlalbayt (عليه السلام), but also don't dare to say anything bad about the killers. Instead of that they accuse the Shia of killing Imam Hussain (عليه السلام). they are unfortunately in denial
  13. Thank you for your reply. Yes that’s true, but Sunnis do respect the killers of Imam Hussain (عليه السلام). Some example of the Prophet’s (s) hadith quoted many Sunni scholars on the authority of `Umar b. Sa`d! Al-Tirmidhi, Sunan, kitab sifat al-janna `an rasulillah, volume 4, page 678 Al-Nasa i, al-Sunan al-mujtaba, kitab tahrim al-dam, volume 7, page 121 Al-Nasa i, al-Sunan al-kubra , volume 6, page 263 Al-Bayhaqi, al-Sunan al-kubra, volume 3, page 375 Ahmad b. Hanbal, al-Tabarani, and others. `Abd al-Rahman b. `Abza `Abd al-Rahman b. `Abza (or `Abzi) al-Khuza`i was a companion of the Prophet (s). He was present in the troops of Ibn Ziyad who fought and killed Imam al-Husayn (a). (See al-Dinawari, al-Akhbar al-Tiwal, page 298). See some of the narrations by him in: Al-Bukhari, Sahih, kitab al-tayammum, volume 1, page 129 Muslim, Sahih, kitab al-hayd, volume 1, page 280 Al-Tirmidhi, Abu Dawud, Ibn Maja, and many others al-Harith b. Yazid al-Kufi Al-Harith b. Yazid al-`Akali al-Taymi al-Kufi seems to the al-Harith b. Yazid b. Ruwaym on whose services Ibn Ziyad called upon by sending him from his own base in Kufa to join `Umar b. Sa`d’s army (See al-Dinawari, al-Akhbar al-Tiwal, page 254). No other al-Harith b. Yazids in rijal lexicons seem to hail from Kufa. See his narrations in: Al-Bukhari, Sahih, kitab al-`itq, volume 2, page 898 Muslim, Sahih, kitab fada’il al-sahaba, volume 4, page 1957 Al-Nasa’i, Ibn Maja, and others. Shabath b. Rib`i Abu `Abd al-Quddus Shabath b. Rib`i al-Tamimi al-Yarbu`i was a man with a checkered background. A companion of the Prophet (s), he used to be once on the side of Imam Ali (a), then joined the Khawarij and later was part of Ibn Ziyad’s troops in Karbala fighting Imam al-Husayn (a)! See: al-Dinawari, al-Akhbar al-Tiwal, page 254; al-`Asqalani, al- Isaba, volume 3, page 376 al-`Asqalani, Tahdhib al-tahdhib, volume 4, page 266. From al-Tabari, from the scene of the battle of Karbala: He (i.e.`Umar b. Sa`d) put `Azrah b. Qays al-Ahmasi in command of the cavalry and Shabath b. Rib`i al-Yarbu`i in command of the footsoldiers. (Al-Tabari, al-Ta’rikh, translated into English as History of al-Tabari The Caliphate of Yazid b. Mu’awiyah , Howard, pp. 121) Some narrations from Shabath in: Abu Dawud, Sunan, kitab al-’adab, volume 4, page 315. Al-Nasa’i, al-Sunan al-kubra, volume 6, page 204. Sunnis like to have a discussion about our books. They use sources like the Shia killed imam Hussain (عليه السلام). I want to show them Shia sources that our Shia scholars explain that part
×
×
  • Create New...