ServantOfMahdi

The country with the largest no. of Nāsibīs & Khārijīs in the world; surely going to be the land of the biggest reinforcements for the Sufyānī.
May Allāh grant patience to the victim families.
May Allāh bring joy to the martyrs' souls with lofty ranks in Paradise & a speedy revenge for their blood.
May Allāh hasten the Reappearance of our saviour al-Qā’im (عليه السلام).
Āmīn

The country with the largest no. of Nāsibīs & Khārijīs in the world; surely going to be the land of the biggest reinforcements for the Sufyānī.
May Allāh grant patience to the victim families.
May Allāh bring joy to the martyrs' souls with lofty ranks in Paradise & a speedy revenge for their blood.
May Allāh hasten the Reappearance of our saviour al-Qā’im (عليه السلام).
Āmīn

May Allah curse Ibn Saud, Muhammad ibn 'Abd-al Wahhab and Ibn Taymiyyah and Bani Umayyah

News At least 31 killed, dozens wounded in suicide blast at Islamabad mosque
Powerful explosion rocks Shia mosque in Pakistani capital’s Tarlai Kalan area during Friday prayers.
 
A suicide bombing attack at a Shia mosque in Islamabad has killed at least 31 people and wounded dozens more, in one of the worst such incidents to hit Pakistan’s capital.
The powerful explosion occurred at Khadija Tul Kubra mosque, in southeastern Islamabad’s Tarlai Kalan area, during Friday prayers.
 
 
Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said the mosque’s security guards tried to intercept the suspect, who opened fire at them before detonating his explosives among the worshippers.
Asif alleged the attacker had been travelling to and from Afghanistan.
In a statement, the Islamabad administration said 169 people were transferred to hospital after rescue teams reached the site of the explosion.
Footage shared on social media and verified by Al Jazeera showed bloodied bodies lying on the floor of the mosque, surrounded by broken glass and debris.
Islamabad resident Aun Shah said his father was “badly” injured in the attack. “He has a hole in his stomach,” he said.
Security personnel stand guard outside the mosque following the deadly blast [Farooq Naeem/AFP] Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar condemned the incident as a “cowardly suicide attack on innocent worshippers”.
“Targeting places of worship and civilians is a heinous crime against humanity and a blatant violation of Islamic principles. Pakistan stands united against terrorism in all its forms,” he posted on X.
At the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences hospital, AFP news agency journalists saw several adults and children being carried in on stretchers or by their arms and legs.
Advertisement Medics and bystanders helped unload victims with blood-soaked clothes from the back of ambulances and vehicles. At least one casualty arrived in the boot of a car, while friends and relatives of the wounded screamed as they arrived at the hospital’s heavily guarded emergency ward, the news agency reported.
People mourning outside the mosque [AFP] In a statement, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed his “deep grief” following the incident. Meanwhile, President Asif Ali Zardari said “targeting innocent civilians is a crime against humanity”.
ed families in this difficult time,” he added. Top Pakistani Shia leader Raja Abbas Nasir said the incident was not only “a serious failure in protecting human lives but also raises significant questions about the performance of the authorities and law enforcement agencies”.
The United Kingdom’s ambassador to Pakistan, Jane Marriott, condemned the attack in a statement on social media, calling the violence “abhorrent”.
“Outraged and heartbroken by the horrific attack at Imambargah in Islamabad during Friday prayers,” she said. “My thoughts and prayers are with those killed and injured and their families.”
The Delegation of the The European Union in Pakistan said it “condemns all acts of terrorism” and offered its condolences to the families of the victims.
In November last year, a suicide bomber blew himself up at the entrance of the Islamabad District Judicial Complex, killing at least 12 people and wounding dozens.
In September 2008, a suicide bomber detonated a dump truck at Islamabad’s Marriott hotel, killing at least 63 people and wounding more than 250.
Al Jazeera’s Abid Hussain contributed to this report
 

Salam respectfully it's not right which clearly it's neither from major nor minor signs ; which it's just a sign for recognizing him after his reappearance ; which 313 can be martyrs from past centuries likewise Malik Ashtar & Salman Farsi (Muhammadi) & some of contemporary martyrs likewise Sayed hasan Nasrullah , Imad Mughniyeh , general Soleimani , martyr Hujaji  & other people likewise them whether will be  alive or being martyrs .
https://fa.wikishia.net/view/مالک_اشتر
 
 
https://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/5461913/چهارصد-و-پنجاه-زنی-که-در-ظهور-امام-زمانعج-نقش-دارند

His approach and style, very sorry to say, reminds me of the derisive and scornful Najdī Takfīrī ideologues I used to read and listen to in my days of Wahhābī extremism; that dismissive and disdainful temperament I've been too familiar with that makes one loose-tongued to the extent that he forgets the required adab when talking about Allāh and His affairs.
I listened to the complete discussion, the ridiculing of the acts of ‘ibādah and the signs of humility before Allāh was absolutely not required at all, rather was no different from how I've seen Khawārij make fun of tazkiyah and ‘irfān and just focussing on warlike pursuits as the primary concern of the divine revelation.
The host had to take the pain of getting him to stop from using foul language in what was perhaps intended to be an academic discussion. I've never ever seen any Shia scholar talk like that before, a world apart from the lofty, qualitative, heart-moving wonderful words that come from the mouths of the likes of Imam Khamenei (رضي الله عنه) and Hassan Nasrallah (رضي الله عنه).

Salam
first of all, we’re looking at these matters we should look at chapter ale Imran verse 85 to 91 and see which side of the coin people fall
Also wanted you to evaluate the chapter Baqarah verse 160 through 163 as well as the first soul of chapter 63 the hypocrite
We then have to look at the fact in the first part of 3333 before the grammar switches she was commanded to stay in her house and worship and not leave
She dismayed the direct word of Allah when she left her house and she was admonished to turn back if she heard the dogs barking at a certain place which she was convinced not to
As for love and hate, we were told by the holy prophet in his family love and hate is only for the sake of Allah 
So if someone hates, are you sure it should not be for personal grudge whether it should be for the sake of them all in the commands of Allah she broke in in the vicegetent of Allah she disobeyed 
The verses in chapter 24 the chapter of light will not revealed about her rather they were revealed because people were accusing the holy prophet, peace, and blessing be upon him , an old man and the son of Maryam the copt wasn’t his these verses blur revealed to maintain his honor in the honor of that and to prove the paternity of his son Ibrahim as .
The incident with talha did not occur during the lifetime of the prophet  peace and blessing  upon him because of the narration a cuckhold is cursed
However, their historical discussions that she and Umar were caught by Abbubaker doing something after the death of the holy prophet, peace, and blessings upon him, and those two murdered Aboubaka because of what he sawthose his historical discussions are not without merit and it’s a strong possibility, though it might not b
It’s also a strong discussion that she was the sister of bubble walker not the daughter that she was 28 years old married not a virgin and that her husband was killed by the commander of the faithful at badr and that is why she hated him
She was given to the holy prophet, peace and lessons be upon them after it was begged for him to marry her. He will not refuse something awful more than three times so he accepted the manage.
lady Khadija what’s 28 in a virgin raising three nieces at the time of the marriage, only three years older than the holy prophet, peace and blessings upon her she was at such a high-level, but it’s mentioned that Archangel Gabriel peace upon him brought the Salam of Allah himself to her
Aisha was extremely jealous of Khadijah and by extension Fatimah  for them both
She would complain when the holy prophet, peace and blessings upon him would show affection to his daughter or speak of his late wife 
you’re rebuke you’re saying she believed me when I was rejected. She proclaimed me truthful when they called me a liar. She supported me with her wealth when I was poor, and I was allowed by the Lord. They have a child/childern  with her, but not other women.
There is an narration accepted by both schools of thought whoever refuses to accept the Khalifate of the commander of the faithful and many mention Ali Ibn Abu Talib is a kafir 
So the one who rejected his government and fought against him, surely as a disbeliever
The question becomes why do many of the scholars give verdict saying not to insult her not to mark her not to mark the first three what is the meaning this 
Rather be have advice not to make derogatory poetry, such as the poetry this common about the first two in what people think they did in the house together that they went in two for three days, etc., and not to pronounce the curses on them publicly is to hurt other peoples feelings or ruined dialogue, but they’re not prohibited, telling the truth about them calling out their evils, pointing out the verses, the show their disbelief rather must be done in our respectful way in privately. There’s no problem in cursing them in the bowing frustrating or supplicating of the prayer, prayers. 
In their own most revered book which they’ve edited the later copies there was a narration where our lady Fatima peace be upon her says about the two I will not look at you. I will not speak to you. I will curse you in every prayer and I will complain about you until I meet my father.
There are narrations of the commander of the faithful cursed four men in four women privately in a supplementary prayers 
She caused problems at the battle of the camel at the funeral of our be loved Imam Hassan as and showed her hatred to the family of the holy prophet and her disobedience to the prophet, which is in fact proof that she never loved, obeyed or believed in the holy prophet, peace, and  blessing be upon him 
She was killed by Muwiyah who put a rug over a pit with spikes. She fell in the pit through the chair and was impaled. He poured lime and water, and she was burned alive.
A fitting preparation for her eternal punishment
Love and hatred should be an accordance to the holy Quran and the lifestyle of the prophet and his pure righteous family
wallahu Alam 

The war Aisha fought against Imam Ali (عليه السلام) wasn't limited to the battlefield, rather extended to the very hadiths that shaped Sunni arguments.

The war Aisha fought against Imam Ali (عليه السلام) wasn't limited to the battlefield, rather extended to the very hadiths that shaped Sunni arguments.

Salaam,
Brother Bilal, do you plan to ever make it open source for online? 

His approach and style, very sorry to say, reminds me of the derisive and scornful Najdī Takfīrī ideologues I used to read and listen to in my days of Wahhābī extremism; that dismissive and disdainful temperament I've been too familiar with that makes one loose-tongued to the extent that he forgets the required adab when talking about Allāh and His affairs.
I listened to the complete discussion, the ridiculing of the acts of ‘ibādah and the signs of humility before Allāh was absolutely not required at all, rather was no different from how I've seen Khawārij make fun of tazkiyah and ‘irfān and just focussing on warlike pursuits as the primary concern of the divine revelation.
The host had to take the pain of getting him to stop from using foul language in what was perhaps intended to be an academic discussion. I've never ever seen any Shia scholar talk like that before, a world apart from the lofty, qualitative, heart-moving wonderful words that come from the mouths of the likes of Imam Khamenei (رضي الله عنه) and Hassan Nasrallah (رضي الله عنه).

Salam respectfully all of such hadiths about mass killing of people are too weak hadiths which all narrators of these hadith inchain of hadith are too weak or unreliable narrators likewise 
 
 
Muhammad ibn Qasim ibn Ubayd, in a manner that has been mentioned by his teachers, has said from Imam Sadiq ((عليه السلام).) about the statement of Allah: “And the Hereafter and this world are Ours, and I warn you of a blazing fire,” which means that the Qaim ((عليه السلام).) will kill 999 out of every thousand people when he rises in anger.
This narration is weak in terms of chain of transmission, because apart from the fact that Furat ibn Ibrahim himself does not have any confirmation, there are several other problems in the chain of transmission of this narration:
First: Muhammad ibn Qasim ibn Ubayd himself is unknown and his name is not mentioned in any of the Shiite books of Rijal; as Sheikh Ali Namazi writes in Mustadrakat: 14323. Muhammad ibn Qasim ibn Ubayd al-Kubaidi: They did not mention him....[2]
Second: Muhammad ibn Qasim narrated this narration in a manner that is, he narrated from so-and-so from so-and-so; But the names of these people are not mentioned here or in the introduction to Tafsir al-Furat in order to examine and prove their reliability or lack of reliability.
Therefore, the evidence of this narration is weak and a weak narration is not worth citing.
 
 
Sharafa aldin Astar abadi in book of Ta;vil al Ayat has mnetioned :
This narration is narrated in a Marfu’  manner from Amr ibn Shimr.
A Marfu’  narration from the Shia point of view means a narration whose chain of transmission is interrupted and the author of the book or a subsequent narrator narrates it with the word “Rifa’ah” or “Marfu’ah”. For example: Muhammad ibn Ya’qub al-Kulaini rafa’ah from al-Sadiq ((عليه السلام).).
A Marfu’ah narration is equivalent to a broken chain of transmission from the Sunni point of view and has no value as a reference or argument.
Secondly: Mr. Amr ibn Shimr himself, from whom the narration is narrated in a Marfu’ah manner, is weak; the late Najashi writes about him in his Rijal:
Amr ibn Shimr Abu Abdullah al-Ju’fi Arabi, narrated from Abu Abdullah ((عليه السلام).), very weak, Zaid hadiths in the books of Jabir al-Ju’fi are attributed to him, and the matter is ambiguous.[4]
Amr ibn Shimr, who narrated a narration from Imam Sadiq ((عليه السلام).), is very weak. He added hadiths to Jabir al-Jufi’s books and attributed some of them to Jabir, which led to falsification and mistakes.

Conclusion: These hadiths are weak in terms of chain of transmission, and relying on a weak hadith either indicates the person’s lack of knowledge or his hatred and grudge against the Imam of the Age (may Allah hasten his appearance).
https://fa.wikifeqh.ir/شبهه_کشتار_وسیع_امام_زمان
 
Such statement likewise wise Malhama  & kiiling people on earth  & etc just has came from misunderstanding or lack of knowledge .
What are the causes of the reappearance of the Imam of Time (atf)?
https://islamquest.net/en/archive/fa583

That's the point. You'll never answer it keeping it simple and to the point. Does God the Son really need a body of flesh and bones to exist? Isn't he the son even without a physical body? Didn't he exist before becoming flesh? Wasn't he "God the Son" before that? 
If the Son existed eternally, then the Trinity existed eternally. If the Trinity existed eternally, then why did none of God’s prophets clearly teach it, and why did the covenant people of God never believe it? If the Son was truly “God the Son” even before incarnation, then incarnation doesn’t solve the historical absence of Trinity belief among Israelites — it only proves the doctrine appeared later in theology, not in the original faith.
The Israelites followed strict absolute monotheism — “God is One,” not three co-equal persons. No prophet clearly taught Trinity, no Jewish sect believed it, and Judaism still rejects it today. Even historically, the Trinity doctrine developed centuries later through church theology and councils. So at best, it’s a later theological development — not the original belief of Moses’ community.
This is a very simple historical yes/no question. If it needs paragraphs instead of a yes or no, that usually means the answer is uncomfortable, not complicated. So — did Israelites believe God is three co-equal persons before Jesus — yes or no?
 

O Allah send your infinite blessings on your beloved your best creation Muhammad and his Immaculate Household, and bring immense joy to their scion Imam al-Mahdi al-Qa'im Muhammad ibn Hasan al-Askari (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) on this birth anniversary of his this year by giving him the permission and date of his Reappearance. 
Amin bihaqqil-masoomeen ya Rabbal-aalameen

Very simple proof How Jesus is not God:
Jesus answered, “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, of whom you say, ‘He is our God' John 8:54-55
This can only comes from man who is not God. But unfortunately what truth can we ever agree if we can interpret everything according to our bias? 

Just wanting to know your views, do you really believe that before Jesus (عليه السلام) was born, the believers in the Old Testament, the 'Chosen People of the Covenant', the Israelites, the community of Moses (عليه السلام), in all their 2 millennium + history, did believe in the Trinity the Christian way even for a second? Not for a debate here, just wanna know your honest views. A simple yes or no will suffice to tell a lot about your sincerity in and devotion to knowing and believing in the truth. Waiting.

I fear for Whitney Webb's life...she should consider moving to Russia like Edward Snowden...if they really decide to come for her, Chile won't be able to protect her

A definite must-see...you simply can't make this stuff up...reality stranger than fiction...cynics who oppose any hint of conspiracies should take heed and listen...Jimmy Dore interviews Whitney Webb on her new book 'One Nation Under Blackmail'...50 minutes...topics covered: Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, CIA, The Clintons, Mossad, IDF, one hundred year relationship between National Crime Syndicate, Murder Inc. and Office of Naval Intelligence (i.e. Operation Underworld), human trafficking, JFK and J. Edgar Hoover sexually blackmailed, shadow banking, organized crime working in cahoots with unions, voter precincts, democratic and republican parties and much more...real eye-opener
 

O Allah send your infinite blessings on your beloved your best creation Muhammad and his Immaculate Household, and bring immense joy to their scion Imam al-Mahdi al-Qa'im Muhammad ibn Hasan al-Askari (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) on this birth anniversary of his this year by giving him the permission and date of his Reappearance. 
Amin bihaqqil-masoomeen ya Rabbal-aalameen

Salam
Imam Sadiq as a sudden an innovation the chain was moderate, but I don’t have it with me at the time
Whoever rejects one of us rejects us all
Therefore, one must accept the divine authority of all of the 14 or it is, if he has accepted none of us so the greatest gift we can give to people of other schools of thought and religion is to teach them and convince them of the divine authorities, so they may board the ship of salvation
wallahu Alam 

I don't know if it might help, but still I felt like sharing this hadith of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم), of the meaning – The best kind of Faith (Īmān) is knowing that Allāh is with you wherever you are.
"Knowing", not just believing (in theory), not just a dogma, not only a doctrine. Knowing it as a reality. Allāh Himself has stated in Sūrah al-Ḥadīd 
وھومعکم أينماكنتم
And He is with you wherever you are
Allāh tells us this about Him so that we try to remain aware of this reality, and this awareness indeed ought to have a great effect on our prayers because the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) has called it the best type of Īmān.
You might like this book:
https://archive.org/details/TheSufiPathOfKnowledgeWilliamC.Chittick

I don't know if it might help, but still I felt like sharing this hadith of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم), of the meaning – The best kind of Faith (Īmān) is knowing that Allāh is with you wherever you are.
"Knowing", not just believing (in theory), not just a dogma, not only a doctrine. Knowing it as a reality. Allāh Himself has stated in Sūrah al-Ḥadīd 
وھومعکم أينماكنتم
And He is with you wherever you are
Allāh tells us this about Him so that we try to remain aware of this reality, and this awareness indeed ought to have a great effect on our prayers because the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) has called it the best type of Īmān.
You might like this book:
https://archive.org/details/TheSufiPathOfKnowledgeWilliamC.Chittick

Chapter 88, Ghashiyah (The Overwhelming Event) – Verse 1-4.
 
 
 
هَلْ أَتَاكَ حَدِيثُ الْغَاشِيَةِ  وُجُوهٌ يَوْمَئِذٍ خَاشِعَةٌ  عَامِلَةٌ نَّاصِبَةٌ  تَصْلَى نَارًا حَامِيَةً
“Has not the news of the overwhelming (covered) event come to you? (Some) faces shall he downcast on that day, toiling, appointing, entering the blazing fire”
When Imam Sadiq (عليه السلام) was asked about the verse, “Has not the news of the overwhelming (covered) event come to you?” the Imam (عليه السلام) replied, “(It means) the Qaem (عليه السلام) will go to (the people) by sword.”
Regarding the verse, “(Some) faces shall be downcast on that day”, Imam (عليه السلام) said, (It means) they will not be able to stop the Qaem (عليه السلام).”
Regarding the word, “toiling”, Imam (عليه السلام) replied, (It means) their deeds were not based on that which was sent down by Allah.
About the word “appointing”, Imam (عليه السلام) said, (It means) they appointed others for leadership instead of the Imams.
About the words “entering the blazing fire”, Imam (عليه السلام) said, (It means) that they will enter the fire of war in this life at the time of the Qaem (عليه السلام), and they will enter the blazing fires of Hell in the Hereafter. (Al Kafi volume 8 page 50)