ServantOfMahdi

Part 19: how surah al-kahf shields against dajjalism

Yes just like Allah knew that iblis won't obey but He still commanded the angels prostration to Adam (عليه السلام), thus iblis got exposed and thrown out from an "alayhimussalam" assembly to be called "rajim" forever; likewise the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) knew that umar won't obey but he still commanded the writing of his will about Ahl al-Bayt, thus umar got exposed and thrown out from the "radiyallahu anhum" assembly and the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)'s house to be remembered as the foremost rajim from this Ummah.

Important updates: https://youtu.be/xx0h4mDDUPo?si=o4wOq6X_uwbGfwgj

Wa alayka ssalam wa rahmatullah. Welcome dear brother

Defining Shirk and What the Wahhabis get WRONG

O Allah, bless the pinnacle of the beauty of Your creation the paragon of humanity the seal of Prophethood our master Muhammad and his Immaculate Household the manifestation of human perfection the embodiment of Allah's Book, and hasten the Reappearance of their scion Your final proof over Your creation the Imam of this age the final savior of mankind the Son of Imam al-Hasan al-Askari, the end-times wielder of a heavenly sword Lord Kalki of the ancient Indic traditions, the Lord of the lords and the King of the kings in the end-times with a world vanquishing iron sceptre of the Book of Revelation, the inheritor of Imam Haydar's heavenly forked-tip sword Dhul-Faqar witness to the battles of Uhud, Khandaq, Khaybar, Jamal and Siffin, Sahib al-Amr al-Qa'im al-Mahdi Muhammad al-Ma‘sum IV and grant us through him ultimate victories over today's Uhudis, Khandaqis, Khaybaris, Jamalis and Siffinis, and for his sake protect and strengthen the country promised to us by his forefathers as his country, preserve it for the welfare of the whole world, cover it with Your shields, reinforce it with Your heavenly hosts, and let not us down, by the virtue of our Mistress our Queen the most beloved to the one most beloved to You, amen.

An extremely misleading comparison brother, sorry to say, but you're deliberately ignoring the stated fact that narrations explicitly talking about 2 Sufyānīs do exist. Neither Adam & Lot are titles, nor are there any narrations explicitly stating that two Prophets had the same name (Adam or Lot). Whereas, both Sufyānī & Yamānī are titles. I'm giving just two examples here of two-Sufyānī narrations: As for Yamānīs being two, I've already shown you above it's a scholarly opinion not just a layman claim. Doesn't the Qur'ān mention historically two individuals—without specifying—with the same title Fir‘awn (Pharaoh) , which if (wrongly) taken as a name, can lead one to deny the historical fact that the Fir‘awn of Mūsā (عليه السلام)'s childhood (Ramesses II) and the Fir‘awn of Exodus (& Drowning—Merneptah) were two different persons? If narrations mentioning the same title Sufyānī contradict, and you know that many narrations explicitly state two Sufyānīs, then you know that one set of narrations talks of the 1st Sufyānī while the other of the 2nd Sufyānī—Period. To be referred to with the same title as of one's predecessor, does one really need to be his biological son? Not at all brother, that's your assumption with no sound basis. In Sūrah Yūsuf, the one in whose house Yūsuf (عليه السلام) reached adulthood has been mentioned as "al-‘Azīz", and in the same Sūrah, Yūsuf (عليه السلام) too has been mentioned as "al-‘Azīz" as a later holder of that same position of authority. Some narrations just say قرحة, some say قرحة في خلفه (ulcer in his windpipe); for a rich analysis (from hometown to initial journey to rise to leadership period in Iraq to place, timing & way of death) of the 1st Sufyānī prophecies vis-à-vis Zarqāwī's profile (including how Zarqāwī actually died as per his autopsy): The prophecies (Muhammadan & Biblical) concerning the first Sufyānī align with Zarqāwī’s personal details with an extraordinary level of precision—so personal, so particular, and so exact—that I have not seen anything comparable in the case of any other individual. I don't bear responsibilty to prove what I haven't claimed, nor do I know of any such narration with exactly these words. What I know & believe in regarding the Khurāsānī is this: First & Second (Sufyānīs & Yamānīs) not minor & major. One narration talks of the rise of the three banners (revolutions) with their chronology, another talks about the three khurūj (military campaigns/uprisings) starting on the same date. If that's too much of a stretch, then I wonder how all these grand watershed era-shaping events went unforetold in Islamic prophecies? And Allah knows best.

Mā shā’ Allāh, bārakAllāh, you're lucky to have a son born on the sixth martyrdom anniversary of General Qāsim ibn Ḥasan Sulaymānī (رضي الله عنه). I suggest you to name your son Qāsim Ḥasan or Qāsim Sulaymān in his memory.

Exploiting the religiosity, morality, restraint and forbearance of that very man they want to bring down, just the opposite of what the shah used to do with the dissenters and protestors in his time.

As for now, I don't know whether there are any Shia hadiths over this subject. If any, provided having a sound narration chain, that'll be decisive to the extent of what the matn mentions. If not, then either we rely on what's available not contradicting the Qur'an, or we believe in only what the Qur'an states and reject and disbelieve in whatever it doesn't mention (which obviously doesn't sound wise), the extreme literalism peculiar to Salafism.

The New Testament is explicit in conveying that after Jesus' (عليه السلام) birth, Mary سلام اللہ علیہا and Joseph the Carpenter (عليه السلام) brought him up together as a married couple. Jesus' siblings? Named brothers: James (Yaʿqūb) Joses (Yūsī / Joseph) Simon (Shimʿūn) Judas (Jude / Yahūdhā) Matthew 13:55–56, Mark 6:3 “Is not this the carpenter’s son? … Are not his brothers James and Joses and Simon and Judas? And are not all his sisters with us?” The sisters are not named. There are three main views: 1. They were Mary’s other children Held by many Protestants Implies Mary did not remain perpetually virgin 2. They were step-brothers (children of Joseph from a previous marriage) Common in Eastern Orthodox Christianity 3. They were cousins or close relatives Held by Roman Catholics Based on Semitic usage where “brother” can mean kinsman

With all due respect: That (two Sufyānīs and two Yamānīs) is not my way of thinking my dear brother, that's what many narrations prove; and one's not knowing something doesn't make it non-existent, and when narrations have been presented, the cautious approach is to avoid straight denial and instead express one's unknowing of the basis of the other's claim. 2 Sufyānīs: Multiple narrations in Kitāb al-Fitan of Nu‘aym ibn Ḥammād are explicit in stating this, which have been summarised in the relevant videos posted above (you can research if you like to: https://www.scribd.com/document/378445646/Kitab-al-Fitan-of-Nuaym-b-Hammad (Arabic) https://ia801709.us.archive.org/12/items/kitaab-al-fitan/book.pdf (English)) All the signs of the 1st Sufyānī have matched Zarqāwī لعنہ ﷲ. 2 Yamānīs: Some prophecies mention the Yamani's being martyred before the Reappearance of al-Qāim, while some mention the Yamānī meeting al-Qāim; since it's a title, not a person's name, like Fir‘awn (Pharaoh) was a title which in the Qur’ān has been used for two related persons, but apparently, especially to someone not well versed in tafsīr and history, seems to be a name of a single person, likewise narrations suggest the use of the title Yamānī for two related persons. All the signs of the 1st Yamānī have matched Sayyid Ḥusayn al-Ḥūthī al-Shahīd (رضي الله عنه). Vali Nasr does in his "The Shia Revival", while calling Basra's location "the far south"; geography and cardinal directions are independent of dialects and accents; moreover the mention of Kūfah in the prophecies is understood to refer to the broader region (the province named so in the Imams' times, with central Iraq mentioned as Zawrā), not only that particular city. I don't know where in any of the videos this has been claimed? May be you were in a hurry to express your disagreement and avoided attending to relevant details important even for a sound rebuttal. We are here in the same boat. What's that stretch? Zarqāwī, Ḥusayn al-Ḥūthī & Iran launching those of their operations on the same date that went on to reshape the whole of the Middle East as we see it today, continuing and progressing towards the final showdown? Narrations about the personal characteristics of the Sufyānī are contradictory, and the only way to reconcile is to bring in the narrations talking explicitly about two Sufyānīs. As for the prophesied anti-Shia pogroms by the 2nd Sufyānī, they will occur in the times of the conquest of Ḥijāz by the 2nd Yamānī.

Even the most obvious event—the Reappearance of al-Qāʾim (عليه السلام)—will be denied by many Muslims. If that is the case, then what can be expected regarding these events, which are merely signs indicating that the Reappearance has drawn near? They are even more likely to be denied. Anti-Shia pogroms define the leadership of both the first Sufyānī and the second Sufyānī in the prophecies, with those occurring in the time of the second Sufyānī being more widespread and more intense. One prophecy from Imam Jaʿfar al-Ṣādiq (عليه السلام) predicts that the uprisings of the Sufyānī, the Yamānī, and the Khurāsānī would begin on the same date—something that occurred on the day of the US invasion of Iraq. Another prophecy from Imam al-Bāqir (عليه السلام) foretells the raising of the Khurāsānī banner, followed by the raising of the Yamānī banner, after which the Sufyānī banner would be raised. This corresponds to the following three revolutions: the Iranian Islamic Revolution (1979), the Yemeni Zaydist Houthi Revolution (2014), and the Syrian Wahhābī HTS revolution (2024). The battles between the first Sufyānī and the Khurāsānī’s general, Shuʿayb ibn Ṣāliḥ, have already taken place during the Iraq War. What remains are the second Sufyānī’s anti-Shia pogroms, the second Yamānī’s campaigns against him, and, at the height of this conflict, the Reappearance of Ṣāḥib al-Amr (عليه السلام) in Mecca. The three movements—Khurāsānī, Yamānī, and Sufyānī—have already been present and have shaped the wars in Iraq, Yemen, and Syria. As the prophecies continue to be gradually fulfilled, the foretold Khurāsānī-Yamānī alliance against the Sufyānī—identified as the Iran–Houthi Yemen alliance versus Wahhābī Syria—is already in place and is now steadily moving toward the final confrontation that precedes the Reappearance of the Imam (عليه السلام). And Allah knows best.

وماعليناإلاالبلاغ

بكفه اليمنى خال In his right palm is خال (either khaalun or خَالٌّ khaallun with a stressed ل ) khaal - mark (root خ-ي-ل) khaall - malfunction (root خ-ل-ل) http://youtube.com/post/UgkxEoB5fm1N1bXcExxzmxSse-yqLWr7C3ht?si=FXmq1bNSgq4FVp6L

A fulfilled prophecy?

Part 18: Houthis

Part 17: